Is screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in renal transplantation worthwhile? Results of a large single-center U.K. study

How to Deal With Kidney Retransplantation-Second, Third, Fourth, and Beyond

Kidney transplantation is the best health option for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Ideally, a kidney transplant would last for the lifetime of each recipient. However, depending on the age of the recipient and details of the kidney transplant, there may be a need for a second, third, fourth, or even more kidney transplants. In this overview, the outcome of multiple kidney transplants for an individual is presented. Key issues include surgical approach and immunologic concerns. Included in the surgical approach is an analysis of transplant nephrectomy, with indications, timing, and immunologic impact. Allograft thrombosis, whether related to donor or recipient factors merits investigation to prevent it from happening again. Other posttransplant events such as rejection, viral illness (polyomavirus hominis type I), recurrent disease (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease may lead to the need for retransplantation. The pediatric recipient is especially likely to need a subsequent kidney transplant. Finally, noncompliance/nonadherence can affect both adults and children. Innovative approaches may reduce the need for retransplantation in the future.

Estimating the potential impact of implementing pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in primary care across the UK

AIMS

Pharmacogenetics (PGx) in the UK is currently implemented in secondary care for a small group of high-risk medicines. However, most prescribing takes place in primary care, with a large group of medicines influenced by commonly occurring genetic variations. The goal of this study is to quantitatively estimate the volumes of medicines impacted by implementation of a population-level, pre-emptive pharmacogenetic screening programme for nine genes related to medicines frequently dispensed in primary care in 2019.

METHODS

A large community pharmacy database was analysed to estimate the national incidence of first prescriptions for 56 PGx drugs used in the UK for the period 1 January-31 December 2019. These estimated prescription volumes were combined with phenotype frequency data to estimate the occurrence of actionable drug-gene interactions (DGI) in daily practice in community pharmacies.

RESULTS

In between 19.1 and 21.1% (n = 5 233 353-5 780 595) of all new prescriptions for 56 drugs (n = 27 411 288 new prescriptions/year), an actionable drug-gene interaction (DGI) was present according to the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group and/or the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. In these cases, the DGI would result in either increased monitoring, guarding against a maximum ceiling dose or an optional or immediate drug/dose change. An immediate dose adjustment or change in drug regimen accounted for 8.6-9.1% (n = 2 354 058-2 500 283) of these prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Actionable drug-gene interactions frequently occur in UK primary care, with a large opportunity to optimise prescribing.

Utility of thrombophilia screening in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Thrombosis after kidney transplantation may result in catastrophic outcomes, including graft loss. Thrombophilia has been implicated in post-transplant thrombosis; data, however, are inconclusive on the impact of acquired and inherited thrombophilia and resultant thrombosis in renal graft recipients. We aimed to evaluate whether identifying children with thrombophilia during the pretransplant evaluation predicted post-transplant outcomes. We reviewed 100 kidney transplants performed in 100 children, aged 1-18 years, in a single-center retrospective study. Routine pretransplant comprehensive thrombophilia evaluation was completed. Thrombophilia was demonstrated in 36% patients (N = 36). TEs occurred in 11 patients before kidney transplant. Low PS and antithrombin were found in 9/86 (10.5%) and 2/89 (2.2%) children, respectively. Heterozygosity for FLV and PGM were found in 5/81 (6.2%) and 1/93(1.1%) children, respectively. A post-transplant thrombotic event occurred in 10 children (10%); six involved the renal transplant. The association between a history of a pretransplant thrombotic event and post-operative renal graft thrombosis approached, but did not reach significance (P = 0.071). There was no association between preoperative screening abnormalities and post-operative TEs. Graft loss due to a thrombotic event occurred in two patients; none had underlying thrombophilia. Our data suggest that the utility of universal, comprehensive preoperative thrombophilia testing is not beneficial in determining risk of post-operative graft thrombosis. Thrombophilia testing may be considered in a select population with a history of pretransplant thrombotic event.

Hypercoagulability in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Thrombosis remains an important complication after kidney transplantation. Outcomes for graft and deep vein thrombosis are not favorable. The majority of early kidney transplant failure in adults is due to allograft thrombosis. Risk stratification, early diagnosis, and appropriate intervention are critical to the management of thrombotic complications of transplant. In patients with end-stage renal disease, the prevalence of acquired risk factors for thrombosis is significantly high. Because of hereditary and acquired risk factors, renal transplant recipients manifest features of a chronic prothrombotic state. Identification of hereditary thrombotic risk factors before transplantation may be a useful tool for selecting appropriate candidates for thrombosis prophylaxis immediately after transplantation. Short-term anticoagulation may be appropriate for all patients after kidney transplantation.

Epidemiology of Prothrombin G20210A Mutation in the Mediterranean Region

There are many genetic and acquired risk factors that are known to cause venous thromboembolic disorders (VTE). One of these is the Prothrombin G20210A mutation, which has been identified in 1996. Prothrombin G20210A mutation causes higher levels of the clotting factor prothrombin in the blood of carriers, which creates a higher tendency towards blood clotting (hypercoagulability), and therefore the carriers become at higher risk of developing VTE. High prevalence of Prothrombin G20210A mutation was reported in Caucasian populations, but the prevalence was almost absent in non-Caucasians. That was most obvious in countries of South Europe and the Mediterranean region. This review article discusses Prothrombin G20210A mutation, how it causes VTE, the origin of the mutation, and its distribution worldwide with special concentration on the Mediterranean area.

[Incidence of thrombophilia and risk of renal vessel thrombosis in kidney transplant recipients]

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment of end stage kidney disease. The most common vascular complication in the early postoperative period is thrombosis of the renal artery and vein. These complications usually lead to the loss of the transplanted kidney.

AIM

of our study was to identify those factors which represent an increased risk for thrombotic complication and determine whether routine screening for thrombophilia is justifiable before transplantation. As an illustration to this problem we report a case of successful renal vein recanalisation after thrombosis.

METHODS

We give an overview of the literature about incidence of renal graft thrombosis, hypercoagulable states, predictive value of factor V. Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in venous thromboembolism. We discuss those publications that suggest a preoperative screening of transplant candidates for hypercoagulable states and thrombophilia and those that do not think that such screening is reasonable. In our case a 28 year old male patient received a cadaveric kidney. Thrombosis of the renal vein was diagnosed 8 hours after transplantation. Reoperation was performed immediately: venous anastomosis was opened, the thrombus removed. After reoperation the circulation of the kidney recovered, intravenous heparin treatment was introduced immediately.

RESULTS

24 months later the kidney is still functioning well. Postoperative thrombophilia screening showed heterozygosity for factor V Leiden.

CONCLUSION

There are only few publications reporting on successful recanalisation after renal vein thrombosis. In our case rapid diagnosis and immediate operative treatment saved the graft. There is no uniform proposal in the literature whether preoperative screening for thrombophilia is justifiable or not. In our view screening for thrombophilia and thromboprophylaxis is mandatory. Extensive prospective studies should be undertaken to refine the risks and establish the associations of thrombophilia and thromboembolism after kidney transplantation.

No Association of Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T Gene Polymorphisms With Kidney Allograft Survival: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that inherited risk factors of venous thromboembolism, such as factor V G1691A (FV-Leiden), prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, might be associated with poorer survival rates of transplanted kidneys. On the basis of this hypothesis, we performed a multicenter study, involving recipients of primary and repeat kidney transplants, to investigate the potential effect of these three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on graft survival.

METHODS

The study consisted of 676 first and 651 retransplant patients. Using the polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primers method, we typed all patients for the three SNP and analyzed graft survival.

RESULTS

We could not find a statistically significant association between graft survival and factor V Leiden or MTHFR C677T genotypes. A better 3-yr graft survival was found for first transplant recipients with the genotype prothrombin 20210 G/G as compared to those with the G/A genotype (P=0.031). However, Bonferroni correction for the three SNPs investigated in this series rendered the P value insignificant (P(corrected)=0.093).

CONCLUSION

We did not find a statistically significant association of SNP factor V Leiden G1691A and MTHFR C677T with renal graft survival. Prothrombin G20210A resulted in a significant association that was not sustained after Bonferroni correction. This SNP might be an interesting candidate for future studies.

Genetic thrombophilia

The genetic thrombophilias are an important cause of venous thrombotic events. Much has been learned about the natural history of these disorders, their genetics, and, to a lesser degree, their treatment. This article provides an overview of the genetics of thrombophilia. Specific information on the factor V Leiden mutation;the prothrombin G20210A mutation; and protein C, proteinS, and antithrombin deficiency is reviewed. Current testing and treatment options for the genetic thrombophilias also are discussed.

Hypercoagulability in renal transplant recipients. Identifying patients at risk of renal allograft thrombosis and evaluating strategies for prevention

Renal transplantation improves survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Improvements in immunosuppressive therapy have reduced early allograft loss due to acute rejection to very low levels. Early allograft loss, due to acute thrombotic complications, remains a constant and proportionally increasing complication of renal transplantation. Identifying risk factor(s) for thrombosis amenable to preventive strategies has been elusive. Epidemiological studies have attempted to define risk in terms of modifiable (drugs, dialysis modality, surgical procedure) and non-modifiable (age, diabetes mellitus, vascular anomalies) factors, or identify changes in coagulation or fibrinolysis promoting a more thrombotic state. Most recently the evolution of thrombophilia research has established the potential for inherited hypercoagulability to predispose to acute allograft thrombosis. Inheritance of the factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin G20210A mutation, or the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) may increase the risk of renal allograft thrombosis approximately 3-fold in selected patients. Patients with ESRD due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) appear at particularly high risk of thrombosis, especially if they have either APA or detectable beta(2)-glycoprotein-1. Data for other hypercoagulable states such as hyperhomocystinemia or the C677T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are deficient. Patients with APA, FVL, or prothrombin G20210A mutation also appear to have greater graft loss due to vascular rejection, possibly reflecting immunological injury upon the vascular wall exacerbated or induced by the prothrombotic state. While substantial in vitro data suggest cyclosporine is prothrombotic, an independent clinical association with allograft thrombosis is unproven. Interventions to reduce thrombotic risk including heparin, warfarin, and aspirin have been evaluated in both selected high-risk groups (heparin and warfarin) and unselected populations (heparin and aspirin). In unselected patients at low clinical risk, aspirin (75-150 mg/day) with or without a short period of unfractionated heparin (5000U twice a day for 5 days) appears to reduce the risk of renal allograft thrombosis significantly with a low risk of bleeding, especially when compared with low molecular weight heparins which risk accumulation in renal failure. In high-risk groups (identified thrombophilic risk factor, previous thrombosis, or SLE) longer period of heparin, with or without aspirin and maintenance with warfarin, should be considered. Re-transplantation following graft loss due to vascular thrombosis can be undertaken with a low risk of recurrence. Further prospective studies evaluating both putative risk factors and intervention strategies are required to determine whether routine clinical screening for thrombophilic factors is justified.