Efficacy of lower dose capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer and factors influencing therapeutic response and outcome

Comparative study of low dose of capecitabine versus standard dose in metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety

Background

A lower dose of capecitabine revealed better toxicity profiles and comparable efficacy in treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of lower dose of capecitabine in comparison with the standard dose.

Patients and methods

Patients were enrolled in two groups. Group 1 included 21 patients who received the standard dose of capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily [BID] for 14 days), while the patients in group 2 (19 patients) received lower dose of capecitabine (850 mg/m2 BID for 14 days) every 3 weeks.

Results

In group 1, dose reduction was reported in 12 (57.1%) patients versus 1 patient in group 2 (5.3%; P = 0.0005). Patients in group 1 reported higher toxicity rates without any significant difference between the groups. The median duration of response was 17 weeks in group 1, while it was 19 weeks in group 2. Disease progression was recorded in 10 (47.6%) patients in group 1 versus 8 (42.1%) patients in group 2 (P = 0.81). The mean time to progression was 8.16 ± 0.63 months and the median was 10.1 months in group 1, while the mean was 8.98 ± 0.75 months and the median was 10 months in group 2 (P = 0.66). The overall survival had a mean of 11.94 ± 0.754 and 11.24 ± 0.665 months, while the median was 13.1 and 13 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.9).

Conclusion

A lower dose of capecitabine provides MBC patients with an active therapy that can be continued for prolonged periods to achieve long-term disease control without compromising its antitumor activity.

Henna Application in the Prevention of Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Patients

AIM

This study investigates the prophylactic effect of henna on the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in patients receiving capecitabine for breast and colorectal cancer.

METHOD

This experimental study was carried out between May 2014 and May 2015. In this self-control experimental study, 52 patients with breast and colorectal cancer were included on the first day of capecitabine treatment and had a minimum follow-up of 3 cycles. One hand/foot of each patient constituted the study hand/foot, whereas the others constituted the control. Henna was administered to the study hand/foot on the first day of treatment and application renewed weekly. Development of grade 1-3 toxicity was set as the termination criterion for study.

RESULTS

Painful skin changes such as rawness, intumescence and bulla formation, blocking the daily activities or self-care were observed in 26.9% of the patients in the 3rd or 4th cycles of treatment. Development time and severity of skin changes over time did not differ significantly between the study and the control hand/foot.

CONCLUSION

Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to conclude on the prophylactic effect of henna in the management of the HFS.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Trastuzumab Plus Capecitabine With or Without Pertuzumab in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Experienced Disease Progression During or After Trastuzumab-Based Therapy

Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus capecitabine with or without pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer who experienced disease progression during or after trastuzumab-based therapy and received a prior taxane. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to arm A: trastuzumab 8 mg/kg → 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks plus capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² twice a day (2 weeks on, 1 week off, every 3 weeks); or arm B: pertuzumab 840 mg → 420 mg once every 3 weeks plus trastuzumab at the same dose and schedule as arm A plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² on the same schedule as arm A. The primary end point was independent review facility-assessed progression-free survival (IRF PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. Hierarchical testing procedures were used to control type I error for statistical testing of IRF PFS, OS, and objective response rate. Results Randomly assigned (intent-to-treat) populations were 224 and 228 patients in arms A and B, respectively. Median IRF PFS at 28.6 and 25.3 months' median follow-up was 9.0 v 11.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P = .0731) and interim OS was 28.1 v 36.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.90). The most common adverse events (all grades; incidence of ≥ 10% in either arm and ≥ 5% difference between arms) were hand-foot syndrome, nausea, and neutropenia in arm A, and diarrhea, rash, and nasopharyngitis in arm B. Conclusion The addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab and capecitabine did not significantly improve IRF PFS. An 8-month increase in median OS to 36.1 months with pertuzumab was observed. Statistical significance for OS cannot be claimed because of the hierarchical testing of OS after the primary PFS end point; however, the magnitude of OS difference is in keeping with prior experience of pertuzumab in metastatic breast cancer. No new safety signals were identified.

Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane

Purpose

This phase III randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00337103) compared eribulin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods

Women with MBC who had received prior anthracycline- and taxane-based therapy were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or capecitabine as their first-, second-, or third-line chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Stratification factors were human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status and geographic region. Coprimary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Median OS times for eribulin (n = 554) and capecitabine (n = 548) were 15.9 and 14.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00; P = .056). Median PFS times for eribulin and capecitabine were 4.1 and 4.2 months, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.25; P = .30). Objective response rates were 11.0% for eribulin and 11.5% for capecitabine. Global health status and overall quality-of-life scores over time were similar in the treatment arms. Both treatments had manageable safety profiles consistent with their known adverse effects; most adverse events were grade 1 or 2.

Conclusion

In this phase III study, eribulin was not shown to be superior to capecitabine with regard to OS or PFS.

A retrospective study evaluating a fixed low dose capecitabine monotherapy in women with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer

To determine if a low fixed dosing strategy of capecitabine would produce comparable clinical activity with less adverse toxicities compared to published data with higher doses in the setting of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with a low fixed dose of capecitabine (CAPE-L) at 1,000 mg twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. Outcomes included clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall response rates (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). A historical comparison group of mBC patients treated on 12 prior trials at the package-insert dose of capecitabine (n = 1,949) was utilized. Eighty-six patients were analyzed in our cohort. Positive hormone receptor status (79.1 vs. 50.6 %), and capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy (44.2 vs. 16.5 %) were more frequent in our cohort relative to the historical comparison. The median starting dose in our cohort was 633.5 mg/m(2). The CBR was similar between the CAPE-L and the standard dose cohorts (55.8 vs. 49.5 %), as was ORR (24.3 vs. 24 %), and median TTP (7 mo, 95 % CI 5.5-8.5 vs. 5.1 mo, 95 % CI 4.5-5.7). Median OS was longer in our cohort (24 mo, 95 % CI 16.8-31.2) than the historic standard dose cohort (12.1 mo, 95 % CI 9.6-14.4), a difference that was likely explained by the higher proportion of patients in the CAPE-L cohort who received capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy and who had hormone receptor positive disease. As expected, adverse events were less frequent with CAPE-L. We found that CAPE-L, which translates into a dose of 600-650 mg/m(2), appeared to have good clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity.

Individualized chemotherapy based on organ selectivity: a retrospective study of vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study proposed a conception of individualized chemotherapy based on organ selectivity of drug distribution by retrospectively comparing the effect of vinorelbine and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2009, 133 patients with lung metastasis and 87 patients with liver metastasis were analyzed and followed up until December 2012. The survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median time to progression of the vinorelbine, capecitabine and anthracycline/taxane groups of patients with lung metastasis was 5.7, 2.9 and 2.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival of the vinorelbine group (27.4 months) was longer than the capecitabine (12.2 months, P = 0.027) and anthracycline/taxane groups (9.1 months, P < 0.001) in patients with lung metastasis. The median time to progression of the vinorelbine, capecitabine and anthracycline/taxane groups of patients with liver metastasis was 2.3, 7.3 and 2.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival of the capecitabine group (15.2 months) was longer than the vinorelbine (9.0 months, P = 0.029) and anthracycline/taxane groups (6.4 months, P = 0.004) in patients with liver metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that vinorelbine and capecitabine have different advantageous effects in breast cancer patients with lung/liver metastasis. Thus, we propose individualized chemotherapy based on organ specificity and pharmacokinetics.

Managing ixabepilone adverse events with dose reduction

Ixabepilone is a synthetic analogue of epothilone B approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in combination with capecitabine for cancer resistant to an anthracycline and a taxane, and as monotherapy for cancer resistant or refractory to anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine. The principal dose-limiting adverse events (AEs) of ixabepilone's standard dose (40 mg/m(2) administered by 3-hour infusion once every 3 weeks) are peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, and fatigue. An effective strategy to manage ixabepilone-related AEs is dose reduction by 20% (from 40 to 32 to 25 mg/m(2)); this does not appear to affect treatment efficacy and enables continuation of treatment after recovery (grade 1 or resolved). When appropriate, treatment can be restarted with a 20% dose reduction (to 32 mg/m(2)). For heavily pretreated patients, especially those with a low performance status, 32 mg/m(2) is an appropriate initial dose; the dose of capecitabine should also be lowered by 20%. Weekly ixabepilone (15-20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) may have an improved tolerability profile, but prospective studies with a large number of patients are required to determine whether it has therapeutic benefit comparable with the current approved regimen. More information is required on dosage and scheduling of ixabepilone in combination with other agents, including novel targeted therapies.

Optimising the dose of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer: confused, clarified or confirmed?

While 'targeted' drugs often take centre stage when considering developments in breast cancer, improved understanding, administration and use of chemotherapeutic agents also contribute to better outcomes for women with metastatic breast cancer. Moreover, these developments offer the potential for further improvements when chemotherapy and targeted agents are combined. In this article, we focus on capecitabine dosing in advanced breast cancer, review the available data and discuss the implications of this evidence on best treatment practice both for chemotherapy alone and for chemotherapy when combined with biological agents. It appears that a capecitabine starting dose of 1000 mg/m² twice daily enables treatment to be administered for longer periods, providing continuous exposure to cytotoxic therapy and thus prolonging the duration of disease control. Although no randomised data are available comparing different doses of capecitabine, the cumulative evidence supports this approach.

Antiangiogenic effect of capecitabine combined with ginsenoside Rg3 on breast cancer in mice

Capecitabine is a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate, which has a broader spectrum of antitumor activity than other fluoropyrimidines, such as 5-FU, DFUR, or UFT; it has proved effective over a wide dose range. Recent research has suggested that frequent administration of lower doses of certain chemotherapeutic drugs might enhance their antiangiogenic effect. The present study investigated the antiangiogenic effect of capecitabine on breast cancer. In order to augment its efficacy, we combined capecitabine chemotherapy with ginsenoside Rg3. Our results indicate that a metronomic regimen of capecitabine inhibited angiogenesis in breast cancer, and its antiangiogenic effects may be further enhanced by the concurrent administration of ginsenoside Rg3. As an antiangiogenic method, this regimen presented better antitumor effects, less toxicity, and reduced susceptibility to drug resistance.