Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula

Narrative review of flaps and grafts in robotic reconstructive urologic surgery

Background and Objective

Flaps and grafts are used for filling dead space, ureteral substitution, and as mesh alternatives. The surgical robot is invaluable in urologic reconstructive surgery due to the ability of the robot to reach the deep pelvis, its minimally invasive access, the ability to use indocyanine green to identify structures and assess tissue perfusion and viability, and ergonomics for the surgeon. Robotic reconstruction can involve tissue transfer in the form of flaps and grafts to provide form and function to organs that have been damaged by iatrogenic injuries, trauma, infections, cancer, radiation injury, or congenital abnormalities. Common flaps and grafts can be readily adapted to the robotic approach. In this literature review, we examine the robotic use of flaps and grafts in reconstructive urology.

Methods

A thorough literature review was conducted via a PubMed search for predefined terms.

Key Content and Findings

Flaps and grafts in reconstructive urology are used for interposition, ureteral substitution, and as mesh alternatives. Omental flaps are used for tissue interposition, or to provide structure and nutrients, and are easily employed with the robot. Various robotic applications of peritoneal flaps have been described. Vascular rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps are well-vascularized flaps that occupy dead space and provide structural support, which can be harvested readily with the robot. Sigmoid epiploica are an excellent flap for pelvic reconstruction. Gracilis flaps and fascia lata grafts are well-tolerated and provide space occupying tissue. Boari flaps aid in robotic ureteral reconstruction, especially in the setting of long defects. Oral mucosa is excellent for ureteral or bladder neck reconstruction. Rectal mucosa is well-tolerated and easy to harvest robotically for a variety of urinary tract reconstructive applications. The appendix or ileum can be interposed for repair of damaged ureters.

Conclusions

Various flaps and grafts have been adapted for robotic reconstructive urology. As the field develops, refinement of techniques and innovation in flaps and employment of the robot will propel this field forward. More studies, especially comparative studies, are needed to elucidate the flaps and grafts that are most likely to be successful with the least morbidity for each use case.

Laparoscopic repair of acquired rectourethral fistula by vesical peritoneal flap

INTRODUCTION

A rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an infrequent complication that can be iatrogenic in most cases. Multiple surgical interventions were described for RUF repair including transsphincteric, transanal, transperineal, and transabdominal approaches. To this day, there is no consensus on a standardized surgery of choice for acquired RUF.

MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Our patient was diagnosed with RUF 4 weeks after undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for midrectum adenocarcinoma, with failure of conservative treatment. A three-port transabdominal approach was used to dissect the rectoprostatic space and close the fistula orifice on the anterior rectal wall. With the technical impossibility to develop an omental flap, the peritoneum on the posterior vesical wall was carefully dissected to form a rectangular flap pedicled by its inferior aspect. The harvested peritoneal flap was then anchored between the prostate and the rectum. Follow-up imaging showed the absence of RUF, concurrently with total remission of RUF symptomatology.

DISCUSSION

Management of acquired RUF can be challenging, especially after failure of conservative treatment. Laparoscopic repair of acquired RUF by vesical peritoneal flap is a valid option for a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of RUF.

Outcomes of gracilis muscle interposition for rectourethral fistulas caused by treatment of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Gracilis muscle interposition (GMI) has been associated with favorable outcomes in treating complex perianal fistulas. Outcomes of GMI may vary according to the fistula etiology, particularly between rectovaginal fistulas in women and rectourethral fistulas (RUF) in men. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of GMI to treat RUF acquired after prostate cancer treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included male patients treated with GMI for RUF acquired after prostate cancer treatment between January 2000 and December 2018 in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida. The primary outcome was the success of GMI, defined as complete healing of RUF without recurrence. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

This study included 53 male patients with a median age of 68 (range, 46-85) years. Patients developed RUF after treatment of prostate cancer with radiation (52.8%), surgery (34%), or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (13.2%). Median hospital stay was 5 (IQR, 4-7) days. Twenty (37.7%) patients experienced 25 complications, the most common being wound infection and dehiscence. Primary healing after GMI was achieved in 28 (52.8%) patients. Fifteen additional patients experienced successful healing of RUF after additional procedures, for a total success rate of 81.1%. Median time to complete healing was 8 (range, 4-56) weeks. The only significant factor associated with outcome of GMI was wound dehiscence (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the initial success rate of GMI was approximately 53%, it increased to 81% after additional procedures. Complications after GMI were mostly minor, with wound complications being the most common. Perianal wound dehiscence was significantly associated with failure of healing of RUF after GMI.

Gracilis muscle transposition in complex anorectal fistulas of diverse types and etiologies: long-term results of 60 cases

PURPOSE

Complex fistulas often require several attempts at repair and continue to be a challenging task for the surgeon, but above all, a major burden for the affected patient. This study is aimed at evaluating the potential of gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) as a therapeutic option for complex fistulas of diverse etiologies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted over a period of 16 years with a total of 60 patients (mean age 50 years). All were treated for complex fistula with GMT at St. Josef's Hospital in Regensburg, Germany. Follow-up data were collected and analyzed using a prospective database and telephone interview. Success was defined as the absence of fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (44 women, 16 men; mean age 50 years, range 24-82 years) were reviewed from January 2005 to June 2021. Primary fistula closure after GMT was achieved in 20 patients (33%) and 19 required further interventions for final healing. Overall healing rate was 65%. Fistula type was heterogeneous, with a dominant subgroup of 35 rectovaginal fistulas. Etiologies of the fistulas were irradiation, abscesses, obstetric injury, and iatrogenic/unknown, and 98% of patients had had previous unsuccessful repair attempts (mean 3.6, range 1-15). In 60% of patients with a stoma (all patients had a stoma, 60/60), stoma closure could be performed after successful fistula closure. Mean follow-up after surgery was 35.9 months (range 1-187 months). No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications were observed in 25%: wound healing disorders (n = 6), gracilis necroses (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 2), scar tissue pain (n = 2), suture granuloma (n = 1), and osteomyelitis (n = 1). In 3 patients, a second gracilis transposition was performed due to fistula recurrence (n = 2) or fecal incontinence (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Based on the authors' experience, GMT is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of complex fistulas when other therapeutic attempts have failed and should therefore be considered earlier in the treatment process. It should be seen as the main but not the only step, as additional procedures may be required for complete closure in some cases.

Gracilis muscle interposition for complex perineal fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

AIM

Complex perineal fistulas (CPFs) are among the most challenging problems in colorectal practice. Various procedures have been used to treat CPFs, with none being a panacea. Our study aimed to assess the overall success and complication rates after gracilis muscle interposition in patients with CPF.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched until January 2022 according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies including children <18 years or <10 patients were excluded, as well as reviews, duplicate or animal studies, studies with poor documentation (no report of success rate) and non-English text. An open-source, cross-platform software for advanced meta-analysis openMeta [Analyst]™ version 12.11.14 and Cochrane Review Manager 5.4® were used to conduct the meta-analysis of data.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies published between 2002 and 2021 were identified. The studies included 658 patients (409 women). Most patients had rectovaginal (50.7%) or rectourethral fistulas (33.7%). The most common causes of CPF were pelvic surgery (29.4%) and inflammatory bowel disease (25.2%). A history of radiotherapy was reported in approximately 18% of the patients. 498 (75.7%) patients with CPF achieved complete healing after gracilis muscle interposition. The weighted mean rate of success of the gracilis interposition procedure was 79.4% (95% CI 73.8%-85%, I²  = 75.3%), the weighted mean short-term complication rate was 25.7% (95% CI 18.1-33.2, I²  = 84.1%) and the weighted mean rate for 30-day reoperation was 3.6% (95% CI 1.6-5.6, I²  = 42%). The weighted mean rate of fistula recurrence was 16.7% (95% CI 11%-22.3%, I²  = 61%).

CONCLUSION

The gracilis muscle interposition technique is a viable treatment option for CPF. Surgeons should be familiar with indications and techniques to offer it as an option for patients. Given the relatively infrequent use of the operation, referral rather than performance of graciloplasty is an acceptable option.

Rectal Perforation During Pelvic Surgery

Rectal perforations during pelvic surgery are rare but serious complications. The occurrence of rectal involvement is generally lower than that of the involvement of other portions of the bowel. The urologic field is responsible for the majority of iatrogenic rectal injuries from pelvic surgery; general and gynecologic surgeries are prone to the occurrence as well, the latter especially in the case of rectal shaving for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Attention should be posed to the prevention of rectal injuries, especially in case of challenging or salvage procedures; some tricks may be recommended to avoid thermal and mechanical damages and to realize a safe dissection. Intraoperative detection of rectal injuries is of paramount importance; once confirmed, immediate management with the closure of the defect is recommended. In general, rectal injuries diagnosed after surgery are liable to significantly worse outcomes than those detected and managed intraoperatively.

Patient summary

Rectal perforation is a rare but possible complication of pelvic surgeries. The more challenging the procedure (ie, surgery for locally advanced tumors or after radiation therapy), the higher the risk of rectal lesion. Intraoperative management of the injury should be attempted, with direct repair of the defect with or without fecal diversion.

Preventing Rectourethral Fistula Recurrence With Gracilis Flap

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon serious condition with various etiologies including neoplasm, radiation therapy, and surgery. Treatment for RUF remains problematic with a high recurrence rate. Although studies have suggested the recurrence rate of RUF is lower after surgical repair using a gracilis flap, outcomes have varied and the studies were small and inadequately controlled. Here, we compare outcomes of RUF repair with and without gracilis flap to evaluate its efficacy in preventing fistula recurrence and identify risk factors for recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone surgical repair for RUF between 2007 and 2018 at our institution and had at least 30 days of follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared for patients who had gracilis flap repair and those who did not (controls). Single variable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

The gracilis group (n = 24) and control group (n = 12) had similar demographics and comorbidities. Fistula recurrence was far less frequent in the gracilis group (8% vs 50%, P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in other outcomes including length of hospitalization and surgical complications. When recurrent RUF was treated with a muscle flap (gracilis or inferior gluteus), 83% of the group had no additional fistula recurrence. In the control group, history of radiation ( P = 0.04) and urinary incontinence ( P = 0.015) were associated with fistula recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend using a gracilis flap for RUF repair given its association with lower recurrence without increased surgical complications.

Objective Perfusion Assessment in Gracilis Muscle Interposition—A Novel Software-Based Approach to Indocyanine Green Derived Near-Infrared Fluorescence in Reconstructive Surgery

Background: Gracilis muscle interposition (GMI) is an established treatment option for complex perineal fistulas and reconstruction. The outcome is limited by complications such as necrosis, impaired wound healing and fistula persistence or recurrence. Quantifiable methods of assessing muscle flap perfusion intraoperatively are lacking. This study evaluates a novel and objective software-based assessment of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence (ICG-NIRF) in GMI. Methods: Intraoperative ICG-NIRF visualization data of five patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing GMI for perineal fistula and reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively. A new software was utilized to generate perfusion curves for the specific regions of interest (ROIs) of each GMI by depicting the fluorescence intensity over time. Additionally, a pixel-to-pixel and perfusion zone analysis were performed. The findings were correlated with the clinical outcome. Results: Four patients underwent GMI without postoperative complications within 3 months. The novel perfusion indicators identified here (shape of the perfusion curve, maximum slope value, distribution and range) indicated adequate perfusion. In one patient, GMI failed. In this case, the perfusion indicators suggested impaired perfusion. Conclusions: We present a novel, software-based approach for ICG-NIRF perfusion assessment, identifying previously unknown objective indicators of muscle flap perfusion. Ready for intraoperative real-time use, this method has considerable potential to optimize GMI surgery in the future.

Post-traumatic rectourethral fistula in an adolescent managed via a transperineal approach using a local gluteal tissue interposition flap: a case report

Background

Rectourethral fistula is a rare disease with a wide variety of etiologies and clinical presentations. A definitive surgical procedure for rectourethral fistula repair has not been established.

Case presentation

A 13-year-old boy sustained a penetrating injury to the perineum, and developed a symptomatic rectourethral fistula thereafter. Conservative management through urinary diversion and transanal repair was unsuccessful. Fecal diversion with loop colostomy was performed, and three months later, a fistula repair was performed via a transperineal approach with interposition of a local gluteal tissue flap. There were no postoperative complications, and magnetic resonance imaging studies confirmed the successful closure of the fistula. The urinary and fecal diversions were reverted 1 and 6 months after the fistula repair, respectively, and postoperative excretory system complications did not occur.

Conclusions

The transperineal approach with interposition of a local gluteal tissue flap provides a viable surgical option for adolescent patients with rectourethral fistulas who are unresponsive to conservative management.

Gracilis Muscle Interposition for Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: Experience With 119 Consecutive Patients

BACKGROUND

Treatment of complex anal fistula is challenging, often mandating multiple procedures. The gracilis muscle has been used to treat perineal fistulas and to repair perineal defects.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to report the results of gracilis muscle interposition for complex anal fistula, including prognostic factors for success.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database for patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for complex anal fistula from 2000 to 2018.

SETTING

Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative outcome were obtained from medical records. Office visits were used for follow-up.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for complex anal fistula were included. Patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for reasons other than complex anal fistula were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the healing of complex anal fistula following gracilis muscle interposition and following additional procedures, when needed.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients (60 men, 59 women; median age: 56 (21-85) years) were included. The initial success rate of gracilis muscle interposition was 42%; the final success rate if additional procedures were undertaken was 92%. Overall success rate was 32.2% in women and 51.6% in men. Univariate analysis revealed that sex (p = 0.0315) and bed rest >3 days (p = 0.0078) were significant poor prognostic factors for failure, whereas the multivariate logistic regression model showed that length of bed rest >3 days was a significant poor prognostic factor for failure. In the female subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that bed rest ≥3 days was a significant poor prognostic factor, whereas in the male population there was no significant prognostic factor.

LIMITATION

This study was limited by its retrospective nature and the heterogeneity of patients.

CONCLUSION

Although initial success is <50%, the ultimate success after gracilis muscle interposition and other subsequent procedures is >90%. Patients must be preoperatively counseled that additional procedures will probably be required to achieve successful fistula closure. Furthermore, prolonged bed rest should be avoided after gracilis muscle interposition. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B551.

INTERPOSICIN DEL MSCULO GRACILIS PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FSTULA ANAL COMPLEJA EXPERIENCIA CON PACIENTES CONSECUTIVOS

ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento de la fístula anal compleja es un desafío que a menudo requiere de múltiples procedimientos quirúrgicos. El músculo gracilis se ha utilizado para tratar fístulas y reparar defectos perineales.OBJETIVO:Informar los resultados de la interposición del músculo gracilis para la fístula anal compleja, incluyendo los factores pronósticos para un tratamiento exitoso.DISEÑO:Se efectuó un análisis retrospectivo obtenido de una base de datos prospectiva para pacientes sometidos a interposición del músculo gracilis por fístula anal compleja del 2000 al 2018.METODO:Los datos demográficos de los pacientes, la información del procedimiento quirúrgico y los resultados postoperatorios se obtuvieron de los expedientes clínicos; el seguimiento se llevó a cabo por medio de visitas al consultorio.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a interposición del músculo gracilis por fístula anal compleja; Se excluyeron los pacientes que se sometieron a interposición del músculo gracilis por motivos distintos a la fístula anal compleja.CRITERIOS DE EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS:Curación de una fístula anal compleja después de la interposición del músculo gracilis y procedimientos adicionales, cuando fueron necesarios.RESULTADOS:Se estudiaron un total de 119 pacientes [60 hombres, 59 mujeres; con media de edad de 56 (21-85) años]. La tasa de éxito inicial de la interposición del músculo gracilis fue del 42%; La tasa de éxito final cuando realizaron procedimientos adicionales fue del 92%. La tasa de éxito global fue del 32,2% en mujeres y del 51,6% en hombres. El análisis univariado reveló que el género (p = 0,0315) y el reposo en cama > 3 días (p = 0,0078) en forma significativa fueron factores de pronóstico bajo para el fracaso, mientras que el modelo de regresión logística multivariable mostró que la duración del reposo en cama> 3 días fue un factor de pronóstico significativamente bajo para fracaso. En el subgrupo de mujeres, el análisis multivariado mostró que el reposo en cama ≥3 días fue un factor de pronóstico significativamente bajo, mientras que en la población masculina no hubo un factor pronóstico significativo.LIMITACIÓN:Carácter retrospectivo y heterogenicidad de los pacientes.CONCLUSIÓN:Aunque el éxito inicial es <50%, el éxito final después de la interposición del músculo gracilis y otros procedimientos posteriores es > 90%. Se debe aconsejar a los pacientes antes de la operación que probablemente se requieran procedimientos adicionales para lograr el cierre exitoso de la fístula. Además, debe evitarse el reposo prolongado en cama después de la interposición del músculo gracilis. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B551.

Treatment for rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy with biological material interposition through a perineal access

INTRODUCTION

Rectal injury is a rare complication after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The development of rectourethral fistulas (URF) from rectal injuries is one of the most feared and of more complex resolution in urology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2020 we have operated on a total of 5 patients with URF after extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through a perineal access using the interposition of biological material. All fistulas had a diameter of less than 6 mm at endoscopy and were less than 6 cm apart from the anal margin.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64 years old. All patients had a previous bowel and urinary diversion for at least 3 months. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in a forced lithotomy position, fistulorraphy and interposition of biological material of porcine origin (lyophilized porcine dermis [Permacol®]) were performed through a perineal access. Mean operative time was 174 min (140-210). Most patients were discharged on the third postoperative day. The bladder catheter was left in place for a mean of 40 days (30-60). Prior to its removal, cystography and a Gastrografin® barium enema were performed, showing resolution of the fistula in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The interposition of biological material from porcine dermis through perineal approach is a safe alternative with good results in patients submitted to urethrorectal fistulorraphy after radical prostatectomy.

Treatment for rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy with biological material interposition through a perineal access

INTRODUCTION

Rectal injury is a rare complication after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The development of rectourethral fistulas (URF) from rectal injuries is one of the most feared and of more complex resolution in urology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2020 we have operated on a total of 5 patients with URF after extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through a perineal access using the interposition of biological material. All fistulas had a diameter of less than 6 mm at endoscopy and were less than 6 cm apart from the anal margin.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64 years old. All patients had a previous bowel and urinary diversion for at least 3 months. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in a forced lithotomy position, fistulorraphy and interposition of biological material of porcine origin (lyophilized porcine dermis [Permacol®]) were performed through a perineal access. Mean operative time was 174 minutes (140-210). Most patients were discharged on the third postoperative day. The bladder catheter was left in place for a mean of 40 days (30-60). Prior to its removal, cystography and a Gastrografin® barium enema were performed, showing resolution of the fistula in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The interposition of biological material from porcine dermis through perineal approach is a safe alternative with good results in patients submitted to urethrorectal fistulorraphy after radical prostatectomy.

Results of the York Mason Procedure with and without Concomitant Graciloplasty to Treat Iatrogenic Rectourethral Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulas (RUFs) are rare but devastating complications after surgery or radiation therapy to the urethra, prostate, or rectum. RUF repair is challenging, especially in irradiated patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the York Mason (YM) procedure with or without concomitant gracilis muscle interposition (graciloplasty) for RUF repair.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Records of patients with an iatrogenic RUF who underwent the YM procedure between 2008 and 2018 in two university hospitals were reviewed. Data on etiology, diagnostic and operative procedures, urinary and fecal diversion, and postoperative follow-up were collected.

INTERVENTION

Twenty-eight patients underwent 33 YM procedures. Concomitant graciloplasty was performed in four (14%) primary repairs and two (7%) repairs for recurrent RUFs.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was successful RUF repair, defined as absence of symptoms and no leakage on control urethrocystography. The secondary endpoint was colostomy reversal rate.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up was 24 mo. Ten patients (36%) were irradiated previously. The ultimate success rate was 75% after a maximum of three YM procedures. Success rates were 89% and 50% in patients with nonirradiated and irradiated fistulas, respectively. In irradiated patients, the success rates of the first YM procedure with and without graciloplasty were 100% and 29%, respectively. In recurrent cases, concomitant graciloplasty did not result in better outcomes. Colostomy reversal was possible in 15 patients after successful repair. In all patients, fecal continence was intact and no anal stenosis was reported. Limitations of the study include small sample size and the retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of the YM procedure with graciloplasty resulted in higher success rates of RUF repair in patients with irradiated fistulas. Fecal continence was preserved, and colostomy reversal is feasible.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We analyzed the outcomes, complications, and colostomy reversal rate of the York Mason procedure for the repair of rectourethral fistulas (RUFs). We found that concomitant graciloplasty increases success rates in case of prior radiation therapy. Colostomy reversal is feasible after RUF repair.

Recto-vaginal fistulas: A case series

•

Falandry and Martius’ techniques were used firstly for vesico-vaginal fistulas with satisfying long-term functional results.

•

The same techniques are feasible and safe for rectovaginal fistula repair.

•

In this case series, patients had an improvement of their self-image and health-related quality of life.

•

Temporary colostomy is recommended before this reconstructive surgery.

Introduction

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is defined as an abnormal communication between the anterior wall of the rectum and the posterior wall of the vagina. Many surgical techniques have been described in the treatment of RVF. However, none has proved its superiority. The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of surgical treatment of RVF using Martius and Falandry techniques in order to assess the feasibility and the efficacy of these techniques which were first described for vesico-vaginal fistulas.

Methods

The study was a retrospective case series conducted in a single centre: Department of general surgery at Ibn Sina University Hospital in Rabat. We included patients with rectovaginal fistula consecutively recruited from 2011 to 2014. 10 patients developed RVF after surgery for rectal cancer (9 cases), uterine cancer (1 case). One patient had RVF for ano-rectal malformation. Colostomy was performed before the treatment of fistula in 9 cases (82 %). They underwent surgical treatment using Falandry (8 patients) and Martius techniques (3 patients) performed by an experienced urologist surgeon.

Results

No postoperative complications were recorded. Time to discharge was postoperative day 3–4. There was a complete disappearance of RVF in 8 patients (72.7 % of cases), relapse in 2 cases (18 %), and failure in one case (9%). The average follow-up was 12.6 +/-10 months. Functionally, no long-term cases of fecal incontinence or dyspareunia were noted.

Conclusion

The choice of surgical technique in the treatment of RVF remains difficult because of poor literature data and absence of consensus. RVF repair results either by Martius or Falandry techniques are encouraging with low morbidity.

When the bowel meets the bladder: Optimal management of colorectal pathology with urological involvement

Fistulae between the gastrointestinal and urinary systems are rare but becoming increasingly more common in current surgical practice. They are a heterogeneous group of pathological entities that are uncommon complications of both benign and malignant processes. As the incidence of complicated diverticular disease and colorectal malignancy increases, so too does the extent of fistulous connections between the gastrointestinal and urinary systems. These complex problems will be more common as a factor of an aging population with increased life expectancy. Diverticular disease is the most commonly encountered aetiology, accounting for up to 80% of cases, followed by colorectal malignancy in up to 20%. A high index of suspicion is required in order to make the diagnosis, with ever improving imaging techniques playing an important role in the diagnostic algorithm. Management strategies vary, with most surgeons now advocating for a single-stage approach to enterovesical fistulae, particularly in the elective setting. Concomitant bladder management techniques are also disputed. Traditionally, open techniques were the standard; however, increased experience and advances in surgical technology have contributed to refined and improved laparoscopic management. Unfortunately, due to the relative rarity of these entities, no randomised studies have been performed to ascertain the most appropriate management strategy. Rectourinary fistulae have dramatically increased in incidence with advances in the non-operative management of prostate cancer. With radiotherapy being a major contributing factor in the development of these complex fistulae, optimum surgical approach and exposure has changed accordingly to optimise their management. Conservative management in the form of diversion therapy is effective in temporising the situation and allowing for the diversion of faecal contents if there is associated soiling, macerated tissues or associated co-morbidities. One may plan for definitive surgical intervention at a later stage. Less contaminated cases with no fibrosis may proceed directly to definitive surgery if the appropriate expertise is available. An abdominal approach with direct repair and omentum interposition between the repaired tissues has been well described. In low lying fistulae, a transperineal approach with the patient in a prone-jack knife position provides optimum exposure and allows for the use of interposition muscle grafts. According to recent literature, it offers a high success rate in complex cases.

[Fistula surgery]

Vesicovaginal fistulas are a rare problem in the western world but are frequent occurrences in developing countries. In Germany the most frequent cause is hysterectomy. Vesicovaginal fistulas can be treated by the transvaginal or transabdominal approach depending on the characteristics of the fistula and the patient. The incidence and complexity of urorectal fistulas increase with the number of cumulative sequences of prostate cancer treatment. Overall there is no clear consensus about the optimal surgical approach route. The surgical treatment of both vesicovaginal and urorectal fistulas is associated with high permanent fistula closure rates; however, for both entities if the fistula is discovered early enough, conservative treatment with a temporary catheter drainage can be tried, depending on the underlying cause. For both conditions fistula repair in irradiated patients shows a much lower success rate. A spontaneous closure of fistulas in radiogenic fistulas is also not to be expected.

Redo gracilis interposition for complex perineal fistulas

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal, pouch-vaginal, and recto-urethral fistulas are very challenging to treat. Gracilis muscle interposition was shown be an effective treatment for these complex fistulas. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and outcomes of redo gracilis interposition for persistent and recurrent complex perineal fistulas.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who had redo gracilis muscle interposition for complex perineal fistulas at our institution from 1995 to 2019 was performed.

RESULTS

Nine patients (5 males, mean age 55 years) were included for analysis. The types of fistulas were recto-urethral (n = 5), rectovaginal (n = 2) and pouch-vaginal (n = 2). The success rate was 56% with 5 patients achieving complete healing of the fistula. Only 1 patient (11%) experienced a postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Redo gracilis muscle interposition is feasible and safe with promising resultsin healing of complex perineal fistula.

Operative results, sexual function and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition in complex rectovaginal fistulas

AIM

Successful treatment of complex rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) continues to be a surgical challenge. Interposition of well-perfused tissue, such as gracilis muscle, is one treatment option. The aim of this study was to investigate the operative results, sexual function and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) in the authors' own group of patients.

METHOD

The study included 19 women with RVF (mean age 48 years). The postoperative outcome was evaluated by a questionnaire and clinical examination.

RESULTS

The postoperative follow-up period was 7 months to 3.5 years (mean 23 months). GMT led to primary healing of RVF in 10 (53%) patients. Recurrences were observed in nine (47%) patients with RVF, in four (44%) of whom healing was achieved as a result of further interventions. Following GMT, two complications (abscess formation) requiring revision occurred. Although 42% of the patients reported certain limitations following muscle removal, GMT is a procedure that has a positive influence on the healing rate (74%), quality of life, continence and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

GMT is a procedure that allows healing in the majority of patients with RVFs, and it should be considered especially in patients with recurrent fistulas, in whom a correlation between decreasing healing rates and the number of previous operations has been demonstrated.

The Use of Tissue Flaps in the Management of Urinary Tract Fistulas

Urinary tract fistulas represent a complex group of pathologies that present significant management challenges. While most such fistulas ultimately require definitive surgical management, compromised local tissue quality or other factors often render straightforward simple one layered closure challenging with a substantial risk of failure. Interpositional tissue flaps have become a mainstay of treatment in these circumstances, enabling the delivery of healthy tissue from other locations to the site of pathology. Herein, we present an overview of the assessment and management of complex urinary tract fistulas involving the reproductive and gastrointestinal organs, and the decision to utilize flaps. We review the underlying principles of tissue flaps and classify different types of flaps. We conclude with a discussion of the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and harvesting techniques for the most commonly utilized flaps in urinary tract fistula repair.

Gracilis muscle transposition for treatment of recurrent anovaginal, rectovaginal, rectourethral, and pouch-vaginal fistulas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) to treat recurrent anovaginal, rectovaginal, rectourethral, and pouch–vaginal fistulas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in patients with IBD who had GMT performed by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2018. Follow-up data regarding healing rate, complications, additional procedures, and stoma closure rate was collected.

Results

A total of 30 women and 2 men had GMT. In all patients fistula was associated with Crohn's disease. In 1 female patient, contralateral gracilis transposition was required after a failed attempt at repair. The primary healing rate was 47% (15/32) and the definitive healing rate (healed by the time of data collection and after secondary procedures) was 71% (23/32). Additional surgical procedures due to fistula persistence or recurrence were performed on 17 patients (53%).At least 7 patients (21%) suffered complications including one wound infection with ischemia of the gracilis muscle. Stoma closure was successful in 18 of 31 cases of patients with stoma (58% of the patients).

Conclusions

GMT for the treatment of recurrent and complex anorectal fistulas in patients with IBD patient is eventually successful in almost 2/3 of patients.

Use of biological mesh in trans-anal treatment for recurrent recto-urethral fistula

PURPOSE

To report the author's experience on a mini-invasive technique using bioprosthetic plug and a rectal wall flap advancement in the treatment of recurrent recto-urethral fistula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2015, seven patients with recurrent recto-urethral fistula were referred to the Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. Intraoperatively all patients were found to have a rectal wall lesion and were treated with urinary and fecal diversion. For the persistence of the fistula, all the patients underwent a mini-invasive treatment consisting on placement of a bioprosthetic plug in the fistula covered by an endorectal advancement flap through a trans-anal and trans-urethral combined technique.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 48 min with a median blood loss of 30 ml. Median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 1-3). No case of fistula recurrence or plug migration was described. None of the patients experienced fecal or urinary incontinence. All patients obtained complete fistula healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent recto-urethral fistula is a challenging postsurgical complication for surgeons and urologists, and its best treatment is still unknown. Our method seems to be feasible and effective for the treatment of complex recto-urethral fistula.

Case Report: Use of reinforced buccal mucosa graft over gracilis muscle flap in management of post high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) rectourethral fistula

High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has come forward as alternative treatment for carcinoma of the prostate. Though minimally invasive,HIFUhas potential side effects. Urethrorectal fistula is one such rare side effect. Management of these fistulas has been described by Vanni et al.

This case report describes points of technique that will help successful management of resilient rectourethral fistula. Urinary and faecal diversion in the form of suprapubic catheter and colostomy is vital. Adequate time between stoma formation, fistula closure and then finally stoma closure is needed. Lithotomy position and perineal approach gives best exposure to the fistula. The rectum should be dissected 2cm above the fistula; this aids in tension free closure of the rectal defect. Similarly buccal mucosal graft was used on the urethra to achieve tension free closure. A good vascular pedicle gracilis muscle flap is used to interpose between the two repairs. This not only provides a physical barrier but also provides a vascular bed for BMG uptake. Perfect haemostasis is essential, as any collection may become a site of infection thus compromising results.

 We strongly recommend rectourethral fistula be directly repaired with gracilis muscle flap with reinforced buccal mucosa graft without attempting any less invasive repairs because the “first chance is the best chance”.

Rectourethral Fistula Management

Rectourethral fistula (RUF) is a rare condition that occurs, in most cases, as a consequence of prostate cancer treatments. Clinical suspicion and proper assessment prior to surgery are essential to adapt and successfully carry out an appropriate treatment plan. There are no randomized trials to guide clinical practice, and therefore, scientific evidence in this respect is limited. Expert recommendations seem to agree on the transperineal approach with flap interposition as the surgical treatment of choice in cases of complex fistulas, especially in those that have undergone prior radiation. Undoubtedly, the key to the successful treatment of the disease is the multidisciplinary and standardized management by physicians with experience in the field.

Perineal approach for rectourethral fistulae after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience with the perineal approach to treat rectourethral fistulae (RUF) after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study from 2012 to 2015 presenting 5 cases of RUF after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy. All cases required major abdominal surgery between the radical laparoscopic prostatectomy and the RUF treatment due to various complications. In no case was radiation therapy indicated prior to or after the repair. A perineal approach was performed in the 5 cases as the first option. One case required a second operation with a combined approach (abdominal and perineal) due to persistent fistulae.

RESULTS

After a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, 5 cases had resolved the RUF. Two patients presented urinary incontinence, and one patient had an anastomotic stricture that required internal urethrotomy. The other patients had no long-term complications.

CONCLUSION

The perineal approach provides a healthy surgical field in patients who undergo multiple operations, achieving high rates of resolution of the fistulae.

Management of Recurrent Rectourethral Fistula by York Mason Posterior Transrectal Transsphincteric Approach

Rectourethral fistula (RUF) may develop after ureterovesical and rectal intervention or radiation therapy (RT) rarely, but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The patient will typically present with pneumaturia, faecaluria, and urinary drainage from the rectum. Diagnosis can be easily done with digital rectal examination, cystography, and urethrocystoscopy. Conservative supportive management of RUF does not appear to be successful in most patients, and management with surgical intervention remains the best treatment option. Several surgical techniques have been described including transabdominal, transanal, transperineal, combined abdominoperineal, anterior and posterior transsphincteric, transsacral, laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic minimally invasive approaches. There have been very few data about treatment of recurrent RUF. We would like to report the management of recurrent RUF following transurethral resection of prostate and RT for prostate carcinoma in an immunosuppressed, 75-year-old patient by York Mason posterior transrectal transsphincteric approach.

Testicular Interposition Flap for Repair of Perineal Urinary Fistulae: A Novel Surgical Technique

Rectourinary fistulae and urinary-cutaneous fistulae are a rare yet devastating complication. Current options for tissue interposition include rectus, gracilis, or gluteal muscle, omentum, or intestine for use in coloanal pull-through procedures. In elderly patients, testicular interposition flaps may be an excellent tissue option to use when vitalized tissue is necessary to supplement fistula repair. Elderly patients frequently have increased spermatic cord length, potentially offering a longer flap reach than use of a muscle flap. Additionally, mobilizing one of the testicles and developing it through the external inguinal ring may be a less morbid and less costly procedure than harvesting and tunneling a muscle flap. Longer follow-up and further studies are needed to determine the outcomes of this novel technique.

Algorithm-based multidisciplinary treatment approach for rectourethral fistula

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of an algorithm-based multidisciplinary treatment approach to rectourethral fistula.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database at a tertiary center of all consecutive patients treated between 2003 and 2013.

RESULTS

Thirty males (mean age 63 years) were reviewed. Prostate cancer treatment was the most common fistula etiology (97%). Urinary drainage consisted of urethral catheter in all patients and suprapubic catheter in 14 (47%). The rate of fecal diversion was 67%. During a mean follow-up of 72 months, healing rate was 90% and recurrence rate 0%. Spontaneous healing was achieved in 14 patients (47%): 8 (27%) without fecal diversion and 6 (20%) following fecal diversion. Thirteen patients (43%) required definitive intervention. The majority of operated patients underwent transanal or transperineal flap (endorectal, dartos, or gracilis) successfully. Only 2 patients (7%) required an abdominal approach (positive oncologic margins or non-functioning bladder). Fifteen out of the 20 patients (75%) who underwent fecal diversion had stoma closure with an overall permanent stoma rate of 17%. Long-term urinary incontinence was noted in 11 patients (37%). Six patients (20%) required permanent urinary diversion or drainage catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

Algorithm-based treatment approach for rectourethral fistula is useful in the management of this rare condition. Selective fecal diversion is possible, and majority of patients who require definitive intervention can be treated with a transanal or transperineal approach. The rate of permanent stoma is low, but long-term urinary dysfunction is frequent.

York Mason procedure to repair iatrogenic rectourinary fistula: our experience

BACKGROUND

Rectourinary fistula (RUF) is an uncommon but devastating condition in men. It usually occurs as a complication of prostatic cancer treatment, whether this is by radiation therapy or surgery. It can also occur in patients with benign pathology of the prostate, inflammatory bowel disease, or Fournier's gangrene, and following pelvic trauma. RUF represents a challenge for the surgeon because spontaneous closure is a rare event. Several techniques have been described for surgical repair of fistula. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate that the York Mason posterior, transrectal correction of an iatrogenic RUF is a reliable approach that offers good postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 39 patients who underwent York Mason repair from 1998 to 2012 at the University of Southern California (USC) and Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome (UCBM). The most frequent common causes of RUF were itemized, and statistical analysis was performed to determine correlations between the fistula's etiology and surgical outcome. Patients were then divided into two different cohorts: those who had undergone only one previous procedure (group 1) and those who had undergone two or more surgeries (group 2). We performed a statistical analysis between the two groups and calculated the percentage of fistula repair by means of the posterior trans-sphincteric approach with the York Mason technique in each groups We evaluated the presence of comorbidities (diabetes and infection) and their influence on the surgical outcome. Finally, we reported patient outcomes during follow-up.

RESULTS

In the present series, the RUF was iatrogenic in every case. The onset of the fistula followed prostate cancer treatment, most commonly after laparoscopic procedures. The success rate of fistula repair was found to be independent of the fistula's etiology. Diabetes and infections did not influence the surgical outcome. Overall, more than 50 % of patients treated with the York Mason posterior, transanal, transrectal approach remained free of fistula during follow-up. Almost 90 % of those who were previously operated only once remained free of fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior trans-sphincteric approach of the York Mason technique is effective in treating RUF.

[Surgical treatment of rectourinary fistulas: review of the literature]

BACKGROUND

A rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon complication resulting from surgery, radiation, or trauma. Retrospective studies and case reports have highlighted different approaches for surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review our experience with surgical management of RUF.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid) and the Cochrane Library were searched by using the terms RUFs urethrorectal fistulas, and prostatourethral-rectal fistulas.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies were retrospective and in English. Of the records identified, 31 series were included.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-five patients were identified. Most patients underwent one of four categories of repair: transanal (4.7%), transabdominal (14.1%), transsphincteric (26.6%), and transperineal (57.6%). Tissue interposition flaps, predominantly gracilis muscle, were used in 56% of repairs. The fistula was successfully closed in 93.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of complexity, RUFs have an initial closure rate of 93.9%.

Acquired recto-uretral fistulas: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic options

Rectouretral fistulas are a rare disease, but represent an important problem for the patient that suffers them and a challenge for the urologist and colorectal surgeon who has to manage them. A wide review has been performed focusing on etiopathogenic factors, diagnostic and therapeutic options including the analysis of different surgical techniques. PubMed, MEDLINE y EMBASE medical database were searched up to September 2014.

Surgical management of complex rectourethral fistulas in irradiated and nonirradiated patients

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulas are an uncommon, yet devastating occurrence after treatment for prostate cancer or trauma, and their surgical management has historically been nonstandardized. Anecdotally, irradiated rectourethral fistulas portend a worse prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To review outcomes after surgical treatment of rectourethral fistulas in radiated and nonirradiated patients to construct a logical surgical algorithm.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients presenting to Duke University with the diagnosis of rectourethral fistula from 1996 to 2012.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients presented with and were treated for rectourethral fistulas: 21 received radiation, and a rectourethral fistula from trauma or iatrogenic injury developed in 16.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The groups were compared regarding their functional outcomes, including healing, time to healing, continence, and recurrence.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. Patients who had irradiated rectourethral fistulas had a significantly higher rate of passage of urine through the rectum and wound infections, a higher rate of crystalloid infusion and blood transfusion requirements, and a longer time to ostomy reversal than nonirradiated patients. Patients who had irradiated rectourethral fistulas underwent more complex operative repairs, including gracilis interposition flaps (38%) and pelvic exenterations (19%), whereas nonirradiated patients most commonly underwent a York-Mason repair (50%). There were no statistically significant differences in rectourethral fistula healing or in postoperative and functional outcomes. Only 55% of irradiated patients had their ostomy reversed versus 91% in the nonirradiated group.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the small sample size and the retrospective nature of the review.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of rectourethral fistulas caused by radiation has a significantly higher wound infection rate and median time to healing, and lower overall stomal reversal rate than nonradiation-induced rectourethral fistulas. Patients who had irradiated rectourethral fistulas required significantly more complex operations, likely contributing to the higher morbidity, mortality, and lower fistula closure rate. We propose an algorithm for approaching rectourethral fistulas based on etiology.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for surgical repair of rectovesical fistula following radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Rectovesical fistula is a rare complication following prostatectomy, associated with significant symptoms such as urinary drainage from anus or faecaluria. While several surgical procedures have been described to treat this condition, none of them has been accepted as the universal standard. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established endoluminal procedure for local excision of rectal tumors. But its application to the repair of rectovesical fistula has been almost unknown.

METHODS

We performed TEM as a surgical repair for refractory rectovesical fistula developing after radical prostatectomy in 10 patients. Under the magnified three-dimensional view, through the stereoscope, the fistula and the surrounding rectal mucosa were precisely resected. The defect and the muscle layer of the rectum were closed by hand-sew technique in four layers.

RESULTS

Fistula was completely closed in 7 patients, who eventually underwent enterostomy closure, while in the other 3 patients the fistula recurred. In the three recurrent cases, the fistula was associated with wide, tough scar tissue due to previous irradiation, HIFU, or repeated surgical repair attempts.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectovesical fistulas associated with wide, tough scar tissue due to multi-time attempt of surgical repair or any type of energy ablation should not be indicated for repair by TEM. However, for simple fistulas without tough, fibrotic surroundings, TEM can be indicated as a minimally invasive surgical option with very low morbidity, without any incision in healthy tissue for approach.

Treatment of urethrorectal fistulas caused by radical prostatectomy - two surgical techniques

INTRODUCTION

The repair of complex urethrorectal fistulas, which can be the result of treating prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy, is a big problem in urology and its final result is not always satisfactory. There are no universally accepted methods for repairing such fistulas. In our work we present a retrospective analysis of patients treated for urethrorectal fistulas after previous radical prostatectomy. The methods used were the initial excision and suture of the fistula, or a gracilis muscle flap interposition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the years 2000-2012, four patients were treated because of urethrorectal fistulas after radical prostatectomy. In two patients, open radical prostatectomy had been performed. Two other patients had been operated laparoscopically. Two patients had a primary fistula repair. They were operated using anterior perineal access. Two others were treated with the use of a gracilis muscle flap.

RESULTS

During the follow up, there was no recurrence of fistulas. Medium follow up for the first two patients was 120 and 156 months, and follow up of two other patients was 16 and 23 months. Until now, there were no final postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of the fistulas requires an individual approach to each case. Excision and suturing of the fistula gives a very good final result, especially when the primary reconstruction is performed. Repair of urethrorectal fistula using a gracilis muscle flap appears to be an excellent option in cases of complex recurrent fistulas. It is also associated with low morbidity in patients and a high success rate.

Rectourethral fistula: systemic review of and experiences with various surgical treatment methods

PURPOSE

A rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon complication resulting from surgery, radiation or trauma. Although various surgical procedures for the treatment of an RUF have been described, none has gained acceptance as the procedure of choice. The aim of this study was to review our experience with surgical management of RUF.

METHODS

The outcomes of 6 male patients (mean age, 51 years) with an RUF who were operated on by a single surgeon between May 2005 and July 2012 were assessed.

RESULTS

The causes of the RUF were iatrogenic in four cases (two after radiation therapy for rectal cancer, one after brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and one after surgery for a bladder stone) and traumatic in two cases. Fecal diversion was the initial treatment in five patients. In one patient, fecal diversion was performed simultaneously with definitive repair. Four patients underwent staged repair after a mean of 12 months. Rectal advancement flaps were done for simple, small fistula (n = 2), and flap interpositions (gracilis muscle flap, n = 2; omental flap, n = 1) were done for complex or recurrent fistulae. Urinary strictures and incontinence were observed in patients after gracilis muscle flap interposition, but they were resolved with simple treatments. The mean follow-up period was 28 months, and closure of the fistula was achieved in all five patients (100%) who underwent definitive repairs. The fistula persisted in one patient who refused further definitive surgery after receiving only a fecal diversion.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the severity and the recurrence status of RUF, a relatively simple rectal advancement flap repair or a more complex gracilis muscle or omental flap interposition can be used to achieve closure of the fistula.

Bilateral puborectalis interposition repair of rectourethral fistula

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistula is a rare but significant complication that often requires operative intervention.

OBJECTIVE

A new perineal approach using the medial aspect of the puborectalis muscles as a double-breasted rotational interposition flap to repair the rectourethral fistula is hereby described.

PROCEDURE

With the patient in a modified Lloyd-Davies position, a vertical midline incision from the base of the scrotum to 2 cm anterior to the anal verge is made. The dissection continues along the anterior rectal wall through the Denonvilliers fascia until the rectourethral fistula is reached. The dissection through the fused Denonvilliers fascia continues a further 1 to 2 cm above the fistula. The openings in the rectum and the urethra are then closed vertically (urethra) and horizontally (rectum) with interrupted 3/0 and 4/0 polyglactin sutures. The puborectalis muscles are then mobilized as a 1-cm strip bilaterally and released posteriorly at the level of the anorectum. The 2 strips of the puborectalis muscles are then rotated medially and superiorly along its anterior attachments, forming a double -breasted overlapping flap overlying the fistula openings. The flaps are anchored into the superior and contralateral aspect of the surgical field with the use of 2/0 polyglactin sutures.

RESULTS

From November 2011 to December 2012, 4 patients underwent this procedure. No perioperative complications, including those related to the harvesting of the puborectalis muscles, were identified. Subsequent radiological studies confirmed the success of the procedure. After a median follow-up of 8 (6-18) months, 3 patients had their colostomy reversed and remained continent, whereas the last patient had a permanent ileostomy. None of the patients reported any urinary leakage through the perineum.

CONCLUSIONS

The double-breasted puborectalis interposition flap is an alternative transperineal procedure in the management of rectourethral fistula. It avoids a laparotomy and is rectum sparing.

Outcomes after recto-anastomosis fistula repair in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess fistula recurrence rate and health-related quality of life (HRQL) after repair, as well as the impact on continence and erection in patients with recto-anastomotic fistula after radical prostatectomy (RP). In recent publications, the numbers of cases of recto-urinary fistulae after RP are relatively small. Success rates at fistula closure are good; however, data about functional outcomes and HRQL are more restricted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients treated for recto-urethral fistulae after RP between 1993 and 2008. All 17 patients were assessed for fistula recurrence in 2007 and received a standardised non-validated questionnaire to assess HRQL in 2011; furthermore, a patient's chart review was performed.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

fistula closure was abdominal in 10 patients, perineal in five and combined abdominal and perineal in two, some with tissue interposition.

RESULTS

In 2007, follow-up was available for 14 patients, one was deceased and two were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 73.3 months and the mean patient age was 63 years. In two of the 17 patients, rectal injury during the initial surgery was reported; another three had undergone adjuvant radiation therapy (18%). In 2011, another two patients were deceased; the mean (range) follow-up was 99.5 (44-184) months. There was a great improvement in HRQL as compared with before surgery in seven of the 12 evaluable patients, a slight improvement in one and no change in three. In all, eight of the 12 patients were very satisfied with the surgery and four were satisfied.

CONCLUSION

Perineal or abdominal fistula repair yields excellent success rates and high patient satisfaction. However, urinary incontinence can be found in some patients postoperatively, requiring further treatment.

Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulas are uncommon. Retrospective studies and case reports have highlighted various approaches for surgical repair. Because clinical presentations and technical expertise vary widely, no single procedure has been universally adopted.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to qualitatively analyze studies describing surgical techniques and outcomes in adult acquired rectourethral fistulas to outline universal approaches for evaluation and management.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid) and the Cochrane Library were searched by using the terms rectourethral fistulas, recto-urethral fistulas, urethrorectal fistulas, and prostatourethral-rectal fistulas.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies were retrospective, in English, and reported at least 4 cases. Any series with >50% congenital cases or <50% adults (19+ years) was excluded. Of the 569 records identified, 26 articles were included.

INTERVENTION

The intervention was surgical repair of rectourethral fistula.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were successful fistula closure, fistula recurrence or persistence, and permanent fecal and/or urinary diversion.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixteen patients were identified, including 169 (40%) who had previous pelvic irradiation and/or ablation. Most patients (90%) underwent 1 of 4 categories of repair: transanal (5.9%), transabdominal (12.5%), transsphincteric (15.7%), and transperineal (65.9%). Tissue interposition flaps, predominantly gracilis muscle, were used in 72% of repairs. The fistula was successfully closed in 87.5%. Overall permanent fecal and/or urinary diversion rates were 10.6% and 8.3%. Most high-volume centers (≥25 patients) performed transperineal repairs with tissue flaps in 100% of cases.

LIMITATIONS

This review was limited by the heterogeneity of repairs and bias toward preferred surgical approaches in single-center studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of complexity, rectourethral fistulas have an initial closure rate approaching 90% when the transperineal approach is used. Permanent fecal and/or urinary diversion should be a last resort in patients with devastated, nonfunctional fecal and urinary systems.

Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?

BACKGROUND

Acquired rectourethral fistulas are uncommon and challenging to repair. Most arise as a complication of prostate cancer treatment. Several procedures have been described to repair rectourethral fistulas with varying outcomes. We review the etiology, management, and outcomes of patients with rectourethral fistulas at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing repair of rectourethral fistulas was undertaken. Data were collected on patient demographics, fistula etiology, operative procedure, fecal and urinary diversion, and clinical outcome. Patients with urinary and/or fecal diversion underwent radiographic evaluation to confirm closure of the fistula prior to reversal of the diversion.

RESULTS

Fistula repair was performed on 22 patients from 1999 to 2009. All the patients were male of an average age of 69 years (range: 39-82 years). All patients, except one, had prostate cancer. Fistula formation was associated with radiotherapy in 54.4% of patients, brachytherapy in 36.4% of patients, and with external beam radiation therapy in 18.2% of patients. Other causes included prostatectomy (seven patients, 31.8%), cryotherapy (two patients, 9.1%), and perianal abscess (one patient, 4.5%). Procedures performed for fistula repair included transanal repair (eleven patients, 50%), transperineal repair (five patients, 22.7%), transabdominal repair (three patients, 13.6%), and York-Mason repair (three patients, 13.6%). Fourteen patients (63.6%) had urinary diversion. Fecal diversion was performed in 16 (72.7%) patients. Five (22.7%) patients had had previous attempts at fistula repair. Of the 22 patients treated, repair was successful in 20 patients (91%). The average follow-up time was 6 months (range: 3-13 months).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of treatment of rectourethral fistulas is high, regardless of the procedure type. Patients with previous repair attempts tend to have less favorable outcomes. With high success rates, less invasive procedures should be attempted first.

Gracilis muscle interposition with primary rectal without urethral repair for moderate sized rectourethral fistula caused by brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a case report

INTRODUCTION

There is a 0.16% chance of a rectourethral fistula after prostate brachytherapy monotherapy using Palladium-103 or Iodine-125 implants. We present an unusual case report of a rectourethral fistula following brachyradiotherapy monotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. It was also associated with unusual management of the fistula.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 58-year-old Caucasian man underwent brachyradiotherapy monotherapy as definitive treatment for verified intracapsular prostate adenocarcinoma receiving 56 Iodine-125 implants using a transrectal ultrasound-guided technique. The patient started to complain of severe perineal pain and mild rectal bleeding 15Â months after brachyradiotherapy. A biopsy of mucosa of his anterior rectal wall was performed. A moderate sized rectourethral fistula was confirmed 23Â months after implantation of Iodine-125 seeds. Laparoscopic sigmoidostomy and suprapubic cystostomy were then performed. Long-term cortisone applications in combination with 30 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and antibacterial therapies were initiated due to necrotic infection. A gracilis muscle interposition to create a partition between the patient's rectum and urethra in conjunction with primary rectal repair but without urethral repair were performed 6 months later. The 3cm rectal defect was repaired via a 3cm-long horizontal perineal incision. The 1.5cm urethral defect just below the prostate was not repaired. The patient underwent an optic internal urethrotomy 3Â months later for a 1.5cm-long urethral stricture. Several planned preventive urethral buginages were performed to avoid urethral stricture recurrence. At 12Â months postoperatively, there were no signs of a fistula and cancer recurrence. He now has a normal voiding and anal continence.

CONCLUSION

Severe rectal pain, bleeding, and local anterior necrotic proctitis are predictors of a rectourethral fistula. Urinary and fecal diversion is the first-step operation. Gracilis muscle interposition in conjunction with primary rectal repair but without urethral reconstruction is one of the reconstructive surgery options for moderate 2cm to 3cm rectourethral fistulas. Internal urethrotomy is a procedure for postoperative urethral strictures of 1.5cm in length.

Surgical Treatment of Iatrogenic Rectourinary Fistula-York-Mason Technique-a Case Report

Introduction. Recto-urinary fistulas resulting from trauma or surgery are a serious and debilitating complication. They represent a challenge not only because of the difficulty on choosing the best technique to solve them but also because of the risk of recurrence. Spontaneous cure is rare. Materials and Methods. We describe the case of a 61-years-old man that on the 9th postoperative day of a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) started with fecaluria and liquid faeces. Recto-urinary fistula was confirmed at the 10th postoperative day by CT scan and contrast enema. Discussion. We chose the York-Mason technique, because it is simple to perform, effective and has minimal morbidity. This is a posterior, transrectal, and transsphincteric approach, carried out on healthy tissues without previous scarring phenomena. Results. The postoperative period progressed without complications, and the patient discharged on the 4th day. The closure of the fistula was confirmed radiologically by retrograde cystography after 4 weeks allowing the removal of drainage catheter. The reconstruction of intestinal transit was carried out 2 months later. Conclusion. The York-Mason technique, a transrectal and transsphincteric approach with minimal morbidity, proved to be effective on the resolution of the recto-urinary fistula, a rare complication of the radical prostatectomy.

Outcome of a modified York Mason technique in men with iatrogenic urethrorectal fistula after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Urethrorectal fistula formation is a rare but devastating complication after radical prostatectomy. Reconstructive surgery is usually required, and one surgical option is the York Mason procedure.

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience with a modified York Mason technique for the surgical management of urethrorectal fistula.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of medical records.

SETTING

Tertiary care university medical center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive male patients with urethrorectal fistula due to radical prostatectomy who underwent York Mason repair between 1998 and 2009.

INTERVENTION

All patients initially received both a urinary and a bowel diversion as the first step of the treatment. The second step consisted of a modification of the York Mason technique in which the approach began with a parasacrococcygeal incision extending from the coccyx to the anal verge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All patients were seen 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and yearly thereafter to assess the resolution of clinical functional disorders and the Wexner fecal incontinence score.

RESULTS

The study included 10 men with a mean age of 63.7 (range, 50-80) years who had urethrorectal fistula after open retropubic prostatectomy (n = 6) or after laparoscopic prostatectomy (n = 4). Confined prostate cancer (pT2) was found in 7 patients and extracapsular extension of the tumor (pT3) in 3 patients. Urethrorectal fistula was discovered because of fecaluria in 6 patients and pneumaturia in 6. The mean time from surgery to York Mason repair was 15 (range, 4-42) months. Five patients had each previously undergone 1 unsuccessful repair procedure. The mean operative time was 81 (range, 60-130) minutes and the mean hospital stay was 6 days. No fecal incontinence or anal stenosis developed after York Mason repair. No recurrence of urethrorectal fistula occurred during a mean follow-up of 24 (range, 18-38) months.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of objective fecal continence data.

CONCLUSIONS

: York Mason repair appears to be a safe and effective approach for management of urethrorectal fistula. The rates of fistula closure and symptom resolution are encouraging, and patients show rapid postoperative recovery with minimal morbidity. Thus, York Mason repair should always be considered for treatment of urethrorectal fistula after radical prostatectomy.