Life after 80 Hours: The Impact of Resident Work Hours Mandates on Trauma and Emergency Experience and Work Effort for Senior Residents and Faculty

Managing moderately injured pediatric patients without immediate surgeon presence: 10 years later

PURPOSE

Beginning in 2003, the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician replaced the surgeon as the team leader for all level II trauma resuscitations at a busy pediatric trauma center. The purpose was to review the outcomes 10 years after implementing this practice change.

METHODS

Trauma registry data for all level II activations requiring admission were extracted for the 21 months (April 1, 2001-December 31, 2002) prior to policy change (period 1, **n=627) and compared to the admitted patients from the 10 subsequent years (2003-2013; period 2, n=2694). Data included demographics, length of stay (LOS), injury severity score (ISS), readmissions, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

Mean ISS scores for admitted patients during period 1 (8.5) were higher than during period 2 (7.8). During period 1, 53.6% of patients underwent abdominal CT versus 41.8% in period 2 (p<.001), and the median ED LOS was 135 versus 191 minutes in period 2. From 2000 to 2003, 91% of patients seen as level II trauma alerts were admitted compared to 56.6% of patients in period 2 (p<0.001). There were no missed abdominal injuries identified, and readmission rate was low.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that level II trauma resuscitations can be safely evaluated and managed without immediate surgeon presence. Although ED LOS increased, admission rate and CT scan usage decreased significantly without an increase in missed injuries.

The effect of reducing maximum shift lengths to 16 hours on internal medicine interns' educational opportunities

PURPOSE

To evaluate educational experiences of internal medicine interns before and after maximum shift lengths were decreased from 30 hours to 16 hours.

METHOD

The authors compared educational experiences of internal medicine interns at Vanderbilt University Medical Center before (2010; 47 interns) and after (2011; 50 interns) duty hours restrictions were implemented in July 2011. The authors compared number of inpatient encounters, breadth of concepts in notes, exposure to five common presenting problems, procedural experience, and attendance at teaching conferences.

RESULTS

Following the duty hours restrictions, interns cared for more unique patients (mean 118 versus 140 patients per intern, P = .005) and wrote more history and physicals (mean 73 versus 88, P = .005). Documentation included more total concepts after the 16-hour maximum shift implementation, with a 14% increase for history and physicals (338 versus 387, P < .001) and a 10% increase for progress notes (316 versus 349, P < .001). There was no difference in the median number of selected procedures performed (6 versus 6, P = 0.94). Attendance was higher at the weekly chief resident conference (60% versus 68% of expected attendees, P < .001) but unchanged at morning report conferences (79% versus 78%, P = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

Intern clinical exposure did not decrease after implementation of the 16-hour shift length restriction. In fact, interns saw more patients, produced more detailed notes, and attended more conferences following duty hours restrictions.

Duty-hour limits and patient care and resident outcomes: can high-quality studies offer insight into complex relationships?

Long hours are an accepted component of resident education, yet data suggest they contribute to fatigue that may compromise patient safety. A systematic review confirms that limiting duty hours increases residents' hours of sleep and improves objective measures of alertness. Most studies of operative experience for surgical residents found no effect, and there is evidence of a limited positive effect on residents' mood. We find a mixed effect on patient safety, although problems with supervision, rather than the limits, may be responsible or contibute; evidence of reduced continuity of care and reduced continuity in residents' clinical education; and evidence that increased workload under the limits has a negative effect on patient and resident outcomes. We highlight specific areas for research and offer recommendations for national policy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of North American working hours restrictions on mortality and morbidity in surgical patients

Background

Short duty hours, imposed by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) regulations, have been claimed to be associated with loss of continuity of care among surgical patients, leading to a potentially increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the strength of associations between duty hour restrictions and morbidity and mortality of various surgical procedures.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Previews®, the Education Resources Information Center and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2000 to September 2009) were searched, and reports screened to identify comparative studies of mortality and morbidity before and after the introduction of ACGME regulation periods. Random-effects (RE) and quality-effects (QE) meta-analyses were performed to determine the risk of morbidity or death associated with long duty hours compared with shorter duty hours. Results are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95 per cent confidence interval.

Results

A total of 19 data sets (10 articles), including 730 648 subjects in the mortality studies and 64 346 in the morbidity studies, were analysed. Long duty hours were associated with a non-significantly increased risk of death compared with shorter duty hours (OR 1·28, 0·94 to 1·73). There was no difference in morbidity between the two groups (OR 1·03, 0·67 to 1·57). Mortality associations were generally stronger for general surgery, more recent studies and higher-quality studies. Heterogeneity was evident among the studies included.

Conclusion

The reduction in working hours has not affected patient care negatively in terms of demonstrable differences in morbidity and mortality. However, it cannot be distinguished whether this effect is actually due to a non-detrimental effect of the reduction in working hours or whether any such detriment is offset by continually improving patient care and increased surgical supervision.

Orthopaedic resident and program director opinions of resident duty hours: a national survey

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) established national guidelines for resident duty hours in July 2003. Following an Institute of Medicine report in December 2008, the ACGME recommended further restrictions on resident duty hours that went into effect in July 2011. We conducted a national survey to assess the opinions of orthopaedic residents and of directors of residency and fellowship programs in the U.S. regarding the 2003 and 2011 ACGME resident duty-hour regulations and the effects of these regulations on resident education and patient care.

METHODS

A fifteen-item questionnaire was electronically distributed by the Candidate, Resident, and Fellow Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to all U.S. orthopaedic residents (n = 3860) and directors of residency programs (n = 184) and fellowship programs (n = 496) between January and April 2011. Thirty-four percent (1314) of the residents and 27% (185) of the program directors completed the questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences between the responses of residents and program directors and between the responses of junior and senior residents.

RESULTS

The responses of orthopaedic residents and program directors differed significantly (p &lt; 0.001) for fourteen of the fifteen survey items. The responses of residents and program directors were divergent for questions regarding the 2003 rules. Overall, 71% of residents thought that the eighty-hour work week was appropriate, whereas only 38% of program directors agreed (p &lt; 0.001). Most program directors (70%) did not think that the 2003 duty-hour rules had improved patient care, whereas only 24% of residents responded in the same way (p &lt; 0.001). The responses of residents and program directors to questions regarding the 2011 duty-hour rules were generally compatible, but the degree to which they perceived the issues was different. Only 18% of residents and 19% of program directors thought that the suggested strategic five-hour evening rest period implemented in July 2011 for on-call residents was appropriate (p &gt; 0.05), and both groups (84% of residents and 74% of program directors) also disagreed with the limitation of intern shifts to sixteen hours (p &lt; 0.001). Seventy percent of residents and 79% of program directors thought that the new duty-hour regulations would result in an increased number of handoffs that would be detrimental to patient care (p &lt; 0.001). The mean responses of junior residents and senior residents differed for eight of the fifteen survey items (p &lt; 0.001), with the responses of senior residents more closely resembling those of program directors on six of these eight questions. The mean responses and percentiles for the survey items did not differ significantly between residency directors and fellowship directors (p &gt; 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey indicated significant differences between the opinions of orthopaedic residents and program (residency and fellowship) directors regarding the 2003 ACGME resident duty-hour regulations and the effects of these regulations on resident education and patient care. However, both residents and program directors agreed that the further reductions in duty hours in the 2011 rules may be detrimental to resident education and patient care.

Effect of the ACGME duty hours restrictions on surgical residents and faculty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Educators in surgical training programs are concerned that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hours limitations may adversely affect surgical residents' education, especially their operative experience, so the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of duty hours reductions on surgical residency.

METHOD

The authors searched English- and French-language literature (2000-2008) for articles about the impact of duty hours restrictions on surgical residents' education and well-being and on faculty educators. They used the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ERIC. The authors included every report that examined the effects of duty hours limits on surgical training, excluding opinion papers and editorials. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment for all reports and resolved disagreements by consensus.

RESULTS

The authors retrieved 1,146 reports and included 56 in the study. They compiled positive and negative outcomes on (1) residents' education, (2) resident lifestyle, and (3) surgical faculty. Overall, the effects of duty hours reductions on residents' education and lifestyle were positive or neutral, but the effects on surgical faculty were negative. The 16 articles with the highest-quality scores had 27 positive themes and 11 negative themes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest and most current review of the literature addressing the effect of the ACGME duty hours limitations on surgical training. Limitations had a positive effect on residents but a negative effect on surgical faculty. Importantly, duty hours limitations did not adversely affect surgical residents' operating-room experience.

Effects of reducing or eliminating resident work shifts over 16 hours: a systematic review

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has called for the elimination of resident work shifts exceeding 16 hours without sleep. We sought to comprehensively evaluate the effects of eliminating or reducing shifts over 16 hours.

DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES

We performed a systematic review of published and unpublished studies (1950-2008) to synthesize data on all intervention studies that have reduced or eliminated U.S. residents' extended shifts. A total of 2,984 citations were identified initially, which were independently reviewed by two authors to determine their eligibility for inclusion. All outcomes relevant to quality of life, education, and safety were collected. Study quality was rated using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methodology.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria (kappa = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77-0.94] for inclusion decisions). Following reduction or elimination of extended shifts, 8 of 8 studies measuring resident quality of life found improvements. Four of 14 studies that assessed educational outcomes found improvements, 9 found no significant changes, and one found education worsened. Seven of 11 identified statistically significant improvements in patient safety or quality of care; no studies found that safety or care quality worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review, we found that reduction or elimination of resident work shifts exceeding 16 hours did not adversely affect resident education, and was associated with improvements in patient safety and resident quality of life in most studies. Further multi-center studies are needed to substantiate these findings, and definitively measure the effects of eliminating extended shifts on patient outcomes.

Restricted duty hours for surgeons and impact on residents quality of life, education, and patient care: a literature review

Background

Work-hour limitations have been implemented by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in July 2003 in order to minimize fatigue related medical adverse events. The effects of this regulation are still under intense debate. In this literature review, data of effects of limited work-hours on the quality of life, surgical education, and patient care was summarized, focusing on surgical subspecialities.

Methods

Studies that assessed the effects of the work-hour regulation published following the implementation of ACGME guidelines (2003) were searched using PubMed database. The following search modules were selected: work-hours, 80-hour work week, quality of life, work satisfaction, surgical education, residency training, patient care, continuity of care. Publications were included if they were completed in the United States and covered the subject of our review. Manuscrips were analysed to identify authors, year of publication, type of study, number of participants, and the main outcomes.

Review Findings

Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies demonstrate that the residents quality of life has improved. The effects on surgical education are still unclear due to inconsistency in studies. Furthermore, according to several objective studies there were no changes in mortality and morbidity following the implementation.

Conclusion

Further studies are necessary addressing the effects of surgical education and studying the objective methods to assess the technical skill and procedural competence of surgeons. In addition, patient surveys analysing their satisfaction and concerns can contribute to recent discussion, as well.

Effects of resident work hour limitations on faculty professional lives

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident work hour limitations were implemented in July, 2003. Effects on faculty are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the resident work hour limitations on the professional lives of faculty physicians.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Survey of faculty physicians at three teaching hospitals associated with university-based internal medicine and surgery residency programs in Seattle, Washington. Physicians who attended on Internal Medicine and Surgery in-patient services during the 10 mo after implementation of work hour limitations were eligible for participation (N = 366); 282 physicians (77%) returned surveys.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants were asked about the effects of resident work hour limitations on aspects of their professional lives, including clinical work, research, teaching, and professional satisfaction.

RESULTS

Most attending physicians reported that, because of work hour limitations, they spent more time on clinical work (52%), felt more responsibility for supervising patient care (65%), and spent less time on research or other academic pursuits (51%) and teaching residents (72%). Reported changes in work content were independently associated with the self-reported probability of leaving academic medicine in the next 3 y.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident work hour limitations have had large effects on the professional lives of faculty. These findings may have important implications for recruiting and retaining faculty at academic medical centers.

Economic stress and misaligned incentives in critical care medicine in the United States

OBJECTIVES

This review will provide an overview of issues with economic ramifications intrinsic to the management of intensive care resources and identify some of the external pressures that ultimately influence the provision of intensive care services.

DESIGN

A review of the current literature was performed.

RESULTS

Economic stress is a reality of the management of intensive care resources. The nature of critical care medicine as a technologically heavy, labor intensive, high-cost, limited resource, combined with a projected increase in demand in an era of cost containment, presents an array of challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

It is in the best interest of the care of our patients that critical care providers increase awareness of the many factors influencing our practice economically. It is through such understanding that challenges can be met, solutions can be found, and the quality of intensive care can be improved in a financially sustainable environment.

Effect of the 80-hour work week on resident operative experience in general surgery

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine the effect of the 80-hour work week on resident operative experience.

METHODS

General surgery resident operative experience was evaluated during a 4-year period and divided into 2 groups: before (group A [July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2003]) and after (group B July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005]) implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty hour guidelines.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in mean total and primary surgeon cases in group B for postgraduate year (PGY) levels 1, 2, and 4 (P < or = .001). There was a significant decrease in PGY 5 teaching assistant and PGY 1 first assistant experience in group B (P < or = .001). There was no difference in PGY 3 resident operative volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The mandated work-hour guidelines have negatively impacted the operative experience of general surgery residents, especially at the junior level. Despite implementing modifications designed to optimize resident operative experience, surgical training programs may require further adaptations.

Myths and Realities of the 80-Hour Work Week

BACKGROUND

Myths are so ingrained into cultural traditions that emotion frequently overshadows a rational evaluation of the facts. The reduction in resident work hours has resulted in the formation of several myths. The purpose of this review is to examine the published data on resident work hours to separate out myth from reality.

METHODS

An electronic database was searched for publications related to resident training, work-hours, continuity of care, sleep deprivation, quality of life, patient safety, clinical/operative experience, faculty work hours, and surgical education.

RESULTS

Sleep deprivation has been shown to be harmful, and residents played a role in advocating for work-hour limits. Surgical residents have seen a less dramatic improvement in quality of life compared with other disciplines. Work-hour reductions have decreased participation in clinic but have not resulted in a significant decline in clinical or operative exposure. Limiting resident work hours will unlikely result in a decrease health-care cost. Reduction in resident work hours has not resulted in an improvement or deterioration in patient outcome. Reduction of work hours has not increased faculty work hours nor made surgery a more attractive career choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite strongly held opinions, resident work-hour reduction has resulted in little significant change in lifestyle, clinical exposure, patient well-being, faculty work hours, or medical student recruitment.

A leap in faith: the impact of removing the surgeon from the level II trauma response

BACKGROUND

Limitation of resident work hours has created the need to explore alternatives to surgeon presence during initial assessment and resuscitation for selected life-threatening injuries in children. We recently eliminated the requirement for surgeon presence during Level II alerts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this change on patient care.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of trauma alert activity was performed using data from our trauma registry. In March 2003, responsibility for level II alerts was transferred from the pediatric surgeons (PSs) to the Emergency Department (ED) physicians. We compared the activity in the 18-month period before this change (period 1; n = 627) to that afterward (period 2; n = 587). Outcome measures included injury severity score, emergency department length of stay, missed injuries, abdominal computed tomography use, and mortality. Data were analyzed using log-rank statistic, chi2, or t test, where appropriate, with significance level at P < .05.

RESULTS

During the entire study period, 1499 patients met the trauma alert activation criteria of which 1214 (81%) were level II alerts. The mean injury severity score for period 1 (8.5 +/- 7.3 SD) was similar to period 2 (9.0 +/- 7.1 SD). When ED physicians replaced PS for Level II alerts, ED length of stay increased from 135 minutes to 165 minutes (P < .001). In addition, the use of abdominal computed tomography was significantly decreased (53.6% vs 42.6%; P < .001). However, there were no missed injuries and no significant differences in the rate of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

When ED physicians replaced PS for Level II alerts, trauma room length of stay was increased, but use of abdominal imaging was decreased with no differences in rate of missed injury or mortality. Emergency Department physicians can safely replace PS during Level II alerts. These findings may be useful to institutions experiencing surgical workforce limitations for trauma alerts.

Sleep and the medical profession

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review addresses the way in which sleep physiology influences the medical profession and health care delivery.

RECENT FINDINGS

The training process for the medical professional has undergone dramatic changes over the past century. In recent times, however, the complexity and level of care delivered has out-stripped a trainee's ability to forego sleep and is compromising both physician and patient safety and thereby threatens the foundation of the profession. Recently, significant strides have been made in our understanding of sleep loss and consequences to physicians-in-training. Nevertheless, the implementation of changes fostered by such findings faces numerous conceptual and practical obstacles. This review updates the reader on recent evidence for changing the way medical professionals are trained, and opines on how solutions generated from such research should be embraced. Additionally, the deficiencies in our current understanding of sleep and medical training are identified so that future research can be undertaken in such areas.

SUMMARY

Acknowledging the defects in our current system of training physicians and enacting further changes is sorely needed to improve patient safety and the well-being of physicians-in-training.

Progressive independence in clinical training: a tradition worth defending?

BACKGROUND

Progressive independence is a traditional premise of clinical training. Recently, issues such as managed care, work hours limitation, and patient safety have begun to impact the degree of autonomy afforded to clinical trainees. This article reviews empirical evidence and theory pertaining to the role of progressive autonomy in clinical learning.

METHOD

A computerized literature search was performed using Medline, PsycINFO, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Educational Resources Information Center. This article presents a synthetic review of relevant empirical and theoretical concepts from the domains of medicine, psychology, education, kinesiology, and sociology.

RESULTS

The clinical psychology and medical education literatures provide evidence that clinical trainees act more independently as their training progresses, but have not yet evaluated the educational efficacy of providing progressive independence, or the consequences of failing to do so. The expertise and motor learning literatures provide some theoretical evidence (as yet untested in complex clinical environments) that the provision of too much guidance or feedback to trainees could be educationally detrimental in the long term. The sociology literature provides insight into the cultural values underlying the behavior of clinical teachers and trainees relating to issues of supervision and independence.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited empirical support for the current model of progressive independence in clinical learning; however, diverse theoretical perspectives raise concern about the potential educational consequences of eroding progressive independence. These perspectives could inform future research programs that would create a creative and effective response to the social and economic forces impacting clinical education.