Accuracy of exhaled nitric oxide measurements for the diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

Noninvasive methods for detection of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only therapeutic option for end-stage lung diseases. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which manifests as airflow restriction and/or obstruction, is the primary factor limiting the long-term survival of patients after surgery. According to histopathological and radiographic findings, CLAD comprises two phenotypes, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. Half of all lung recipients will develop CLAD in 5 years, and this rate may increase up to 75% 10 years after surgery owing to the paucity in accurate and effective early detection and treatment methods. Recently, many studies have presented noninvasive methods for detecting CLAD and improving diagnosis and intervention. However, the significance of accurately detecting CLAD remains controversial. We reviewed published studies that have presented noninvasive methods for detecting CLAD to highlight the current knowledge on clinical symptoms, spirometry, imaging examinations, and other methods to detect the disease.

Application of nitric oxide measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a convenient, non-invasive method for the assessment of active, mainly Th2-driven, airway inflammation, which is sensitive to treatment with standard anti-inflammatory therapy. Consequently, FeNO serves as a valued tool to aid diagnosis and monitoring in several asthma phenotypes. More recently, FeNO has been evaluated in several other respiratory, infectious, and/or immunological conditions. In this short review, we provide an overview of several clinical studies and discuss the status of potential applications of NO measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma.

Azithromycin and the treatment of lymphocytic airway inflammation after lung transplantation

Lymphocytic airway inflammation is a major risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction, for which there is no established treatment. We investigated whether azithromycin could control lymphocytic airway inflammation and improve allograft function. Fifteen lung transplant recipients demonstrating acute allograft dysfunction due to isolated lymphocytic airway inflammation were prospectively treated with azithromycin for at least 6 months (NCT01109160). Spirometry (FVC, FEV1 , FEF25-75 , Tiffeneau index) and FeNO were assessed before and up to 12 months after initiation of azithromycin. Radiologic features, local inflammation assessed on airway biopsy (rejection score, IL-17(+)  cells/mm(2) lamina propria) and broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (total and differential cell counts, chemokine and cytokine levels); as well as systemic C-reactive protein levels were compared between baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Airflow improved and FeNO decreased to baseline levels after 1 month of azithromycin and were sustained thereafter. After 3 months of treatment, radiologic abnormalities, submucosal cellular inflammation, lavage protein levels of IL-1β, IL-8/CXCL-8, IP-10/CXCL-10, RANTES/CCL5, MIP1-α/CCL3, MIP-1β/CCL4, Eotaxin, PDGF-BB, total cell count, neutrophils and eosinophils, as well as plasma C-reactive protein levels all significantly decreased compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Administration of azithromycin was associated with suppression of posttransplant lymphocytic airway inflammation and clinical improvement in lung allograft function.

Serial monitoring of exhaled nitric oxide in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a marker of airway inflammation, is often elevated in lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) with acute rejection or infection. Isolated measurements in the setting of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome have been variable. We sought to assess the utility of serial FeNO in predicting chronic allograft dysfunction or the presence of acute rejection or infection.

METHODS

Eighty-six LTxRs underwent 325 serial FeNO measurements at an expiratory flow rate of 50 ml/s. The change in FeNO (ΔFeNO) between two measurements obtained during a stable state (ΔFeNO-SS) was compared with ΔFeNO, where the first measurement was taken during a stable state and the second during an unstable state (defined as a subsequent decline in FEV1 > 10% over 3 months [ΔFeNO-SU]) or an acute complication (acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis or acute infection [ΔFeNO-SAC]). The median follow-up time after the baseline FeNO was 10 (range 3 to 25) months.

RESULTS

ΔFeNO-SS in 117 FeNO pairs was similar to ΔFeNO-SU in 26 pairs (2.1 ± 3 ppb vs 2.3 ± 4 ppb; p = 0.2). ΔFeNO-SAC in 17 pairs was markedly increased (27 ± 20 ppb; p < 0.001 vs ΔFeNO-SS). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for ΔFeNO in detecting an acute complication was 0.93 (p < 0.001). By applying a cut-off of >10 ppb, the sensitivity and specificity was 82% and 100%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 97.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in FeNO may serve as a useful adjunct in the detection of acute complications after lung transplantation. In this limited analysis, ΔFeNO was not predictive of a subsequent decline in allograft function.

Biomarkers of pulmonary rejection

Immunologic complications after lung transplantation (LT) include acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and most forms of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). ACR is an inflammatory process in which the reaction is mediated by the T-cell population. Most episodes of ACR fully recover with treatment, but repeated bouts are considered to be a risk factor for CAD. Biomarker cytokines interleukin (IL)-10, IL-15, IL-6, CCL5, CCR2 and IFNγ may play significant roles in this complication. Formerly bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) or chronic rejection or most forms of CAD were considered to be immunologic complications not amenable therapeutic measures. CAD, the main limitation for long-term survival in LT, is characterized histologically by airway epithelial cell apoptosis and luminal fibrosis in the respiratory bronchioles causing airflow obstruction and, in some cases, lung parenchymal affectations causing restrictive lung disease. Several biomarkers have been studied in CAD, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-23, IL-13, IFN γ, and TGF β cytokines, pH, bile acid, and tripsine of gastroesophageal reflux and toll-like receptors of innate immunity. Herein we have reviewed the literature of biomarkers involved in lung rejection.

Clinical application of exhaled nitric oxide measurement in pediatric lung diseases

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non invasive method for assessing the inflammatory status of children with airway disease. Different ways to measure FeNO levels are currently available. The possibility of measuring FeNO levels in an office setting even in young children, and the commercial availability of portable devices, support the routine use of FeNO determination in the daily pediatric practice. Although many confounding factors may affect its measurement, FeNO is now widely used in the management of children with asthma, and seems to provide significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than lung function or bronchial challenge tests. The role of FeNO in airway infection (e.g. viral bronchiolitis and common acquired pneumonia), in bronchiectasis, or in cases with diffuse lung disease is less clear. This review focuses on the most recent advances and the current clinical applications of FeNO measurement in pediatric lung disease.

Breath biomarkers in diagnosis of pulmonary diseases

Breath analysis provides a convenient and simple alternative to traditional specimen testing in clinical laboratory diagnosis. As such, substantial research has been devoted to the analysis and identification of breath biomarkers. Development of new analytes enhances the desirability of breath analysis especially for patients who monitor daily biochemical parameters. Elucidating the physiologic significance of volatile substances in breath is essential for clinical use. This review describes the use of breath biomarkers in diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), lung cancer, as well as other pulmonary diseases. A number of breath biomarkers in lung pathophysiology will be described including nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and other hydrocarbons.

Usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide to guide risk stratification for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

The aim of this study was to assess fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for the early diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation (LTX). 611 FeNO measurements in 166 consecutive patients were classified depending on BOS stage at the time of assessment and course during minimum follow-up of 3 months: (1) stable non-BOS, (2) unstable non-BOS, (3) stable BOS and (4) unstable BOS. Unstable course was defined as new onset of BOS≥1 or progression of BOS. FeNO before unstable course was significantly increased in comparison to their stable counterparts (non-BOS: 28.9 ± 1.2 ppb, n = 40 vs. 16.4 ± 0.8 ppb, n = 131 and BOS: 32.5 ± 1.3 ppb, n = 35 vs. 15.3 ± 0.8 ppb, n = 26; p = 0.01 each). Average time from FeNO reading to onset of deterioration was 117 ± 9 days in non-BOS and 136 ± 9 days in BOS patients. The positive and negative predictive value of FeNO >20 ppb for BOS was 69.0% and 96.9%, respectively. Serial measurements demonstrated significantly lower mean individual variation in stable recipients as compared to stable patients switching to unstable course (3.2 ± 0.3 ppb vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 ppb, p = 0.02). In particular, the excellent negative predictive value of persistently low FeNO readings for future BOS make FeNO assessments a useful tool for continuous risk stratification after LTX.

Exhaled nitric oxide in diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases

The analysis of biomarkers in exhaled breath constituents has recently become of great interest in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of many respiratory conditions. Of particular interest is the measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in breath. Its measurement is noninvasive, easy and reproducible. The technique has recently been standardized by both American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. The availability of cheap, portable and reliable equipment has made the assay possible in clinics by general physicians and, in the near future, at home by patients. The concentration of exhaled nitric oxide is markedly elevated in bronchial asthma and is positively related to the degree of esinophilic inflammation. Its measurement can be used in the diagnosis of bronchial asthma and titration of dose of steroids as well as to identify steroid responsive patients in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In primary ciliary dyskinesia, nasal NO is diagnostically low and of considerable value in diagnosis. Among lung transplant recipients, FENO can be of great value in the early detection of infection, bronchioloitis obliterans syndrome and rejection. This review discusses the biology, factors affecting measurement, and clinical application of FENO in the diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases.

Exhaled nitric oxide in childhood asthma: a review

As an 'inflammometer', the fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (Fe(NO)) is increasingly used in the management of paediatric asthma. Fe(NO) provides us with valuable, additional information regarding the nature of underlying airway inflammation, and complements lung function testing and measurement of airway hyper-reactivity. This review focuses on clinical applications of Fe(NO) in paediatric asthma. First, Fe(NO) provides us with a practical tool to aid in the diagnosis of asthma and distinguish patients who will benefit from inhaled corticosteroids from those who will not. Second, Fe(NO) is helpful in predicting exacerbations, and predicting successful steroid reduction or withdrawal. In atopic asthmatic children Fe(NO) is beneficial in adjusting steroid doses, discerning those patients who require additional therapy from those whose medication dose could feasibly be reduced. In pre-school children Fe(NO) may be of help in the differential diagnosis of respiratory symptoms, and may potentially allow for better targeting and monitoring of anti-inflammatory treatment.

Early detection of chronic pulmonary allograft dysfunction by exhaled biomarkers

RATIONALE

Early detection of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is important because therapies are more likely to be effective if employed early in the disease process.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of exhaled NO and CO (which reflect airway inflammation) and the slope of the alveolar plateau for helium (which reflects heterogeneity of ventilation distribution) for detection of BOS stages 0-p and 1.

METHODS

Recipients of bilateral (n=64) and single (n=1) lung grafts were prospectively monitored for 1,249 days; the helium slope was derived from single-breath washouts and exhaled NO and CO were measured by chemiluminescence on 933 occasions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, 9 patients were in stage 0-p and 16 patients were in BOS stage 1 or higher; 21 patients had at least one measurement made in BOS stage 0-p. All markers increased in BOS stage 0-p, but only the helium slope increased in BOS stage 1. The helium slope had better sensitivity for detection of stages 0-p and 1 than either exhaled NO or CO, but considering exhaled NO and CO together improved their sensitivity; the best sensitivity was found with the three markers in combination. The biomarkers had high negative predictive values, but low specificity and positive predictive values.

CONCLUSIONS

After lung transplantation, (1) the helium slope and exhaled NO, but also exhaled CO, increase in BOS stage 0-p, (2) the helium slope has better sensitivity than exhaled NO and CO for the detection of BOS stages 0-p and 1, and (3) exhaled biomarkers have high negative predictive values, but low specificity and positive predictive values.

Exhaled nitric oxide measurements: clinical application and interpretation

The use of exhaled nitric oxide measurements (F(E)NO) in clinical practice is now coming of age. There are a number of theoretical and practical factors which have brought this about. Firstly, F(E)NO is a good surrogate marker for eosinophilic airway inflammation. High F(E)NO levels may be used to distinguish eosinophilic from non-eosinophilic pathologies. This information complements conventional pulmonary function testing in the assessment of patients with non-specific respiratory symptoms. Secondly, eosinophilic airway inflammation is steroid responsive. There are now sufficient data to justify the claim that F(E)NO measurements may be used successfully to identify and monitor steroid response as well as steroid requirements in the diagnosis and management of airways disease. F(E)NO measurements are also helpful in identifying patients who do/do not require ongoing treatment with inhaled steroids. Thirdly, portable nitric oxide analysers are now available, making routine testing a practical possibility. However, a number of issues still need to be resolved, including the diagnostic role of F(E)NO in preschool children and the use of reference values versus individual F(E)NO profiles in managing patients with difficult or severe asthma.

The pH of exhaled breath condensate of patients with allograft rejection after lung transplantation

Endogenous airway acidification, as assessed by the condensate pH, has been implicated in the pathophysiology of inflammatory airway diseases such as cystic fibrosis and asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the pH of condensate in patients after lung transplantation (LTX). From the cohort of transplanted patients at our center, 83 patients (9 heart-lung transplantation, 48 double-lung transplantation, 26 single-lung transplantation) were recruited and analyzed in a cross-sectional manner: 26 patients were diagnosed with chronic rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), 7 patients were diagnosed with acute rejection (AR) while 50 patients had no evidence of rejection according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria. The condensate pH was significantly reduced in patients with BOS and AR when compared to patients without rejection and control subjects (5.8 +/- 0.5 and 6.2 +/- 0.4 versus 6.6 +/- 0.4 and 6.5 +/- 0 .4, respectively; p < 0.05). Moreover, there was a significant correlation between condensate pH levels and the BOS grade (r =-0.62; p < 0.01), the FEV(1) (r = 0.39; p < 0.01) and the total cell and neutrophil count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (r =-0.39 and r =-0.56, respectively; p < 0.01). Airway acidification occurs in BOS and may directly or indirectly reflect airway inflammation in patients with allograft rejection after LTX. Measuring condensate pH might thus be a new tool for the evaluation of rejection in lung transplant patients.

Monitoring the lung periphery of transplanted lungs

Lung transplantation is now accepted as a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung diseases, but long-term survival is threatened by bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), which is regarded as a manifestation of chronic allograft rejection. We have used studies of ventilation distribution for the early detection of this complication. In a prospective study of 57 bilateral-lung transplant recipients, we showed that the slope of phase III of the helium single-breath washout, which targets inhomogeneities of ventilation distribution in the terminal and respiratory bronchioles, was particularly sensitive to the development of BO. In a preliminary study using nitrogen multiple-breath washouts, we showed that S(acin) and S(cond), which reflect structural changes in the acinar and conductive lung zones, were both markedly increased in patients with BO. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that monitoring the function of the allograft by measuring the distribution of ventilation in the lung periphery may be a clinically valuable tool.