Fusion of the Septic Ankle: Experience with 15 Cases Using Hybrid External Fixation

Is Ankle Arthrodesis With an Ilizarov External Fixator an Effective Treatment for Septic Ankle Arthritis? A Study With a Minimum of 6 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Septic ankle arthritis is a devastating clinical problem with a high potential for permanent disability and amputation. Successful treatment of septic ankle arthritis remains a challenge for the surgeon and patient. Ankle arthrodesis combined with radical debridement may be an effective option to eradicate infection and salvage the limb. Although numerous fusion methods have been proposed, there is controversy about the most effective technique.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

At a minimum follow-up of 6 years after ankle arthrodesis performed using an Ilizarov external fixator, we asked, (1) In what proportion of patients was bony fusion achieved? (2) What complications were observed, and what reoperations were performed in these patients? (3) How much did patient-reported outcomes improve from before surgery to the most recent follow-up in this group?

METHODS

Between April 2010 to March 2015, we treated 59 patients for septic ankle arthritis. Of those, we considered patients who were at least 18 years of age with irreversible destruction of the joint as potentially eligible. During that time period, all patients met the prespecified criteria and were treated with ankle arthrodesis using an Ilizarov external fixator. Two percent (one of 59) of patients were excluded because they died in the second year after surgery for reasons unrelated to the procedure, and another 7% (four of 59) of patients were excluded because they were lost before the minimum study follow-up interval of 6 years. Finally, 92% (54 of 59) of patients were analyzed at a mean follow-up time of 9 ± 1 years. A total of 61% (33 of 54) were men, and they had a mean age of 48 ± 12 years. Forty-six percent (25 of 54) of patients were smokers, and 13% (seven of 54) of patients had Type 2 diabetes mellitus. All patients received radical debridement and primary arthrodesis with an Ilizarov external fixator, followed by antibiotic therapy. Postoperatively, patients were instructed to perform lower extremity functional exercises and external fixator care; weightbearing ambulation as tolerated was encouraged as early as possible. Fusion was assessed with a radiographic review that was performed by an individual who was not involved in the surgical care of these patients. We defined bony fusion as continuous trabeculae and complete cortical bridging in the fusion interface achieved before 9 months; delayed union was defined as fusion achieved by 9 to 12 months; and nonunion was defined as patients in whom fusion was not achieved by 12 months. Complications and reoperations were tallied through a record review that was performed by an individual who was not involved in the surgical care of these patients. We defined complications as any deviation from the expected postoperative course. We used the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the VAS active pain score, and the SF-12 questionnaire (including the physical component summary [PCS] score and mental component summary [MCS] score) to assess patient-reported outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the AOFAS score was 30 points of 100, the MCID for the VAS active pain score was 2 points of 10, and the MCID of PCS and MCS scores was 7 points and 9 points, respectively.

RESULTS

Primary bony fusion was achieved in 94% (51 of 54) of patients. Delayed union was found in 2% (one of 54) of patients. Nonunion was found in 6% (three of 54); one of these patients underwent autologous bone grafting during revision, and bony fusion was ultimately achieved. Final bony fusion was achieved in 96% (52 of 54) of patients. Recurrent infection was found in 2% (one of 54). The median (range) AOFAS score improved from 28 points (8 to 59) before surgery to 80 points (52 to 86) at the most recent follow-up (median difference 52; p < 0.001). The median (range) VAS active pain score decreased from 8 points (6 to 9) before surgery to 2 points (0 to 5) at the most recent follow-up (median difference -6; p < 0.001). For the Short Form 12-item score, the median (range) PCS score improved from 0 points (0 to 30) before surgery to 70 points (40 to 95) at the most recent follow-up (median difference 70; p < 0.001), and the median (range) MCS score improved from 46 points (21 to 75) before surgery to 75 points (50 to 92) at the most recent follow-up (median difference 29; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixation might eradicate an infection and restore foot function in patients with septic ankle arthritis. However, patients should be fully informed of the complications related to the external fixator, such as pin-tract infections, recurrent infection, and nonunion. Standardized and professional pin care is important. Additionally, because Ilizarov external fixators can be inconvenient to the patients' daily lives, future studies should explore how psychologic support affects patients who undergo ankle arthrodesis with these devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Staged Joint Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Severe Septic Ankle Arthritis Sequelae: A Case Report

Septic ankle arthritis is a devastating clinical entity with high risks of morbidity and mortality. Prompt treatment is necessary because delayed or inadequate treatment can lead to irreversible damage that may occur on the articular surface, resulting in cartilage erosion, infective synovitis, osteomyelitis, joint deformity, and pain and joint dysfunction. An aggressive surgical approach is required when a joint infection causes severe limb-threatening arthritis. A 58-year-old woman visited our clinic with increasing pain in the right ankle, which had been present for the previous 2 months. She complained of discomfort in daily life due to deformity of the ankle; limping; and severe pain in the ankle even after walking a little. The patient reported a history of right-ankle injury while exiting a bus in her early 20s. Plain radiographs of the right ankle joint revealed that the medial malleolus was nearly absent in the right ankle joint on the anteroposterior view, and severe varus deformity was observed with osteoarthritic changes because of joint space destruction. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed diffuse synovial thickening of the destroyed tibiotalar joint with joint effusion. Hybrid 99mTc white blood cell single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography showed increased uptake along the soft tissue around the ankle joint; uptake was generally low in the talocrural and subtalar joints. A two-stage operation was performed to remove the infected lesions and correct the deformity, thus enabling limb salvage. The patient was nearly asymptomatic at the 6-month follow-up, with no discomfort in her daily life and nearly normal ability to carry out full functional activities. She had no complications or recurrent symptoms at the 1-year follow-up. We have described a rare case of a staged limb salvage procedure in a patient with chronic septic arthritis sequelae. For patients with severe joint deformity because of septic ankle sequelae, staged arthrodesis is a reliable method to remove infected lesions, solve soft tissue problems, correct deformities, and maintain leg length.

Treatment of hindfoot and ankle infections with Ilizarov external fixator or spacer, followed by secondary arthrodesis

An established treatment strategy in surgical site infection after hindfoot and ankle surgery is a two-stage procedure with debridement and placement of a cement spacer, followed by antibiotic treatment and secondary arthrodesis. However, there is little evidence to favor this treatment over a one-stage procedure with debridement, followed by primary arthrodesis with an Ilizarov external fixator and antibiotic treatment. We compared the infection control and clinical and radiological outcome of a two-stage and a one-stage procedure. In this study, 7 patients with a two-stage revision and 11 patients with a one-stage revision between 2005 and 2015 were included. The primary outcome was infection control (absence of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society PJI criteria) 2 years after the ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis. Secondary outcome measures were the AOFAS hindfoot score and radiological consolidation rate. Infection control was 85% (6 out of 7 patients) in the two-stage group and 81% (9 out of 11 patients) in the one-stage group (p = 1.0). One patient (14%) of the two-stage and two patients (18%) in the one-stage group needed below-knee amputation. In the two-stage group, the mean postoperative AOFAS score was 74.8 (SD: ±11.3) versus 71.7 (SD: ±17.8) in the one-stage group. Radiological consolidation could be achieved in 71% in the spacer group (n = 5) and in 72% in the Ilizarov external fixator group (n = 9). Infection control, AOFAS score, and radiologic consolidation of hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis were comparable in both groups of patients with complicated postsurgical hindfoot or ankle infections.

Simultaneous septic arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints with the Ilizarov external fixator-an analysis of 13 patients

Purpose

Treatment of joint destruction of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints caused by acute or chronic infections in compromised hosts is a challenging problem. In these cases, simultaneous septic arthrodesis with the use of the Ilizarov external fixator represents a possible alternative to amputation. This case series presents the results and complications of patients with acute or chronic infection of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2015, 13 patients with acute or chronic infections were treated by simultaneous single-stage debridement/arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. In seven patients, there was a florid infection with fistula formation and soft tissue defects, and in six patients, there was chronic osteomyelitis with closed soft tissue. In addition to the demographic data, the time spent in the fixator, the major and minor complications and the endpoint of consolidation were reviewed.

Results

The mean time spent in the fixator was 18 (min 15, max 26) weeks. The mean follow-up time for nine patients was 100 (min 3, max 341) weeks. Complete osseous consolidation of both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints was achieved in 10 patients (77%). In three (23%) patients, there was complete consolidation of one of the joints and partial consolidation of the other joint.

Conclusion

The Ilizarov external fixator allows for simultaneous arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints in septic joint destruction. However, the healing rates are below the rates reported in the literature for isolated tibiotalar or tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis in comparable clinical situations.

Salvage arthrodesis for infected ankle fractures with segmental bone-loss using Ilizarov concepts: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Complex ankle fractures accompanied with infection and segmental bone loss are a worrying issue. This prospective study was conducted to explore the effectiveness of using Ilizarov concepts in achieving salvage arthrodesis and reconstructing post-debridement defects in such complicated scenarios.

METHODS

A total of 44 consecutive patients (mean age 35.61 ± 8.57 years, 30 males, 44 feet) of post-traumatic infected ankle fractures, who met our selection criteria, were enrolled and subjected to radical debridement and salvage arthrodesis using the bifocal bone transport concepts of Ilizarov. All patients were treated between 2012 and 2017 either by acute shortening compression of the arthrodesis site with re-lengthening (ASRL) through the created proximal metaphyseal osteotomy (group I, n = 20) or by gradual bone transport (BT) through the proximal osteotomy with gradual closure of the distal ankle defect (group II, n = 24). Plain-radiographs were used for radiological assessment. Clinically, the outcomes were objectively graded according to the Hawkins criteria, while subjectively the patients reported their satisfaction on a 1-5 points acceptance scale.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 37.16 ± 5.31 (30-48 months). Successful fusion was achieved in 43/44 patients, with a significantly (P < 0.05) lesser needs for bone-grafting in favour of group II. The results were good in 32 cases, fair in 11, and poor in a single case with no significant difference between the two groups. The acceptance scores were significantly (P < 0.05) superior in group II (3.08 ± 1.1 points) than that group I (2.25 ± 1.4 points).

CONCLUSIONS

Bifocal bone transport is effective in salvaging troublesome infected ankle fractures with bone loss. BT is more comprehensive and acceptable than ASRL with lesser needs for bone grafting.

External versus internal fixation for arthrodesis of chronic ankle joint infections - A comparative retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the ankle is a salvage procedure in case of chronic ankle joint infection. External fixation still is the gold standard. We compared the outcome of external fixator versus intramedullary nailing for arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint.

METHODS

All patients with ankle joint infection who received arthrodesis with either external fixator or intramedullary nail between 08/2009 and 09/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the successful control of infection, osseous fusion, and mobilization with full weightbearing.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were included. Nineteen patients (27%) suffered reinfection. Patients with intramedullary nailing showed significantly fewer reinfections (p=0.019), achieved full weightbearing significantly more often (p=0.042) and faster and developed significantly fewer complications (p<0.001). Forty-three patients showed bone fusion without significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing appears to be a successful alternative to the established procedure of external fixation in cases of chronic ankle joint infection.

What Is the Optimal Antibiotic (Type, Dose and Route of Administration) Treatment for Infections After Foot/Ankle Fracture or Fusion Procedures?

RECOMMENDATION

The optimal antibiotic treatment after foot/ankle fractures or fusion should be determined based on the result of culture. In the absence of culture results, administered antibiotics should include coverage against common pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Strong.

DELEGATE VOTE

Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus).

Comparison of Monolateral External Fixation and Internal Fixation for Skeletal Stabilisation in the Management of Small Tibial Bone Defects following Successful Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis

Background

To compare the salvage rate and complication between internal fixation and external fixation in patients with small bone defects caused by chronic infectious osteomyelitis debridement.

Methods

125 patients with chronic infectious osteomyelitis of tibia fracture who underwent multiple irrigation, debridement procedure, and local/systemic antibiotics were enrolled. Bone defects, which were less than 4 cm, were treated with bone grafting using either internal fixation or monolateral external fixation. 12-month follow-up was conducted with an interval of 3 months to evaluate union of bone defect.

Results

Patients who underwent monolateral external fixation had higher body mass index and fasting blood glucose, longer time since injury, and larger bone defect compared with internal fixation. No significant difference was observed in incidence of complications (23.5% versus 19.3%), surgery time (156 ± 23 minutes versus 162 ± 21 minutes), and time to union (11.1 ± 3.0 months versus 10.9 ± 3.1 months) between external fixation and internal fixation. Internal fixation had no significant influence on the occurrence of postoperation complications after multivariate adjustment when compared with external fixation. Furthermore, patients who underwent internal fixation experienced higher level of daily living scales and lower level of anxiety.

Conclusions

It was relatively safe to use internal fixation for stabilization in osteomyelitis patients whose bone defects were less than 4 cm and infection was well controlled.

Arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle: risk factors and complications

INTRODUCTION

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis is a good therapeutic option in cases of infection after trauma or orthopedic surgical procedures. Many different procedures have been described, but external fixation seems to be standard. Aim of this study is to identify risk factors for complications in septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who received septic ankle joint arthrodesis between January 2008 and December 2012 were included in this study. Patients were evaluated clinically and with radiographs or CT scans.

RESULTS

Follow-up of 74 of 79 patients with an external AO frame fixator could be evaluated; follow-up was 411 days (105-991). The mean age at surgery was 57.7 years (19-87). At this time, complications occurred in 41 patients (52 %) with wound healing problems (17 patients, 22 %) and non-union (12 patients, 15 %), and some needed surgical revision. In our collective, men had a significant higher non-union rate (p = 0.031), age or BMI showed no difference. Patients with diabetes and alcohol consumption showed a higher risk for complications (p = 0.049 and p = 0.031, respectively). 62 % of primary arthrodesis showed union, whereas in the case of revision, arthrodesis only 39 % showed union.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator is a probable tool to achieve union. This study showed that there is a high complication rate and some risk factors for complications could be identified. A blinded and prospective study is needed to compare intramedullary nailing and external fixation to evaluate the possible advantage of intramedullary devices in septic ankle arthrodesis.

[Hindfoot arthrodesis for post-infectious ankle destruction using an intramedullary retrograde hindfoot nail]

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage after operations with deep infections of the ankle is often successful using arthrodesis of the hindfoot. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail following post-infectious ankle destruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2010 a total of 44 patients were treated with tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis and 14 patients with tibiocalcaneal (TC) arthrodesis using a retrograde hindfoot nail after quieting of infection. Evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the short-form 12-item (SF-12) scores.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients 49 (35 male and 14 female) could be followed-up. The average time of follow-up was 18 months and the mean age was 58 years. In 85.7 % bony union could be achieved and 10.2 % suffered from reinfections. The mean results achieved in the different scores were AOFAS 56 and SF-12 39.1 (physical health summary scale) and 46.1 (mental health summary scale). Statistical analysis showed a significantly higher rate of bony fusion for TTC arthrodesis. Bony non-union showed a significant correlation to patients with reinfection and to diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hindfoot arthrodesis for treatment of septic arthritis after infections is possible by using an intramedullary nail. The results show a high rate of fusion with an acceptable reinfection rate and good patient acceptance.

Outcome of arthrodesis of the hindfoot as a salvage procedure for complex ankle pathology using the Ilizarov technique

Achieving arthrodesis of the ankle can be difficult in the presence of infection, deformity, poor soft tissues and bone loss. We present a series of 48 patients with complex ankle pathology, treated with the Ilizarov technique. Infection was present in 30 patients and 30 had significant deformity before surgery. Outcome was assessed clinically and with patient-reported outcome measures (Modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (MAOFAS) scale and the Short-Form (SF-36)).

Arthrodesis was achieved in 40 patients with the Ilizarov technique alone and in six further patients with additional surgery. Infection was eradicated in all patients at a mean follow-up of 46.6 months (13 to 162). Successful arthrodesis was less likely in those with comorbidities and in tibiocalcaneal fusion compared with tibiotalar fusion.

These patients had poor general health scores compared with the normal population before surgery. The mean MAOFAS score improved significantly from 24.3 (0 to 90) pre-operatively to 56.2 (30 to 90) post-operatively, but there was only a modest improvement in general health; the mean SF-36 improved from 44.8 (19 to 66) to 50.1 (21 to 76). There was a major benefit in terms of pain relief.

Arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is an effective treatment for complex ankle pathology, with good clinical outcomes and eradication of infection. However, even after successful arthrodesis general health scores remain limited.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:371–7.

Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthrodesis may be achieved using the Ilizarov method. Comorbidities, such as diabetes, Charcot neuroarthropathy, osteomyelitis, leg length discrepancy, and smoking, can make an ankle fusion complex and may be associated with lower rates of healing.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked if (1) smoking and other comorbidities led to lower fusion rates, (2) time wearing the frame affected outcome, and (3) simultaneous tibial lengthening improved fusion rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 101 patients who underwent complex ankle fusion using the Ilizarov technique. The median time wearing the frame was 25 weeks (range, 10-65 weeks). Twenty-four patients had simultaneous tibial lengthening. The minimum followup for 91 of the 101 patients was 27 months (median, 65 months; range, 27-134 months).

RESULTS

Fusion was achieved in 76 of 91 patients. Smoking was associated with a 54% rate of nonunion. Fifteen of 19 patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy achieved union but had a high rate of subsequent subtalar joint failure. Time wearing the frame did not affect union rates. Tibial lengthening did not improve ankle fusion rates.

CONCLUSION

Smokers should be warned of the high risk of nonunion and we recommend they quit smoking. We also recommend surgeons recognize the higher nonunion rate in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. We believe tibial lengthening should not be performed to enhance healing at the fusion site.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthrodesis with internal fixation of the infected ankle

Arthrodesis may be necessary to avoid amputation when treating an infected tibiotalar joint. In such cases, external or hybrid fixation is usually used. In this retrospective study, we report our experience in treating tibiotalar joint infection by arthrodesis with internal fixation. From March 1992 to October 2005 (13 years, 7 months), 20 patients underwent septic ankle arthrodesis with internal fixation. The mean duration of infection before fusion was 2.5 ± 6.7 years. Arthrodesis was performed with the Méary technique in 9 (45%) cases and with the Crawford-Adams technique in 11 (55%) cases. Internal fixation consisted of screw fixation, staple fixation, or a combination of both. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 97.5 ± 37.5 days, and the mean follow-up was 64 ± 36 months, with no patient lost to follow-up. Patients were considered cured if no clinical, biological, or radiologic signs of infection were present at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. The incidence of cure was 85.0% (91.0% with Crawford-Adams and 77.8% with Méary techniques). Radiographic fusion was identified in 89.5% of the cases (91.0% with Crawford-Adams and 87.5% with Méary techniques) at a mean of 4.8 ± 2.4 (range 3 to 11) months postoperative. Tibiotalar arthrodesis in the presence of sepsis can be performed with internal osteosynthesis only under certain conditions. In our experience, this treatment produced satisfactory fusion in 89.5% of patients and eradicated infection in 85.0% of cases.

Treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement

While ankle arthrodesis has remained the gold standard treatment for symptomatic primary, secondary, and posttraumatic ankle arthritis, more recently, total ankle replacement (TAR) has seen considerable improvement in terms of biomechanics, function, and complication rates. However, while in the long-term degeneration of the adjacent joints is almost always found on radiographs after ankle arthrodesis, the longevity of TAR is still insufficient and does not match that of total knee and hip joints. The current review article focuses on the treatment of ankle arthritis by means of arthrodesis and TAR.

Ankle and foot osteomyelitis: treatment protocol and clinical results

INTRODUCTION

A management protocol for ankle and foot osteomyelitis and the outcome in 84 patients treated in a unit with special interest in musculoskeletal infection, is presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients' mean age was 50.7+/-16.5 years and mean follow-up 31.5+/-18.2 months. Systemic antibiotics were administered initially empirically, and later according to cultures. Surgical treatment included surgical debridement and bead-pouch technique, minor amputation (ray or toe), below knee amputation, and joint fusion. "Second-look" procedures were performed after 48-7h. Vascularised grafts or Ilizarov's technique were used for bone defect reconstruction. Soft tissues were managed according the 'reconstructive ladder' concept.

RESULTS

Host-type (Cierny's classification) was A in 25, B in 53 and C in 6 patients. Seventy-six infections were chronic. Causes were: open trauma without fracture (45/84), open fractures (9/84), ORIF of closed fractures (25/84) and elective surgery (5/84). Patients underwent 3.0+/-1.5 (range 1-10) operative procedures and spent 14.8+/-12.2 (range 3-60) days in hospital. Two (host-C) patients died. Complications requiring reoperations occurred in 20/84 (2/25 host-A, 16/53 host-B, 2/6 host-C; significant difference between host-A versus host-B and -C patients, p<0.001). Infection recurrence occurred in 12 (none host-A; significant difference between host-A versus host-B and -C patients, p<0.001). Multiple organisms were isolated in 39/84. Ankle arthrodesis using external fixation was performed in 9 (fusion rate 8/9). The free vascularised fibula graft was used in 2 and distraction osteogenesis in 8 patients with a mean bone defect of 5.4 cm (range 3-13). Below knee amputations were performed in 5/84 (3/53 host-B, 2/6 host-C) and foot ray amputations in 8/84 (6/53 host-B, 2/6 host-C). Soft tissue coverage required: free muscle flap transfer in 6/84, reverse soleus flap in 1/84, local fasciocutaneous flaps in 7/84, split thickness skin grafts in 5/84, and vacuum assisted closure in 5/84 patients. Eighty-two surviving patients, including amputees, were able to mobilise independently and were satisfied with the result of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Host-B and -C patients had more complications and infection recurrences and occasionally required amputations. Reconstructive procedures were performed for limb salvage in patients with soft tissue and bone defects and restoration of a functional limb was achieved.

Limb salvage in Charcot foot and ankle osteomyelitis: combined use single stage/double stage of arthrodesis and external fixation

BACKGROUND

Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot/ankle is a devastating complication of diabetes. Along with neuroarthropathy, osteomyelitis can occur which can result in amputation. This prospective study evaluated a limb salvage procedure as an alternative to amputation through surgical treatment of osteomyelitis of the midfoot or the ankle and stabilization with external fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with Charcot arthropathy and osteomyelitis underwent debridement and attempted fusion with an external fixator. Chart and radiograph review was performed to assess the success of the fusion and eradication of infection.

RESULTS

Out of 45 patients, 39 patients healed using emergent surgery to drain an acute manifestation of the infection while maintaining the fixation for an average of 25.7 weeks. Two patients were treated with intramedullary nail in a subsequent surgical procedure. In four patients, the infection could not be controlled, therefore a major amputation was carried out.

CONCLUSION

For select patients, external fixation proved to be a reasonable alternative to below-knee amputation.

External ring fixation versus screw fixation for ankle arthrodesis: a biomechanical comparison

BACKGROUND

The use of external ring fixation for ankle arthrodesis offers an alternative to internal screw fixation when bone quality is suboptimal, when complex ankle pathology is present, and as a salvage procedure for complicated cases. Additionally, it permits earlier weightbearing and postoperative adjustment of bone alignment and joint compression. This study was designed to determine whether there are differences in initial ankle joint fixation integrity between these two techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities underwent ankle arthrodesis with a hybrid ring fixator, and the bending and torsional stiffness of each arthrodesed joint was quantified. Stiffness was calculated from angulation measured at the tibiotalar joint using electronic clinometers attached to those bones. The external fixators were then removed and ankle arthrodesis performed using 6.5-mm cannulated screws: three across the ankle joint, one fixing the fibula to the tibia, and one fixing the fibula to the talus. Stiffness testing was then repeated.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, or joint rotation under torsional load was demonstrable between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

The similarity in ankle fusion site stability achieved with external ring fixation and an optimized screw fixation technique under the described testing conditions indicates that, in cases in which suboptimal bone quality or complex ankle pathology preclude the use of internal fixation, an external fixator is a viable option.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Establishing that the primary stability of external ring fixation is comparable to that of screw fixation provides a basis for its use in cases in which screw fixation may be problematic.

Ankle fusion for bone loss around the ankle joint using the Ilizarov technique

We present the results of ankle fusion using the Ilizarov technique for bone loss around the ankle in 20 patients. All except one had sustained post-traumatic bone loss. Infection was present in 17. The mean age was 33.1 years (7 to 71). The mean size of the defect was 3.98 cm (1.5 to 12) and associated limb shortening before the index procedure varied from 1 cm to 5 cm. The mean time in the external fixator was 335 days (42 to 870). Tibiotalar fusion was performed in 19 patients and tibiocalcaneal fusion in one. Associated problems included diabetes in one patient, pelvic and urethral injury in one, visual injury in one patient and ipsilateral tibial fracture in five. At the final mean follow-up of 51.55 months (24 to 121) fusion had been achieved in 19 of 20 patients. A total of 16 patients were able to return to work. The results were graded as good in 11 patients, fair in six and poor in three. The mean external fixation index was 8.8 days/mm (0 to 30). One patient with diabetes developed severe infection which required early removal of the fixator. Refractures occurred in three patients, two of which were at the site of fusion and one at a previous tibial shaft fracture site. Equinus deformity of the ankle fusion occurred after a further fracture in one patient. There were two patients with residual forefoot equinus, and one developed late valgus at the fusion site.

Poor consolidation of the regenerated bone in two patients was treated by bone grafting in one and by bone and fibular strut grafting in the other. Residual soft-tissue infection was still present in two patients.

Management of complications of open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures

The management of complications resulting from the open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures is discussed in detail. The initial radiographic findings of the most common postsurgical complications of ankle fracture reduction are briefly discussed, namely lateral, medial, and posterior malleolar malunion or nonunion, syndesmotic widening, degenerative changes, and septic arthritis with or without concomitant osteomyelitis. Emphasis is placed on the management of these complications, with a review of the treatment options proposed in the literature, a detailed discussion of the authors' recommendations, and an inclusion of different case presentations.

Distal tibial reconstruction with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail. Surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Distal tibial reconstruction with use of an external fixator when there is bone loss, limb-length discrepancy, and/or ankle instability is associated with many problems. The technique of limb-lengthening, ankle arthrodesis, and segmental transfer over an intramedullary nail has been introduced to overcome these problems. The present study investigates this combined technique.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2005, six patients, who ranged from seventeen to seventy years old, underwent distal tibial reconstruction and ankle arthrodesis with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail to treat a distal tibial defect following resection for chronic osteomyelitis or tumor or to treat a limb-length discrepancy combined with ankle instability. Functional and radiographic results were evaluated, with use of the criteria described by Paley et al., at an average follow-up of thirty-four months.

RESULTS

The mean size of the bone defect in three patients was 5.3 cm (2, 7, and 7 cm), and the mean amount of the limb-shortening in four patients was 5.25 cm (range, 4 to 6 cm). The mean external fixation time was 3.5 months, and the mean external fixator index was 0.57 mo/cm. There was no recurrence of infection in the two patients with osteomyelitis. All six patients had excellent bone results, and the functional results were excellent for two patients and good for four patients. There were four complications, three of which were categorized, according to Paley, as a problem (a difficulty that occurs during lengthening and is resolved without operative intervention) and one that was categorized as an obstacle (a difficulty that occurs during lengthening and needs operative treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined technique is an improvement over the classic external fixation techniques of distal tibial reconstruction with ankle arthrodesis. It reduces the duration of external fixation, thus increasing patient acceptance, and it is associated with a low complication rate facilitating more rapid rehabilitation.

An approach to the failed ankle arthrodesis

Ankle arthrodesis remains the gold standard of surgical treatment for advanced ankle joint arthritis. Failure can occur as a result of infection, nonunion or malunion, resulting in pain and poor function. This paper offers a systematic approach to preventing, and managing these problems should they occur. Revision arthrodesis performed with a detailed understanding of the appropriate alignment and mechanics of the ankle joint, combined with meticulous attention to understanding and reversing the cause of the failure can result in successful salvage and restoration of function.

Ankle arthrodesis: the simple and the complex

Ankle arthrodesis is by no means a simple surgery. It requires preoperative planning, meticulous preparation of bony surfaces, cognizance of ankle positioning, and rigidity of fixation. The procedure also requires enough experience on the part of the operating surgeon to recognize important patient factors and to determine which type of ankle arthrodesis is most appropriate for that specific patient.

Fusion of the septic knee with external hybrid fixator

Arthrodesis is a well-recognized salvage procedure in patients with septic destruction of knee joints. It offers the opportunity for restoring weight bearing capability and significant pain relief as well as eradication of infection, but at the expense of joint motion. However, arthrodesis in order to joint sepsis may be difficult to achieve because of poor bone stock, persistent infection and soft tissue compromise. From 2000 to June 2004, in 70 consecutive patients arthrodesis of the knee was indicated. Nineteen patients were considered to have external hybrid fixator (EHF) and were therefore included to the prospective study protocol. Forty-three stabilisations of destructed knee joints were done by a modular titanium rod. In these cases bony fusion was very unlikely to be achieved because of devastating defects due to infected total knee arthroplasties. Eight patients were treated by compression nailing. In these situations EHF was not indicated. In three patients minor complication occurred. In two out of 17 patients fusion failed because of primary underestimated bony defects (11.8%). The use of EHF for arthrodeses after septic destruction of knee joints can be recommended according to our results. However, EHF will not be successful or applicable in each case. Therefore, physicians and institutions that offer this special method should have not only experiences with EHF but also with arthrodeses and alternative procedures.