Dynamic Posturography Findings Predict Balance Status in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients

A Proposal for Comprehensive Audio-Vestibular Test Battery Protocol for Diagnosis and Follow-Up Monitoring in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma Undergoing Surgical Tumor Removal

Background: A vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a benign tumor, causing audiological and vestibular symptoms. This study aimed to propose a comprehensive audio-vestibular test battery protocol for diagnosis and follow-up monitoring in patients with unilateral VSs undergoing surgical removal. Methods: The detailed interpretation of audiological and vestibular findings was presented in two example cases. The surgery was performed through the middle cranial fossa (#1) and translabyrinthine approach (#2). The participants were evaluated with tonal, speech, and impedance audiometry, ABR, caloric test, vHIT, cVEMP, oVEMP, SOT, and DHI. Patient and tumor characteristics were retrieved from the patient's history. Results: In the postoperative period, the reduction in gain of the lateral semicircular canal was observed in the vHITs of both patients. The DHI in case #1 increased after surgery, while it decreased in case #2. The improvement in postural performances compared to the preoperative SOT (CON 5, CON 6, composite score) and immediately after the procedure was observed. Conclusions: A specific diagnostic protocol is necessary to compare the results of different surgical techniques and approaches. Diagnostic tests performed before the surgery should be repeated within a specific time frame during postoperative follow-up to enable the comparison of results. The proposed protocol can help us better understand the processes ongoing during tumor growth and postoperative vestibular compensation.

Evaluation of Vestibular Function in Diagnosis of Vestibular Schwannomas

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors of the vestibular nerve. The common first symptoms are hearing loss and tinnitus, followed by imbalance, vertigo, and facial nerve involvement. The subjective symptoms of VS patients are not consistent with the severity of vestibular lesions and the results of vestibular tests, which often interfere with clinicians' diagnoses. Thus, the main screening and diagnostic methods for VS are audiometry and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ignoring the evaluation of vestibular function at the source of pathological lesions. With the development and improvement of vestibular evaluation technology and its wide application in the clinic, modern vestibular examination technology can reflect the severity and frequency of vestibular lesions and compensation from multiple perspectives, providing an objective basis for the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular diseases. In this report, we review the results and characteristics of vestibular tests in VS patients and further clarify the clinical value of vestibular function assessment in the diagnosis and treatment of VS.

Relationship of Vertigo and Postural Instability in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma

Objectives

Growth of vestibular schwannomas (VS) causes progressive vestibular symptoms and postural instability. Since the tumor grows slowly, compensation of decaying vestibular input may decrease subjective symptoms of dizziness. This study aims to estimate the relationship of subjective vestibular symptoms and objective postural instability in patients with VS.

Methods

A retrospective review of 18 patients newly diagnosed with VS and with subjective vertigo symptoms was performed. The results of vestibular function tests including the sensory organization test (SOT) using computerized dynamic posturography, caloric test, and self-report measures of subjective dizziness handicap (Dizziness Handicap Inventory) and visual analogue scale were compared according to the onset of vertigo symptoms.

Results

In VS patients, SOT showed decreased equilibrium score for all vestibular function related conditions, condition (C) 5 and 6, and composite (COMP) score. COMP scores were not correlated with visual analogue scale or Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores. Acute onset group included six patients and insidious onset group, 12 patients. Equilibrium scores for C5 and C6, and COMP scores were lower for insidious onset group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our findings confirmed postural instability is prevalent in VS patients. SOT parameters did not differ significantly between acute onset and insidious onset groups, but increased tumor size and canal weakness were noted in the insidious onset group. Clinicians should consider that postural instability is likely present even in patients who do not complain of acute vertigo, and appropriate counseling should be discussed with the patients.

Small vestibular schwannomas can cause gait instability

PURPOSE

To confirm whether detailed gait analysis can detect gait instability in patients with small vestibular schwannoma (VS) with an apparently normal gait.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (7 males, 15 females; 40-64 years old) with small VS and nine healthy age- and weight-matched controls were enrolled. Small VS was defined as the longest diameter less than 20mm from the porus acusticus internus on MRI with no brainstem compression. Each subject was asked to walk straight for a distance of 8m with tactile sensors attached to both feet, and repeat two trials with eyes open and closed. Gait variables of stance, swing, double support, stability, and average length of the trajectories of the center of force (TCOF) during stance were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the stability of the TCOF were found during gaits with eyes open and closed between the two groups. No obvious changes in gait variables were recognized with eyes open between the two groups. However, under gait with eyes closed, the values of the coefficient of variation (CV) of the gait phase were significantly greater in stance and swing in the VS group than in the normal group. In addition, patients with canal paresis (CP) showed greater CV values in gait phase related parameters than those who without CP during gait with eyes closed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with small VS may have an apparently normal gait, but their vestibular deficit could be detected by proper use of gait analysis, especially with visual deprivation.

Diagnosis and therapy of vestibular schwannoma

MRI studies are of paramount importance for diagnosis and follow-up measurements during conservative and postinterventional management of vestibular schwannomas (VS). MRI findings that convey important information for hearing-preservation VS surgery are: length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact, involvement of the internal auditory canal, incomplete filling of internal auditory canal, tumor size less than 15 mm and the intralabyrinthine signal intensity on 3DFT-CISS gradient-echo images. Functional neuro-otologic studies of facial nerve function, hearing and vestibular/balance function provide a valuable means of assessment of the actual impairment of the functional status of the VS patient. Intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function and hearing has been refined, resulting in improved final postoperative facial nerve and hearing outcomes in VS patients treated with microsurgery. Long-term results reported by teams practicing stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy have been very encouraging. On the other hand, conservative management appears to be a viable option for a select group of VS patients. The refinement of surgical technique has rendered surgery safer and less invasive, resulting in better functional outcomes. Steroid use is currently used postinterventionally to improve final hearing outcome, although with questionable effectiveness. Physical rehabilitation programs are applied to accelerate vestibular functional recovery postoperatively and there is weak evidence that early physical rehabilitation may improve the final facial nerve outcome. Quality-of-life measures have emerged as important determinants of final therapeutic decision-making. More studies with high levels of evidence are needed to support clinical decisions.