Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) combined with tacrolimus in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

B-Cell Induction Therapies in Intestinal Transplantation

Despite advancements in short-term outcomes since the inception of intestinal transplant, significant long-term graft failure persists. Early successes are attributed to the utilization of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy, coupled with T-cell modulating induction regimens, which effectively reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, the challenge of chronic allograft injury remains unresolved. There is increasing evidence indicating a correlation between donor-specific antibodies and the survival of visceral allografts. Strategies aimed at reducing the presence or load of these antibodies may potentially enhance long-term outcomes. Consequently, our focus is now turning toward B-cell induction therapies as a possible solution.

Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Human cytomegalovirus: a survey of end-organ diseases and diagnostic challenges in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most important infectious complications in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, early detection and prompt treatment are imperative to improve transplant outcomes. This article highlights the clinical characteristics of the most common CMV end-organ diseases in SOT recipients and their diagnostic modalities and challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

CMV can cause a variety of end-organ diseases in SOT recipients. Although CMV nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is frequently employed to detect CMV reactivation or infection, its predictive value for various CMV end-organ diseases remains uncertain. Given the limitation of PCR or other noninvasive tests, confirmation of CMV end-organ disease may require tissue biopsy, which may not be feasible or available, or may cause untoward complications.

SUMMARY

The utility of PCR to diagnose CMV end-organ disease is limited. As CMV can infect any organ system(s), clinicians caring for SOT recipients need to maintain vigilance for any signs and symptoms of end-organ disease to allow early recognition and prompt treatment. Invasive procedures might be needed to confirm the diagnosis and minimize the empirical use of antiviral therapy that may have substantial drug toxicities.

Induction regimens and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after pediatric intestinal transplantation: Single-center experience

Pediatric recipients of intestinal transplants have a high incidence of PTLD, but the impact of specific induction immunosuppression agents is unclear. In this single-center retrospective review from 2000 to 2017, we describe the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of PTLD after primary intestinal transplantation in 173 children with or without liver, after induction with rATG, alemtuzumab, or anti-IL-2R agents. Thirty cases of PTLD occurred among 28 children, 28 EBV+ and 2 EBV-. Although not statistically significant, the PTLD incidence was higher after isolated intestinal transplant compared with liver-inclusive allograft (19.3% vs 13.3%, P = .393) and after induction with anti-IL-2R antibody and alemtuzumab compared with rATG (28.6% and 27.3% vs 13.3%, P = .076). The 30 PTLD cases included 13 monomorphic PTLD, 13 polymorphic PTLD, one spindle cell, one Burkitt lymphoma, and two cases too necrotic to classify. After reduction of immunosuppression, management was based on disease histology and extent. Resection with or without rituximab was used for polymorphic tumors and limited disease extent, whereas chemotherapy was used for diffuse disease. Of the 28 patients, 11 recovered with functioning allografts (39.3%), 10 recovered after enterectomy (35.7%), and seven patients died (25%), three due to PTLD and four due to other causes. All who died of progressive PTLD had received chemotherapy, highlighting the mortality of PTLD, toxicity of treatment and need for novel agents. Alemtuzumab is no longer used for induction at our center.

Alemtuzumab induction combined with reduced maintenance immunosuppression is associated with improved outcomes after lung transplantation: A single centre experience

Question addressed by the study

The value of induction therapy in lung transplantation is controversial. According to the ISHLT, only about 50% of patients transplanted within the last 10 years received induction therapy. We reviewed our institutional experience to investigate the impact of induction therapy on short- and long-term outcomes.

Materials/Patients and methods

Between 2007 and 2015, 446 patients with a complete follow-up were included in this retrospective analysis. Analysis comprised long-term kidney function, infectious complications, incidence of rejection and overall survival.

Results

A total of 231 patients received alemtuzumab, 50 patients antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 165 patients did not receive induction therapy (NI). The alemtuzumab group revealed the lowest rate of chronic kidney insufficiency (NI: 52.2%; ATG: 60%; alemtuzumab: 36.6%; p = 0.001). Both, the NI group (p<0.001) and the ATG group (p = 0.010) showed a significant increase of serum creatinine during follow-up compared to alemtuzumab patients. Furthermore, alemtuzumab group experienced the lowest rate of infection in the first year after transplantation. Finally, improved survival, low rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis (LB) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were found in patients treated either with alemtuzumab or ATG.

Conclusion

Alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by reduced maintenance immunosuppression is associated with a better kidney function compared to no induction and ATG. Survival rate as well as freedom from ACR and CLAD were comparable between alemtuzumab and ATG.

Outcome of pigs with short gut syndrome submitted to orthotopic intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the current model of small bowel resection and intestinal transplantation in pigs.

METHODS

Forty two Large White pigs were distributed in five groups: G1(n=6), G2(n=6) and G3(n=6) were submitted to 80%,100% and 100% plus right colon resection respectively and G4(n=7) and G5(n=5) to 100% SBR plus IT without and with immunosuppression based on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic acid. Evaluation included weight control, clinical status, biochemical analysis and endoscopies for graft biopsies. Follow-up in G1 and 2 was 84 days, while in G3, four and five was ± three weeks.

RESULTS

G1 increased weight suggesting adaptation while G2 and 3 loused weight and inadequate adaptation. G4 and 5 died of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and sepses respectively. Overall survival in G1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 at 30 days was 100, 100, 0 and 20 %, respectively. Medium survival in G4 and 5 was 14 and 16 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The resection of 80% of small intestine in pigs is not suitable for short bowel syndrome induction. Intestinal transplantation with the proposed immunosuppression protocol was effective in prevent the occurrence of severe acute rejection, but inappropriate to increase recipients survival.

Characterization, prophylaxis, and treatment of infectious complications in craniomaxillofacial and upper extremity allotransplantation: a multicenter perspective

BACKGROUND

Vascularized composite allotransplants consist of heterogeneous tissues from different germ layers, which include skin, muscle, bone, fat, nerves, and lymph nodes. The antigenic diversity of these tissues, particularly of the highly immunogenic skin component, necessitates potent immunosuppressive regimens similar to that of some solid organ transplants. Indeed, the lifelong, high-dose, multidrug immunosuppressive protocols expose vascularized composite allotransplant recipients to considerable risk of infectious, metabolic, and neoplastic sequelae. In this article, the authors review the infectious risk to patients after vascularized composite allotransplantation, with special attention to the somewhat limited experience with the prophylaxis and treatment of infections after this innovative reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

A review of the literature was undertaken to elucidate the characterization, prophylaxis, and treatment of all documented infectious complications.

RESULTS

Infections in face and hand vascularized composite allotransplants follow a course similar to that of solid organ transplants. Several differences exist, including the unique flora of craniomaxillofacial transplants, the increased risk of donor-derived infections, and the alteration of the risk-to-benefit ratio for cytomegalovirus infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient with a face or limb transplant has many of the same infectious risks as a lung transplant recipient, which include bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Because of the anatomy, mucosal exposure, and differing donor flora, however, the face or limb transplant is susceptible to invasive diseases from a variety of microbes.

Where are we at with short bowel syndrome and small bowel transplant

Intestinal failure can be defined as the critical reduction of functional gut mass below the minimal amount necessary for adequate digestion and absorption to satisfy body nutrient and fluid requirements in adults or children. Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is characterized by a state of malabsorption following extensive resection of the small bowel. SBS may occur after resection of more than 50% and is certain after resection of more than 70% of the small intestine, or if less than 100 cm of small bowel is left. Several treatment modalities other than total parenteral nutrition, including hormones (recombinant human growth hormone, glucagon-like peptide-2) and tailoring surgeries (Bianchi procedure, serial transverse enteroplasty), had been proposed, however these were either experimental or inefficient. Small bowel transplant is a rather new approach for SBS. The once feared field of solid organ transplantation is nowadays becoming more and more popular, even in developing countries. This is partially secondary to the developments in immunosuppressive strategy. In this regard, alemtuzumab deserves special attention. There are more complex surgeries, such as multivisceral transplantation, for multi-organ involvement including small bowel. This latter technique is relatively new when compared to small bowel transplant, and is performed in certain centers worldwide. In this review, an attempt is made to give an insight into small bowel syndrome, small bowel transplantation, and related issues.

Hand allotransplantation

In the past decade, more than 100 different composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) procedures have been performed around the world including more than 50 hand and 8 facial transplants with encouraging graft survival and excellent functional outcomes. Broader clinical application of CTA, however, continues to be hampered by requirement for long-term, high-dose, multidrug maintenance immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection mediated particularly by composite tissue allograft's highly immunogenic skin component. Medication toxicity could result in severe adverse events including metabolic and infectious complications or malignancy. Notably, unlike in solid organs, clinical success is dictated not only by graft acceptance and survival but also by nerve regeneration, which determines ultimate functional outcomes. Novel strategies such as cellular and biologic therapies that integrate the concepts of immune regulation with those of nerve regeneration have shown promising results in small and large animal models. Clinical translation of these insights to reconstructive transplantation and CTA could further minimize the need of immunosuppression and optimize functional outcomes. This will enable wider application of such treatment options for patients in need of complex reconstructive surgery for congenital deformities or devastating injuries that are not amenable to standard methods of repair.

Achievements and challenges in composite tissue allotransplantation

Overall, more than 60 hand/forearm/arm transplantations and 16 face transplantations have been performed in the past 12 years. In the European experience summarized here, three grafts have been lost in response to a vascular thrombosis (n = 1), rejection and incompliance with immunosuppression (n = 1) and death (n = 1). The overall functional and esthetic outcome is very satisfactory, but serious side effects and complications related to immunosuppression are challenges hindering progress in this field. The high levels of immunosuppression, skin rejection, nerve regeneration, donor legislation and the acceptance level need to be addressed to promote growth of this promising new field in transplantation and reconstructive surgery.

Five-year outcomes with alemtuzumab induction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy with alemtuzumab, followed by lower than conventional intensity post-transplant immunosuppression (eg, tacrolimus monotherapy), has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality in abdominal and heart transplantation. We examined 5-year outcomes in lung recipients receiving alemtuzumab in conjunction with reduced-intensity post-transplant immunosuppression (early lower-dose tacrolimus; lower-dose steroids, with or without mycophenolate mofetil), compared with lung recipients receiving other induction agents or no induction in association with post-transplant immunosuppression.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using prospectively collected data from a single-site clinical database of 336 lung recipients (aged ≥ 18) who received allografts between 1998 and 2005, classified by induction type: alemtuzumab, 127; Thymoglobulin, 43; daclizumab, 73; and none, 93. Survival analyses examined patient and graft survival, and freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis, obliterative bronchiolitis (OB), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

RESULTS

Five-year patient and graft survival differed by group (p = 0.046, p = 0.038, respectively). Alemtuzumab patient/graft survival rates were 59%/59%. Survival rates were 60%/44% for Thymoglobulin, 47%/46% for no induction, and 44%/41% for daclizumab. Freedom from ACR, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, OB, and BOS differed by group (all values, p < 0.008); alemtuzumab recipients showed greater 5-year freedom from each outcome (30%/82%/86%/54%) than Thymoglobulin (20%/54%/62%/27%), daclizumab (19%/55%/70%/43%), and no-induction groups (18%/70%/69%/46%). The groups did not differ in PTLD rates (≥ 94% free of PTLD at 5 years; p = 0.864). Effects were unchanged after controlling for potential covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction may be associated with improved outcomes in lung transplantation. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish any effects of this agent.

Immunologic aspects and rejection in solid organ versus reconstructive transplantation

The immunosuppressive medications developed over the past 3 decades have paved the way for solid organ transplantation to become the treatment of choice for end-stage organ failure. At the end of the century, composite tissue transplantation in humans was performed with success using the same immunosuppressive medications and therapeutic principles. A decade later, experience from >100 cases of reconstructive transplantation have increased the knowledge, changed the view, and affected the therapeutic principles in this novel field. We herein portray the evolution of this novel type of transplant with particular reference to immunologic aspects, particularly differences between reconstructive and solid organ transplantation.

Intestinal transplantation in children: a review of immunotherapy regimens

This review summarizes the outcomes and known adverse effects of current immunosuppression strategies in use in pediatric intestinal transplantation. Intestinal transplantation has evolved from an experimental therapy to a highly successful treatment for children with intestinal failure who have complications with total parenteral nutrition. Because of continued success with intestinal transplantation over the past decade, the focus of clinicians and researchers is shifting from short-term patient survival to optimizing long-term outcomes. Current 5-year patient and graft survival rates after intestinal transplantation are 58% and 40%, respectively, in the US; single centers have reported nearly 80% patient and 60% graft survival rates at 5 years. The immunosuppression strategy in intestinal transplantation includes a tacrolimus-based regimen, usually in conjunction with an antibody induction therapy such as rabbit-antithymocyte globulin, interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, or alemtuzumab. The use of these immunosuppressive regimens, along with improved medical and surgical care, has contributed significantly toward improved outcomes. Optimization of post-transplant immunosuppression strategies to reduce adverse effects while minimizing acute and chronic graft rejection is a strong clinical and research focus.

Alemtuzumab in solid organ transplantation and in composite tissue allotransplantation

Alemtuzumab (Campath®, Genzyme Corporation, MA, USA) is a potent monoclonal antilymphocyte, anti-CD52 antibody. Since the 1980s, alemtuzumab has been used extensively in organ transplantation as an induction agent – also with the aim of avoiding or reducing maintenance immunosuppression. We herein review the literature on alemtuzumab in solid organ and composite tissue allotransplantation with an emphasis on clinical and mechanistic aspects of alemtuzumab. In summary, the use of alemtuzumab in solid organ and composite tissue allotransplantation shows excellent early results and holds potential for wider use in conjunction with immunosuppression minimization protocols.

Intestinal transplantation: current outcomes and opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights current outcomes in intestinal transplantation and summarizes advances that have recently occurred in five interrelated areas: progress in intestinal rehabilitation, immunologic and technical modifications, awareness of opportunities for improved allograft monitoring, and better assessment of long-term complications and morbidities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved long-term management of patients with intestinal failure as well as improved outcomes with intestine transplant are changing the previously established paradigms of timing for referral. For those requiring transplant, use of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody induction protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1 and 5 year patient survival rates of 93 and 78%, respectively with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection or morbidities such as renal dysfunction. Descriptions of tissue, proteomic and genomic technologies to complement traditional methodologies to monitor graft function are emerging.

SUMMARY

Optimal timing for referral of children with intestinal failure and improved medical and surgical therapies increase the opportunity for intestinal adaptation without the need for transplant. For those undergoing transplant, technical and immunologic modifications, developments in graft monitoring, and reduction of long-term morbidities are leading to improved outcomes.

Current perspectives on pediatric intestinal transplantation

Irreversible intestinal failure in children is predominantly caused by surgical conditions such as volvulus, necrotizing enterocolitis, and gastroschisis. Functional intestinal failure from motility disorders such as intestinal pseudo-obstruction or enterocyte dysfunction with microvillus inclusion disease also may require intestine replacement. Approved indications for intestinal transplantation include liver dysfunction, loss of major venous access, frequent central line-related sepsis, and recurrent episodes of severe dehydration despite intravenous fluid management. Surgical options include transplantation of the isolated intestine, combined liver-intestine transplantation, or multivisceral transplantation of the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, and small bowel (with or without the liver). Immunosuppression for intestinal transplantation is based on tacrolimus therapy, often with induction immunosuppression using antilymphocyte antibodies (eg, antithymocyte antibody and alemtuzumab). Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1- and 5-year patient survival rates of 95% and 77%, respectively, with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection.

Islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction and calcineurin-free maintenance immunosuppression results in improved short- and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Only a minority of islet transplant recipients maintain insulin independence at 5 years under the Edmonton protocol of immunosuppression. New immunosuppressive strategies are required to improve long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three subjects with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction and sirolimus-tacrolimus maintenance for 3 months and then sirolimus-mycophenolic acid maintenance thereafter. Follow-up was more than 2 years. Comparison was with 16 historical subjects transplanted under the Miami version of the Edmonton protocol.

RESULTS

Insulin independence was achieved in 2 of 3 alemtuzumab and 14 of 16 historical subjects. Those who did not achieve insulin independence only received a single islet infusion. Insulin-independence rates remained unchanged in the alemtuzumab group, but decreased from 14 of 16 (88%) to 6 of 16 (38%) in the historical group over 2 years. Insulin requirements increased in the historical group while remaining stable in the alemtuzumab group. Comparison of functional measures at 3 months suggested better engraftment with alemtuzumab (P=NS). Further comparison of alemtuzumab versus historical groups, up to 24 months, demonstrated significantly better: Mixed meal stimulation index (24 months, 1.0+/-0.08 [n=3] vs. 0.5+/-0.06 pmol/mL [n=6], P<0.01), mixed meal peak C-peptide (24 months, 5.0+/-0.5 [n=3] vs. 3.1+/-0.3 nmol/mL [n=6], P<0.05), HbA1c (24 months, 5.4+/-0.15 [n=3] vs. 6.3+/-0.12 pmol/mL [n=10], P<0.01). Administration of alemtuzumab was well tolerated. There was no increased incidence of infections in alemtuzumab subjects despite profound, prolonged lymphocyte depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction was well tolerated and resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes. Further investigation is underway for validation.

Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation: Current concepts and challenges

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen that influences the outcome of liver transplantation. In addition to the direct effects of CMV syndrome and tissue-invasive diseases, CMV is associated with an increased predisposition to acute and chronic allograft rejection, accelerated hepatitis C recurrence, and other opportunistic infections, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. Risk factors for CMV disease are often interrelated, and include CMV D+/R- serostatus, acute rejection, female gender, age, use of high-dose mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone, and the overall state of immunity. In addition to the role of CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, there are data to suggest that functionality of the innate immune system contributes to CMV disease pathogenesis. In one study, liver transplant recipients with a specific polymorphism in innate immune molecules known as Toll-like receptors were more likely to develop higher levels of CMV replication and clinical disease. Because of the direct and indirect adverse effects of CMV disease, its prevention, whether through antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy, is an essential component in improving the outcome of liver transplantation. In the majority of transplant centers, antiviral prophylaxis is the preferred strategy over preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in CMV-seronegative recipients of liver allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-). However, the major drawback of antiviral prophylaxis is the occurrence of delayed-onset primary CMV disease. In several prospective and retrospective studies, the incidence of delayed-onset primary CMV disease ranged from 16% to 47% of CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients. Current data suggests that delayed-onset CMV disease is associated with increased mortality after liver transplantation. Therefore, optimized strategies for prevention and novel drugs with unique modes of action are needed. Currently, a randomized controlled clinical trial is being performed comparing the efficacy and safety of maribavir, a novel benzimidazole riboside, and oral ganciclovir as prophylaxis against primary CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. The treatment of CMV disease consists mainly of intravenous (IV) ganciclovir, and if feasible, a reduction in the degree of immunosuppression. A recent controlled clinical trial demonstrated that valganciclovir is as effective and safe as IV ganciclovir for the treatment of CMV disease in solid organ (including liver) transplant recipients. In this article, the author reviews the current state and the future perspectives of prevention and treatment of CMV disease after liver transplantation.

Induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin and rituximab in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

BACKGROUND

Induction immunosuppression is now a common practice after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. We report our experience in 27 adult recipients who received rituximab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in combination as induction agents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-seven adult patients received 29 intestinal transplants between July 2004 and March 2007. All patients received induction immunosuppression therapy with rATG, rituximab, and steroids. Tacrolimums and a steroid taper were used for maintenance therapy. Patient and graft survival, episodes of rejection as well as posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and graft-versus-host disease were analyzed.

RESULTS

One-year patient and graft survival was 81% and 76%, respectively. Thirteen patients (48%) experienced 19 episodes of acute rejection (9 mild episodes, 2 moderate, and 8 severe). Patients with a multivisceral graft experienced less episodes of severe acute rejection (1 of 19, 5%) when compared with isolated intestinal transplants and modified multivisceral transplants (7 of 10, 70%). Two patients had episodes of skin graft-versus-host disease that responded to steroid boluses. PTLD was not seen in our series. Two patients developed cytomegalovirus enteritis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of rATG and rituximab was an effective induction therapy in our preliminary data. The number and severity of rejection episodes increased when the liver was not included as part of the graft. An immunosuppression regimen including rATG, rituximab, and steroids may have a protective effect against PTLD and chronic rejection.

Present status and future perspectives of intestinal transplantation

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the only definitive therapy for irreversible intestinal failure. Owing to the limited short- and long-term graft survival over the years, ITx has been a complementary treatment to home parenteral nutrition. However, the development of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation has been significant over the past 15-20 years owing to the progress in immunosuppressive therapy, refinement of surgical techniques, post-transplant care, intestinal immunology, and immunological as well as anti-infectious monitoring. The improvement of patient- and graft survival over the last few years together with data on the cost effectiveness of ITx, following 2 years after transplantation, may require a redefinition of the indication for ITx.

The ?Blind Innsbruck Ostomy?, a cutaneous enterostomy for long-term histologic surveillance after small bowel transplantation

Intestinal transplantation has evolved into an established treatment for patients with intestinal failure. Although acute rejection episodes are reversible, late onset and chronic rejections remain major prognostic factors. We describe here our experience with endoscopic and histologic long-term monitoring through a cutaneous enterostomy. Between 1989 and 2003, 24 intestinal transplants were performed. After revascularization and reconstruction of proximal intestinal continuity, a side-to-end ileo-enterostomy was performed 20 cm from the stoma and the terminal allograft ileostomy left in the abdominal wall. Approximately after 2 months, in eight patients (nine transplants), the stoma was excluded from the gastrointestinal continuity, allowing ongoing endoscopy and histologic examination. Of 280 forceps biopsies, 64 (23%) were performed through the 'blind ostomy'. Eleven acute allograft rejections were diagnosed between days 3 and 51, with two episodes in three cases. Through the 'blind ostomy', a late mild acute rejection was diagnosed in five instances, three to 37 months after transplantation. In all these patients, basal immunosuppression was intensified. Chronic rejection was seen in three cases 4-26 months after transplantation. In one of the three patients, chronic rejection was diagnosed from the excluded blind enterostomy. A long-term cutaneous enterostomy, even if disconnected from the intestinal continuity, enables simple long-term monitoring of small bowel allografts.

Is intestinal transplantation now an alternative to home parenteral nutrition?

Patients with irreversible intestinal failure and complications of parenteral nutrition should now be routinely considered for small intestine transplantation. Despite attempts for >40 years immunological graft intolerance presented an impenetrable barrier to successful engraftment until the development in the late 1970s of the powerful calcineurin-inhibitor immunosuppressive agents. Their use over the last 17 years has led to small intestinal transplantation being generally considered as a routine option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure and failing parenteral nutrition. The 1-year patient survival rates (%) are now excellent for renal (95), liver (78), heart (82) and lung (75) transplantation. In contrast, survival rates for small intestinal transplantation have been slow to improve, although they are now approaching those for lung and liver transplantation (intestine 78%, intestine and liver 60%, multivisceral 66%), and well-performing centres report recent 1-year graft survival rates as high as 92%. Patient 5-year survival (%) has also improved (intestine alone 50, intestine and liver 50 and multivisceral 62) and compares increasingly favourably with renal (85), liver (67), heart (67) and lung (46). Currently, small intestinal transplantation is reserved for patients with irreversible small intestinal failure who have a poor prognosis on parenteral nutrition. However, as 5-year patient survival following intestinal transplantation approaches that for parenteral nutrition there will be increasing pressure to offer this modality of treatment as an alternative to parenteral nutrition, especially for those patients who have a poor quality of life as a result of parenteral nutrition.

Contemporaneous chronic rejection of multiple allografts with principal pancreatic involvement in modified multivisceral transplantation

The patient was a 10 yr-old-male with short gut syndrome secondary to Hirschsprung's disease, who underwent a modified (no liver) multivisceral transplant (stomach, pancreas, small and large intestine). The patient experienced malabsorption early in the post-operative course and had been dependent on a combination of enteral and intravenous nutrition. He developed symptoms of bowel obstruction and was suspected to have chronic rejection by an exploratory laparotomy four yr after transplant. Re-transplantation of a multivisceral transplant (stomach, pancreas, liver, small and large intestine) was performed. Microscopic examinations of the explanted allograft organ block revealed varying degrees of chronic rejection in many of the organs but with the pancreatic allograft being affected most severely. The malabsorption symptom following the first transplant may have been caused by the early onset of chronic pancreatic allograft dysfunction. Our case indicates varying severity of chronic rejection among multiple allografts where the pancreatic allograft appeared most susceptible to chronic rejection.

Abdominal wall transplantation with microsurgical technique

Many patients undergoing intestinal or multivisceral transplantation have a past history of complete midgut removal with the loss of the domain of the abdominal compartment or have severely damaged abdominal walls from repeated laparotomies, tumours or enterocutaneous fistulae. These patients may encounter severe abdominal wall closure problems at the end of transplantation, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. It is, therefore, of paramount importance to properly cover transplanted organs in order to reduce postoperative complications. Abdominal wall transplantation was recently proposed for closure of patients undergoing both small-bowel and multivisceral transplantation: the results are encouraging. However, the technical procedure proposed requires the procurement of long segments of iliac vessels as far as the vena cava and the aorta. Since donor multiorgan procurement involves many surgical teams, the removal of these vessels, with the abdominal graft, led to their unavailability for vascular surgeons. Here we present three consecutive cases of abdominal wall transplantation in which, by taking advantage of microsurgical experience, we were able to carry out a transplantation of the abdominal wall by direct anastomosis of the epigastric vessels, obtaining a very good outcome.

Analysis of acute cellular rejection episodes in recipients of primary intestinal transplantation: a single center, 11-year experience

Intestinal transplantation has evolved over the years with major improvements in patient and graft survival. Acute cellular rejection of the intestine, however, still remains one of the most challenging aspects of postoperative management. We analyzed retrospectively collected data from 209 recipients of primary intestinal grafts at our institution over the past 11 years. A total of 290 episodes of biopsy-proven rejection requiring clinical treatment were analyzed. Rejection episodes doubled in length, on average, with each increasing grade (mild, moderate, severe). We observed increased incidence of overall rejection and particularly severe rejection in recipients of isolated intestinal and liver-intestine grafts in comparison with multivisceral grafts. Two rejection history variables had a significant negative impact on graft survival: the occurrence of a severe rejection episode and a rejection episode lasting >or=21 days. The lower incidence rate of severe rejection in recipients of multivisceral grafts might be due to a combination of increased donor lymphatic tissue and larger load of donor-derived immune competent cells present in the graft. The development of more effective monitoring and treatment protocols to prevent the occurrence of severe and/or lengthy rejection episodes is of critical importance for intestinal graft survival.

Current status of transplantation of the small intestine

The evolution of small bowel transplantation has been significant over the past 20 years to the point at which it can now be considered a viable and often successful option in the treatment of many forms of short bowel syndrome. A refinement of surgical techniques, improved immunosuppression, enhanced understanding of gut immunology, and better treatment and prevention of complications have contributed to a marked improvement in graft and patient survival. Whereas this transplant population is still beset with many potential complications after isolated bowel or multivisceral transplantation and long-term graft survival (like with other solid organ transplants) remains a challenge, the future holds promise for a continuation of the current positive trend of improvement in several areas.

Daclizumab and alemtuzumab as induction agents in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: A comparison of two different regimens on 29 recipients during the early post-operative period

INTRODUCTION

Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H).

RESULTS

During first month, 45% of Daclizumab recipients experienced six acute cellular rejections (ACRs) of mild degree, while 63% of them developed an infection requiring treatment. We found three acute cellular rejections in 17.6% of Alemtuzumab recipients, two with moderate degree; 64.7% of them required treatment for infection.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Graft and patient 3-years cumulative survival rate were not significantly different between groups. Alemtuzumab seems to offer a better immunosuppression during first month.

Steroids in intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recently, new immunosuppressive protocols after intestinal transplantation have been proposed to avoid steroids use and their adverse effects. We evaluated the impact of steroids on survival and post-transplant complications in our experience.

PATIENT AND METHODS

In our retrospective study we considered the mean daily dosage of steroids received by 25 patients after intestinal/multivisceral transplantation (minimal follow-up was six months). We analyzed graft and patient survival rates, correlation with rejection and infectious episodes and steroids side effects.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of three yr, we did not find any significant difference in steroid doses between our immunosuppressive protocols. Patients with a mean dosage of prednisone higher than 20 mg/d experienced a lower graft (p = 0.009) and patient (p = 0.02) survival rate. The side effects of steroids after transplant were similar. Infections were more frequent during steroids administration (p = 0.04).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Steroids therapy may be useful to treat acute rejection, but in our experience high steroids regimen did not improve graft and patient survival, increasing infectious rate. We assumed that high dose of steroids can be avoided as maintenance therapy, except in selected cases.

Immunosuppressive preconditioning or induction regimens : evidence to date

The success of solid organ transplantation has been directly related to the development of immunosuppressive drug therapies. Preconditioning or induction therapy was developed to reduce early immunological and nonimmunological renal injury, with the goal of increasing long-term graft survival. However, the routine induction of immunological tolerance to solid organ allograft is currently not achievable because of the morbidity and mortality related to the immunosuppressive regimens themselves. The different therapeutic preconditioning or induction agents and their associated effects on cellular rejection, graft survival outcomes and the need for multiagent post-transplant maintenance therapy are reviewed.

Opportunistic infections in 547 organ transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal CD-52 antibody

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab is being increasingly used for the prevention and/or treatment of acute allograft rejection in organ transplant recipients. We assessed the risks of infection in, to our knowledge, the largest cohort and broadest range of organ transplant recipients yet reported to have received alemtuzumab.

METHODS

All patients who received alemtuzumab from September 2002 through March 2004, either as induction therapy at the time of transplantation or for the treatment of rejection, were evaluated for the development of an opportunistic infection (OI) until death or for 12 months after receipt of the last dose of alemtuzumab.

RESULTS

A total of 547 recipients were included, 65% of whom received alemtuzumab for induction therapy only. Overall, 56 recipients (10%) developed 62 OIs, including cytomegalovirus disease (n = 16), BK virus infection (n=12), posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (n=5), human herpesvirus 6 infection (n=1), parvovirus infection (n=1), esophageal candidiasis (n=12), cryptococcosis (n=2), invasive mold infection (n=4), Nocardia infection (n=4), mycobacterial infection (n=3), Balamuthia mandrillaris infection (n=1), and toxoplasmosis (n=1). Patients who received alemtuzumab for induction therapy were significantly less likely to develop an OI, compared with patients who received alemtuzumab for rejection therapy (4.5% vs. 21%; P<.001). Independent predictors of the development of an OI were administration of alemtuzumab for rejection therapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-6.8; P<.001), allograft failure (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P=.04), and receipt of a lung transplant (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.7-8.0; P=.001) or an intestinal transplant (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 3.5-19.5; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received alemtuzumab for the treatment of allograft rejection were significantly more likely to develop an OI, compared with patients who received alemtuzumab for induction therapy only. Such data have implications for new antimicrobial prophylactic strategies.

Intestinal transplantation for short bowel syndrome secondary to gastroschisis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastroschisis is the most frequent cause of pediatric intestinal transplantation. This study reviews our experience of intestinal transplantation secondary to gastroschisis to elucidate those factors affecting the outcome of children with short bowel syndrome.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for children who underwent intestinal transplantation for gastroschisis at the University of Miami between June 2003 and August 1994.

RESULTS

Thirty-two transplants were performed in 28 children with gastroschisis during the study period. Associated intestinal anomalies were present in 22 infants (atresia [n = 14], volvulus [n = 3], and/or ischemia [n = 16]). Spontaneous prenatal closure of gastroschisis, a rare anomaly associated with bowel atresia and ischemia because of a very small abdominal defect, was seen in 9 patients. Most of the patients had a complicated course and required multiple abdominal surgeries before transplant. Fifteen (53.6%) patients are currently alive at a median follow-up of 23.5 months. Short-term survival rate has significantly improved in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with complex gastroschisis and intestinal anomalies have a significant risk for progression to short bowel syndrome. Intestinal transplantation can be a lifesaving option and provides a satisfactory outcome for children with short bowel syndrome secondary to gastroschisis.

Histopathologic characteristics of human intestine allograft acute rejection in patients pretreated with thymoglobulin or alemtuzumab

BACKGROUND

We report herein the histopathologic characteristics of human intestine allograft acute rejection in a consecutive series of 48 patients receiving small bowel transplantations and treated with a preconditioning protocol between July 4, 2001 and January 31, 2004.

METHODS

Recipient pretreatment was with an i.v. infusion of 5-10 mg/kg thymoglobulin or 30-60 mg of alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) over several hours prior to revascularization. Postoperative treatment was limited to tacrolimus (target 12-h trough level 10-15 ng/mL) unless additional drugs were needed to treat breakthrough rejection.

RESULTS

A total of 3,497 biopsies of the allograft jejunum and/or ileum were obtained. A recently validated histological grading schema was prospectively utilized to grade acute rejection. A total of 116 acute rejection episodes were diagnosed (48 indeterminate, 36 mild, 11 moderate, and 21 severe). Several unique histopathologic features of allograft acute rejection were observed in the pretreated patients. First, scattered lamina propria neutrophilic inflammation often precedes the onset of acute rejection. Second, acute rejection is often associated with more prominent eosinophils in lamina propria or eosinophilic cryptitis. Third, certain acute rejection episodes are characterized by absence of crypts with intact surface villous epithelium. Finally, the mucosal damage associated with moderate or severe acute rejection can completely recover after additional immunosuppressive treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study describes several characteristic histopathologic features of allograft small bowel acute rejection associated with thymoglobulin or alemtuzumab preconditioning. Recognition of these unique histopathologic features will enable accurate diagnosis and ensure successful weaning of immunosuppressive drugs.

Intestinal Transplantation With Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) Induction for Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H [C1H]) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the CD 52 antigen that is present on the surface of T cells, B cells, natural killer cells and monocytes. We studied its application in intestinal transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of adult patients who underwent intestinal transplantation between December 1994 and May 2005. Group 1: non-C1H group (n = 39); group 2: C1H group (n = 37). C1H was administered as an induction immunosuppression in four doses (0.3 mg/kg), or in two doses (30 mg/kg). Tacrolimus levels were maintained at low level (5-10 ng/dL). No maintenance steroids were given.

RESULTS

One-year survival of group 1 and group 2 patients were 57% and 70%, respectively. This difference is not statistically significant. Of 37 patients in group 2, 21 are alive. The incidence of rejection was lower in group 2 (P < .005). Average current tacrolimus level is 6.97 +/- 3.98 ng/dL. Seventeen patients (81%) are steroid free, and 15 (71%) are maintained solely on tacrolimus. There was no graft versus host disease in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data suggest that C1H can provide effective immunosuppression for intestinal transplantation. Incidence of rejection was less with this regimen using low maintenance tacrolimus and minimal steroids.

The Miami Experience With Almost 100 Multivisceral Transplants

We report our experience with 98 patients who received primary multivisceral transplantations. Three eras can be distinguished based on the evolution of technique, immunosuppression, and monitoring: August 1994 to December 1997 (first era); January 1998 to December 2000 (second era); and January 2001 to present (third era). Sixteen patients were transplanted during the first era, 18 during the second era, and 64 during the third era. Fifty-three patients are alive with a median follow-up of 37.5 months (range: 1 to 116 months). The leading cause of mortality was infection (n = 17), followed by rejection (n = 6). Seven patients required retransplantation and five of them subsequently died. The estimated 3-year survival was 25% +/- 11% for era 1; 44% +/- 12% for era 2; and 58% +/- 7% for era 3. Additionally, 45.3% (29/64) of patients in the third era never developed rejection versus 23.5% (8/34) of patients in the first two eras combined. The percentage of patients who developed a moderate or severe rejection was significantly less in the third era compared with the first two eras combined, 31.6% (20/64) versus 67.6% (23/34). A comparison of the hazard rate of developing severe rejection showed a protective effect of the multivisceral graft (P = .0001). In conclusion, multivisceral transplantation is indicated for patients with short bowel syndrome and extended abdominal catastrophies. Evolution in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and monitoring have improved patient survival, which is now similar to that of other complex solid organ transplants.

The Importance of Analyzing Graft and Patient Survival by Cause of Failure: An Example Using Pediatric Small Intestine Transplant Data

BACKGROUND

Although graft and patient survival are vital in reporting overall results of clinical transplant studies, these outcomes do not account for distinct types of graft failure and death, which clearly exist in pediatric small intestine transplantation (Itx). The use of a cause-specific hazard (CSH) approach may provide more precise identification and thus greater insight as to why certain factors are prognostically important.

METHODS

Among 119 pediatric patients who received primary Itx at our center since 1994, Cox model stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for the following CSH rates: intestinal graft failure (IGF)/death due to rejection, death due to infection not triggered by IGF, and intestinal graft loss/death due to other causes.

RESULTS

Two factors were associated with a significantly higher rate of developing IGF due to rejection (23 such failures): receiving an isolated intestine or liver-intestine transplant (P=0.00001) and receiving no induction agent (P=0.006). Conversely, age at transplant <1 year was the single factor associated with a significantly higher death rate due to infection (P=0.0005) (21 such deaths). Two characteristics were associated with a significantly higher death rate due to other causes: being in the hospital pretransplant (P=0.007) and not receiving daclizumab induction therapy (P=0.02) (24 such deaths). Although these four factors (transplant type/age/hospital status/induction therapy) were, for the most part, associated with graft/patient survival, the CSH analysis more precisely identified their prognostic value and achieved greater statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

A CSH approach should be used in conjunction with overall outcome analyses.

Novel therapies in transplantation

Immunosuppressant drugs are crucial in order to protect transplanted kidney, heart or liver against the body's natural defence mechanisms. These drugs are used to prevent both acute rejection of the organ as well as chronic deterioration of the graft over longer periods of time. Currently used immunosuppressant drugs are calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin and tacrolimus), steroids (prednisolone and methylprednisolone), antimetabolites (azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil), antiproliferatives (sirolimus) and monoclonal antibodies that are used as an induction therapy (basilximab, daclizumab and muromonab). Over time, we have learnt more about existing immunosuppressive choices and the ways to monitor these drugs, and the current trend in immunosuppression therapy is towards tailoring the therapy according to an individual patient. The major issue that is now emerging is not how to prevent acute rejection, as current drugs are all efficacious, but rather how to avoid the long-term side effects that can harm both the graft and host, and negatively influence compliance. The market in transplantation is considerable and still growing; the whole market including the immuno-suppressants used in autoimmune diseases had sales of approximately pound 1.5 billion in 2001. There are currently 23 new drugs in advanced clinical development intended to be used in either organ transplantation or as treatment of autoimmune diseases. The new drugs that are intended to be used in transplantation are mostly analogues of currently used drugs with improved safety and pharmaceutical profiles.

Zoom endoscopic monitoring of small bowel allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

The small bowel has been successfully transplanted in patients with irreversible intestinal failure. This report aims to describe endoscopic monitoring of small bowel rejection.

METHODS

A magnification endoscope (zoom endoscope) was used in this study. In the first part of the study (October 1998 to March 2000, 271 endoscopy sessions), the specific endoscopic findings that correlated with rejection were determined. An analysis then was performed on data from the second period (March 2001 to November 2002, 499 sessions) to evaluate the zoom endoscope's accuracy in monitoring rejection.

RESULTS

Specific endoscopic findings of rejection found in the first period included background erythema, villous congestion, blunted villous tip, and shortened villous height. When the rejection was successfully treated, endoscopic appearance returned to normal. On the basis of these findings, five endoscopic criteria (villous shortening, villous blunting, background erythema, villous congestion, and mucosal friability) were used to score endoscopic sessions in the second period. Endoscopic diagnosis of rejection was compared with histology. Adult patients showed a sensitivity of 45%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a negative predictive value of 88%. In pediatric patients, these values were, respectively, 61%, 84%, 57%, and 86%. On 59 distinct occasions (30 in period 1 and 29 in period 2) in which the results were endoscopy negative yet biopsy positive (mild) for rejection, we elected not to treat these rejections on the basis of clinical evaluation, and 58 (98%) resolved without further therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of magnification, endoscopy is a useful tool for monitoring acute rejection in the small bowel allograft.

Alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD52, a small glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein that is highly expressed on normal T- and B-lymphocytes, and on a large proportion of malignant lymphoid cells, but not on hematopoietic progenitor cells. Over the past several years, a number of clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical activity of alemtuzumab in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, T-cell malignancies such as T-prolymphocytic leukemia and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, as well as in the prevention and therapy of graft-versus-host disease in the setting of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Its application in a number of autoimmune disorders is currently under investigation. The most significant side effect of alemtuzumab is predisposition to infections related to the associated profound lymphopenia. Despite this, and with appropriate and more effective antibiotic prophylaxis, it is likely that we will witness an expansion of the role of alemtuzumab in the future.

Efficacy of Alemtuzumab in Organ Transplantation

An overview of the past 5 years of clinical renal transplantation would include progress in (i) the development of protocols with new induction agents (non-depleting versus depleting monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies) designed to reduce the incidence and severity of acute rejection, (ii) the attempt to reduce calcineurin inhibitor short- and long-term nephrotoxicity, and (iii) the attempt to reduce immunosuppression overall if an immunoregulatory state ('tolerance') against donor alloantigens could be achieved. One such induction agent is the humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab (Campath-1H), which depletes T cells (most potently), as well as B cells and other lymphoid subsets, and may decrease the dosage or need for concurrent maintenance immunosuppressive agents.

Immunosuppressive agents in solid organ transplantation: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy

Effective immunosuppression is an essential pre-requisite for successful organ transplantation and improvements in outcome after transplantation have to a large extent been dependent on developments in immunosuppressive therapy. Here we provide an overview of the different immunosuppressive agents currently used in solid organ transplantation. A historical perspective on the development of immunosuppression for organ transplantation is followed by a review of the individual agents, with a focus on their mechanism of action and efficacy. Steroids, anti-proliferative agents (azathioprine and mycophenolate), calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) and TOR inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) are discussed along with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibody preparations. Many of the key clinical trials that underpin current clinical usage of these agents are described and side-effects of the different agents are highlighted. Finally, a number of newer agents still in various stages of clinical development are briefly considered.