Conversion motor paralysis disorder

M.U.P.S (Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms): Is the Accurate Diagnosis Necessary for the Rehab-Team?

Background: Physiatrists often treat patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUPS), which suggest various psychiatric, psychosomatic or physical diagnoses. Some patients are finally diagnosed with somatoform, dissociative or factitious disorders, while some experience psychological factors affecting physical conditions. It happens that patients are admitted to rehabilitative medical facilities without a clear diagnosis. Apparently, there are overlapping symptoms between chronic fatigue syndrome, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), "Gulf War syndrome", fibromyalgia, CRPS, and others.Aims: To assess recognition of medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) by physicians, mostly specialists in physical and rehabilitative medicine are engaged.Methods: All information was collected from scientific database site, and derived from the authors' nearly 50 years of clinical experience.Results: Cognitive-affective disturbance, chronic muscle and joint pain, panic disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, malingering, and others can be described in the medical literature as unexplained physical symptoms.Conclusions: Treatment should comprise a multidisciplinary-integrative approach, by practitioners from medicine, psychology, allied health professionals and social work. MUPS is not a "non-disease" entity, but rather, an unexplained clinical phenomenon. Patients are entitled to benefit from the rehabilitative medicine model of treatment even if their clinical diagnosis is not accurate or clear.

Evaluation of neurologic deficit without apparent cause: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

A patient presenting with an acute neurologic deficit with no apparent etiology presents a diagnostic dilemma. A broad differential diagnosis must be entertained, considering both organic and psychiatric causes.

METHODS

A case report and thorough literature review of acute paraplegia after a low-energy trauma without a discernible organic etiology.

RESULTS

Diagnostic imaging excluded any bony malalignment or fracture and any abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging. When no organic etiology was identified, a multidisciplinary approach using neurology, psychiatry, and physical medicine and rehabilitation services was applied. Neurophysiologic testing confirmed the absence of an organic disorder, and at this juncture, diagnostic efforts focused on identifying any psychiatric disorder to facilitate appropriate treatment for this individual. The final diagnosis was malingering.

CONCLUSIONS

The full psychiatric differential diagnosis should be considered in the evaluation of any patient with an atypical presentation of paralysis. A thorough clinical examination in combination with the appropriate diagnostic studies can confidently exclude an organic disorder. When considering a psychiatric disorder, the differential diagnosis should include conversion disorder and malingering, although each must remain a diagnosis of exclusion. Maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and involving multiple disciplines (neurology, psychiatry, social work, medical specialists) early in the evaluation of atypical paralysis may facilitate earlier diagnosis and initiation of treatment for the underlying etiology.