Differential early posttransplant cytokine responses in living and cadaver donor renal allografts

Influence of the IL17A and IL17F gene polymorphisms on the long-term kidney allograft function and return to dialysis after kidney transplantation

The immune response after allogenic transplantation is a complex phenomenon involving cytokines, chemokines, and other mediators of inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the IL17A and IL17F gene polymorphisms on long-term kidney allograft function, graft function loss/return to dialysis, and mortality after kidney transplantation. This study enrolled 269 Caucasian deceased donor renal transplant recipients. The rs2275913:G>A (-197G>A) polymorphism within the IL17A gene promoter and rs2397084:T>C (Glu126Gly), rs11465553:G>A (Val155Ile), and rs763780:T>C (His167Arg) polymorphisms within the IL17F gene were genotyped. Creatinine concentrations 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after transplantation were significantly higher in recipients with the rs2275913:A>G IL17A GG genotype (GG vs. GA + AA: p = 0.03, p = 0.004, p = 0.006, p = 0.03, p = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, the GG genotype was statistically significantly associated with increased risk of delayed graft function. This association remained significant in multivariate regression analysis adjusted for recipients' age and sex. In the case of the rs11465553, IL17F univariate Cox regression analysis showed statistically significant association of GA genotype with higher risk of graft loss/return to dialysis (GA vs. GG: HR = 2.795, 95%CI = 1.031-7.579, p = 0.04). The results of our study suggest that the GG genotype of the rs2275913 IL17A gene promoter polymorphism is associated with significantly impaired long-term kidney allograft function, whereas the GA genotype of the rs11465553 IL17F gene polymorphism may be associated with a significantly higher risk of graft function loss and return to dialysis after kidney transplantation.

IL2-IL21 gene cluster polymorphism is not associated with allograft function after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytokines are key mediators of the immune response after transplantation. The interleukin (IL)-2 cytokine family, which includes IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21, is of particular interest because of its importance in the allogenic response. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the rs6822844 gene polymorphism in the IL2-IL21 region and allograft function after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The study enrolled 270 Caucasian kidney allograft recipients (166 males and 104 females, mean age 47.63 ± 12.96 years). Following parameters were recorded in each case: recipient's age, delayed graft function (DGF), occurrence and number of episodes of acute rejection (AR), and chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). Genotyping of the rs6822844 IL2-IL21 cluster gene polymorphism was performed using real-time PCR assay.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the genotypes and alleles of the rs6822844 IL2-IL21 cluster gene polymorphism among patients with DGF (p = 0.72), AR (p = 0.69) and CAD (p = 0.77), or in creatinine concentrations 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 or 36 months after transplantation (p = 0.46, p = 0.58, p = 0.6, p = 0.72, p = 0.7, p = 0.76, respectively).

CONCLUSION

It seems that the rs6822844 IL2-IL21 gene cluster polymorphism is of little importance in allograft function after kidney transplantation.

Evidence for IFN-? up- and IL-4 downregulation late post-transplant in patients with good kidney graft outcome

We found recently that patients with good graft outcome showed higher IFN-gamma and IL-2, and lower IL-10 plasma levels late post-transplant than early post-transplant. In this retrospective study, we compared cytokine plasma levels in 33 symptom-free outpatients with those of 33 renal transplant recipients with early acute rejection (EAR), 29 with chronic rejection (CR), and 34 healthy controls (HC) to assess whether there is evidence for Th1 activation late post-transplant in patients with good graft outcome. Cytokines were measured pre-transplant, one wk, one month, six months, one yr, and two yr after transplantation. Twelve and 24 months post-transplant, IFN-gamma plasma levels were significantly higher (p = 0.001; p = 0.001, respectively) and IL-4 plasma levels significantly lower (p = 0.028; p = 0.003, respectively) in patients with stable graft function than those in controls. Six, 12, and 24 months post-transplant, patients with stable graft function had similar IFN-gamma and IL-4 plasma levels as patients with successfully treated EAR (p = n.s.), and higher IFN-gamma (p = 0.013; p = 0.001; p = 0.0005, respectively) and lower IL-4 (p = 0.007; p = 0.417; p = 0.0001, respectively) plasma levels than patients with CR. These data suggest that increased plasma IFN-gamma and decreased plasma IL-4 late post-transplant might be involved in the induction of mechanisms that facilitate good long-term graft outcome.

Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring Kidney Transplant Recipients

Recent advancements in immunobiology have introduced several new diagnostic tools for monitoring kidney transplant recipients. These have been added to more established tests that, although imperfect, remain important benchmarks of diagnostic utility. Both new and old tests can be characterized with regard to their practicality, and as to whether they detect aberrant function or define the cause of dysfunction. Unfortunately, no current test is both practical and specific to a particular disease entity. Accordingly, the diagnosis of graft dysfunction remains dependent on the proper use and interpretation of many studies. This article reviews the current assays that have been evaluated in the clinic for the diagnosis of renal allograft-related diseases. These are limited to assays based on routinely obtainable samples such as blood, biopsy tissue, and urine. Newer studies are presented, along with more mundane assays, to highlight the practical use of studies regardless of their degree of mechanistic sophistication.

Allograft inflammatory factor-1 and its immune regulation

The allograft inflammatory factor-1 (AIF-1) is a 17 kDa interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) inducible Ca(2+)-binding EF-hand protein that is encoded within the HLA class III genomic region. Three proteins including ionized Ca(2+)-binding adaptor 1, microglia response factor-1, and daintain are identical with AIF-1. The expression of AIF-1 was mostly limited to the monocyte/macrophage lineage, and augmented by cytokines such as IFN-gamma. It was assumed that AIF-1 was a novel molecule involved in inflammatory responses, allograft rejection, as well as the activation and function of macrophages. However, it has been reported that AIF-1 is also expressed in macrophages and microglial cells in autoimmune diseases such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, neuritis and uveitis models, suggesting that AIF-1 may play a pivotal role in autoimmunity. In the present manuscript, the genomic and functional characteristics of AIF-1 family proteins as well as their immune regulatory effects are reviewed.

Association of high pretransplant sIL-6R plasma levels with acute tubular necrosis in kidney graft recipients

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function is primarily caused by acute tubular necrosis (ATN). We studied in renal transplant recipients with posttransplant graft biopsy whether an up-regulated immune system in the recipient immediately before transplantation affects the risk of developing ATN and might be relevant for the pathogenesis of ATN.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we analyzed pretransplant and early posttransplant soluble interleukin (sIL)-1RA, interleukin (IL)-2, sIL-2R, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, sIL-6R, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta2, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and neopterin plasma levels in patients with ATN (n=26). Matched patients with acute rejection (AR) (n=26) or normal posttransplant biopsy (n=26) served as controls.

RESULTS

Pretransplant sIL-6R was higher (P=0.0004) and pretransplant TGF-beta2 lower (P=0.002) in patients with ATN than in patients with normal biopsy. ROC curves showed that high pretransplant sIL-6R has a high sensitivity (77%) and high specificity (64%) for ATN (P=0.002). Posttransplant plasma sIL-6R continued to be higher in ATN patients than in patients with normal biopsy (P=0.001). Patients with acute rejection showed pre- and posttransplant sIL-6R and TGF-beta2 plasma levels similar to those of patients with normal biopsy (P=NS).

CONCLUSION

High pretransplant sIL-6R plasma levels are associated with an increased risk of ATN and might contribute to the development of ATN early posttransplant. Our data suggest that preactivation of the recipient's immune system increases the risk of ATN.