Allograft transmission of hepatitis C virus infection from infected donors in cardiac transplantation

Review of heart transplantation from hepatitis C-positive donors

Significant scarcity of a donor pool exists for heart transplantation (HT) as the prevalence of patients with end-stage refractory heart failure is increasing exceptionally. With the discovery of effective direct-acting antiviral and favorable short-term outcomes following HT, the hearts from hepatitis C virus (HCV) patient are being utilized to increase the donor pool. Short-term outcomes with regards to graft function, coronary artery vasculopathy, and kidney and liver disease is comparable in HCV-negative recipients undergoing HT from HCV-positive donors compared to HCV-negative donors. A significant high incidence of donor-derived HCV transmission was observed with great success of achieving sustained viral response with the use of direct-acting antivirals. By accepting HCV-positive organs, the donor pool has expanded with younger donors, a shorter waitlist time, and a reduction in waitlist mortality. However, the long-term outcomes and impact of specific HCV genotypes remains to be seen. We reviewed the current literature on HT from HCV-positive donors.

New Approaches to Donor Selection and Preparation in Heart Transplantation

Purpose of review

With increasing survival of patients with stage D heart failure, the demand for heart transplantation has increased. The supply of donor hearts remains relatively limited. Strategies have been investigated and new technologies have been developed to expand the current donor pool. These new approaches will be discussed herein.

Recent findings

Donor hearts are often considered “marginal” due to risk factors such as older age, size mismatch with the intended recipient, prolonged ischemic time, presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and hepatitis B/C infection. We reviewed recent data regarding the use of donor hearts with these risk factors and suggest ways to safely liberalize current donor heart acceptance criteria. New technologies such as temperature-controlled transport systems and ex vivo cardiac perfusion methods have also demonstrated promising short-term and intermediate outcomes as compared with routine cold storage, by promoting heart preservation and enabling heart procurement from remote sites with shorter cold ischemic time. Recent use of hearts from donation after circulatory death donors has demonstrated comparable outcomes to conventional donation after brain death, which can further expand the current donor pool.

Summary

Careful selection of “marginal” donor hearts, use of ex vivo cardiac perfusion, and acceptance of hearts after circulatory death may expand our current cardiac donor pool with comparable outcomes to conventional donor selection and preparation methods.

Impact of Early Initiation of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Thoracic Organ Transplantation From Hepatitis C Virus Positive Donors

Thoracic organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors are not commonly used for transplantation. The development of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for HCV treatment has led to renewed interest in using HCV-positive organs. We evaluated HCV transmission rates, viremia clearance, and short-term outcomes in HCV-negative patients who received HCV-positive thoracic organs at our institution. From January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019, 38 patients underwent HCV-positive thoracic organ transplantation (16 lungs and 22 hearts). Heart recipients were started on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, a pangenotypic DAA, when they developed HCV viremia. Lung recipients were empirically started on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir within the first 3 post-transplant days. The primary outcome was cure of HCV defined as sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). All heart recipients developed HCV viremia with median initial viral load of 64,565 IU/mL (interquartile range: 1660-473,151). The median time from DAA initiation to viremia clearance was 19 days (confidence interval: 15-27 days). Eleven out of 16 (68.8%) lung recipients developed HCV viremia with median initial viral load of 26 IU/mL (interquartile range: 15-143). The median time from DAA initiation to viremia clearance was 10 days (confidence interval: 6-17 days). Five out of 16 (31.3%) lung recipients never became viremic. All patients demonstrated SVR12. Thoracic organ transplantation from HCV viremic donors is safe with excellent short-term survival. Early initiation of HCV treatment results in rapid viremia clearance and SVR12. Long-term outcomes and optimal timing of DAA initiation remains to be determined.

Hepatitis C donor viremic cardiac transplantation: A practical approach

INTRODUCTION

Patients with end-stage heart failure eligible for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) exceed the number of available donor organs. With highly effective hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral therapy now available, HCV+ organs are increasingly utilized. We seek to describe our experience with patients receiving HCV viremic organs as compared to non-HCV transplant recipients.

METHODS

Our center began utilizing HCV hearts in February 2018. We retrospectively reviewed baseline demographics, laboratory data and outcomes for those undergoing OHT with majority being from a viremic HCV donor.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 25 HCV recipients received hearts from NAT+ donors with 22 of 23 seroconverting within 7 days. Fifteen recipients have completed HCV treatment, with the longest duration of follow-up being 13 months. No differences in rates of rejection, hospitalizations or death were seen between non-HCV and HCV transplant patients.

DISCUSSION

With the advent of available direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), viremic HCV hearts provide an opportunity to increase organ availability. Moreover, treatment for HCV in the setting of immunosuppression is well-tolerated and results in sustained viremic response.

CONCLUSION

Viremic, discordant HCV OHT can be performed in a safe and effective manner utilizing a systematic, multidisciplinary approach without an effect on short-term outcomes.

Pre-emptive pangenotypic direct acting antiviral therapy in donor HCV-positive to recipient HCV-negative heart transplantation: an open-label study

BACKGROUND

Low donor heart availability underscores the need to identify all potentially transplantable organs. We sought to determine whether pre-emptive administration of pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral therapy can safely prevent the development of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in uninfected recipients of HCV-infected donor hearts.

METHODS

Patients were recruited for this an open-label, single-centre, proof-of-concept study from Nov 1, 2017, to Nov 30, 2018. Following enrolment, the recipient's status on the heart transplantation waiting list was updated to reflect a willingness to accept either an HCV-positive or HCV-negative heart donor. Patients who underwent transplantation with a viraemic donor heart, as determined by nucleic acid testing (NAT), received pre-emptive oral glecaprevir-pibrentasvir before transport to the operating room followed by an 8-week course of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir after transplantation. Patients receiving HCV antibody-positive donor hearts without detectable circulating HCV RNA were followed using a reactive approach and started glecaprevir-pibrentasvir only if they developed viraemia. The primary outcome was achievement of sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir therapy (SVR12). Patients were followed from study enrolment to 1 year after transplantation. This is an interim analysis, initiated after all enrolled patients reached the primary outcome. Results reflect data from Nov 1, 2017, to May 30, 2019. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03208244.

FINDINGS

55 patients were assessed for eligibility and 52 consented to enrolment. 25 patients underwent heart transplantation with HCV-positive donor hearts (20 NAT-positive, five NAT-negative), three of whom underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. All 20 recipients of NAT-positive hearts tolerated glecaprevir-pibrentasvir and showed rapid viral suppression (median time to clearance 3·5 days, IQR 0·0-8·3), with the subsequent achievement of SVR12 by all 20. The five recipients of NAT-negative grafts did not become viraemic. Median pre-transplant waiting time for patients following enrolment in the HCV protocol was 20 days (IQR 8-57). Patient and allograft survival were 100% at a median follow-up of 10·7 months (range 6·5-18·0).

INTERPRETATION

Pre-emptive administration of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir therapy results in expedited organ transplantation, rapid HCV suppression, prevention of chronic HCV infection, and excellent early allograft function in patients receiving HCV-infected donor hearts. Long-term outcomes are not yet known.

FUNDING

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission

In 2016, the Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand, with the support of the Australian Government Organ and Tissue authority, commissioned a literature review on the topic of infectious disease transmission from deceased donors to recipients of solid organ transplants. The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on transmission risks, diagnostic test characteristics, and recipient management to inform best-practice clinical guidelines. The final review, presented as a special supplement in Transplantation Direct, collates case reports of transmission events and other peer-reviewed literature, and summarizes current (as of June 2017) international guidelines on donor screening and recipient management. Of particular interest at the time of writing was how to maximize utilization of donors at increased risk for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, given the recent developments, including the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus and improvements in donor screening technologies. The review also covers emerging risks associated with recent epidemics (eg, Zika virus) and the risk of transmission of nonendemic pathogens related to donor travel history or country of origin. Lastly, the implications for recipient consent of expanded utilization of donors at increased risk of blood-borne viral disease transmission are considered.

Early outcomes using hepatitis C-positive donors for cardiac transplantation in the era of effective direct-acting anti-viral therapies

BACKGROUND

Given the shortage of suitable donor hearts for cardiac transplantation, and the favorable safety and efficacy of current agents used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV), our institution recently piloted transplantation of select patients using HCV-positive donors.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and March 2017, 12 HCV-naive patients and 1 patient with a history of treated HCV underwent heart transplantation (HT) using hearts from HCV-positive donors after informed consent. Patients who acquired HCV were referred to hepatology and treated with direct-acting anti-viral therapies (DAAs). Data collection and analysis were performed with institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

At the time of HT, mean age of recipients was 53 ± 10 years, and 8 patients (61.5%) were on left ventricular assist device support. After consent to consider an HCV-positive heart, mean time to HT was 11 ± 12 days. Nine of 13 patients (69%) developed HCV viremia after transplant, including 8 who completed DAA treatment and demonstrated cure, as defined by a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment. One patient died during Week 7 of his treatment due to pulmonary embolism. DAAs were well tolerated in all treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of highly effective DAAs, the use of HCV-positive donors represents a potential approach to safely expand the donor pool. Additional follow-up is needed to elucidate long-term outcomes.

Tissue donation and virus safety: more nucleic acid amplification testing is needed

In tissue and organ transplantation, it is of great importance to avoid the transmission of blood-borne viruses to the recipient. While serologic testing for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and -2, anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc), and Treponema pallidum infection is mandatory, there is until now in most countries no explicit demand for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) to detect HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and HCV infection. After a review of reports in the literature on viral transmission events, tissue-specific issues, and manufacturing and inactivation procedures, we evaluated the significance of HIV, HCV, and HBV detection using NAT  in  donors of various types of tissues and compared our results with the experiences of blood banking organizations. There is a significant risk of HIV, HCV, and HBV transmission by musculoskeletal tissues because of their high blood content and the high donor-recipient ratio. If no effective virus inactivation procedure for musculoskeletal tissue is applied, donors should be screened using NAT  for  HIV, HCV, and HBV. Serologically screened cardiovascular tissue carries a very low risk of HIV, HCV, or HBV transmission. Nevertheless, because effective virus inactivation is impossible (retention of tissue morphology) and the donor-recipient ratio may be as high as 1:10, we concluded that NAT  should be performed for HIV, HCV, and HBV as an additional safety measure. Although cornea allografts carry the lowest risk of transmitting HIV, HCV, and HBV  owing to corneal physiology, morphology, and the epidemiology of corneal diseases, NAT  for  HCV should still be performed. If the NAT  screening of a donor for HIV, HCV, and HBV is negative, quarantine storage of the donor tissue seems dispensable. In view of numerous synergistic effects with transfusion medicine, it would be advantageous for tissue banks to cooperate with blood bank laboratories in performing virological tests.

The effect of recipient hepatitis C virus infection on outcomes following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Insufficient data exist on the clinical course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in heart transplant (HT) recipients. Our study reports the outcomes of heart transplantation in pretransplantation HCV-positive (HCV+) recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the heart transplantation database at our institution was performed to identify HT recipients who were HCV+ prior to transplantation. Chart reviews yielded demographic features, liver function tests, graft function, incidence of posttransplantation acute hepatitis and transplant coronary artery disease, and patient survival data.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2006, 10 HCV+ patients underwent cardiac transplantation. The recipient mean age was 47 years (range, 23-69). Seven recipients were males and 3 were females. At listing 9 patients had no cirrhosis. One patient with Child-B cirrhosis was listed for combined heart-liver transplantation. Two of 10 donors were known to be HCV carriers. Posttransplantation in-hospital survival rate was 100%. At a mean follow-up of 58 months (range, 1.6-145), 3 deaths occurred, yielding an overall survival rate of 70%. Only 1 death (10%) was linked to accelerated acute hepatitis. Transplant coronary artery disease was detected in 2 patients (20%). Echocardiograms of survivors at last follow-up revealed normal ejection fractions. In addition, there were no cases of hepatocellular carcinoma; all survivors were without evidence of hepatic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplanting recipients known to have HCV did not seem to affect overall posttransplantation survival or to increase the risk of liver dysfunction or graft-related complications.

The acquisition time of infection: a determinant of the severity of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and histopathological course of HCV infection acquired before and during or after renal transplantation.

METHODS

According to HCV status, 197 RT patients were divided into three groups. At the time of RT, anti-HCV antibody was positive in 47 patients (pre-RT HCV group). In 27 patients, in whom anti-HCV negative at the time of RT, anti-HCV and/or HCV RNA was found to be positive following an ALT elevation episode after RT (post-RT HCV group). Both anti-HCV and HCV RNA were negative at all times in remaining 123 patients (control group).

RESULTS

Liver biopsy was performed in 31 of 47 patients in pre-RT and 24 of 27 in post-RT HCV group after RT. Duration of follow-up was similar in all groups with a mean of 7.1 +/- 4.0 yr. Ascites and encephalopathy were seen in only post-RT HCV group (22%). Histological grade (6.5 +/- 2.7 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.4) and stage (2.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.8) was significantly severe in post-RT HCV group (p < 0.01). Three patients died due to liver failure in post-RT HCV group.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection acquired during or after RT shows a severe and rapidly progressive clinicopathological course, which is significantly different from pre-transplant anti-HCV positive patients.

Cardiac Transplantation Using Extended-Donor Criteria Organs for Systemic Amyloidosis Complicated by Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Systemic amyloidosis complicated by heart failure is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Heart transplantation for patients with systemic amyloidosis is controversial due to recurrence of disease in the transplanted organ or progression of disease in other organs.

METHODS

All patients with systemic amyloidosis and heart failure referred for heart transplant evaluation from 1997 to 2004 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. An interdisciplinary protocol for cardiac transplantation using extended-donor criteria organs, followed in 6 months by either high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for patients with primary (AL) or by orthotopic liver transplantation for familial (ATTR) amyloidosis, was developed. Survival of the transplanted amyloid cohort was compared to survival of those amyloid patients not transplanted and to patients transplanted for other indications.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with systemic amyloidosis and heart failure were included in the study; 12 patients received heart transplants. Amyloid heart transplant recipients were more likely female (58% vs. 8%, P=0.02) and had lower serum creatinine (1.3+/-0.5 vs. 2.0+/-0.7 mg/dL, P=0.01) than nontransplanted amyloid patients. Survival at 1-year after heart transplant evaluation was higher among transplanted patients (75% vs. 23%) compared to patients not transplanted (P=0.001). Short-term survival posttransplant did not differ between transplanted amyloid patients and contemporaneous standard and extended-donor criteria heart transplant patients (P=0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac transplantation for amyloid patients with extended-donor criteria organs followed by either stem cell or liver transplantation is associated with improved survival compared to patients not transplanted. Short- to intermediate-term survival is similar to patients receiving heart transplantation for other indications. This clinical management strategy provides cardiac amyloid patients a novel therapeutic option.

Hepatitis C in transplant recipients of solid organs, other than liver

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in candidates for, and recipients of, solid organ transplants. HCV infection can lead to diminished patient and allograft survival in the long-term in recipients of kidney transplants. Outcomes in recipients of other solid organ transplants (lung, heart, small bowel, pancreas, pancreas-kidney) are not well established. Large, well-designed, prospective studies are needed to answer these questions. Interferon therapy for HCV before transplantation can lead to improved outcomes. Therefore, transplant candidates should be considered for and offered interferon therapy before embarking on organ transplantation. Posttransplant interferon therapy can be complicated by acute allograft rejection and is not recommended, except with advanced liver disease.

HCV infection: aspects of epidemiology and transmission relevant to oral health care workers

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common worldwide problem, giving rise to long-term viral carriage and risk of chronic hepatic disease, hepatic malignancy and a wide spectrum of immunologically mediated disorders. The present report describes relevant data suggesting that nosocomial transmission to oral health care workers is unlikely, but in view of medical and occupational consequences of such infection, and the absence of long-term effective treatment or vaccine, the oral surgery profession must continue to be vigilant and to maintain the highest standards of infection control procedures to minimize the possible acquisition of HCV during dental treatment.

Treatment of hepatitis C in potential kidney and heart transplant patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in certain solid organ transplant recipients, most notably in those undergoing liver or kidney transplantation. Infection typically antedates transplantation but may have been acquired at the time of transplantation via infected blood products or organs. A more rapid and aggressive course of HCV-related infection and liver disease is the major concern in organ transplant recipients compared with immunocompetent patients. HCV-related liver disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by dialysis or transplantation. The outcome of HCV infection in renal and liver transplant recipients has been extensively investigated, whereas literature on HCV-related liver disease among patients with orthotopic heart transplantation is scanty. This article reviews the literature concerning the treatment of HCV-related liver disease in renal and orthotopic heart transplantation.