How Long Should You Wait for a Chest Radiograph after Placing a Chest Tube on Water Seal? A Prospective Study

[Chest Tube in Thoracic Trauma - Recommendations of the Interdisciplinary Thoracic Trauma Task Group of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) and the German Trauma Society (DGU)]

For unstable patients with chest trauma, the chest tube is the method of choice for the treatment of a relevant pneumothorax or haemothorax. In the case of a tension pneumothorax, needle decompression with a cannula of at least 5 cm length should be performed, directly followed by the insertion of a chest tube. The evaluation of the patient should be performed primarily with a clinical examination, a chest X-ray and sonography, but the gold standard of diagnostic testing is computed tomography (CT).A small-bore chest tube (e.g. 14 French) should be used in stable patients, while unstable patients should receive a large-bore drain (24 French or larger). Insertion of chest drains has a high complication rate of between 5% and 25%, and incorrect positioning of the tube is the most common complication. However, incorrect positioning can usually only be reliably detected or ruled out with a CT scan, and chest X-rays proofed to be insufficient to answer this question. Therapy should be carried out with mild suction of approximately 20 cmH₂O, and clamping the chest tube before removal showed no beneficial effect. The removal of drains can be safely performed, either at the end of inspiration or at the end of expiration. In order to reduce the high complication rate, in the future the focus should be more on the education and training of medical staff members.

ERS statement on chest imaging in acute respiratory failure

Chest imaging in patients with acute respiratory failure plays an important role in diagnosing, monitoring and assessing the underlying disease. The available modalities range from plain chest X-ray to computed tomography, lung ultrasound, electrical impedance tomography and positron emission tomography. Surprisingly, there are presently no clear-cut recommendations for critical care physicians regarding indications for and limitations of these different techniques.The purpose of the present European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement is to provide physicians with a comprehensive clinical review of chest imaging techniques for the assessment of patients with acute respiratory failure, based on the scientific evidence as identified by systematic searches. For each of these imaging techniques, the panel evaluated the following items: possible indications, technical aspects, qualitative and quantitative analysis of lung morphology and the potential interplay with mechanical ventilation. A systematic search of the literature was performed from inception to September 2018. A first search provided 1833 references. After evaluating the full text and discussion among the committee, 135 references were used to prepare the current statement.These chest imaging techniques allow a better assessment and understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of patients with acute respiratory failure, but have different indications and can provide additional information to each other.

Chest Tube Management Practices by Trauma Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Chest tube (CT) placement is among the most common procedures performed by trauma surgeons; evidence guiding CT management is limited and tends toward thoracic surgery patients. The study goal was to identify current CT management practices among trauma providers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a Web-based multiple-choice survey to assess CT management practices of trauma providers who were active, senior, or provisional members (n = 1890) of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and distributed via e-mail. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

The response rate was 39% (n = 734). Ninety-one percent of respondents were attending surgeons, the remainder fellows or residents. Regarding experience, 36% of respondents had five or fewer years of practice, 54% 10 y or fewer, and 79% 20 y or fewer. Attendings were more likely than trainees to place pigtail catheters for stable patients with pneumothorax (PTX). Attendings with experience of <5 y were more likely to choose a pigtail than more experienced surgeons for elderly patients with PTX. Respondents preferred standard size CTs for hemothorax and unstable patients with PTX, and larger tubes for unstable patients with hemothorax. Most respondents (53%) perceived the quality of evidence for trauma CT management to be low and cited personal experience and training as the main factors driving their practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma CT management is variable and nonstandardized, depending mostly on clinician training and personal experience. Few surgeons identify their practice as evidence based. We offer compelling justification for the need for trauma CT management research to determine best practices.

Chest Tube Removal in Simple Pneumothorax: Does Water-Seal Duration Matter?

Timing of chest tube (CT) removal after transition from suction to water-seal (WS) varies when treating traumatic simple pneumothoraces (PTXs). Longer periods of WS may identify slow-occurring PTXs reducing CT replacement, whereas shorter periods may expedite patient disposition and have associated cost savings. Prior studies support the need for an interval of WS. We compare durations of WS, looking at rates of CT reinsertion. A 10-year retrospective review on trauma patients with a simple PTX requiring a CT was performed. WS duration of 1 to 8 hours (short - SG) versus 18 to 36 hours (long - LG) were compared. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used. Of the 2000 patient charts reviewed, 209 met the criteria, with 43 in the SG and 166 in the LG. Patient demographics and mechanism of injury were similar. There was no difference in CT replacement [6.9% (SG) vs 4.8% (LG), P 0.59]. Logistic regression revealed an increase in CT replacement if the patient ever had positive pressure ventilation (OR 4.1, CI 1.1–17, P 0.04) and if returned to suction from WS (OR 6.3, CI 1.2–28, P 0.03). Short intervals of WS do not increase CT reinsertion while decreasing the total time and morbidity associated with CT.

Results of a clinical practice algorithm for the management of thoracostomy tubes placed for traumatic mechanism

Introduction

The management and removal of thoracostomy tubes for trauma-related hemothorax and pneumothorax is controversial. General recommendations exist; however, institutional data related to an algorithmic approach has not been well described. The difficulty in establishing an algorithm centers about individualized patients’ needs for subsequent management after thoracostomy tube placement. In our institution, we use the same protocol for all trauma patients who receive a thoracostomy tube with minimal complications.

Purpose

To present the clinical outcomes of patients who required a tube thoracostomy for traumatic injury and were managed by an institutional protocol.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 313 trauma patients at a single level I trauma institution from January 2008 through June 2012 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patient age ≥ 18 years, involvement in a trauma, and requirement of a thoracostomy tube. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographic data, injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), and chest-tube specific data. Thoracostomy tube complications were defined as persistent air leak, persistent pneumothorax, recurrent pneumothorax, and clotting of thoracostomy tube. The patients were managed per our institutional algorithm. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

Most of the patients who required a thoracostomy tube had blunt-related traumas (271/313; 86.6%), while 42 patients (13.4%) sustained penetrating injuries. There were 215 (68.7%) male patients. The average age at time of injury was 45.7 ± 21.1 years and the mean ISS was 24.9 ± 15.9 (mean ± SD). Elevated alcohol levels were found in 65 of the 247 patients who were tested upon admission (26.3%). Overall, 15 patients (4.8%) developed a thoracostomy tube related complication: persistent air leak in six patients, persistent pneumothorax in six patients, recurrent pneumothorax in two patients, and clotted thoracostomy tube in one patient. The average LOS was 10.4 ± 8.4 days, and the mean length of thoracostomy tube placement was 5.9 ± 4.3 days.

Conclusions

Our algorithmic thoracostomy tube management protocol resulted in a complication rate of 4.8%. By managing thoracostomy tubes in a systematic manner, our patients have improved outcomes following placement and removal compared to other studies.

Impact of positive pressure ventilation on thoracostomy tube removal

BACKGROUND

Little data exist examining the impact of positive pressure ventilation on safe thoracostomy tube removal. We sought to evaluate the impact of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) on recurrent pneumothoraces (PTX) after removal of thoracostomy tubes (TT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed evaluating all trauma patients requiring TT drainage of PTX or hemothoraces during a 3-year period. All chest radiographs before and after TT removal were reviewed to identify PTX recurrence. The principle outcome was recurrent PTX after TT removal. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess for significance.

RESULTS

We studied 234 TT removals in 190 patients. One hundred thirty-six (58%) TTs were removed under PPV. PTX recurred in 15 (11%) and 6 (4%) required reinsertion. In 10 patients (7.4%), there was a radiographically stable small PTX before and after removal not requiring TT reinsertion. In comparison, 98 (42%) TTs were removed under spontaneous ventilation. PTX recurred in 16 (16%) and 3 (3%) required reinsertion. There were 25 (25.5%) stable small PTXs before and after removal. The overall recurrence rate difference was -5.3% (confidence interval: -14.8 to 3.5) and reinsertion rate difference was 1.35% (confidence interval: -4.7 to 6.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of recurrent PTX or TT replacement after removal is not associated with PPV status. The slightly lower recurrence rate on PPV combined with the smaller proportion of patients with stable small PTX before removal may reflect more careful clinician selection of ideal patients or technique of TT removal among patients on PPV. Prospective data are needed to clarify these associations.