Value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Clinical investigation of the cystic duct variation based on the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature

PURPOSE

Anatomical variation of the cystic duct (CD) is rare but can result in misunderstanding of the CD anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, potentially leading to bile duct injury. Therefore, the precise preoperative identification of CD variation is important. However, preoperative imaging analyses of the biliary system are not always possible or sufficient. We therefore investigated CD variations based on the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature.

METHODS

This study enrolled 480 patients who underwent imaging before hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. We assessed the variation of the CD and hepatic vasculature and evaluated the correlations among these variations.

RESULTS

A variant CD anatomy was identified in 12 cases (2.5%) as CD draining into the right hepatic bile duct (BD) in 4 cases and into the right posterior BD in 8 cases. CD variation was significantly more common in cases with portal vein (PV) and BD variation than in those without the variation. We developed a scoring system based on the presence of PV and BD variations that showed good discriminatory power for identification of CD variants.

CONCLUSION

Cases with a variant CD anatomy were more likely to exhibit variant PV and BD anatomies than cases with a normal CD anatomy. These findings will be useful for the preoperative identification of CD variants.

Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images obtained with a three-dimensional navigator-gated (NG) technique and compare findings with conventional respiratory-triggered (RT) images in pre-laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.

METHODS

Turbo-spin-echo (TSE) RT-MRCP (average 242 s) and balanced turbo-field-echo (bTFE) NG-MRCP (average 263 s) were acquired at 1.5-T MRI for 49 pre-laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality, visibility of anatomical structures, common bile duct (CBD) stones, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Interobserver agreement was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The anatomical details of the cystic duct were clearly demonstrated in 33 (67.3 %, reader A) and 35 (71.4 %, reader B) patients on RT-MRCP, and in 45 (91.8 %) and 44 (89.7 %) patients on NG-MRCP. On NG-MRCP, visualisation of the cystic duct (3.22/3.12), its origin (3.57/3.55), and the gallbladder(3.61/3.59) was statistically better than on RT-MRCP (2.90/2.78, 3.29/3.12, 2.98/2.88, respectively). The overall image quality was statistically better on NG-MRCP than RT-MRCP. Each technique identified the presence of CBD stones in all affected patients. The SNR was significantly higher on NG-MRCP (CHD 22.40, gallbladder 17.13) than RT-MRCP (CHD 17.05, gallbladder 9.30). Interobserver agreement was fair to perfect.

CONCLUSION

Navigator-gated MRCP is more useful than respiratory-triggered MRCP for evaluating the gallbladder and cystic duct in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

KEY POINTS

• Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) provides important cystic duct information before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. • Navigator-gated (NG) MRCP images were better than conventional respiratory-triggered (RT) MRCP. • The signal-to-noise ratio was significantly higher for NG-MRCP than for conventional RT-MRCP. • Balanced turbo-field-echo NG-MRCP is useful for evaluating the gallbladder and cystic duct.

Biliary anatomy on 3D MRCP: Comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms

PURPOSE

To compare volume-rendering (VR) and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) of three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (3D-TSE-PACE-MRCP) to define biliary anatomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

VR and MIP images of 3D-TSE-PACE-MRCP for 102 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Interpretation of cystic duct variation and biliary branching patterns of each image were recorded independently by two radiologists in a blinded fashion. Interpretation confidence on a five-point scale was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The McNemar test was used to compare the accuracies of each reformation with the reference standard obtained by consensus interpretation of both the images and source images.

RESULTS

The reference standard identified all biliary bifurcations and 95 of 102 cystic duct confluences (93.1%). VR findings agreed with the reference standard findings more often than MIP with regard to cystic duct variation (94 [92.2%] vs. 76 [74.5%], P<0.01) while there was no significant difference for biliary branching patterns (99 [97.1%] vs. 92 [90.2%], P=0.092). The mean confidence score was significantly higher with VR than MIP with regard to both cystic duct variation and biliary branching patterns (3.7 vs. 2.4; P<0.01; 4.1 vs. 3.3; P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

VR reformation of 3D-TSE-PACE-MRCP defines biliary anatomies more accurately than MIP.