Peroral and transgastric esophageal anastomosis with flexible shaft remote-control stapler (SurgASSIST)

New double-stapling technique for esophagojejunostomy and esophagogastrostomy in gastric cancer surgery, using a peroral intraluminal approach with a digital stapling system

In the abdominal-transhiatal approach for resection of adenocarcinoma of the cardia or subcardia, and in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), the use of a circular stapling device has potential problems with the placement of the purse-string suture and insertion of the anvil of the instrument. We describe a new double-stapling technique for esophagojejunostomy and esophagogastrostomy, using a peroral intraluminal approach with a digital stapling system, a flexible shaft remote-control stapler - the Surg-ASSIST and Power Circular Stapler 21 mm (PCS). The overtube of the flexible shaft of the PCS is prepared with a nylon tie and secured to a nasogastric (NG) tube. The flexible shaft is manually advanced down the esophagus with guidance by pulling the NG tube from the abdominal cavity side. The trocar of the flexible shaft is removed from the stump of the abdominal esophagus and connected to the anvil and they are approximated; the stapler device is then fired to form a double-stapled esophagojejunostomy and esophagogastrostomy. Our peroral intraluminal approach does not require a suturing technique, and it can make anastomosis after resection for carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and after LATG safe and simple.

Preliminary experience using a computer-mediated flexible circular stapler in laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy

Intracorporeal esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy is technically challenging. We employed a computer-mediated flexible circular stapler (SurgASSIST) for esophagogastrostomy in 2 cases with gastrointestinal stromal tumor located near the esophagogastric junction. Esophagogastrostomy was successfully constructed intracorporeally using the double-stapling technique. Operation times for the 2 cases were 225 and 170 minutes. No anastomotic leakage was encountered. However, anastomotic stricture requiring balloon dilatation occurred in 1 patient. The SurgASSIST system was feasible for esophageal anastomosis in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. However, the digital loading unit (DLU) is too large to introduce transorally, and attempting introduction of the DLU through the narrow lumen may create lesions or perforate the organ. Further improvements in the DLU will facilitate wider use of this system for various procedures in laparoscopic surgery.

Computer assisted surgical stapling

Computer assisted surgical stapling is the application of new technology to conventional staplers. The components of the system, their use in open thoracic surgery and a review of the literature to date are presented.

Endosurgery: what do we need?

A paradigm shift in therapeutic endoscopy occurred with the advent of mucosectomy for the treatment of mucosal neoplasms and suture plication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The objectives changed from finding simple, easy, and quick alternatives to surgery to reproducing surgical results. A radical version of flexible endoscopy has emerged to meet new goals of full-thickness resections, creation of anastomoses, and lumen reconfiguration. This will require a new generation of endosurgical tools that cut, stitch, and staple with added dimensions of multiaxis orientation and triangulation.

Transgastric gastro-jejunal anastomosis with flexible endoscope on a biosynthetic model

Introduction: In the last few years the rapid development of flexible endoscopies has opened new possibilities in minimal invasive procedures. With the help of these techniques the exposure, the risk of complications and the healing period of the patient might be reduced. One of these procedures is the transgastric intervention. Through an incision on the wall of the stomach, the endoscope could be led into the abdominal cavity, where several interventions can be performed. The aim of the study was to examine the technical feasibility and the success of the formation of gastro-jejunal anastomosis. Meanwhile the difficulties of the method could be explored in order to introduce this method in human use. Method: A lifelike biosynthetic model was made from a slaughtered domestic pig’s gastrointestinal tract (stomach and the first few jejunum loops) which was fixed onto a plastic frame. Two single-channel gastroscopes were inserted into the stomach. On the wall of the stomach an approximately 2 centimetres wide incision was made by the electrocoagulator with a needle-knife. Through it the first jejunum loop was grasped by a foreign-body forceps and then was retracted into the stomach. Subsequently the jejunum loop was held safely with the first endoscope. Parallel to it an incision was made on the jejunum by the electrocoagulator. The authors managed to securely unite the open edges of the gastric wall and the jejunum with endoclips. Result: The model was good for practising. The anastomosis is technically feasible and was successfully made on biosynthetic porcine model using the transgastric route. Although the incisions both on the gastric wall and on the jejunum loop were made easily, the fixing of the anastomosis might be questionable. Conclusion: It was revealed that more experiments and the development of new, special instruments are needed in order to conduct the anastomosis safely.

Computer-controlled stapling system for lung surgery

PURPOSE

Current disposable hand-actuated staplers may pose reliability problems, especially with respect to the measurement of tissue thickness. We have evaluated a newly developed stapler with a computer-controlled placement of staples.

DESCRIPTION

The SurgAssist system (Power Medical Interventions, New Hope, PA) is comprised of a console that houses a computer, a remote control unit, a flexible shaft, and a cartridge. The remote control unit has two uses: (1) controlling the accurate placement of the cartridge by orientating the tip of the flexible shaft, and (2) controlling the closure of the stapler and the firing. Each cartridge contains a programmed electronic device that triggers the activation of the appropriate program in the main microprocessor. The compression level on the tissue is determined by the computer.

EVALUATION

The system was used in a consecutive series of 38 patients, 26 times during open lung surgery and 12 times during video-assisted thoracic surgery. The following open procedures were performed: three pneumonectomies, 15 lobectomies, three segmentectomies, and five wedge resections. The following video-assisted thoracic surgery procedures were performed: eight wedge resections and four bullectomies for pneumothorax. There was no stapling failure and no complication related to the use of the stapler. During video-assisted thoracic surgery, some ergonomic problems were encountered that will be overcome by redesign.

CONCLUSIONS

The computer-controlled stapling system may significantly improve tissue approximation during open and video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Computer-mediated power stapling for anatomical lung resection: experience in 100 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES

: Mechanical stapling is widely used for lung resection. Complications related to the stapling are few but not infrequent. This varies from complete disruption of the staples to incomplete sealing of vascular structures. A stapling platform that has a strong clamping force with precise and consistent staple formation suitable for thickness of tissue is likely to be an advance in existing devices and may reduce the complication rate. A new, computer-mediated power stapling is currently available for lung resections, with three types of digital loading units (DLU). Clinical data on its use are limited. We report our experience with this stapling platform (SurgASSIST) in our first 100 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection.

METHODS

: Fifty-four men and forty-six women (mean age, 64 ± 7 years) underwent anatomic lung resections, using a lateral, muscle-sparing mini-thoracotomy, during 2004 to 2005, with the SurgASSIST platform. Three types of DLUs were used for lung resection: a linear cutter, a right-angled vascular cutter, and a right-angled bronchial cutter. Observational data were collected prospectively on the operative procedure, type of staples used, duration of operation, chest tube drainage, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

: There were 83 lobectomies, 5 bilobectomies, 5 segmental resections, and 7 pneumonectomies. A total of 502 DLUs (mean, 5 per patient; 102 vascular, 91 bronchial, and 309 linear cutters) were used in this series. There were no major operative complications. The mean operating time was 136 ± 41 minutes. One bronchial dehiscence and one incomplete sealing of the pulmonary vein in the staple line were observed. In one patient, the linear cutter could not be opened in the automatic setting. There were 15% misreads by the computer on the DLU or their inserts. There was one hospital death unrelated to the stapling. Twenty additional complications included prolonged chest tube drainage (n = 8), reoperations (n = 2), atrial fibrillation (n = 5), hemothorax (n = 1), chylothorax (n = 1), C-dif colitis (n = 1), myocardial ischemia (n = 1), and incarcerated ventral hernia (n = 1). The median hospital length of stay was 5 days (range, 3 to 26 days) and the median length of chest tube drainage was 3 days (1 to 22 days).

CONCLUSIONS

: Our experience shows that the computer-mediated power stapling of lung parenchyma and hilar structures during anatomic resection is safe and reproducible.