Management of breast carcinoma identified intraoperatively during reduction mammaplasty

Occult Breast Carcinoma Is More Common in Women Undergoing Breast Reduction after Contralateral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Occult breast carcinoma is occasionally found in breast reduction specimens. Although its incidence varies widely, there is a trend toward an increased incidence for women with a history of breast cancer. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of occult carcinoma incidence in breast reduction specimens.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies with no language restrictions for studies that recorded the incidence of occult carcinoma in breast reduction specimens. Cancer incidence per specimen was pooled for women with and without a history of breast cancer.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 29 were quantitatively analyzed. The pooled incidence of carcinoma was higher within specimens from women with breast cancer (3.4 percent; 95 percent CI, 2.2 to 5.3 percent) than without (0.6 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.4 to 0.8 percent), and this increased likelihood was significant when populations were compared directly (OR, 6.02; 95 percent CI, 3.06 to 11.86; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with a history of breast cancer have an increased incidence of occult breast carcinoma within their breast reduction specimens compared with women with no breast cancer history. There is a need for preoperative radiology screening, counseling, and histopathology guidelines to ensure adequate diagnosis and management of these women.

Breast Cancer Found Incidentally After Reduction Mammaplasty in Young Insured Women

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammaplasty is a common operation performed for healthy women. The estimated incidence of breast cancer diagnosed at the time of reduction mammaplasty varies from 0.06 to 4.5%, and information on the care of these patients is limited. This study aimed to determine the incidence of breast cancer identified incidentally during reduction mammaplasty and to characterize preoperative imaging.

METHODS

Women 18 years of age or older who underwent reduction mammaplasty from 2013 to 2015 were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan^® Research Databases. Patients with prior breast cancer were excluded. Descriptive statistics were calculated for patient characteristics, incidental breast cancer, preoperative breast imaging, and postoperative treatment.

RESULTS

Reduction mammaplasty was performed for 18,969 women with a mean age of 42.5 years. Of these patients, 186 (0.98%) were incidentally found to have breast cancer, with 134 (0.71%) having invasive breast cancer and 52 (0.27%) having carcinoma in situ. The patients with incidentally found cancer were older than the patients without cancer (50.8 vs. 42.5 years; p < 0.001). Overall, 58.2% of the patients had undergone mammography before reduction mammoplasty. The rates were higher (> 80%) for the patients older than 40 years. Preoperative mammography was performed for 76.3% of those with a diagnosis of breast cancer at time of reduction mammoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer diagnosed incidentally at the time of reduction mammaplasty is uncommon and often radiographically occult. The majority of women older than 50 years appropriately received preoperative mammography. These data can be used to manage patient expectations about the potential for the incidental diagnosis of breast cancer at reduction mammaplasty, even with a negative preoperative mammography.

Recommendations for Pathologic Evaluation of Reduction Mammoplasty Specimens: A Prospective Study With Systematic Tissue Sampling

CONTEXT

- Breast reduction mammaplasty (RMP) for symptomatic macromastia or correction of asymmetry is performed in more than 100 000 patients per year in the United States. The reported incidence of significant pathologic findings (SPF), that is, carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia, ranges from 0.06% to 12.8%. No standard pathology assessment for RMP exists.

OBJECTIVES

- To propose standard sampling for microscopic evaluation in RMP specimens, to evaluate the incidence of occult carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia, and to identify clinical risk factors for SPF in patients undergoing RMP.

DESIGN

- All RMP specimens from 2006 to 2013 at a single institution were prospectively examined. After baseline gross and microscopic evaluations, each specimen was subjected to systematic additional sampling. The incidence of SPF was tabulated, and variables such as age, specimen weight, previous history of SPF, and results of preoperative mammogram were examined. Clinical follow-up review was also subsequently undertaken.

RESULTS

- A total of 595 patients were evaluated. Significant pathologic findings were present in 9.8% (58 of 595) of patients. No cancer was identified in patients younger than 40 years; the rates of carcinoma were 2.4% (14 of 595) in all patients, 3.6% (14 of 392) in patients aged 40 years or older, and 4.3% (10 of 233) in patients aged 50 years or older. No carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia was identified on preoperative mammogram. Increased sampling was associated with a significantly greater frequency of SPF only in patients aged 40 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

- In patients younger than 35 years, gross-only evaluation is sufficient. However, increased sampling may be necessary in patients older than 40 years.

Breast Cancer Detection by Preoperative Imaging in Reduction Mammaplasty Patients: A Single Center Study of 918 Patients

BACKGROUND

The role of preoperative imaging and the usability of different imaging modalities is highly variable and controversial in reduction mammaplasty patients. Our study describes the imaging process in a single center in regard to modality selection, age and timing, and of the association between imaging and histopathological findings in reduction mammaplasty specimens.

METHODS

Nine hundred eighteen women, who underwent reduction mammaplasty during 1.1.2007-31.12.2011, were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, preoperative imaging, further preoperative examinations, and pathology reports.

RESULTS

Preoperative imaging had been conducted for 89.2% (n = 819) of the patients. In 49 (6.0%) patients, suspicious preoperative imaging led to further examinations revealing 2 high-risk lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)), and 2 cancers preoperatively. Postoperatively abnormal histopathology specimens were revealed in 88 (10.4%) patients. The incidence of high-risk lesions was 5.5% (n = 47), and the incidence of cancer was 1.2% (n = 10). Preoperative imaging was normal (BI-RADS 1 and BI-RADS 2) in 80.8% of these patients. The sensitivity of the preoperative imaging for cancer detection was 20.0%, and the specificity was 100.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative imaging and further examinations do not sufficiently detect malignant or cancer risk-increasing findings. Therefore, histopathological analysis of reduction mammaplasty specimens seems mandatory.

Occult carcinoma in 866 reduction mammaplasties: preserving the choice of lumpectomy

BACKGROUND

Occult breast carcinoma is occasionally found in reduction mammaplasty specimens. Historically, these patients were treated with mastectomy because the exact location of the tumor was unknown. Currently, breast conservation is the treatment of choice in 50 to 85 percent of breast cancers. The authors present a technique of routine specimen marking that allows localization of the tumor and preservation of the choice of lumpectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 866 patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty performed by a single surgeon between 1990 and 2009. Data were collected for patients who had occult cancer found in their specimens, including age, cancer risk factors, abnormality, nodal status, selected treatment, and survival status. Specimens were marked and oriented and then sent in separate bags to the pathologist.

RESULTS

There were 10 cases of occult carcinoma among the 866 women (1.15 percent) who underwent reduction mammaplasty. Six cancers were found in patients undergoing reduction for symptomatic macromastia [n = 629 (0.95 percent)]. Four new cancers were found in the group of patients with a personal history of cancer [n = 237 (1.69 percent)]. All 10 patients had normal preoperative mammograms. Location, size, and margin status were easily identified and patients were offered the choice of lumpectomy or mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This article demonstrates that careful marking of reduction specimens in high-risk patients or in women older than 40 years allows the pathologist to orient, localize, and further section tissue for margin status. Communication among plastic surgeon, pathologist, oncologist, and radiation therapist preserves the choice of breast conserving therapy for early cancers.

Carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in reduction mammaplasty: increased sampling leads to increased detection. A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammaplasty for symptomatic macromastia or correction of asymmetry is performed more than 100,000 times per year in the United States. The reported incidence of occult breast cancer in reduction mammaplasty ranges from 0.06 to 4.6 percent. No standard pathology assessment for reduction mammaplasty exists. The authors evaluated the incidence of occult carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in reduction mammaplasty specimens and identified clinical risk factors. Systematic sampling of additional tissue sections was instituted to evaluate the hypothesis that increased sampling would identify more significant pathologic findings.

METHODS

All reduction mammaplasty specimens over a 20-month period at a single institution were prospectively examined. All specimens had baseline gross and microscopic evaluations, and then each was subjected to systematic additional sampling. The incidence of significant pathologic findings (carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia) was tabulated. Variables such as age and preoperative mammogram were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 202 cases were evaluated. Significant pathologic findings (carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia) were present in 12.4 percent. The rate of carcinoma was 4 percent in all patients (6.2 percent in patients >or=40 years and 7.9 percent in patients >or=50 years).

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher rate (12.4 percent) of significant pathologic findings was identified in this prospective study compared with published literature. None of the lesions was identified on preoperative mammogram. Age was significantly associated with significant pathologic findings. Increased sampling was associated with significant pathologic findings only in patients 40 years or older, indicating the need for thorough sampling of reduction mammaplasty specimens in patients older than 40.

Breast Reduction Surgery and Breast Cancer Risk: Does Reduction Mammaplasty Have a Role in Primary Prevention Strategies for Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer?

Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy has been demonstrated to reduce breast cancer incidence in women with a high inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. For the majority of high-risk women, however, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is not an acceptable option for primary prevention of breast cancer. Several epidemiological follow-up studies have indicated that there may be a substantial reduction in breast cancer risk among women who have undergone breast reduction surgery. The authors reviewed the evidence from these studies, with emphasis on the problems inherent in interpreting the results of nonexperimental studies of elective medical procedures. Although such observational studies cannot demonstrate definitively that reduction mammaplasty reduces the risk of breast cancer, the evidence from these studies is sufficiently strong to warrant the evaluation of breast reduction surgery as an option for primary prevention in clinical studies of women at increased risk of breast cancer. The availability of a more acceptable surgical option for primary prevention of breast cancer could increase the number of women willing to choose risk reduction surgery and thus may result in an overall reduction in breast cancer mortality among high-risk women.