A powder-free surgical glove bag for retraction of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical glove use for specimen removal in laparoscopy, the cheapest available: a prospective study

Despite the proven benefits of laparoscopic surgery, it is indeed very costly. The aim of our study was to show an effective way to reduce one of the costs. Between January 2012 and December 2018, we used sterile unpowdered latex-free surgical gloves for specimen retrieval in 243 selected cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The mean retrieval time was 6.7 ± 3.6 min. All procedures were performed safely. Minor wound infection was noted in three patients but there was no case of port site hernia in our series. We conclude that specimen retrieval using sterile, unpowdered, latex-free surgical gloves is safe, effective and cheap. No special additional preparation is required.

Retained gallbladder secondary to retrieval bag rupture during laparoscopic cholecystectomy-A case report

INTRODUCTION

Retrieval bags are used in laparoscopic cholecystectomies to reduce the risk of bile and gallstone spillage during removal of the gallbladder. Retrieval bag rupture is rare, and its complications have never been previously documented.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 17-year-old female presented three months post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a tender periumbilical mass. Her operative report noted difficulty removing the retrieval bag from the infra-umbilical port site. Imaging of the lump revealed an intra-abdominal fluid collection communicating with the umbilicus. A diagnostic laparoscopy uncovered significant pus in the peritoneal cavity and a gallbladder remnant with multiple gallstones. A combination of sharp and blunt dissections was used to free the gallbladder remnant from its adherent surroundings for removal. A peritoneal washout was performed following extraction of the retained gallstones. The patient's presentation could be traced back to her laparoscopic cholecystectomy where it was confirmed that the retrieval bag ruptured during removal. This would have transected the gallbladder, causing its remnants and associated gallstones to be retained in the peritoneal cavity.

DISCUSSION

Retrieval bag rupture can result in retained gallbladder remnants in the peritoneal cavity. Abdominal abscess can manifest months after the initial operation.

CONCLUSION

Retrieval bags should be inspected following removal to ensure it is completely intact. Surgeons should consider extending the fascial incision if there is any difficulty during removal. Any damage to the retrieval bag mandates immediate pneumoperitoneum for further exploration of retained products. Governance bodies should incorporate practice guidelines related to retrieval bag rupture as these are currently not present.

Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease different types of retrieval devices have been used to extract the gallbladder from the peritoneal cavity. These devises infer additional costs and may lead to associated risks and complications. We aimed to evaluate the safety of gallbladder retrieval without the use of a retrieval device.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted across two teaching hospitals in the Republic of Ireland from July 2010-2013. Patients undergoing planed elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the two institutions were included in the study. Data were collected on patient demographics, the use of a bag, any need for extension of fascial incision, any unexpected over night stay, any 30-day post operative complications and presence of port site hernia within 1 year surgery.

RESULTS

There were 373 planned elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed during the study period. A bag was not used to retrieve the gallbladder in 41 % (n = 152) patients. A retrieval bag was used in the majority of patients (71 %) who required over night stay due to pain. Overall wound infection rate was low (2.4 %), with 57 % of those being in patients where no retrieval bag was used. An increase incision in the fascia was required in 9.7 % of patients. The majority of these were in patients in whom a retrieval bag was used (75 %). At 1 year follow up, there were no recorded cases of port site hernia for the no retrieval bag group and two (0.9 %) cases of umbilical port site hernias in the group where retrieval bag was used.

CONCLUSION

In cases of elective uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for radiologically confirmed benign disease there was no benefit in using a retrieval bag. Furthermore, not using a bag was associated with less need for increasing the size of the fascial incision thereby reducing post operative pain and risk of port site hernia.

Use of retrieval bags in incidental gallbladder cancer cases

INTRODUCTION

Accidental intraoperative gallbladder perforation is a problem in laparoscopic surgery, especially in cases with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). The question is whether intraoperative gallbladder perforation has a prognostic disadvantage or a retrieval bag provides protection against tumor dissemination.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was sent to all German surgical clinics based on the central register of "incidental gallbladder carcinoma" of the German Society of Surgery founded in 1997.

RESULTS

In 592 IGBC-registered cases, there were 330 laparoscopies, 154 open surgeries, and intraoperative conversion was performed in 106 cases. Of laparoscopic surgeries (n = 330), the recurrence rate was 30%. The recurrence rate for cases with (174/330) and without (156/330) the use of retrieval bag was 32.2% and 27%, respectively. In laparoscopies with intraoperative gallbladder perforation (73/330 cases), the recurrence rate was 38.4%. Of these cases the recurrence rate with (51/73) and without (22/73) the use of retrieval bags was 39.2% and 36.4%, respectively. In 257 cases without intraoperative perforation, tumor recurrence rate was 27.2%, and it was 29.3% or 25.4% with (123/257) and without (134/257) the use of retrieval bags.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the registry data, the intraoperative gallbladder perforation results in significant (P = 0.047) prognostic disadvantage and in these cases retrieval bags were used more often (P = 0.001). However, in IGBC cases if intraoperative gallbladder perforation has already happened, the use of retrieval bags had no protective effects.

An unusual "hernia": losing a stone is not always a good thing!

A 42-year-old woman presented to the surgical outpatient department with what appeared to be a strangulated recurrent paraumbilical hernia. She was taken to theatre, where exploration revealed an unexpected diagnosis: an abdominal wall abscess that had formed around what appeared to be a gallstone dropped at the umbilical port site of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed 10 years previously. The abscess was incised and drained and a connection with the abdominal cavity excluded. The patient made a full recovery. Complications relating to spilled gallstones are rare, but can present in a variety of ways and sometimes many years after the original surgery. They should always be considered in a patient with a history of cholecystectomy presenting with an abdominal wall mass. There is no clear evidence of the best imaging modalities to be used for investigation. Methods for reducing the risk of such complications and the principles of different treatments are discussed.