Experience With the Distally Based Sural Neurofasciocutaneous Flap Supplied by the Terminal Perforator of Peroneal Vessels for Ankle and Foot Reconstruction

How Safe Is Reverse Sural Flap?: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue reconstruction of the lower third of the leg, the ankle, and the foot is challenging for reconstructive surgeons. The options for reconstruction are limited. Reverse sural flap is relatively easy to perform and considered a good option for reconstruction. The complication rates are variable in studies. This study aims to systemically review all available articles based on reverse sural flap focusing on complications of the flap. The overall complication of the flap helps to better understand the reliability of the flap.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify cases of reverse sural artery flap.

RESULTS

A pooled analysis of 89 articles was performed, which yielded 2575 patients (2592 flaps) over a period of 19 years. Most of the cases were performed in Asian countries (1540 flaps, 59.4%) with the majority being performed in China (746 flaps, 28.8%). The most common cause for reverse sural flap surgery was trauma/postsurgical (1785/2592) followed by burn/scarring. Flap complications were recorded in 653 of 2592 flaps (25.20%). The most common complication was partial flap loss, which was recorded in 204 flaps (7.85%) followed by venous congestion (79 flaps, 3.05%). Complete flap loss was observed only in 66 participants (2.5% of all the flaps performed).

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse sural flap is reliable flap for the reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and foot. It can give a comparable outcome as free flap when meticulously performed and, in many cases, a better result.

Pedicled sural flaps versus free anterolateral thigh flaps in reconstruction of dorsal foot and ankle defects in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review compared free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps versus pedicled distally based sural artery (DBSA) flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of dorsal foot and ankle in children.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify cases where an ALT or DBSA was used to reconstruct the dorsal foot in children. A total of 19 articles were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients underwent an ALT reconstruction and 138 patients underwent a DBSA reconstruction. Patients who had a DBSA were more likely to require grafting of the donor site (P<0.001). The size of ALT flaps was significantly larger than DBSA flaps (P=0.002). Subsequent flap thinning was required in 30% of patients after ALT and 12% of patients after DBSA reconstruction (P<0.001). Complications occurred in 11.6% of DBSA and 8.4% of ALT flaps (8.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both flaps are valid options in reconstructing pediatric foot and ankle defects. Each flap has advantages and disadvantages as discussed in this review article. In general for larger defects, an ALT flap was used. Flap choice should be based on the size of the defect.

Distally Based Sural Adipofascial Turnover Flap for Coverage of Complicated Wound in the Foot and Ankle Region

BACKGROUNDS

Distally based perforator propeller flap from the lower leg region is a versatile local reconstructive technique for the foot and ankle defects. However, flap venous congestion remains a tough nut to crack. We hypothesize that raising an adipofascial flap with turnover mode of transposition can improve venous drainage and enhance flap safety.

METHODS

Based on the 2 rows of septocutaneous perforators in the posterior distal third of the lower leg, distally based adipofascial flap was raised from medial sural region nourished by 1 perforator bundle from the posterior tibial artery or from the lateral sural region from the peroneal artery. The superficial dissection was performed in subdermal plane and deep in to the subfascial space. The flap was nourished by perforator-plus-adipofascial pedicle and turned over 180 degrees upside down to reach the distal wounds. One week later, a split-skin graft was used to cover the exposed fascial flap. Postoperatively, flap survival, complications, and patient functional recovery were evaluated.

RESULTS

Distally based sural turnover adipofascial flaps were used in 12 cases with complicated wounds of the distal third lower leg, foot, and ankle region. All wounds were caused by trauma and experienced fracture implants fixation and 5 with osteomyelitis. The comorbidities include diabetes in 9 cases and smoking in 7. There were 8 medial ural flaps and 4 lateral sural flaps. The adipofiscial flaps measured from 6.0 cm × 5.0 cm to 17.0 cm × 6.0 cm (mean, 61.3 cm). Postoperatively, all flaps survived uneventfully without any complication such as flap ischemia and/or necrosis. Two minor donor site complications were encountered, one was postoperative hematoma, and another was hyperproliferative scar. After a mean of 14.6 months of follow-up, the adipofascial flap plus skin graft showed a durable esthetic coverage, with normal shoe wearing and walking.

CONCLUSIONS

Distally based sural adipofascial turnover flap is a simple and reliable wound coverage technique. It avoids venous congestion as usually seen in distally based fasciocutaneous flaps.

A Retrospective Study of an Updated and Traditional Surgical Approach of the Distally Based Sural Flap

BACKGROUND

 The distally based sural flap (DBSF) is one of the armamentarium in the lower limb reconstruction. However, the flap has not gained popularity due to concerns about its reliability and donor site morbidity. Based on the anatomy characterization, we combined and developed five modifications to improve the vascular supply and reduce donor site morbidity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 The authors performed a comparison of retrospective study that included patients who underwent either traditional distally based sural flap (tDBSF) or modified distally based sural flap (mDBSF) surgery approach for ankle, heel, and dorsal foot coverage between January 2007 and May, 2019. The five modifications developed to improve the reliability of the flap include: 1. shift the pivot point more proximally 7.0 cm above the lateral malleolus, 2. preserve the lesser saphenous vein and include branches that communicates with the flap, 3. harvest thinner fascial pedicle, 4. change the skin incision to "S" shape, 5. closure of the donor site with a propeller flap.

RESULTS

 Thirty-one patients underwent mDBSF, and 23 received tDBSF. There were no significant differences in the size of the DBSF. Mean pedicle width was significantly narrower in mDBSF (1.63 ± 0.52 cm vs. 3.81 ± 0.70 in tDBSF). The pivot point was also found to be higher in mDBSF (8.01 ± 0.63 cm vs. 5.46 ± 0.56 cm) above the lateral malleolus. In mDBSF, the size of the propeller flap required for donor site closure was 53.45 ± 19.06 cm² (range 33-80 cm²). The rate of partial necrosis between mDBSF and tDBSF was significantly different (9.68 vs. 34.78%). While the other complications had no difference.

CONCLUSION

 The modifications applied to the harvesting of the DBSF have achieved higher survival rate, lower dehiscence rate, and shorter hospital stay time in comparison with traditional approach in our retrospective study.

Free perforator flaps vs propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction: A cost/effectiveness analysis on a series of 179 cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this report is to compare free perforator flaps and propeller flaps in the coverage of lower limb soft tissue defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

179 patients (age between 5 and 92 years old), underwent soft tissue reconstruction of the lower limb between January 2009 and January 2015, either by free flap or propeller flap. The two groups were retrospectively evaluated in order to assess the outcome, complications and potential risk factors. Correlations between risk factors and presence/absence of failure or complications have been evaluated with descriptive statistical analysis and a set of logistic regression models. Finally, an economic analysis was conducted to evaluate the different tecniques.

RESULTS

In a simple descriptive statistical analysis, the overall failure rate is 6% for free flaps and 3.7% for propeller flaps; the complication rates are 14% vs 21.5% and it increases as dimension increases. The logistic models relating failure and complications with potential risk factors do not show significant differences, whereas the economic analysis show that the average expense of free flaps is 5077.5€ per patient, 1595.6€ per patient for propeller flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not demonstrate significant differences between the two groups about correlation of risk factors or flap size with complication or failure. The surgical option choice should be taken only after accurate evaluation of the soft tissue surrounding the defect. Propeller flaps should be preferred in case of small/medium size defects in otherwise healthy extremities. Free perforator flaps should be the choice in large defects due to trauma or vascular diseases. The economic analysis suggests that propeller flap should be considered when possible.

Reverse sural artery flap: a reliable alternative for foot and ankle soft tissue reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue defects of foot and ankle are challenging due to the susceptibility of the area to trauma and the complexity of the region. Several flaps have been described for wound coverage after surgical debridement at this location. The purpose of this study is to present the reverse sural flap for covering soft tissue defects at the ankle and foot.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2014 to November 2017, ten patients with soft tissue defect at the ankle and foot were retrospectively reviewed. There were nine men and one woman with a mean age of 40.5 years (range 17-71 years). Seven patients were smokers and five were diabetics. The mean size of the defect was 50.5 cm². All operations were performed by the same microsurgical team. At a mean follow-up of 21 months (range, 18 to 24 months), we evaluated wound healing and complications.

RESULTS

In nine patients, the soft tissue defect was successfully covered. In four patients, venous congestion was noticed, whereas in one patient, there was total necrosis of the flap. In all cases, the donor site was healed uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

The reverse sural artery flap is a reliable alternative for wound coverage at the ankle and foot, with low complication and morbidity rate. Nevertheless, it is a demanding microsurgical operation that requires knowledge of the anatomy and surgeons' experience.

Fasciocutaneous flap with perforating branches of peroneal artery repairing soft tissue loss in anterior and middle parts of children's feet: A STROBE-compliant article

Repairing soft tissue loss in feet's anterior and middle parts has become a problem, especially for children. We observed the feasibility and clinical effects of superficial peroneal fasciocutaneous flap pedicled with terminal perforating branches of peroneal artery for repairing children's feet.Between January 2015 and December 2016, soft tissue loss in anterior and middle regions of feet were repaired using superficial peroneal fasciocutaneous flap pedicled with terminal perforating branches of peroneal artery in 8 children with a median age of 6.5 [4-9, interquartile range (IQR) = 3] years. The skin of lower leg was intact, and the soft tissue loss area was located in the anterior and middle regions of feet with a size of 5 cm × 4 cm to 11 cm × 7 cm combined with the exposure of tendons and joints in all the 8 children. On the basis of the conditions above, there were no indications of free skin grafting. Foot wounds were repaired all with the superficial peroneal fasciocutaneous flap pedicled with terminal perforating branches of peroneal artery (6 cm × 5 cm to 12 cm × 8 cm), and then the donor area was sutured to narrow the donor area followed by intermediate split thickness skin graft. The perforating branch trunk of peroneal artery was used as a rotation point (4 cm above the lateral malleolus) in 5 children and descending branch of perforating branch of peroneal artery as a rotation point (2 cm under the lateral malleolus) in 3 children.All flaps survived with primary healing in the 8 children. Postoperative median 7.5-month (3-12, IQR = 4.5) follow-up indicated that flap color and texture were fine, the appearances of donor and recipient areas were satisfactory, wearing shoes was not affected, and walking function and foot blood circulation were normal.For intractable soft tissue loss in the anterior and middle regions of children's feet, superficial peroneal fasciocutaneous flap pedicled with terminal perforating branches of peroneal artery can improve recipient area appearance and walking function because it has the characteristics of reliable blood supply and convenient rotation. It is worth using this method widely in clinics.

The Combined Use of a Neurocutaneous Flap and the Ilizarov Technique for Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects and Bone Loss in the Tibia

BACKGROUND

Management of posttraumatic large soft tissue defects and bone loss remains a therapeutic and surgical challenge for orthopedic surgeons. We assessed the use of a neurocutaneous flap and the Ilizarov technique in the reconstruction of severe composite defects in the tibia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 18 consecutive patients with trauma-related soft tissue defects and bone loss. The size of the soft tissue defect ranges from 8 × 9 cm to 14 × 18 cm. The mean size of bone loss was 4.5 cm. A great saphenous neurocutaneous flap or sural neurocutaneous flap was created to reconstruct the soft tissue defect. The Ilizarov external fixator was applied to reconstruct bony loss by means of distraction osteogenesis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 38.8 months. All transferred flaps survived completely. The area covered ranged from 9 × 10 cm to 15 × 20 cm. The mean distraction length and duration of use of the external fixator were 6 cm and 11.4 months, respectively. All patients achieved final union. Complications of superficial pin-tract infections and mild Achilles tendon contracture were observed, but these were resolved over time. All patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A well-vascularized neurocutaneous flap is a safe and effective option in lower extremity reconstruction under a stable mechanical environment, which can be created using the Ilizarov technique. It is a good option for reconstructing severe complex defects in the lower limb.

Peroneal perforator pedicle propeller flap for lower leg soft tissue defect reconstruction: Clinical applications and treatment of venous congestion

Objective To describe the characteristics of the perforator vessel in the peroneal artery of the lower leg and to explore the use of perforator pedicle propeller flaps to repair soft tissue defects in the lower leg, heel and foot. Methods This retrospective study enrolled patients with soft tissue defects of the distal lower leg, heel and foot who underwent surgery using peroneal perforator-based propeller flaps. The peroneal artery perforators were identified preoperatively by colour duplex Doppler ultrasound. The flap was designed based on the preoperatively-identified perforator location, with the posterior border of the fibula employed as an axis, and the perforator vessel as the pivot point of rotation. Patients were followed-up to determine the outcomes. Results The study analysed 36 patients (mean age, 39.7 years). The majority of the soft tissue defects were on the heel (20; 55.6%). The donor-site of the flap was closed in 11 patients by direct suturing and skin grafting was undertaken in 25 patients. Postoperative complications included venous congestion (nine patients), which was managed with delayed wound coverage and bleeding therapy. All wounds were eventually cured and the flaps were cosmetically acceptable. Conclusions The peroneal perforator pedicle propeller flap is an appropriate choice to repair soft tissue defects of the distal limbs.

Modified reversed superficial peroneal artery flap in the reconstruction of ankle and foot defects following severe burns or trauma

OBJECTIVE

Challenges persist in the reconstruction of the ankle and the foot with exposed tendons, joints, and bones as a result of severe burns and trauma. In flap elevation involving the sensitive superficial nerve, the local nerve was always sacrificed to obtain an anesthetic donor site; however, such a procedure introduced the possibility of painful neuromas. In this study, we present a desired clinical application of a modified reversed superficial peroneal artery flap, in which the superficial peroneal nerve is preserved.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2015, 12 patients with ankle or foot defects were treated with the modified reversed superficial peroneal artery flap. The defects of the patients were caused by hot liquid scald (one patient), electrical injury (five patients), and trauma (six patients). The flap was utilized for covering defects on the ankle (seven patients) and the foot (five patients). The size of the flaps ranged from 4.0cm×6.0cm to 18.0cm×10.0cm. The superficial peroneal artery was involved in the flap, whereas the superficial peroneal nerve was spared by dedicate dissection. The reverse-flow flap was nourished by the superficial peroneal artery through the terminal peroneal artery perforator.

RESULTS

The obtained outcomes were satisfactory functionally and aesthetically. The flaps in 11 patients survived completely without complications, whereas partial necrosis occurred in a 78-year-old patient when the flap survived a week later during follow up. CT angiography revealed the stenosis of the popliteal artery. The wound healed after interventional treatment involving placing a stent and changing the dressings. Basic functions and configurations were salvaged in all cases. All patients were completely satisfied with the proposed flap and suffered no paresthesia in their lower leg.

CONCLUSION

Exhibiting beneficial characteristics such as reliable blood supply, favorable thickness, wide rotating arc, and retention of major vessels and the superficial peroneal nerve, the modified reversed superficial peroneal artery flap is useful in the reconstruction of ankle and foot defects that would not cause any hypoesthesia of the foot.

Reconstruction of the Foot and Ankle Using Pedicled or Free Flaps: Perioperative Flap Survival Analysis

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation between non-technical risk factors and the perioperative flap survival rate and to evaluate the choice of skin flap for the reconstruction of foot and ankle.

Methods

This was a clinical retrospective study. Nine variables were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method coupled with a log-rank test and a Cox regression model was used to predict the risk factors that influence the perioperative flap survival rate. The relationship between postoperative wound infection and risk factors was also analyzed using a logistic regression model.

Results

The overall flap survival rate was 85.42%. The necrosis rates of free flaps and pedicled flaps were 5.26% and 20.69%, respectively. According to the Cox regression model, flap type (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.592; 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.606, 4.184); P < 0.001) and postoperative wound infection (HR = 0.266; 95% CI (0.134, 0.529); P < 0.001) were found to be statistically significant risk factors associated with flap necrosis. Based on the logistic regression model, preoperative wound bed inflammation (odds ratio [OR] = 11.371,95% CI (3.117, 41.478), P < 0.001) was a statistically significant risk factor for postoperative wound infection.

Conclusion

Flap type and postoperative wound infection were both independent risk factors influencing the flap survival rate in the foot and ankle. However, postoperative wound infection was a risk factor for the pedicled flap but not for the free flap. Microvascular anastomosis is a major cause of free flap necrosis. To reconstruct complex or wide soft tissue defects of the foot or ankle, free flaps are safer and more reliable than pedicled flaps and should thus be the primary choice.

Peroneal perforator-based peroneus longus tendon and sural neurofasciocutaneous composite flap transfer for a large soft-tissue defect of the forearm: A case report

We describe the use of a composite flap composed of a sural neurofasciocutaneous flap and a vascularized peroneus longus tendon for the reconstruction of severe composite forearm tissue defects in a patient. A 43-year-old man had his left arm caught in a conveyor belt resulting in a large soft-tissue defect of 18 × 11 cm over the dorsum forearm. The extensor carpi radialis, superficial radial nerve, and radial artery were severely damaged. A free neurofasciocutaneous composite flap measuring 16 × 11 cm was outlined on the patient's left lower leg to allow simultaneous skin, tendon, nerve, and artery reconstruction. The flap, which included the peroneus longus tendon, was elevated on the subfascial plane. After the flap was transferred to the recipient site, the peroneal artery was anastomosed to the radial artery in a flow-through manner. The vascularized tendon graft with 15 cm in length was used to reconstruct the extensor carpi radialis longus tendon defect using an interlacing suture technique. As the skin paddle of the sural neurofasciocutaneous flap and the vascularized peroneus longus tendon graft were linked by the perforator and minimal fascial tissue, the skin paddle was able to rotate and slide with comparative ease. The flap survived completely without any complications. The length of follow-up was 12 months and was uneventful. Range of motion of his left wrist joint was slightly limited to 75 degrees. This novel composite flap may be useful for reconstructing long tendon defects associated with extensive forearm soft tissue defects.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps in Lower Extremity Defects: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications

BACKGROUND

Currently, increased interest in the perforator-pedicled propeller flap should not obscure the fact that it is, in reality, a complex procedure requiring experience and monitoring similar to free flaps. Through a meta-analysis, the authors aimed to identify the risk factors of perforator-pedicled propeller flap failure in lower extremity defects.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1991 to May of 2014 for articles describing perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in the lower extremity. The study selection met the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Fixed-effects models were used.

RESULTS

Forty articles complied with the inclusion criteria, representing 428 perforator-pedicled propeller flaps. The most common cause was posttraumatic (55.2 percent). Most of the defects were at the distal third of the lower leg (45.6 percent). The arc of rotation was 180 degrees for 34.3 percent. Complications were found in 25.2 percent, including partial necrosis (10.2 percent) and complete necrosis (3.5 percent). Complete flap survival was found in 84.3 percent. The authors identified three significant risk factors: age older than 60 years (relative risk, 1.61; p = 0.03), diabetes (relative risk, 2.00; p = 0.02), and arteriopathy (relative risk, 3.12; p = 0.01). No significant results were found regarding smoking status other than a tendency (p = 0.06), acute cause (p = 0.59), posttraumatic cause (p = 0.97), distal third of the lower leg (p = 0.66), fascia inclusion (p = 0.70), and pedicle rotation greater than 120 degrees (p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Age older than 60 years, diabetes, and arteriopathy are significant risk factors of perforator-pedicled propeller flap complications in the lower extremity.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: What is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Currently, increasingly reconstructive surgeon consider the failure rates of perforator propeller flaps especially in the distal third of the lower leg are too important and prefer to return to the use of free flap at first line option with failure rates frequently lower than 5%. So, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis comparing free flaps (perforator-based or not) and pedicled-propeller flaps to respond to the question "what is the safest coverage for distal third of the lower limb?"

METHODS

This review was conducted according to PRISMA criteria. From 1991 to 2015, MEDLINE®, Pubmed central, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. The pooled estimations were performed by meta-analysis. The homogeneity Q statistic and the I² index were computed.

RESULTS

We included 36 articles for free flaps (1,226 flaps) and 19 articles for pedicled-propeller flaps (302 flaps). The overall failure rate was 3.9% [95%CI:2.6-5.3] for free flaps and 2.77% [95%CI:0.0-5.6] for pedicled-propeller flaps (P = 0.36). The complication rates were 19.0% for free flaps and 21.4% for pedicled-propeller flaps (P = 0.37). In more detail, we noted for free flaps versus pedicled-propeller flaps: partial necrosis (2.70 vs. 6.88%, P = 0.001%), wound dehiscence (2.38 vs. 0.26%, P = 0.018), infection (4.45 vs. 1.22%, P = 0.009). The coverage failure rate was 5.24% [95%CI:3.68-6.81] versus 2.99% [95%CI:0.38-5.60] without significant difference (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

In the lower limb the complications are not rare and many teams consider the free flaps to be safer. In this meta-analysis we provide evidence that failure and overall complications rate of perforator propeller flaps are comparable with free flaps. Although, partial necrosis is significantly higher for pedicled-propeller flaps than free flaps, in reality the success of coverage appears similar. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 38:109-119, 2018.

Repairing Pretibial and Foot Soft Tissue Defects with Reverse Transplantation of the Medial Crural Fasciocutaneous Flap

Soft tissue defects of the pretibial area and the foot are among the most common complications in patients with lower extremity injuries and remain a challenge for surgeons. This study examined the clinical effects of repairing pretibial and foot soft tissue defects with a medial crural fasciocutaneous flap. Twenty-three injury cases with soft tissue defects in the middle/lower parts of the tibia and ankle/heel were treated. Of these, 8 injuries were in the lower pretibial region, 11 injuries were in the heel, and 4 injuries were in the dorsalis pedis. The dimensions of the soft tissue defects ranged from 7 cm × 5 cm to 18 cm × 10 cm. The crural fasciocutaneous flap was used for wound repair in all cases. The skin harvest dimensions ranged from 12 cm × 6 cm to 23 cm × 12 cm, and the width of the reverse flap pedicle was greater than 4 cm. The patients were followed up for 6 to 27 months postsurgery. All flaps survived and appeared healthy, and leg function was satisfactorily recovered. Five patients suffered from distal flap necrosis and 2 patients suffered from effusion. The area of the crural fasciocutaneous flap harvest appeared to have a good blood supply, and the procedure was easy to perform without injuries to the main vasculature. In conclusion, the medial crural fasciocutaneous flap is a safe and effective clinical intervention for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the pretibial area and foot.

The vascularized sural nerve graft based on a peroneal artery perforator for reconstruction of the inferior alveolar nerve defect

The sural nerve has been described for nerve reconstruction of the maxillofacial region since it provides many advantages. We report a case of a vascularized sural nerve graft based on a peroneal artery perforator for immediate reconstruction after the removal of intraosseous neuroma originating in the inferior alveolar nerve. The patient had a neuroma caused by iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. A 4-cm long neuroma existed in the inferior alveolar nerve and was resected. A peroneal perforator was chosen as the pedicle of the vascularized sural nerve graft for the nerve gap. The graft including the skin paddle for monitoring the perfusion supplied by this perforator was transferred to the lesion. The nerve gap between the two stumps of the inferior alveolar nerve was repaired using the 6-cm long vascularized sural nerve. The perforator of the peroneal artery was anastomosed to the branch of the facial artery in a perforator-to-perforator fashion. There was no need to sacrifice any main arteries. The skin paddle with 1 cm × 3 cm in size was inset into the incised medial neck. Perceptual function tests with a Semmes-Weinstein pressure esthesiometer and two-point discrimination in the lower lip and chin at 10 months after surgery showed recovery almost to the level of the normal side. This free vascularized sural nerve graft based on a peroneal artery perforator may be a good alternative for reconstruction of inferior alveolar nerve defects.

Distally based perforator propeller sural flap for foot and ankle reconstruction: a modified flap dissection technique

BACKGROUND

Distally based perforator propeller sural flaps that pedicled on an isolated perforator from the peroneal artery or posterior tibial artery are a versatile local reconstructive option for defects of the foot and ankle region. However, flap venous congestion is yet a difficult problem after operation. We hypothesize that containing some adipofascial tissues around the axial perforator can preserve some tiny venous return routes, improve venous drainage, and ultimately enhance flap safety in distally based sural flaps.

METHODS

A prospective case series of 12 patients undergoing distally based perforator sural flaps for foot and ankle coverage were included in this study from January 2008 to December 2010. There were 7 posterior tibial artery perforator flaps from the posteromedial sural region and 5 peroneal artery perforator flaps from the posterolateral sural region. After identifying the proper viable perforator during operation as the pivot point, the whole flap was designed in an eccentric propeller shape. The proximal larger blade was a fasciocutaneous flap, whereas the distal smaller blade was a subdermal vascular plexus flap, preserving at least a quarter area of adipofascial tissue intact around the perforator. Postoperatively, flap swelling was classified into a 5-grade assessment scale. Flap survival, complications, and patient functional recovery were evaluated.

RESULTS

The proximal fasciocutaneous flap measured 4 × 8 to 6 × 18 cm (mean, 57.8 cm), and the distal subdermal cutaneous flap measured 2 × 2 to 4 × 4 cm (mean, 9.2 cm). The flaps were rotated 160 to 180 degrees. Postoperatively, flap swelling was noted under grade 2 in 9 cases, grade 3 in 2, and grade 4 in 1 with some distal superficial skin necrosis, which occurred in the largest flap in our series. All flaps survived uneventfully. After a mean of 13 months of follow-up, the wounds were cured successfully. All patients recovered walking and shoe wearing function.

CONCLUSION

Keeping a quadrant adipofascial tissue around the distal pivot perforator to form a perforator-adipofascial-pedicle can preserve more venous return routes and relieve flap swelling. This technique should be recommended in distally perforator-pedicled propeller flaps because it enhances flap safety yet does not increase the difficulty of 180-degree rotation.

Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: a systematic review and pooled analysis

The distally based sural fasciocutaneous flap is one of the few options available for local flap reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the lower one-third of the leg. Few studies have assessed risk factors associated with poor outcomes in this flap. A literature search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the use of sural artery fasciocutaneous flaps for soft-tissue reconstruction of the leg. Data were pooled and a univariate analysis was performed to identify characteristics associated with increased morbidity. A logistic regression model was created, and odds ratios and p values associated with the development of complications were calculated. Sixty-one papers were identified which included data on 907 patients. The majority of sural flaps were used to cover defects of the heel (28.2%), foot (14.4%) or ankle (25.8%). Trauma was the most common indication, followed by ulcers and open fractures. Flap complications were recorded in 26.4% of cases with a flap loss rate of 3.2%. With multivariate analysis, venous insufficiency and increasing age were independent risk factors for complications. Patients with venous insufficiency had nine times the risk of developing a complication compared to patients without venous insufficiency.

Reverse peroneal artery flap for large defects of ankle and foot: A reliable reconstructive technique

Background:

Large soft tissue defects around the lower third of the leg, ankle and foot always have been challenging to reconstruct. Reverse sural flaps have been used for this problem with variable success. Free tissue transfer has revolutionised management of these problem wounds in selected cases.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty-two patients with large defects around the lower third of the leg, ankle and foot underwent reconstruction with reverse peroneal artery flap (RPAF) over a period of 7 years. The mean age of these patients was 41.2 years.

Results:

Of the 22 flaps, 21 showed complete survival without even marginal necrosis. One flap failed, where atherosclerotic occlusion of peroneal artery was evident on the table. Few patients had minor donor site problems that settled with conservative management.

Conclusions:

RPAF is a very reliable flap for the coverage of large soft tissue defects of the heel, sole and dorsum of foot. This flap adds versatility in planning and execution of this extended reverse sural flap.

The extended peroneal artery perforator flap for lower extremity reconstruction

The peroneal artery perforator flap and its modifications have been widely used for coverage of soft tissue defects of ankle and foot in the past decade. In this article, we report on a series of upper knee, ankle, and foot reconstructions with a proximally or distally based extended peroneal artery perforator (EPAP) flap supplied by distinct perforating branches off the proximal or distal peroneal artery. Total pedicle length obtained ranged from 6 to 12 cm. Twelve patients with soft tissue defects of the lower extremity underwent reconstruction using the EPAP flap. The flaps were designed with the sizes from 10 x 6 cm to 25 x 15 cm. All 12 flaps survived completely without complications. Our experience demonstrates that the EPAP flap is reliable and versatile and can provide a large amount of soft tissue for coverage of defects in the leg anywhere from knee to forefoot obviating the need for free tissue transplantation.

Reverse sural artery flap for reconstruction of blast injuries of the foot and ankle

BACKGROUND

The reverse sural artery fasciocutaneous flap is a versatile soft tissue coverage procedure for traumatic soft tissue defects of the distal tibia, ankle, and foot. War-related blast injuries represent a unique injury mechanism. There are no reports on use of this reconstructive flap in treating highly contaminated war-related musculoskeletal trauma of the foot and ankle. The current study presents results using this soft tissue coverage procedure in a subacute fashion to treat a population of war-related blast injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart study was performed to assess outcomes of ten consecutive patients with severe lower extremity musculoskeletal trauma requiring soft tissue coverage using reverse sural artery fasciocutaneous flaps. Average patient age was 27.2 years. All injuries occurred between 2003 and 2008 as a result of severe war-related blast injuries.

RESULTS

All ten patients sustained Gustilo Type IIIB open fractures within the zones of injuries secondary to high energy blasts. Average time to flap coverage was 37 (range, 18 to 112) days post-injury. All ten flaps were well-healed at 12 weeks postoperatively. Major complications included one nonunion, three deep infections with chronic osteomyelitis, and three late elective amputations unrelated to the viability of the flap.

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients with significant open bony and soft tissue trauma to the foot and ankle, the reverse sural artery fasciocutaneous flap should be considered as a viable first option for soft tissue coverage, even in cases of subacute coverage. Early coverage is preferable in cases of severe contamination and soft tissue destruction, but late coverage of distal lower extremity defects with a sural artery flap is possible with good outcomes.