Peritransplant immunoadsorption: a strategy enabling transplantation in highly sensitized crossmatch-positive cadaveric kidney allograft recipients

Functionalized magnetic nanoparticles remove donor-specific antibodies (DSA) from patient blood in a first ex vivo proof of principle study

The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) such as antibodies directed against donor class I human leucocyte antigen (e.g., HLA-A) is a major barrier to kidney transplant success. As a proof of concept, functionalized magnetic nanoparticles have been designed to eliminate DSA from saline, blood and plasma of healthy donors and sensitized patients. Specific HLA-A1 protein was covalently bound to functionalized cobalt nanoparticles (fNP), human serum albumin (HSA) as control. fNP were added to anti-HLA class I-spiked saline, spiked volunteers' whole blood, and to whole blood and plasma of sensitized patients ex vivo. Anti-HLA-A1 antibody levels were determined with Luminex technology. Antibodies' median fluorescent intensity (MFI) was defined as the primary outcome. Furthermore, the impact of fNP treatment on blood coagulation and cellular uptake was determined. Treatment with fNP reduced MFI by 97 ± 2% and by 94 ± 4% (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001) in spiked saline and whole blood, respectively. In six known sensitized anti-HLA-A1 positive patients, a reduction of 65 ± 26% (p = 0.002) in plasma and 65 ± 33% (p = 0.012) in whole blood was achieved. No impact on coagulation was observed. A minimal number of nanoparticles was detected in peripheral mononuclear blood cells. The study demonstrates-in a first step-the feasibility of anti-HLA antibody removal using fNP. These pilot data might pave the way for a new personalized DSA removal technology in the future.

Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

WITHDRAWN:Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2023.103844 of original article. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. This error bears no reflection on the article or its authors. The publisher apologizes to the authors and the readers for this unfortunate error. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal

Preventing Rejection of the Kidney Transplant

With increasing knowledge of immunologic factors and with the advent of potent immunosuppressive agents, the last several decades have seen significantly improved kidney allograft survival. However, despite overall improved short to medium-term allograft survival, long-term allograft outcomes remain unsatisfactory. A large body of literature implicates acute and chronic rejection as independent risk factors for graft loss. In this article, we review measures taken at various stages in the kidney transplant process to minimize the risk of rejection. In the pre-transplant phase, it is imperative to minimize the risk of sensitization, aim for better HLA matching including eplet matching and use desensitization in carefully selected high-risk patients. The peri-transplant phase involves strategies to minimize cold ischemia times, individualize induction immunosuppression and make all efforts for better HLA matching. In the post-transplant phase, the focus should move towards individualizing maintenance immunosuppression and using innovative strategies to increase compliance. Acute rejection episodes are risk factors for significant graft injury and development of chronic rejection thus one should strive for early detection and aggressive treatment. Monitoring for DSA development, especially in high-risk populations, should be made part of transplant follow-up protocols. A host of new biomarkers are now commercially available, and these should be used for early detection of rejection, immunosuppression modulation, prevention of unnecessary biopsies and monitoring response to rejection treatment. There is a strong push needed for the development of new drugs, especially for the management of chronic or resistant rejections, to prolong graft survival. Prevention of rejection is key for the longevity of kidney allografts. This requires a multipronged approach and significant effort on the part of the recipients and transplant centers.

Immunoadsorption-Based HLA Desensitization in Patients Awaiting Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: An Interventional, Non-Randomised, Single Cohort Study

Whether immunoadsorption (IADS) as part of desensitization protocols could facilitate deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT) in highly sensitized (HS) patients remains to be proven. We retrospectively analyzed our IADS based desensitization protocol for deceased donor KTs between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen HS patients (age 52 years [40-56]) were included. Waiting time before IADS was 6 years [5-10] and the interval between IADS initiation and KT was 5 months [1-12] for the 14 transplanted patients. Nine patients had prior KT. Calculated panel reactive antibody decreased significantly during the protocol (99.3% [92.5-99.9] vs. 79.4% [56.7-81.9]; p = 0.004). Death-censored graft survival was 85.7% at 1 and 2 years post-transplantation. One-year median plasma creatinine level was 135 µmol/L [111-202]. Six developed active antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) at 1 year, with a median delay of 13 days [11-26]. Eight patients developed severe infections, including two fatal outcomes. Finally, compared to 93% of patients who received desensitization receiving a KT, only 43% of a control with similar characteristics underwent transplantation. However, no difference was found in overall probability of being alive with a functioning graft at the end of follow-up. The results indicate that our IADS-based desensitization strategy was not effective due to a high rate of ABMR and severe infectious complications which pose a challenge to its universalization.

Single-Cell Heterogeneity Restorative Chimeric Engineering Nanoparticles for Alleviating Antibody-Mediated Allograft Injury

Disturbance of single-cell transcriptional heterogeneity is an inevitable consequence of persistent donor-specific antibody (DSA) production and allosensitization. However, identifying and efficiently clearing allospecific antibody repertoires to restore single-cell transcriptional profiles remain challenging. Here, inspired by the high affinity of natural bacterial proteins for antibodies, a genetic engineered membrane-coated nanoparticle termed as DSA trapper by the engineering chimeric gene of protein A/G with phosphatidylserine ligands for macrophage phagocytosis was reported. It has been shown that DSA trappers adsorbed alloreactive antibodies with high saturation and activated the heterophagic clearance of antibody complexes, alleviating IgG deposition and complement activation. Remarkably, DSA trappers increased the endothelial protective lineages by 8.39-fold, reversed the highly biased cytotoxicity, and promoted the proliferative profiles of Treg cells, directly providing an obligate immune tolerant niche for single-cell heterogeneity restoration. In the mice of allogeneic transplantation, the DSA trapper spared endothelial from inflammatory degenerative rosette, improved the glomerular filtration rate, and prolonged the survival of allogeneic mice from 23.6 to 78.3 days. In general, by identifying the lineage characteristics of rejection-related antibodies, the chimeric engineered DSA trapper realized immunoadsorption and further phagocytosis of alloantibody complexes to restore the single-cell genetic architecture of the allograft, offering a promising prospect for the treatment of alloantibody-mediated immune injury.

Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Kidney Transplant Candidates

Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.

Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient

Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.

Emerging New Approaches in Desensitization: Targeted Therapies for HLA Sensitization

There is an urgent need for therapeutic interventions for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized patients with preformed or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). The risk of AMR and allograft loss in sensitized patients is increased due to preformed DSA detected at time of transplant or the reactivation of HLA memory after transplantation, causing acute and chronic AMR. Alternatively, de novo DSA that develops post-transplant due to inadequate immunosuppression and again may lead to acute and chronic AMR or even allograft loss. Circulating antibody, the final product of the humoral immune response, has been the primary target of desensitization and AMR treatment. However, in many cases these protocols fail to achieve efficient removal of all DSA and long-term outcomes of patients with persistent DSA are far worse when compared to non-sensitized patients. We believe that targeting multiple components of humoral immunity will lead to improved outcomes for such patients. In this review, we will briefly discuss conventional desensitization methods targeting antibody or B cell removal and then present a mechanistically designed desensitization regimen targeting plasma cells and the humoral response.

Apheresis Efficacy and Tolerance in the Setting of HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

Nearly 18% of patients on a waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) are highly sensitized, which make access to KT more difficult. We assessed the efficacy and tolerance of different techniques (plasma exchanges [PE], double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP], and immunoadsorption [IA]) to remove donor specific antibodies (DSA) in the setting of HLA-incompatible (HLAi) KT. All patients that underwent apheresis for HLAi KT within a single center were included. Intra-session and inter-session Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) decrease in DSA, clinical and biological tolerances were assessed. A total of 881 sessions were performed for 45 patients: 107 DFPP, 54 PE, 720 IA. The procedures led to HLAi KT in 39 patients (87%) after 29 (15–51) days. A higher volume of treated plasma was associated with a greater decrease of inter-session class I and II DSA (p = 0.04, p = 0.02). IA, PE, and a lower maximal DSA MFI were associated with a greater decrease in intra-session class II DSA (p < 0.01). Safety was good: severe adverse events occurred in 17 sessions (1.9%), more frequently with DFPP (6.5%) p < 0.01. Hypotension occurred in 154 sessions (17.5%), more frequently with DFPP (p < 0.01). Apheresis is well tolerated (IA and PE > DFPP) and effective at removing HLA antibodies and allows HLAi KT for sensitized patients.

Desensitization in the Setting of HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplant

The number of kidney transplant candidates is increasing sharply. Among them, at least 20% are HLA sensitized. For these patients, in the setting of both living- and deceased-donor kidney transplant, we may face donor-specific alloantibodies at pretransplant. In such cases, the microlymphocytotoxicity crossmatch may or may not be positive. Kidney transplant with donor-specific antibodies at pretransplant is known as HLA-incompatible transplant. At present, we can use many methods to ensure that the kidney transplant is successful, provided that the recipient is desensitized before or after transplant. In this paper, we review the various strategies available for desensitization of HLA-incompatible kidney transplant recipients and the long-term outcomes.

Donor-Specific Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Donor-specific antibodies have become an established biomarker predicting antibody-mediated rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of graft loss after kidney transplant. There are several phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection along post-transplant course that are determined by the timing and extent of humoral response and the various characteristics of donor-specific antibodies, such as antigen classes, specificity, antibody strength, IgG subclasses, and complement binding capacity. Preformed donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients can trigger hyperacute rejection, accelerated acute rejection, and early acute antibody-mediated rejection. De novo donor-specific antibodies are associated with late acute antibody-mediated rejection, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and transplant glomerulopathy. The pathogeneses of antibody-mediated rejection include not only complement-dependent cytotoxicity, but also complement-independent pathways of antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity and direct endothelial activation and proliferation. The novel assay for complement binding capacity has improved our ability to predict antibody-mediated rejection phenotypes. C1q binding donor-specific antibodies are closely associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection, more severe graft injuries, and early graft failure, whereas C1q nonbinding donor-specific antibodies correlate with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and late graft loss. IgG subclasses have various abilities to activate complement and recruit effector cells through the Fc receptor. Complement binding IgG3 donor-specific antibodies are frequently associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection and severe graft injury, whereas noncomplement binding IgG4 donor-specific antibodies are more correlated with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy. Our in-depth knowledge of complex characteristics of donor-specific antibodies can stratify the patient's immunologic risk, can predict distinct phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection, and hopefully, will guide our clinical practice to improve the transplant outcomes.

Deceased donor kidney transplantation across donor-specific antibody barriers: predictors of antibody-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND

Apheresis-based desensitization allows for successful transplantation across major immunological barriers. For donor-specific antibody (DSA)- and/or crossmatch-positive transplantation, however, it has been shown that even intense immunomodulation may not completely prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated transplant outcomes in 101 DSA+ deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (transplantation between 2009 and 2013; median follow-up: 24 months) who were subjected to immunoadsorption (IA)-based desensitization. Treatment included a single pre-transplant IA session, followed by anti-lymphocyte antibody and serial post-transplant IA. In 27 cases, a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) was rendered negative immediately before transplantation. Seventy-four of the DSA+ recipients had a negative CDCXM already before IA.

RESULTS

Three-year death-censored graft survival in DSA+ patients was significantly worse than in 513 DSA- recipients transplanted during the same period (79 versus 88%, P = 0.008). Thirty-three DSA+ recipients (33%) had ABMR. While a positive baseline CDCXM showed only a trend towards higher ABMR rates (41 versus 30% in CDCXM- recipients, P = 0.2), DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in single bead assays significantly associated with rejection, showing 20 versus 71% ABMR rates at <5000 versus >15 000 peak DSA MFI. The predictive value of MFI was moderate, with the highest accuracy at a median of 13 300 MFI (after cross-validation: 0.72). Other baseline variables, including CDC assay results, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, prior transplantation or type of induction treatment, did not add independent predictive information.

CONCLUSIONS

IA-based desensitization failed to prevent ABMR in a considerable number of DSA+ recipients. Assessing DSA MFI may help stratify risk of rejection, supporting its use as a guide to organ allocation and individualized treatment.

Fibrinogen reduction and bleeding complications in plasma exchange, immunoadsorption and a combination of the two

BACKGROUND

Immunoadsorption (IAS) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are considered safe although fibrinogen is removed. To date no comparison of fibrinogen reduction and associated risk of bleeding in apheresis exists.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of TPE, three IAS adsorbers, and combined TPE/IAS regarding fibrinogen reduction and bleeding incidence in 67 patients (1,032 treatments).

RESULTS

TPE and TPE/IAS reduced fibrinogen by 64 ± 11% and 58 ± 9%, leading to concentrations <100 mg/dl in 20 and 17% of treatments, respectively. IAS decreased fibrinogen less than TPE (26 ± 6%, p < 0.0001), resulting in fibrinogen concentrations <100 mg/dl in 1% of treatments. The processed volume correlated with reduction in TPE (r = 0.64, p < 0.01), but not in IAS. Bleeding occurred in 1.3% (IAS), 2.3% (TPE) and 3.1% (TPE/IAS) of treatments.

CONCLUSION

Hypofibrinogenemia occurs in 20% of patients after TPE and TPE/IAS, but rarely after IAS. IAS removes fibrinogen independently of volume processed. Overall, bleeding is rare in apheresis.

Challenges with sensitized recipients in pediatric heart transplantation

The sensitization of patients to human leukocyte antigens prior to heart transplantation is increasingly being recognized as an important challenge both before and after the transplant, and the effects of sensitization on clinical outcomes are just beginning to be understood. Many patients are listed with the requirement of a negative prospective or virtual crossmatch prior to accepting a donor organ. This strategy has been associated with both longer waitlist times and higher waitlist mortality. An alternative approach is to transplant across a potentially positive crossmatch while utilizing strategies to decrease the significance of the human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This review will examine the challenges and the impact of sensitization on pediatric patients prior to and following heart transplantation.

Essential concept of transplant immunology for clinical practice

Our understanding of transplant immunology has advanced from gross allograft rejection to cellular response and to current molecular level. More sensitive assays have been developed to characterize patient sensitization and to detect pre-existing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in pre-transplant crossmatch. After a transplant, pre-existing or de novo DSA are increasingly monitored to guide clinical management. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to understand the basic concepts and key components of transplant immunology as well as be familiarized with the modern immunological techniques used in kidney transplantation.

Panel-reactive antibody levels and renal transplantation rates in sensitized patients after desensitization and human leucocyte antigen amino acid residue matching

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a new desensitization protocol (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], plasmapheresis and antithymocyte globulin [ATG], complemented with human leucocyte antigen [HLA] amino acid residue matching) could reduce panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels in sensitized patients, to facilitate successful renal transplantation.

METHODS

Patients awaiting transplantation with PRA levels >10% received treatment with MMF; those with PRA levels >30% were also treated with plasmapheresis. Patients whose PRA level was <20% after desensitization were eligible for transplantation. When a donor became available, traditional HLA matching and HLA amino acid residue matching were performed. All patients received ATG induction therapy postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two sensitized patients were enrolled. Desensitization produced a significant decrease in PRA levels; 27 patients (84.4%) became eligible for transplantation and 26 (81.2%) subsequently underwent successful transplantation. Residue matching improved the proportion with a mismatch number of 0-1 from 7.7% to 65.4%, compared with traditional HLA matching. Postoperatively, all patients showed immediate graft function. Acute rejection occurred in three patients (11.5%) and infections in seven patients (25.9%); all were treated successfully.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a desensitization protocol (MMF, plasmapheresis and ATG) and residue matching appears to be an effective strategy for sensitized patients awaiting renal transplantation.

Prevention of antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

There is increasing evidence that antibody-mediated rejection is the major cause of late kidney graft failure. Prevention of antibody-mediated allograft damage has therefore become an important issue in kidney transplantation. Such prevention starts already before transplantation with the avoidance of sensitizing events. When a patient is already sensitized, precise characterization of alloantibodies and exact HLA typing of the donor at the time of transplantation are mandatory. To ensure timely and successful transplantation of highly sensitized patients, desensitization, and inclusion in special programs such as the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch Program should be considered. After transplantation, close monitoring of kidney function, testing for the de novo development or changing characteristics of alloantibodies, and attention to non-adherence to immunosuppression is obligatory. In the current overview, we discuss the currently available measures for the prevention of antibody-mediated kidney graft rejection.

An Introduction to Extracorporeal Blood Purification in Critical Illness

Critical care nephrology is an emerging sub-specialty with rapid technological advancement and a growing body of dedicated literature in blood purification techniques. Their applications have been extended to improve morbidity and survival in multiple organ dysfunctions. Novel techniques have also allowed us to push the frontiers in transplant medicine, giving high-immunological risk patients a chance at a kidney transplant where this was previously precluded by hyperacute antibody-mediated rejection. We aim to review the myriad extracorporeal blood purification techniques now available for treating various critical illnesses in our clinical practice. Some of these techniques will still require further clinical research to determine the optimal timing and dose in order to achieve significant improvement in clinical outcomes.

Therapeutic apheresis for renal disorders

This review summarizes the clinical evidence and practical details for the use of plasmapheresis and other apheresis modalities for each indication in nephrology. Updated information on the molecular biology and immunology of each renal disease is discussed in relation to the rationale for apheresis therapy and its place amid other available treatments. Autoantibody-mediated diseases, such as anti-GBM (anti-glomerular basement membrane) glomerulonephritis (GN), ANCA (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody)-related GN and the antibody-mediated type of TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and alloantibody-mediated diseases such as kidney transplant sensitization and humoral rejection, can be treated by various plasmapheresis methods. These include standard plasmapheresis with a replacement volume, or plasmapheresis with online plasma purification using adsorption columns or secondary filtration. However, it should be noted that the pathogenic molecules implicated in FSGS (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), myeloma cast nephropathy, and perhaps other diseases are too small to be removed by most online purification methods. A great majority of controlled trials and series on which evidence-based treatment recommendations are made were performed using centrifugal plasmapheresis; it is presumed that membrane-separation plasmapheresis is equally efficacious. For some rarer diseases, such as MPGN (membranoproliferative GN) type 2 with factor H abnormalities or C3Nef (C3 nephritic factor) autoantibodies, there are only a few case reports, but enough scientific understanding to warrant a trial of plasmapheresis in severe cases. Photopheresis, which is effective for cell-mediated rejection in heart and lung transplantation, has not yet found a place in the routine treatment of kidney transplant rejection.

Prevention and treatment of alloantibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is commonly caused by preformed and/or de novo HLA alloantibodies, has evolved as a leading cause of early and late kidney allograft injury. In recent years, effective treatment strategies have been established to counteract the deleterious effects of humoral alloreactivity. One major therapeutic challenge is the barrier of a positive pretransplant lymphocytotoxic crossmatch. Several apheresis- and/or IVIG-based protocols have been shown to enable successful crossmatch conversion, including a strategy of peritransplant immunoadsorption for rapid crossmatch conversion immediately before deceased donor transplantation. While such protocols may increase transplant rates and allow for acceptable graft survival, at least in the short-term, it has become evident that, despite intense treatment, many patients still experience clinical or subclinical AMR. This reinforces the need for innovative strategies, such as complementary allocation programs to improve transplant outcomes. For acute AMR, various studies have suggested efficiency of plasmapheresis- or immunoadsorption-based protocols. There is, however, no established treatment for chronic AMR and the development of strategies to reverse or at least halt chronic active rejection remains a big challenge. Major improvements can be expected from studies evaluating innovative therapeutic concepts, such as proteasome inhibition or complement blocking agents.

Significance of peritubular capillary, glomerular, and arteriolar C4d staining patterns in paraffin sections of early kidney transplant biopsies

BACKGROUND

Although diffuse linear C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) is a well-established criterion of alloantibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection, the actual relevance of focal or granular C4d deposits or staining outside PTC (glomeruli and arterioles) has yet to be established.

METHODS

This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic significance of such nontypical C4d staining patterns. A total of 539 early indication biopsies (329 kidney transplants) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal anti-C4d antibody.

RESULTS

We found a close interrelationship between diffuse or focal linear C4d deposition in PTC, linear endothelial deposition in glomeruli, and arteriolar C4d. These specific patterns were also related to transplant glomerulitis and recipient presensitization. No such associations, however, were observed for other patterns, such as granular C4d in PTC. Detection of diffuse but not focal linear C4d in PTC was found to be associated with adverse allograft survival (5-year death-censored graft survival: 48% vs. 82%, 89%, or 84% in patients with focal, minimal, or no C4d, respectively; P<0.0001). Univariate analysis also revealed inferior graft survival in recipients with linear C4d in glomeruli (P=0.02). Applying multivariate Cox regression analysis, however, only diffuse linear PTC staining was found to be predictive of graft loss (hazard ratio 3.95 [95% confidence interval 1.62-9.60]; P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

There might be a relationship between humoral alloimmunity and distinct less established staining patterns, such as focal linear C4d in PTC, endothelial C4d in glomeruli, or arteriolar C4d. Nevertheless, our results reemphasize the prognostic value of diffuse linear PTC staining.

Desensitization protocols and their outcome

In the last decade, transplantation across previously incompatible barriers has increasingly become popular because of organ donor shortage, availability of better methods of detecting and characterizing anti-HLA antibodies, ease of diagnosis, better understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, and the availability of effective regimens. This review summarizes all manuscripts published since the first publication in 2000 on desensitized patients and discusses clinical outcomes including acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection rate, the new agents available, kidney paired exchange programs, and the future directions in sensitized patients. There were 21 studies published between 2000 and 2010, involving 725 patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) who underwent kidney transplantation with different desensitization protocols. All studies were single center and retrospective. The patient and graft survival were 95% and 86%, respectively, at a 2-year median follow-up. Despite acceptable short-term patient and graft survivals, acute rejection rate was 36% and acute antibody-mediated rejection rate was 28%, which is significantly higher than in nonsensitized patients. Recent studies with longer follow-up of those patients raised concerns about long-term success of desensitization protocols. The studies utilizing protocol biopsies in desensitized patients also reported higher subclinical and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. An association between the strength of DSAs determined by median fluorescence intensity values of Luminex single-antigen beads and risk of rejection was observed. Two new agents, bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, and eculizumab, an anti-complement C5 antibody, were recently introduced to desensitization protocols. An alternative intervention is kidney paired exchange, which should be considered first for sensitized patients.

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients: are there options to overcome a positive crossmatch?

Presensitization against a broad array of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) is associated with prolonged waiting times and inferior graft survival in kidney transplantation. Since the late 1960s, a positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch has been considered a contraindication for kidney transplantation and solutions, such as enrollment of eligible patients in the Acceptable Mismatch Program of Eurotransplant and kidney paired donation in the case of living donor kidney transplantation, have been proposed to avoid this barrier. Alternatively, a positive crossmatch might not be considered as a contraindication for kidney transplantation and one can try to overcome this hurdle by desensitization. In principle, there are three different ways to overcome the crossmatch barrier by desensitization. The highly sensitized patient awaiting a cadaveric kidney transplant may be desensitized either immediately pretransplant when an organ is offered or in advance, during the time on the waiting list, to increase his chance of having a negative crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In the case of living donor kidney transplantation, the patient can be desensitized for days to weeks until the positive crossmatch with his intended living kidney donor becomes negative. "Heidelberg algorithm" is a combination of different measures, such as pretransplant risk estimation, good HLA match, inclusion of patients in the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program, and desensitization, which leads to timely transplantation and excellent survival rates in highly sensitized patients at a low rate of toxicity. We believe that all available options should be utilized in an integrated manner for the transplantation of kidney transplant recipients who are at a high risk of antibody-mediated rejection.

Desensitization for renal transplantation: depletion of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, preservation of memory antibodies, and clinical risks

Desensitization protocols reduce donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) and enable renal transplantation in patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxic cross-match (CDC-CXM). The effect of this treatment on protective antibody and immunoglobulin levels is unknown. Thirteen patients with end-stage renal disease, DSA and positive CDC-CXM underwent desensitization. Sera collected pre- and post-transplantation were analysed for anti-tetanus and anti-pneumococcal antibodies, total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels and IgG subclasses and were compared to healthy controls and contemporaneous renal transplant recipients treated with standard immunosuppression alone. Ten patients developed negative CDC-CXM and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and underwent successful transplantation. Eight recipients achieved good graft function without antibody-mediated or late rejection, BK virus or cytomegalovirus infection. One patient had primary non-function due to recurrent oxalosis, and one patient with immediate graft function died from septicaemia. Seven recipients required post-operative transfusion and three developed septicaemia. DSA remained negative by ELISA at 12 months, but were detectable by Luminex(®) . Anti-tetanus and anti-pneumococcal antibodies, total Ig and IgG subclasses were below the normal range but comparable to levels in renal transplant recipients who had not undergone desensitization. Desensitization protocols effectively reduce DSA and allow successful transplantation. Post-operative bleeding and short-term infectious risk is increased. Protective antibody and serum immunoglobulin levels are relatively preserved.

An integrative approach for the transplantation of high-risk sensitized patients

BACKGROUND

Sensitized patients have a lower chance of receiving a crossmatch-negative kidney and, if transplanted, are at risk of antibody-mediated allograft rejection.

METHODS

For safe and timely transplantation of sensitized patients at our center, we developed an integrative algorithm that includes identification of high-risk patients, good human leukocyte antigen match, inclusion in the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch Program when applicable, apheresis, anti-CD20 therapy, posttransplant antibody monitoring, and protocol biopsies. Thirty-four high-risk recipients of a deceased donor kidney (DDK: n=28) or living donor kidney (LDK: n=6) were transplanted using this algorithm.

RESULTS

One-year graft survival, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival rates in DDK recipients were 92.4%, 96.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. No graft loss or patient death was observed in the six LDK patients. Median serum creatinine at 1 year in DDK and LDK recipients was 1.2 and 1.4 mg/dL, respectively. Eleven DDK and three LDK patients experienced at least one biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, mostly showing borderline changes. Antibody-mediated rejection without graft loss was diagnosed in two DDK and one LDK patients. Delayed graft function was observed in 13 DDK and 1 LDK patients. Infectious complications were infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe an algorithm for the categorization and treatment of presensitized high-risk patients. This protocol provides effective prevention of antibody-mediated rejection and is associated with a low rate of side effects and good graft outcome.

Peritransplant immunoadsorption for positive crossmatch deceased donor kidney transplantation

Various desensitization protocols were shown to enable successful living donor kidney transplantation across a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM). Positive crossmatch transplantation, however, is less well established for deceased donor transplantation. We report a cohort of 68 deceased donor renal allograft recipients who, on the basis of broad sensitization (lymphocytotoxic panel reactivity ≥40%), were subjected to a protocol of peritransplant immunoadsorption (IA). Treatment consisted of a single session of immediate pretransplant IA (protein A) followed by posttransplant IA and antilymphocyte antibody therapy. Twenty-one patients had a positive CDCXM, which could be rendered negative by pretransplant apheresis. Solid phase HLA antibody detection revealed preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in all 21 CDCXM-positive and in 30 CDCXM-negative recipients. At 5 years, overall graft survival, death-censored graft survival and patient survival were 63%, 76% and 87%, respectively, without any differences between CDCXM-positive, CDCXM-negative/DSA-positive and CDCXM-negative/DSA-negative recipients. Furthermore, groups did not differ regarding rates of antibody-mediated rejection (24% vs. 30% vs. 24%, p = 0.84), cellular rejection (14% vs. 23% vs. 18%, p = 0.7) or allograft function (median 5-year serum creatinine: 1.3 vs. 1.8 vs. 1.7 mg/dL, p = 0.62). Our results suggest that peritransplant IA is an effective strategy for rapid desensitization in deceased donor transplantation.

Targeting MHC class I monomers to dendritic cells inhibits the indirect pathway of allorecognition and the production of IgG alloantibodies leading to long-term allograft survival

T cell depletion strategies are an efficient therapy for the treatment of acute rejections and are an essential part of tolerance induction protocols in various animal models; however, they are usually nonselective and cause wholesale T cell depletion leaving the individual in a severely immunocompromised state. So far it has been difficult to selectively delete alloreactive T cells because the majority of protocols either delete all T cells, subsets of T cells, or subpopulations of T cells expressing certain activation markers, ignoring the Ag specificity of the TCR. We have developed a model in which we were able to selectively deplete alloreactive T cells with an indirect specificity by targeting intact MHC molecules to quiescent dendritic cells using 33D1 as the targeting Ab. This strategy enabled us to inhibit the indirect alloresponse against MHC-mismatched skin grafts and hence the generation of IgG alloantibodies, which depends on indirectly activated T cells. In combination with the temporary abrogation of the direct alloresponse, we were able to induce indefinite skin graft survival. Importantly, the targeting strategy had no detrimental effect on CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) T cells, which could potentially be used as an adjunctive cellular therapy. Transplantation tolerance depends on the right balance between depletion and regulation. For the former this approach may be a useful tool in the development of future tolerance induction protocols in non-sensitized patients.

Effect of hemodialysis before transplant surgery on renal allograft function--a pair of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis immediately before kidney transplant surgery has been suggested to adversely affect early graft function. On the other hand, considering its profound antiinflammatory effects, a beneficial impact of regional citrate anticoagulation on the evolution of graft function can be speculated. We sought to assess the clinical impact of preoperative hemodialysis and dialysis anticoagulation in two related randomized trials.

METHODS

Eligible kidney transplant candidates with a serum potassium less than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L were randomized to receive dialysis or no dialysis before deceased donor transplantation. Patients with a potassium more than 5.0 mEq/L were randomized to receive dialysis with heparin or citrate anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at posttransplant day 5.

RESULTS

The first comparison (56 vs. 54 patients) revealed no effect of dialysis on eGFR at day 5 (primary endpoint, 12 [interquartile range 5-36] vs. 13 [5-37] mL/min/1.73 m2, P=0.98), rates of delayed graft function (22% vs. 27%, P=0.66), cellular rejection (20% vs. 24%, P=0.65), and C4d-positive dysfunction (2% vs. 9%, P=0.11) or 1-year death-censored graft survival (89% vs. 91%, P=0.51). Comparing citrate with heparin anticoagulation (44 vs. 66 patients), no differences in eGFR at day 5 (17 [8-31] vs. 14 [6-38] ml/min/1.73 m2, P=0.57), delayed graft function (21% vs. 30%, P=0.28), cellular rejection (23% vs. 33%, P=0.29), and graft survival (90% vs. 88%, P=0.44) were found. For citrate anticoagulation, less C4d-positive rejection episodes (P=0.08) and higher 1-year eGFR levels (P=0.03) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Pretransplant hemodialysis and anticoagulation may not affect early graft function in a meaningful way.

Clinical relevance of preformed C4d-fixing and non-C4d-fixing HLA single antigen reactivity in renal allograft recipients

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA), especially those fixing complement, may pose a particular immunologic risk to transplant recipients. To assess the clinical impact of C4d- or non-C4d-fixing (IgG) HLA sensitization, pretransplant sera obtained from 338 kidney allograft recipients prescreened by FlowPRA were retrospectively evaluated by Luminex single antigen (SA) testing using a novel fluorescent-labeled anti-C4d reagent for detection of antibody-triggered C4d deposition in addition to IgG binding. Recipients with [IgG]DSA (n = 39) showed a substantially higher rate of C4d positive rejection (33%) than 16 patients with [IgG] non-DSA (0%) or 283 antibody-negative patients (4%, multivariate analysis excluding retransplantation because of high co-linearity: P < 0.0001), and adversely affected 5-year death-censored graft survival (74% vs. 81% and 90%, respectively, multivariate model: P < 0.05). [C4d] DSA (n = 21) and [C4d] non-DSA (n = 25) increased rates of C4d positive rejections to a similar extent (24% and 28% vs. 4% in recipients without C4d-fixing reactivity; multivariate analysis: P <or= 0.002) with a trend towards adverse 5-year graft survival (76% and 76% vs. 90%; P <or= 0.2). In conclusion, Luminex-based characterization of HLA sensitization may be a useful strategy for risk stratification. Possibly as a result of intensified immunosuppression in presensitized recipients, identification of C4d-fixing DSA was not associated with a further increase of rejection and graft loss rates.

Successful deceased-donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients with peritransplant plasma exchange and Rituximab

Sensitized patients awaiting renal transplantation have a markedly reduced probability of receiving a crossmatch (XM)-negative renal allograft, and, even if transplanted with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)-XM, they are at an increased risk of antibody-mediated humoral rejection with early graft loss. We report here for the first time on the effectiveness of a single pretransplant plasma exchange session in rendering a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity-XM negative and, in combination with anti-CD20 therapy, allowing successful renal transplantation in two sensitized deceased-donor kidney allograft recipients. In a third patient with high donor-specific reactivity, the therapy was unsuccessful. Plasma exchange treatments were continued during the posttransplant period until stable allograft function was achieved. Both patients showed good graft outcome at 27 and 21 months after transplantation with serum creatinine values of 1.60 and 1.25 mg/dL, respectively.

Monocytes/macrophages in kidney allograft intimal arteritis: no association with markers of humoral rejection or with inferior outcome

BACKGROUND

Several studies indicate that interstitial and intracapillary monocytes/macrophages (MO) represent a significant proportion of graft-infiltrating cells in renal allografts and that their presence may unfavourably affect clinical outcome. Much less is known about the role of MO in vascular rejection of transplanted kidneys. The aim of our study was to determine the cellular composition of immune cell infiltrates in intimal arteritis and to analyse whether it is associated with features of humoral immunity and impaired graft survival.

METHODS

In 34 recipients with vascular rejection, we determined the proportion of intimal and interstitial MO and T-cells (expressed as ratio of CD68- and CD3-positive cells) in immunohistochemically double-labelled slides.

RESULTS

Intimal arteritis is always composed of T-cells and MO with a median CD68/CD3 ratio of 1.03. In 47% of cases, however, T-cells predominate (CD68/CD3 ratio <1). The median interstitial CD68/CD3 ratio is 0.61, with T-cells dominating in 64% of cases. There is no correlation between the cellular composition of arterial and interstitial infiltrates. The proportion of interstitial and arterial MO has no impact on graft survival, and is, in contrast to previous reports on MO in allograft glomerulitis and capillaritis, not associated with C4d staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Intimal arteritis in kidney allograft rejection is composed of a mixed infiltrate of MO and T-lymphocytes. In contrast to MO in PTCitis and glomerulitis, the MO in intimal arteritis are not associated with markers of humoral immune response and there are no different allograft outcomes between MO and T-lymphocyte-dominated groups.

Posttransplant HLA alloreactivity in stable kidney transplant recipients-incidences and impact on long-term allograft outcomes

Humoral alloreactivity is well established to predict adverse allograft outcomes. However, in some recipients, alloantibodies may also occur in the absence of graft dysfunction. We evaluated if and how often complement- and noncomplement-fixing alloantibodies are detectable in stable recipients and whether, in this context, they affect long-term outcomes. Sera obtained from 164 kidney transplant recipients at 2, 6 and 12 months were evaluated by FlowPRA screening and single-antigen testing for detection of IgG- or C4d-fixing HLA panel reactivity and donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Applying stringent criteria, we selected 34 patients with an uneventful 1-year course (no graft dysfunction or rejection) and excellent graft function at 12 months [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >or=60 mL/min and proteinuria <or=0.5 g/24 h]. Nine (27%) and 5 (15%) of these recipients tested positive by [IgG] and [C4d]FlowPRA screening, respectively. In five cases, DSA were identified. Frequencies of positive test results and DSA binding intensities were not significantly lower than those documented for patients who did not fulfill the above criteria. In recipients with an excellent 1-year course, FlowPRA reactivity was not associated with lower eGFR or increased protein excretion during 68-month median follow-up. Our results suggest cautious interpretation of antibody monitoring in patients with normal-functioning grafts.

Humoral responses directed against non-human leukocyte antigens in solid-organ transplantation

Antibody-mediated mechanisms have a major impact on allograft function and survival. During the last decade, improved immunohistochemical and serologic diagnostic procedures have been developed to monitor antibody responses against human leukocyte antigens (HLA). Acute and chronic allograft rejection can occur in HLA-identical sibling transplants implicating the importance of immune response against non-HLA targets. Non-HLA, complement and noncomplement-fixing antibodies may be responsible for a variety of allograft injuries, reflecting the complexity of their acute and chronic actions. Non-HLA antibodies may occur as alloantibodies or autoantibodies. Their antigenic targets described, thus, far include various minor histocompatibility antigens, vascular receptors, adhesion molecules, and intermediate filaments. An analysis of the subtle mechanistic differences in the individual antibody responses directed against non-HLA may help to identify patients at particular risk for irreversible acute or chronic allograft injuries and improve overall outcomes. This review summarizes the current state of research, development in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, discusses some emerging problems, and provides perspectives in the area of humoral response against non-HLA in solid-organ transplantation.

In vitro detection of C4d-fixing HLA alloantibodies: associations with capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts

Capillary C4d deposition is a valuable marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In this analysis, flow cytometric detection of alloantibody-triggered C4d deposition to HLA antigen-coated microparticles ([C4d]FlowPRA) was evaluated for its value as a marker for C4d deposition in renal allografts. For comparative analysis, 105 first renal biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and an equal number of concurrent sera were subjected to immunohistochemistry and [C4d] plus standard [IgG]FlowPRA, respectively. C4d deposition/fixation was detected in 17 biopsies and, applying [C4d]FlowPRA HLA class I and II screening, also in a small number of corresponding sera (N = 20). IgG reactivity detected by standard [IgG]FlowPRA was more frequent (49% of sera). Comparing [C4d]FlowPRA screening with capillary C4d staining, we found a high level of specificity (0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.98]), which far exceeded that calculated for [IgG]FlowPRA (0.60 [0.50-0.70]). [IgG]FlowPRA screening, however, turned out to be superior in terms of sensitivity (0.94 [0.83-1.05] vs. 0.76 [0.56-0.97] calculated for C4d-fixing panel reactivity). Remarkably, posttransplant single antigen testing for identification of complement-fixing donor-specific alloreactivities failed to improve the predictive value of FlowPRA-based serology. In conclusion, our results suggest that detection of complement-fixing HLA panel reactivity could provide a specific tool for monitoring of C4d-positive AMR.

Recommendations for the use of immunoapheresis in the treatment of autoimmune bullous diseases

Despite the use of high-dose systemic corticosteroids in combination with other immunosuppressants, in some patients with autoimmune bullous diseases only insufficient improvement is achieved. In these cases and in acute severe disease, adjuvant immunoapheresis has been increasingly used. A consensus meeting was held in mid-2005 in Hamburg, aiming at developing guidelines for the use of immunoapheresis in the treatment of autoimmune bullous diseases. This paper summarizes the experts' recommendations.

Outcome of Multipair Donor Kidney Exchange by a Web-Based Algorithm

Donor kidney exchange is an established method to overcome incompatibility of donor-recipient pairs (DRP). A computerized algorithm was devised to exchange donor kidney and was tested in a multicenter setting. The algorithm was made according to the consensus of participating centers. It makes all possible exchange combinations not only between two incompatible DRP but also circularly among three DRP and selects an optimum set of exchange combinations, considering several factors that can affect the outcome of the exchanged transplant. The algorithm was implemented as a web-based program, and matching was performed five times. Fifty-three DRP were enrolled from five transplant centers. The numbers of DRP that were enrolled in each matching were 38 (25:13), 39 (34:5), 33 (31:2), 32 (28:4), and 34 (30:4) (carryover:newcomer). The numbers of generated exchange combinations were 4:11, 3:17, 2:12, 2:3, and 2:3 (two-pair exchange:three-pair exchange), and the numbers of DRP in selected exchange combinations were six, 12, six, five, and four in each matching. The numbers of DRP with blood type O recipient or AB donor were five and one, respectively, in selected exchange combinations. Six DRP of two-pair exchange combinations and six DRP of three-pair exchange combinations underwent transplantation successfully. Computerized algorithm of donor kidney exchange was tried not only between two incompatible DRP but also circularly among three DRP. It showed that the algorithm has potential to improve the outcome of donor kidney exchange, especially for disadvantaged DRP with blood type O recipients or AB donors.

Immunoadsorption in severe C4d-positive acute kidney allograft rejection: a randomized controlled trial

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) frequently causes refractory graft dysfunction. This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether immunoadsorption (IA) is effective in the treatment of severe C4d-positive AMR. Ten out of 756 kidney allograft recipients were included. Patients were randomly assigned to IA with protein A (N = 5) or no such treatment (N = 5) with the option of IA rescue after 3 weeks. Enrolled recipients were subjected to tacrolimus conversion and, if indicated, 'anti-cellular' treatment. All IA-treated patients responded to treatment. One death unrelated to IA occurred after successful reversal of rejection. Four control subjects remained dialysis-dependent. With the exception of one patient who developed graft necrosis, non-responders were subjected to rescue IA, however, without success. Because of a high graft loss rate in the control group the study was terminated after a first interim analysis. Even though limited by small patient numbers, this trial suggests efficiency of IA in reversing severe AMR.

Desensitization strategies enabling successful renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients

Currently, the number of highly sensitized patients awaiting a renal transplant is increasing on the waiting lists of different organ exchange organizations. Due to the presence of antibodies against a broad variety of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specificities, highly sensitized patients have a markedly reduced chance of receiving a crossmatch-negative organ. It has long been recognized that hyperacute rejection is associated with the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplantation. Meanwhile treatment protocols have been developed to achieve successful transplantation across antibody barriers. Therefore, the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and a positive serological crossmatch are no longer considered as an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation. Mainly, two desensitization protocols have been established in order to overcome a positive crossmatch or to enhance the chance of highly sensitized patients to receive a crossmatch-negative organ: high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or low-dose IVIg in combination with plasmapheresis. Herein, we summarize the characteristics of these two treatment regimes along with other alternative approaches that are currently used for the management of kidney graft recipients with broad alloantibody reactivity against potential kidney donors.

Plasmapheresis in nephrology: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the past, recommendations for the use of plasmapheresis were based on findings reported from pilot studies or anecdotes. New results from several randomized controlled trials have changed the indications for the use of plasma exchange.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large randomized controlled study of patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis showed benefit of plasmapheresis in those with severe renal disease. Patients receiving plasmapheresis compared with methylprednisolone as adjuvant therapy were more likely to be alive and dialysis independent. Plasmapheresis, following publication of a recent randomized controlled trial, should no longer be used for patients with myeloma and acute renal failure. Standard therapy with five to seven plasma exchanges was compared with standard therapy alone. There was no difference in those patients reaching the composite endpoints between the two treatments. New indications include desensitization protocols, using plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin, which have allowed transplantation across immunological barriers. Highly sensitized patents and ABO incompatible patients compared with their potential donors are now being transplanted with excellent results. Studies still need to be done to assess the best desensitization protocol.

SUMMARY

The use of plasmapheresis requires further validation by randomized clinical trials. Recent published trials should alter practice but further studies are required.