Latissimus Dorsi Muscle and Its Short Perforator-Based Skin Compound Free Flap

Anterolateral thigh flow-through flap: A versatile method for reconstruction of complex extremity defects

BACKGROUND

Flow-through flaps have been widely applied only for the reconstruction of complex defects in the extremities because they can be used for arterial reconstruction and soft tissue coverage simultaneously. This report attempts to fully demonstrate the role of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flow-through flap as a versatile method for reconstructing complex defects in the extremities.

METHODS

From February 2011 to March 2017, we retrospectively analyzed the use of a reconstructive surgical technique based on the ALT flow-through flap to treat complex extremity defects in 87 patients (trauma, n = 79; diabetic ulcers, n = 5; squamous cell carcinoma, n = 3). Emergency surgery was performed in 12 patients to bridge a major artery gap and was followed by elective reconstruction in the remaining patients. Applications of the ALT flow-through flap included bridging major artery gaps, preserving recipient blood vessel integrity, reconstructing blood vessel continuity, protecting vascular anastomoses, avoiding difficult end-to-side anastomoses in the recipient area, and balancing blood flow, as well as combined application with an additional flap.

RESULTS

The flap size ranged from 6 × 3 cm to 17 × 9 cm. ALT flow-through flaps were used in combination with an additional flap (n = 4) and in vascular reconstruction (n = 83). Three patients required of the microvascular anastomostic reexploration for venous congestion, total necrosis occurred in two patients, and partial necrosis occurred in one patient. At the donor site, there were three cases of infection and two cases of wound dehiscence. At the recipient site, one case of infection and two cases of wound dehiscence were observed. One patient presented with deep infection secondary to renal failure and underwent amputation. During the follow-up period (range, 1-33 months), all other flaps (84 cases) survived uneventfully, with normal texture and color.

CONCLUSION

The ALT flow-through flap plays many roles as it is a versatile method for reconstructing complex defects of the extremities and serves various other clinical purposes.

Ilizarov Bone Transfer for Treatment of Large Tibial Bone Defects: Clinical Results and Management of Complications

BACKGROUNDS

The purpose of this study is to present our clinical experience using the Ilizarov bone transfer technique and free-flap technique in the reconstruction of large tibial bone and soft tissue defects, including an evaluation of both the management of postoperative complications and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2010 to May 2020, 72 patients with tibia bone and soft tissue defects were retrospectively evaluated. Either an anterolateral thigh perforator flaps (ALTP) or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps (LD), solely or in combination, were used to cover soft tissue defects. Once the flap was stabilized, an Ilizarov external fixator was applied to the limb. Follow-up was postoperatively performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, there were two cases of total and five of partial flap necrosis, and two cases of subcutaneous ulcers, which were caused by vascular crisis, infection, and hematoma, respectively. All the patients underwent Ilizarov external fixator surgery after flap recovery. A total of 16 complications occurred, including 3 cases of simple needle tract infection (antibiotic treatment) and 13 cases of complications requiring reoperation. A correlation factor analysis revealed that the main factors affecting the healing time were the defect length and operative complications. All patients with complications treated with the vascularized iliac flap eventually healed completely.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ilizarov method used together with an ALTP, LD, or a combination thereof yields good clinical results for repairing large bone and soft tissue defects of the tibia, thus reducing the incidence of amputations. However, longer treatment times may be involved, and postoperative complications can occur. The vascularized iliac flap may be a suitable choice for the treatment of postoperative complications of this type of Ilizarov bone transport.

[Clinical application of microdissected thin thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps for repair of diabetic foot ulcers]

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of microdissected thin thoracodorsal arterial perforator flap (TDAP) in repairing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

Methods

The clinical data of 11 patients with DFUs admitted between March 2020 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 5 males and 6 females, aged from 22 to 67 years, with an average of 49.3 years. There were 10 cases of type 2 diabetes and 1 case of type 1 diabetes; the duration of diabetes ranged from 3 months to 25 years (median, 8 months). The duration of DFUs ranged from 6 days to 120 months (median, 1 month). There were 6 cases of grade 3 and 5 cases of grade 4 according to Wagner classification. The tissue necrosis and purulent secretions were found in all ulcer wounds, as well as different degrees of tendon and bone exposure; skin defects ranged from 5 cm×3 cm to 17 cm×6 cm. The DFUs were repaired by microdissected thin TDAP, including 6 cases of flaps (including 1 case of lobulated flap), ranging from 10.0 cm×4.5 cm to 26.0 cm×7.0 cm; 5 cases of chimeric perforator flaps, the range of the flap was 10.0 cm×4.5 cm to 16.0 cm×5.5 cm, and the range of the muscle flap was 6 cm×2 cm to 10 cm×3 cm. The donor site was sutured directly.

Results

The operation time ranged from 3.42 to 11.17 hours, with an average of 5.92 hours. All 11 flaps survived and no vascular crisis occurred; 1 patient had a sinus at the edge of the flap, and the surgical area healed well after dressing change. All 11 patients were followed up 6-12 months, with an average of 9 months. The flap texture was good, the recipient site was in good shape, and there was no swelling; the foot contour was good, the shoes were comfortable to wear, and the movement was good. The incision at the donor site healed by first intention, leaving only linear and concealed scar, without obvious depression deformity, and the shoulder joint function was good.

Conclusion

On the premise of ensuring sufficient blood supply to the lower extremities and strengthening perioperative management, the microdissected thin TDAP to repair DFUs wounds can achieve better effectiveness and appearance; however, the prolonged operation time increases the probability of anesthesia and surgical risks in patients with DFUs.

Novel Design of the Chimeric Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap that Provides for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Composite Tissue Defects of the Heel in Children

Objective

The aim of the present study was to report a novel design of the chimeric deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) to achieve dead space filling, Achilles tendon bridging, and skin resurfacing simultaneously with minimal donor‐site morbidity.

Methods

From September 2012 to May 2016, a retrospective study was carried out on six pediatric patients with composite soft tissue defects of the heel that were repaired with the chimeric DIEP flap. The chimeric flap design included a flap of the anterior sheath of the rectus, a block of rectus muscle, and a large skin paddle. All the parts were supplied by a common artery. After harvesting the flap, all element parts were inserted at the corresponding sites in a tension‐free manner. With one set of vessel anastomoses at the recipient site, accurate repair with tendon reconstruction, dead space elimination, and wound covering were accomplished. The donor site incisions were closed initially. Data on patient age, medical history, injury severity, defect size, flap dimensions, recipient vessels, donor site closure, complications, and follow‐up were collected and reviewed.

Results

Five of the six chimeric DIEP flaps survived without complications. The remaining one case experienced partial necrosis of the skin paddle caused by venous congestion, which healed after routine dressing changes. Primary donor site closure was accomplished in all cases. The mean follow‐up was 18.6 months (range, 10–36 months). Five patients had satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes; one patient needed a secondary debulking procedure. Compared to the unaffected side, the affected side showed no obvious difference for ankle movement, tiptoe function, and patient gait during the follow‐up period. Good ankle function was observed in all patients. There was no donor site breakdown, with only a slightly noticeable linear scar.

Conclusion

The chimeric DIEP flap reduced the operative time, solved the problem of deficiency of recipient vessels, and attained satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes with low donor site morbidity. Therefore, it is a promising option for three‐dimensional reconstruction of composite defects with dead space and Achilles tendon defects as well as skin loss in children.

Selecting a free flap for soft tissue coverage in lower extremity reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Goals of lower extremity microvascular reconstruction (LEMR) include the restoration of function, prevention of infection, and optimal cosmesis. Indications for LEMR include large defects that are not amenable to pedicled options, a large zone of injury, and large complex defects. The novice microsurgeon should first master a handful of free flaps to develop an armamentarium of options for addressing such defects. The scope of this review is to provide free flap options for LEMR in any of the thirds of the lower leg. After reading this article, the reader will understand variations, advantages, disadvantages, indications, and tips for raising each of these flaps.

METHODS

Six most commonly used free flaps for LEMR are described in this paper, including the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and its variations, the radial forearm flap (RFFF), the lateral arm flap (LAF), the gracilis muscle flap, the rectus abdominis flap (RAF) and the latissimus dorsi flap and its variations. Indications, advantages, disadvantages and technique tips are discussed for each flap. Moreover, selection of the recipient vessels, preoperative management along with an algorithm are also provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The ALT flap is a workhorse in covering defects of the leg, foot, and ankle. It's the flap of choice at our institution, especially given the number of traumatic wounds seen as a result of motor vehicles, all-terrain vehicles (ATV), lawnmowers, and gunshot wounds (GSW). At times, the lower extremity zone of injury requires a distant donor site. The RAF can also provide coverage for large soft tissue defects but donor-site morbidity remains its main drawback. The LAF and RFFF provide two pliable options, one that provides pliable soft tissue with minimal donor site morbidity and another that provides a long pedicle. The free gracilis flap is an excellent choice for crossing the ankle joint. Lastly, the free latissimus dorsi is indicated for large defects of the lower extremity independently of the location.

[Repair of composite tissue defects and functional reconstruction of upper arm with latissimus dorsi Kiss flap]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of latissimus dorsi Kiss flap for repairing composite tissue defects and functional reconstruction of upper arm.

Methods

Between March 2010 and November 2016, 12 cases of composite tissue defects of upper arm were repaired by latissimus dorsi Kiss flap with blood vessel and nerve bunch. There were 8 males and 4 females with a median age of 34 years (range, 21-50 years). The reason of injury included plowing mechanical injury in 4 cases, traffic accident injury in 5 cases, electrical injury in 2 cases, and resecting upper arm soft tissue sarcoma in 1 case. There were deltoid defect in 5 cases, triceps brachii and brachialis defect in 4 cases, and deltoid, triceps brachii, and brachialis damaged in varying degrees in 3 cases. The defect area ranged from 13 cm×7 cm to 20 cm×8 cm. Among them, there were 6 cases of fracture combined with partial bone exposure, one of them with bone defect. The disease duration was 3 hours to 6 months. The flap size ranged from 10 cm×6 cm to 15 cm×7 cm, and the donor sites were directly sutured.

Results

Twelve flaps survived with primary healing of wounds. Ten patients were followed up 6-26 months (mean, 14 months). At last follow-up, the flaps were soft and the skin color was similar to the surrounding skin. No obvious scar was found at donor sites. The abduction range of motion of shoulder was 30-90°. The muscle strength of brachialis were all at grade 4 or above. The superficial sensation and tactile sensation recovered partialy (S 1 in 2 cases, S 2 in 6 cases, S 3 in 2 cases). According to Society of Hand Surgery standard for the evaluation of upper part of the function, the shoulder joint function was excellent in 2 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 4 cases.

Conclusion

The design of the latissimus dorsi Kiss flaps are flexible, and the donor site can be directly sutured, with the nerves of the latissimus dorsi muscle can partialy reconstruct abduction function of upper arm. In general, the Kiss flap repairing upper arm defect can obtain satisfactory effectiveness.

A thoracodorsal artery perforator chimeric free flap for prevention of microvascular pedicle compression in lower extremity reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Chimeric flaps are often used in reconstructive fields for multiple defects, different functional defects, and extensive defects. In this article, we present the results of the use of thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAp) chimeric flaps including a latissimus dorsi (LD) or serratus anterior (SA) muscle to prevent pedicle compression for lower extremity reconstruction.

METHODS

Nineteen TDAp chimeric flaps were used to prevent pedicle compression. Seven were female and 12 male. Patients' age ranged from 32 to 73 years. After harvesting TDAp skin flap, LD or SA muscle could be harvested along with the thoracodorsal vessels. Skin flap was incorporated into the main defect and muscle cuffs were positioned along the vascular pedicle.

RESULTS

In 11 cases, there were two components, a skin flap and a muscle flap, and the other 8 were three components, a skin flap and two muscle flaps. The dimensions of the skin flaps ranged from 8 × 5 to 18 × 10 cm, and the muscle flaps ranged from 3 × 2 cm to 8 × 6 cm. The recipient vessel was anterior tibial artery or dorsalis pedis artery. All flap survived. Five cases suffered minor complications including donor site wound disruption, skin flap wound disruption, partial loss of the skin flap, and partial loss of the SA muscle flap. The mean follow-up was 13.9 months. All the patients were able to wear shoes without debulking procedures.

CONCLUSION

The TDAp chimeric flaps including LD or SA muscle flaps were useful for covering the vascular pedicle and relieved vascular compression during lower extremity reconstruction. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 38:46-50, 2018..

Reconstruction of extensive lower limb defects with thoracodorsal axis chimeric flaps

BACKGROUND

Extensive defects of the lower extremities are usually reconstructed with microvascular free flaps because of inadequate local tissues and wound complexity. Many attempts have been made to reconstruct such defects using the chimeric flap concept, enabling flaps with larger surface areas to be used while maintaining economical tissue use. The latissimus dorsi chimeric flap is one of the most useful tools for resurfacing extensive limb defects.

METHODS

Twelve patients with extensive lower leg defects underwent reconstruction with latissimus dorsi chimeric flaps between January of 2008 and March of 2012. A skin flap based on the cutaneous perforators, a latissimus dorsi muscle flap based on the muscular branches, and a serratus anterior muscle flap based on the branch from the thoracodorsal artery were harvested accordingly; the flap design depended on the dimensions and characteristics of the defect.

RESULTS

A total of 12 chimeric flaps were harvested and used, with the average surface area, including skin and muscle components, being 614 cm. The mean surface area of the skin flaps used was 355.6 cm. The mean area of the latissimus dorsi muscle flap was approximately 228 cm, and the surface areas of the three serratus anterior flaps used were 56 cm, 70 cm, and 180 cm. Flaps survived in all cases. Primary closure was used for all of the donor sites except one, and there was minimal donor-site morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The authors' results show that the latissimus dorsi chimeric free flap is a useful and versatile reconstructive option for extensive defects of the lower extremities.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Medial sural artery perforator flap

In the last decade, the medial sural artery perforator flap (MSAP) has emerged as one of the most popular reconstructive options for multiple body sites. The versatility of the flap hinges on the ability to harvest multiple tissue components in various combinations but from the same wound. The flap can be used as a pedicled, free, or chimeric design, or even may be used in sequential order. Anatomic anomalies of these perforators are rare compared with other perforator flaps, but well-prepared preoperative planning and the identification of perforators remain the cornerstone of successful flap harvest. So far, the MSAP has been proved to be an excellent alternative for skin resurfacing and functional reconstruction in head and neck as well as in the extremities. In this review, the anatomy, preoperative planning and flap design, harvest technique, and its clinical application in multiple body sites are summarized. Both the advantages and disadvantages are also included.