Non???Heart-Beating Donor Kidneys in The Netherlands: Allocation and Outcome of Transplantation

Impact of Extraction Time During Donation After Circulatory Death Organ Procurement on Kidney Function After Transplantation in The Netherlands

Background

In The Netherlands, 60% of deceased-donor kidney offers are after donation after circulatory death. Cold and warm ischemia times are known risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) and inferior allograft survival. Extraction time is a relatively new ischemia time. During procurement, cooling of the kidneys is suboptimal with ongoing ischemia. However, evidence is lacking on whether extraction time has an impact on DGF if all ischemic periods are included.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, 1524 donation after circulatory death kidneys were procured and transplanted in The Netherlands. Donation and transplantation-related data were obtained from the database of the Dutch Transplant Foundation. The primary outcome parameter was the incidence of DGF.

Results

In our cohort, extraction time ranged from 14 to 237 min, with a mean of 62 min (SD 32). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, extraction time was an independent risk factor for incidence of DGF (odds ratio per minute increase 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.013; P = 0.001). The agonal phase, hypoperfusion time, and anastomosis time were not independent risk factors for incidence of DGF.

Conclusions

Considering all known ischemic periods during the donation after the circulatory death process, prolonged kidney extraction time increased the risk of DGF after kidney transplantation.

Donor type and 3-month hospital readmission following kidney transplantation: results from the Netherlands organ transplant registry

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmission after transplantation is common in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In this study, we aim to compare the risk of 3-month hospital readmission after kidney transplantation with different donor types in the overall population and in both young (< 65 years) and elderly (≥65 years) KTRs.

METHODS

We included all first-time adult KTRs from 2016 to 2018 in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect while adjusting for baseline confounders.

RESULTS

Among 1917 KTRs, 615 (32.1%) had at least one hospital readmission. Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients had an adjusted OR of 0.76 (95%CI, 0.61 to 0.96; p = 0.02) for hospital readmission compared to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) recipients. In the young and elderly, the adjusted ORs were 0.69 (95%CI, 0.52 to 0.90, p = 0.01) and 0.93 (95%CI, 0.62 to 1.39, p = 0.73) and did not differ significantly from each other (p-value for interaction = 0.38). In DDKT, the risk of hospital readmission is similar between recipients with donation after cardiac death (DCD) or brain death (DBD) and the risk was similar between the young and elderly.

CONCLUSION

A lower risk of post-transplant 3-month hospital readmission was found in recipients after LDKT compared to DDKT, and this benefit of LDKT might be less dominant in elderly patients. In DDKT, having either DCD or DBD donors is not associated with post-transplant 3-month hospital readmission, regardless of age. Tailored patient management is needed for recipients with DDKT and elderly KTRs.

Hypoperfusion warm ischaemia time in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death

Background

The donor hypoperfusion phase before asystole in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has been considered responsible for worse outcomes than those from donors after brain death (DBD).

Methods

We included 10 309 adult renal transplants (7128 DBD and 3181 DCD; 1 January 2010–31 December 2016) from the UK Transplant Registry. We divided DCD renal transplants into groups according to hypoperfusion warm ischaemia time (HWIT). We compared delayed graft function (DGF) rates, primary non-function (PNF) rates and graft survival among them using DBD renal transplants as a reference.

Results

The DGF rate was 21.7% for DBD cases, but ∼40% for DCD cases with HWIT ≤30 min (0–10 min: 42.1%, 11–20 min: 43%, 21–30 min: 38.4%) and 60% for DCD cases with HWIT &gt;30 min (P &lt; 0.001). All DCD groups showed higher DGF risk than DBD renal transplants in multivariable analysis {0–10 min: odds ratio [OR] 2.686 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.352–3.068]; 11–20 min: OR 2.531 [95% CI 2.003–3.198]; 21–30 min: OR 1.764 [95% CI 1.017–3.059]; &gt;30 min: OR 5.814 [95% CI 2.798–12.081]}. The highest risk for DGF in DCD renal transplants with HWIT &gt;30 min was confirmed by multivariable analysis [versus DBD: OR 5.814 (95% CI 2.798–12.081) versus DCD: 0–10 min: OR 2.165 (95% CI 1.038–4.505); 11–20 min: OR 2.299 (95% CI 1.075–4.902); 21–30 min: OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.33–8.197)]. No significant differences were detected regarding PNF rates (P = 0.713) or graft survival (P = 0.757), which was confirmed by multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

HWIT &gt;30 min increases the risk for DGF greatly, but without affecting PNF or graft survival.

Transplantation of kidneys from uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death: comparison with brain death donors with or without extended criteria and impact of normothermic regional perfusion

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney transplants from uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) with kidney transplants from extended (ECD) and standard criteria donors (SCD). In this multicenter study, we included recipients from uDCD (n = 50), and from ECD (n = 57) and SCD (n = 102) who could be eligible for a uDCD program. We compared patient and graft survival, and kidney function between groups. To address the impact of preservation procedures in uDCD, we compared in situ cold perfusion (ICP) with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Patient and graft survival rates were similar between the uDCD and ECD groups, but were lower than the SCD group (P < 0.01). Although delayed graft function (DGF) was more frequent in the uDCD group (66%) than in the ECD (40%) and SCD (27%) groups (P = 0.08 and P < 0.001), graft function was comparable between the uDCD and ECD groups at 3 months onwards post-transplantation. The use of NRP in the uDCD group (n = 19) was associated with a lower risk of DGF, and with a better graft function at 2 years post-transplantation, compared to ICP-uDCD (n = 31) and ECD. In conclusion, the use of uDCD kidneys was associated with post-transplantation results comparable to those of ECD kidneys. NRP preservation may improve the results of uDCD transplantation.

Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement

This document was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations. Under the auspices of these societies, a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force was convened, incorporating expertise in critical care medicine, organ donor management, and transplantation. Members of the task force were divided into 13 subcommittees, each focused on one of the following general or organ-specific areas: death determination using neurologic criteria, donation after circulatory death determination, authorization process, general contraindications to donation, hemodynamic management, endocrine dysfunction and hormone replacement therapy, pediatric donor management, cardiac donation, lung donation, liver donation, kidney donation, small bowel donation, and pancreas donation. Subcommittees were charged with generating a series of management-related questions related to their topic. For each question, subcommittees provided a summary of relevant literature and specific recommendations. The specific recommendations were approved by all members of the task force and then assembled into a complete document. Because the available literature was overwhelmingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decision was made that the document would assume the form of a consensus statement rather than a formally graded guideline. The goal of this document is to provide critical care practitioners with essential information and practical recommendations related to management of the potential organ donor, based on the available literature and expert consensus.

Kidney transplantation from pediatric donors in a single Chinese center

To report clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from pediatric brain and cardiac death donors (DBCD) in a single Chinese center and to investigate its feasibility to expand organ donor pool. 18 recipients, transplanted between August 2011 and October 2013 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, receive a single graft from DBCD donors age ranged from 1.5 to 13 years old. Renal function expressed as serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen as well as eGFR values at 1, 2 weeks as well as 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-transplantation was evaluated. Graft size was also monitored at the same time by ultrasonography. In addition, delayed graft function, acute rejection, surgical complication as well as patient and graft survival were also assessed. The primary causes of DBCD donors included six cases of severe brain trauma and three cases of cerebral hemorrhage. The mean age of DBCD donors was (7.2 ± 3.4) years (range 1.5-13). The mean weight of DBCD donors was (29.8 ± 15.3) kilogram (range 13-67). The mean height of DBCD donors was (118.3 ± 27.8) centimeter (range 70-173). ECMO was applied to DBCD donors to avoid warm ischemia time and the applicating time was (79.8 ± 44.5) (range 32-180) minutes.There were seven males and 11 females recipients. Among which, 16 recipients were pediatrics and two recipients were adults. The mean age of the recipients was (14.6 ± 9.7) years (range 4-47). The mean weight of recipients was (31.9 ± 12.4) kilogram (range 11-54). The mean height of recipients was (138.0 ± 23.7) centimeter (range 84-172). Renal function recovered to normal within the first-week post-operation except one recipient which occurred acute rejection. Two cases of renal artery stenosis were found 2-week and 3-month post-transplantation, respectively. They subsequently underwent ballon angioplasty and followed up for 8 and 12 months, respectively, and no recurrence was found. One recipient developed ureteral leak. Five weeks later, the ureter leak healed after adequate drainage and prolongation of indwelling catheter. Graft size significantly and continuously increased during the first year, especially in the first 3-month post-transplantation. All the 18 recipients are alive at the last follow-up. Among which, 16 recipients are followed up for 12 months and 1-year recipient/graft survival rate is 100 %. The use of single kidney graft from pediatric DBCD could yield good short-term results.

Independent risk factors for urological complications after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Urological complications after kidney transplantation are mostly related to the ureteroneocystostomy, often requiring interventions with additional costs, morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to assess risk factors for urological complications in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Between January 2000 and December 2011, 566 kidney transplantations were performed with deceased donor kidneys. Recipients were divided in a group with, and a group without urological complications, defined as the need for a percutaneous nephrostomy catheter or surgical revision of the ureteroneocystostomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Univariate analysis showed increased number of male donors (p = 0.041), male recipients (p = 0.002), pre-emptively transplanted recipients (p = 0.007), and arterial reconstructions (p = 0.004) in the group with urological complications. Less urological complications occurred in recipients on hemodialysis (p = 0.005). More overall surgical interventions (p<0.001), surgical site infections (p = 0.042), urinary tract infections (p<0.001) and lymphoceles (p<0.001) occurred in the group with urological complications. Multivariate analysis showed that male recipients (p = 0.010) and arterial reconstructions (p = 0.019) were independent risk factors. No difference was found between both groups in patient or graft survival. In conclusion, recipient male gender and arterial reconstruction are independent risk factors for urological complications after deceased donor kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, graft and recipient survival is not different between both groups.

Measurement of renovascular circulating volume during hypothermic organ perfusion

BACKGROUND

Kidney donation after cardiac death leads to vascular damage as a result of warm ischemia, affecting renovascular circulating volume. Novel ultrasound dilution techniques may be used to measure renovascular circulating volumes during hypothermic machine perfusion of donor kidneys.

METHODS

Renovascular circulating volumes of machine-perfused porcine kidneys were repeatedly measured by ultrasound dilution at different perfusion pressures (30, 40, 50, and 60 mm Hg), durations of perfusion (1 and 24 hr), and warm ischemia times (15 and 45 min). Validity of ultrasound dilution was assessed by comparing volume changes after clamping of renal artery branches.

RESULTS

Repeatability of ultrasound dilution measurements of renovascular circulating volumes was good (mean coefficient of variation, 7.6%). Renovascular circulating volumes significantly increased with higher perfusion pressures, remained constant over time, and significantly decreased with longer warm ischemia times. Changes in ultrasound dilution measurements after renal artery branch clamping did not correlate with changes in actual perfused volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound dilution is a reproducible method to assess renovascular circulating volumes in machine-perfused kidneys, which is susceptible to changes in warm ischemia times. Future studies should evaluate the value of renovascular volume in pretransplantation kidney viability testing.

Effect of a single intraoperative high-dose ATG-Fresenius on delayed graft function in donation after cardiac-death donor renal allograft recipients: a randomized study

OBJECTIVES

Reducing the incidence of delayed graft function after transplant with donation after cardiac death donor renal allografts would facilitate managing recipients during their first weeks after a transplant. To reduce this incidence, in most studies, induction therapy with depleting anti-T-lymphocyte antibodies is coupled with a reduction of the dosage of the calcineurin inhibitor. The separate effect of anti-T-cell therapy on the incidence and duration of delayed graft function is therefore difficult to assess.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a randomized study to evaluate the effect of a single intraoperative high-dose of anti-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin (ATG)-Fresenius (9 mg/kg body weight) on the incidence of delayed graft function. Eligible adult recipients of a first donation after cardiac death donor renal allograft were randomly assigned to ATG-Fresenius or no induction therapy. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, in an unadjusted dose, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.

RESULTS

The study was prematurely terminated because of a lower-than-anticipated inclusion rate. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the ATG-Fresenius group (n=28) and the control group (n=24). Twenty-two patients in the ATG-Fresenius group (79%) had delayed graft function, compared with 13 in the control group (54%; P = .06). Allograft and patient survival were comparable in both groups. Serious adverse events occurred more frequently in the ATG-Fresenius group than they did in the control group (57% vs 29%; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative administration of a single high-dose of ATG-Fresenius in donation after cardiac death donor renal allograft recipients, followed by triple immunosuppression with an unadjusted tacrolimus dose, seems ineffective to reduce the incidence of delayed graft function. Moreover, this was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (EudraCT-number, 2007-000210-36.).

Hypothermic machine perfusion in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of kidneys is intended to mitigate the deleterious effects of cold storage on organ quality, particularly when the cold ischemic time is prolonged or the donor is otherwise marginal. The use of HMP has remained controversial; however, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have recently been conducted to clarify its benefits.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic search of the Medline and Embase databases and of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included only RCTs in the meta-analysis. Outcomes analyzed were the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), primary nonfunction (PNF), graft loss, and patient death at 1 y.

RESULTS

We identified seven RCT trials and subjected them to meta-analysis, including 1353 kidney transplant recipients. Hypothermic machine perfusion significantly reduced the incidence of DGF (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.96). There was no difference in the incidence of PNF (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36-1.68), graft loss at 1 y (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.64-1.19), and patient death at 1 y (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.37) between HMP and donor kidneys preserved using cold storage.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few RCT comparing HMP and cold storage of kidneys in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Although these studies are small and heterogeneous in design, HMP appeared to be associated with a reduced incidence of DGF. No difference in the incidence of PNF, graft loss, or patient death at 1 y could be demonstrated.

Randomized trial of short-course high-dose erythropoietin in donation after cardiac death kidney transplant recipients

Eryhropoiesis-stimulating agents have demonstrated tissue-protective effects in experimental models of ischemia-reperfusion injury. PROTECT was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single center study with high-dose recombinant human erythropoietin-β (Epoetin) in 92 donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplant recipients. Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous bolus of Epoetin (3.3 × 10(4) international unit (IU); n = 45) or placebo (saline 0.9% solution; n = 47) on 3 consecutive days, starting 3-4 h before the transplantation and 24 h and 48 h after reperfusion. The immunosuppressive regimen included an anti-CD25 antibody, steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and delayed introduction of cyclosporine. Primary end point was a composite of the incidence of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function, either defined by spontaneous functional recovery or need for dialysis in the first week. Secondary objectives included duration of delayed function, renal function and proteinuria up to 1 year and thrombotic adverse events. Results showed no differences in the incidence or duration of delayed graft function and/or primary nonfunction (Epoetin 77.8 vs. placebo 78.7%, p = 1.00). Epoetin treatment significantly increased the risk of thrombotic events at 1 month and 1 year (Epoetin 24.4% vs. placebo 6.4%, p = 0.02).

Kidney transplantation from a donor following cardiac death supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

To expand the donor pool, organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) has emerged. However, kidneys from DCD donors have a period of long warm ischemia between cardiac arrest and the harvesting of the organs. Recently, we used extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to minimize ischemic injury during 'no touch' periods in a Maastricht category II DCD donor and performed two successful kidney transplantations. The kidneys were procured from a 49-yr-old male donor. The warm ischemia time was 31 min, and the time of maintained circulation using ECMO was 7 hr 55 min. The cold ischemia time was 9 hr 15 min. The kidneys were transplanted into two recipients and functioned immediately after reperfusion. The grafts showed excellent function at one and three months post-transplantation; serum creatinine (SCr) levels were 1.0 mg/dL and 0.8 mg/dL and the estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were 63 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 78 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the first recipient, and SCr levels were 1.1 mg/dL and 1.0 mg/dL and eGFR were 56 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 64 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the second recipient. In conclusion, it is suggested that kidney transplantation from a category II DCD donor assisted by ECMO is a reasonable modality for expanding donor pool.

Mannitol Reduces the Hydrostatic Pressure in the Proximal Tubule of the Isolated Blood-Perfused Rabbit Kidney during Hypoxic Stress and Improves Its Function

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hypoxia may play a role in the development of renal failure in donated kidneys. In the present study, the effects of hypoxia on isolated blood-perfused rabbit kidneys were investigated and the effects of mannitol were explored, giving special attention to intratubular pressure.

METHODS

Kidneys were perfused with their autologous blood during four 30-min periods (P1-P4). P1 was considered baseline function. In P2, hypoxia was induced either alone or with an infusion of mannitol (15 mg/min) during P2-P4. Reoxygenation was applied after P2. Proximal intratubular pressure was measured in all conditions.

RESULTS

During hypoxia, renal blood flow doubled and restored immediately in P3. Urine flow stopped in P2, except in the series with mannitol, but gradually resumed in P3 and P4. Likewise, creatinine clearance recovered slightly (<25%) in P4, except for the series with mannitol, where it still could be measured in P2 and reached a value >50% of P1. Proximal intratubular pressure (mean ± SD) increased from 12 ± 5 in P1 to 24 ± 11 mm Hg during hypoxia and returned to 10 ± 6 mm Hg in P3. This increase was not observed with mannitol.

CONCLUSION

Cellular swelling might be responsible for the suppressed filtration during hypoxia and can be prevented by mannitol.

Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post-transplant outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in recipients of kidney transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors compared to donation after brain death (DBD) donors.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study to evaluate the impact of DGF on controlled (Maastricht category III) DCD donor kidney transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

From 10/01 to 6/08, 578 adult deceased donor kidney transplants were performed including 70 (12%) from DCD and 508 (88%) from DBD donors. Mean follow-up was 36 months. DCD donor kidney transplants had significantly greater rates of DGF (57% DCD vs. 21% DBD, p < 0.0001)) and acute rejection (29% DCD vs. 16% DBD, p = 0.018) compared to DBD donor kidney transplants, but patient and graft survival rates were similar. DBD donor kidney transplants with DGF (n = 109) had significantly greater rates of death-censored graft loss (12.5% DCD vs. 31% DBD), primary non-function (0 DCD vs. 10% DBD) and higher 2 year mean serum creatinine levels (1.4 DCD vs. 2.7 mg/dL DBD) compared to DCD donor kidney transplants with DGF (n = 40, all p < 0.04). On univariate analysis, the presence of acute rejection and older donor age were the only significant risk factors for death-censored graft loss in DCD donor kidney transplants, whereas DGF was not a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher rates of DGF and acute rejection in DCD donor kidney transplants, subsequent outcomes in DCD donor kidney transplants with DGF are better than in DBD donor kidney transplants experiencing DGF, and similar to outcomes in DCD donor kidney transplants without DGF.

Kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death: uncontrolled versus controlled donation

Kidney donation after cardiac death has been popularized over the last decade. The majority of these kidneys are from controlled donors. The number of organs for transplantation can be further increased by uncontrolled donors after cardiac death. The outcome of uncontrolled compared to controlled donor kidney transplantation is relatively unknown. We compared the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation from uncontrolled (n = 128) and controlled (n = 208) donor kidneys procured in the Maastricht region from January 1, 1981 until January 1, 2008, and transplanted in the Eurotransplant region. The incidence of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function in both uncontrolled and controlled donor kidneys is relatively high (22% vs. 21%, and 61% vs. 56%, p = 0.43, respectively). Ten-year graft and recipient survival are similar in both groups (50% vs. 46%, p = 0.74 and 61% vs. 60%, p = 0.76, respectively). Estimated glomerular filtration rates 1 year after transplantation are 40 ± 16 versus 42 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p = 0.55, with a yearly decline thereafter of 0.67 ± 3 versus 0.70 ± 7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year, p = 0.97. The outcome of kidney transplantation from uncontrolled and controlled donors after cardiac death is equivalent. This justifies the expansion of the donor pool with uncontrolled donors to reduce the still growing waiting list for renal transplantation, and may stimulate the implementation of uncontrolled kidney donation programs.

Lessons learned from a single center's experience with 134 donation after cardiac death donor kidney transplants

BACKGROUND

Reports of kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors describe high rates of delayed graft function (DGF).

STUDY DESIGN

From April 1, 2003 to October 17, 2010, we performed 134 kidney transplants from DCD donors including 120 (90%) from standard-criteria donors (SCDs) and 14 (10%) from expanded-criteria donors (ECDs). Nineteen kidneys were recovered from donors managed with extracorporeal interval support for organ retrieval (EISOR) after cardiac arrest to minimize ischemic injury.

RESULTS

Comparison of donor and recipient characteristics found no differences for cases managed with or without EISOR. Overall actuarial patient survival rates were 93%, 91%, and 89% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 31 months. Overall actuarial kidney graft survival rates were 89%, 76%, and 76% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Actuarial graft survival rates of DCD ECD kidneys were 58% and 48% at 1 and 3 years, compared with 90% and 79% at 1 and 3 years for non-ECD grafts (p = 0.013). DGF occurred in 73 patients (54%) overall and was reduced from 55% to 21% (p = 0.016) with the use of EISOR in locally recovered kidneys. The mean resistance value on machine perfusion and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 month after transplantation were both improved (p < 0.05) in kidneys from donors managed with EISOR. Mean initial hospital stay was reduced from 8.0 to 5.0 days in patients receiving kidneys recovered with EISOR (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

EISOR is associated with a lower rate of DGF, lower graft resistance on machine perfusion, and shorter initial hospitalization. Kidneys from DCD SCDs have excellent medium-term outcomes and represent an important means of expanding the donor pool. Kidneys from DCD ECDs have inferior outcomes.

Preservation of kidneys from controlled donors after cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) expands the pool of donor kidneys, but is associated with warm ischaemic injury. Two methods are used to preserve kidneys from controlled DCD donors and reduce warm ischaemic injury: in situ preservation using a double-balloon triple-lumen catheter (DBTL) inserted via the femoral artery and direct cannulation of the aorta after rapid laparotomy. The aim of this study was to compare these two techniques.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 165 controlled DCD procedures in two regions in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2006.

RESULTS

There were 102 donors in the DBTL group and 63 in the aortic group. In the aortic group the kidney discard rate was lower (4·8 versus 28·2 per cent; P < 0·001), and the warm (22 versus 27 min; P < 0·001) and the cold (19 versus 24 h; P < 0·001) ischaemia times were shorter than in the DBTL group. Risk factors for discard included preservation with the DBTL catheter (odds ratio (OR) 5·19, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·88 to 14·36; P = 0·001) and increasing donor age (1·05, 1·02 to 1·07; P < 0·001). Warm ischaemia time had a significant effect on graft failure (hazard ratio 1·04, 1·01 to 1·07; P = 0·009), and consequently graft survival was higher in the aortic cannulation group (86·2 per cent versus 76·8 per cent in the DBTL group at 1 year; P = 0·027).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, direct aortic cannulation appeared to be a better method to preserve controlled DCD kidneys.

Early loss of peritubular capillaries after kidney transplantation

Inflammation, interstitial fibrosis (IF), and tubular atrophy (TA) precede chronic transplant dysfunction, which is a major cause of renal allograft loss. There is an association between IF/TA and loss of peritubular capillaries (PTCs) in advanced renal disease, but whether PTC loss occurs in an early stage of chronic transplant dysfunction is unknown. Here, we studied PTC number, IF/TA, inflammation, and renal function in 48 patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Compared with before transplantation, there was a statistically significant loss of PTCs by 3 months after transplantation. Fewer PTCs in the 3-month biopsy correlated with high IF/TA and inflammation scores and predicted lower renal function at 1 year. Predictors of PTC loss during the first 3 months after transplantation included donor type, rejection, donor age, and the number of PTCs at the time of implantation. In conclusion, PTC loss occurs during the first 3 months after renal transplantation, associates with increased IF and TA, and predicts reduced renal function.

Current situation of donation after circulatory death in European countries

The aim of the present study was to describe the current situation of donation after circulatory death (DCD) in the Council of Europe, through a dedicated survey. Of 27 participating countries, only 10 confirmed any DCD activity, the highest one being described in Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (mainly controlled) and France and Spain (mainly uncontrolled). During 2000-2009, as DCD increased, donation after brain death (DBD) decreased about 20% in the three countries with a predominant controlled DCD activity, while DBD had increased in the majority of European countries. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per DCD increased along time, although it remained substantially lower compared with DBD. During 2000-2008, 5004 organs were transplanted from DCD (4261 kidneys, 505 livers, 157 lungs and 81 pancreas). Short-term outcomes of 2343 kidney recipients from controlled versus 649 from uncontrolled DCD were analyzed: primary non function occurred in 5% vs. 6.4% (P = NS) and delayed graft function in 50.2% vs. 75.7% (P < 0.001). In spite of this, 1 year graft survival was 85.9% vs. 88.9% (P = 0.04), respectively. DCD is increasingly accepted in Europe but still limited to a few countries. Controlled DCD might negatively impact DBD activity. The degree of utilization of DCD is lower compared with DBD. Short-term results of DCD are promising with differences between kidney recipients transplanted from controlled versus uncontrolled DCD, an observation to be further analyzed.

Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study

Background

Machine perfusion (MP) has potential benefits for marginal organs such as from deceased from cardiac death donors (DCD). However, there is still no consensus on MP benefits. We aimed to determine machine perfusion benefits on kidney grafts.

Methods

We evaluated kidney grafts preserved in ViaspanUW or KPS solutions either by CS or MP, in a DCD pig model (60 min warm ischemia + 24 h hypothermic preservation). Endpoints were: function recovery, quality of function during follow up (3 month), inflammation, fibrosis, animal survival.

Results

ViaspanUW-CS animals did not recover function, while in other groups early follow up showed similar values for kidney function. Alanine peptidase and β-NAG activities in the urine were higher in CS than in MP groups. Oxydative stress was lower in KPS-MP animals. Histology was improved by MP over CS. Survival was 0% in ViaspanUW-CS and 60% in other groups. Chronic inflammation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis were lowest in KPS-MP, followed by KPS-CS and ViaspanUW-MP.

Conclusions

With ViaspanUW, effects of MP are obvious as only MP kidney recovered function and allowed survival. With KPS, the benefits of MP over CS are not directly obvious in the early follow up period and only histological analysis, urinary tubular enzymes and red/ox status was discriminating. Chronic follow-up was more conclusive, with a clear superiority of MP over CS, independently of the solution used. KPS was proven superior to ViaspanUW in each preservation method in terms of function and outcome. In our pre-clinical animal model of DCD transplantation, MP offers critical benefits.

Extracorporeal support: improves donor renal graft function after cardiac death

Donors after cardiac death (DCD) could increase the organ pool. Data supports good long-term renal graft survival. However, DCDs are <10% of deceased donors in the United States, due to delayed graft function, and primary nonfunction. These complications are minimized by extracorporeal support after cardiac death (ECS-DCD). This study assesses immediate and acute renal function from different donor types. DCDs kidneys were recovered by conventional rapid recovery or by ECS, and transplanted into nephrectomized healthy swine. Warm ischemia of 10 and 30 min were evaluated. Swine living donors were controls (LVD). ECS-DCDs were treated with 90 min of perfusion until organ recovery. After procurement, kidneys were cold storage 4-6 h. Renal vascular resistance (RVR), urine output (UO), urine protein concentration (UrPr) and creatinine clearance (CrCl), were collected during 4 h posttransplantation. All grafts functioned with adequate renal blood flow for 4 h. RVR at 4 h posttransplant returned to baseline only in the LVD group (0.36 mmHg/mL/min +/- 0.03). RVR was higher in all DCDs (0.66 mmHg/mL/min +/- 0.13), without differences between them. UO was >50 mL/h in all DCDs, except in DCD-30 (6.8 mL/h +/- 1.7). DCD-30 had lower CrCl (0.9 mL/min +/- 0.2) and higher UrPr >200 mg/dL, compared to other DCDs >10 mL/min and <160 mg/dL, respectively. Normothermic ECS can resuscitate kidneys to transplantable status after 30 min of cardiac arrest/WI.

Controlled organ donation after cardiac death: potential donors in the emergency department

BACKGROUND.: The continuing shortfall of organs for transplantation has increased the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD). We hypothesized that some patients who undergo tracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED) and who are assessed for, but not admitted to, critical care might have potential for controlled DCD. METHODS.: We identified all patients who underwent tracheal intubation in the ED between 2004 and 2008 and studied their records to identify those not admitted to an intensive care unit. We reviewed the notes of patients extubated in the ED to ascertain the diagnosis, management, outcome, and potential exclusion criteria for controlled DCD. RESULTS.: One thousand three hundred seventy-four patients had tracheal intubation performed in the ED; 1053 received anesthetic drugs to assist intubation. Three hundred seventy-five patients were not admitted to intensive care unit; 235 died during resuscitation in the ED. Of the 49 patients extubated in the ED to allow terminal care, 26 were older than 70 years and 18 had comorbidities precluding organ donation. Fourteen patients could have been considered for DCD, but in eight, the time from extubation to death exceeded 2 hr. Thus, six patients might have been missed as potential controlled DCD from the ED in this 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS.: Identification of potential donors after cardiac death in the ED with appropriate use of critical care for selected patients may contribute to reducing the shortfall of organs for transplantation, although numbers are likely to be small. This area remains controversial and requires further informed discussion between emergency and critical care doctors and transplant teams.

Kidneys from donors after cardiac death provide survival benefit

The continuing shortage of kidneys for transplantation requires major efforts to expand the donor pool. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) increases the number of available kidneys, but it is unknown whether patients who receive a DCD kidney live longer than patients who remain on dialysis and wait for a conventional kidney from a brain-dead donor (DBD). This observational cohort study included all 2575 patients who were registered on the Dutch waiting list for a first kidney transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2004. From listing until the earliest of death, living-donor kidney transplantation, or December 31, 2005, 459 patients received a DCD transplant and 680 patients received a DBD transplant. Graft failure during the first 3 months after transplantation was twice as likely for DCD kidneys than DBD kidneys (12 versus 6.3%; P=0.001). Standard-criteria DCD transplantation associated with a 56% reduced risk for mortality (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.80) compared with continuing on dialysis and awaiting a standard-criteria DBD kidney. This reduction in mortality translates into 2.4-month additional expected lifetime during the first 4 years after transplantation for recipients of DCD kidneys compared with patients who await a DBD kidney. In summary, standard-criteria DCD kidney transplantation associates with increased survival of patients who have ESRD and are on the transplant waiting list.

Kidney retrieval after sudden out of hospital refractory cardiac arrest: a cohort of uncontrolled non heart beating donors

Introduction

To counter the shortage of kidney grafts in France, a non heart beating donor (NHBD) program has recently been implemented. The aim of this study was to describe this pilot program for kidney retrieval from "uncontrolled" NHBD meaning those for whom attempts of resuscitation after a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) have failed (Maastricht 1 and 2), in a centre previously trained for retrieval from brain dead donors.

Methods

A prospective, monocentric, descriptive study concerning NHBD referred to our institution from February 2007 to June 2008. The protocol includes medical transport of refractory CA under mechanical ventilation and external cardiac massage, kidney protection by insertion of an intraaortic double-balloon catheter (DBC) with perfusion of a hypothermic solution, kidney retrieval and kidney preservation in a hypothermic pulsatile perfusion machine.

Results

122 potential NHBD were referred to our institution after a mean resuscitation attempt of 35 minutes (20–95). Regarding the contraindications, 63 were finally accepted and 56 had the DBC inserted. Organ retrieval was performed in 27 patients (43%) and 31 kidneys out of the 54 procured (57%) have been transplanted. Kidney transplantation exclusion was related to family refusal (n = 15), past medical history, time constraints, viral serology, high vascular ex vivo resistance of the graft and macroscopic abnormalities. The 31 kidneys exhibited an expected high delayed graft function rate (92%). Despite these initial results transplanted kidney had good creatinine clearance at six months (66 ± 24 ml/min) with a 89% graft survival rate at six months.

Conclusions

This study shows the feasibility and efficacy of an organ procurement program targeting NHBD allowing a 10% increase in the kidney transplantation rate over 17 months. With a six months follow-up period, the results of transplanted kidney function were excellent.

Direct thrombin inhibitor prevents delayed graft function in a porcine model of renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantations from donors after cardiac arrest (DCA) are characterized by an increase in the occurrence of delayed graft function and primary nonfunction. In this study, Melagatran, a selective reversible direct thrombin inhibitor was used to limit renal injury in a DCA pig kidney transplantation model.

METHODS

We used a porcine model of DCA to study the effects of treatment with Melagatran in the peri-conservation period. Thromboelastography was used to check Melagatran antithrombin effect on in vitro clot formation. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze the peripheral immune cells activation status. Renal function and morphologic study were performed at days 1 and 7. Finally, we analyzed the mechanisms of Melagatran protection on kidney microvasculature primary endothelial cells.

RESULTS

Prolongation of coagulation time (Ex-Tem) was observed 10 min after injection; however, Melagatran did not modulate increases of thrombin-antithrombin complexes following reperfusion. Melagatran significant treatment lowered the proinflammatory status of circulating immune cells. Animal's survival was increased in Melagatran-treated groups (9 of 10 in Melagatran groups vs. 4 of 10 in controls at day 7). Renal injury and inflammation were also significantly reduced in treated groups. We also demonstrated a direct protective effect of Melagatran against endothelial cell activation and inflammation in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Direct thrombin inhibitor administration in the periconservation period improved graft outcome and reduced renal injury in a model of DCA.

Peritoneal cooling may provide improved protection for uncontrolled donors after cardiac death: an exploratory porcine study

Uncontrolled donation after cardiac death (DCD) renal transplantation relies on rapid establishment of organ preservation interventions. We have developed a model of the uncontrolled DCD, comparing current in situ perfusion (ISP) techniques with additional peritoneal cooling (PC). Ten pigs were killed and subjected to a 2 h ischemia period. The ISP group modeled current DCD protocols. The PC group (PC) modeled current protocols plus PC. Two animals were used as controls and subjected to 2 h of warm ischemia. Core renal temperature and microdialysis markers of ischemia were measured. Preservation interventions began at 30 min, with rapid laparotomy and kidney recovery performed at 2 h, prior to machine perfusion viability testing. The final mean renal temperature achieved in the ISP group was 26.3 degrees C versus 16.9 degrees C in the PC group (p = 0.0001). A significant cryopreservation benefit was suggested by lower peak microdialysate lactate and glycerol levels (ISP vs. PC, p = 0.0003 and 0.0008), and the superiority of the PC group viability criteria (p = 0.0147). This pilot study has demonstrated significant temperature, ischemia protection and viability assessment benefits with the use of supplementary PC. The data suggests a need for further research to determine the potential for reductions in the rates of ischemia-related clinical phenomena for uncontrolled DCDs.

Donor-directed HLA antibodies before and after transplantectomy detected by the luminex single antigen assay

BACKGROUND

Donor-directed antibodies (DDA) have been shown to result in poor graft survival. This study was designed to analyze antibody appearance and patient and graft characteristics related to antibody formation in patients who lost their graft at different time points after transplantation.

METHODS

Pre- and posttransplant sera of 56 DDA-negative first transplant patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II DDA by the Luminex single antigen assay (LSA). All patients were treated with calcineurine inhibitor-based immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Three of 56 patients proved DDA positive by LSA before transplantation. Eighty-one percent of the remaining 53 patients became DDA class I or II positive or both; 16% before and 84% after transplantectomy. Class I antibodies were produced in 84% and class II in 77% of the recipients. Based on time of transplantectomy, three groups were created as follows: less than or equal to 1 month, 1 to 6 months, and more than 6 months. The groups proved to be significantly different for HLA class II mismatch and acute rejection. All recipients in group 1 to 6 months proved to be DDA positive. Logistic regression analysis showed that DDA positivity for class I was related to higher donor age and donor type (nonheart beating), class II to higher donor age and class II mismatch.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-directed HLA antibodies after transplantation were demonstrated in 81% of first transplant recipients, all of whom were DDA negative by LSA before transplantation. The majority of the antibodies was found after transplantectomy. These findings may have to be taken into consideration in the allocation of organs of marginal donors such as older or nonheart beating kidneys.

Donor kidney disease and transplant outcome for kidneys donated after cardiac death

Background

Although outcomes of kidney transplants following donation after cardiac death (DCD) and donation after brainstem death (DBD) are similar, generally only optimal younger DCD donors are considered. This study examined the impact of pre-existing donor kidney disease on the outcome of DCD transplants.

Methods

This retrospective study compared the outcome of all DCD kidney transplants performed during 1996–2006 with contemporaneous kidney transplants from DBD donors. Implantation biopsies were scored for glomerular, tubular, parenchymal and vascular disease (global histology score). There were 104 DCD and 104 DBD kidney transplants.

Results

Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred more frequently in DCD than DBD kidneys (64·4 versus 28·8 per cent; P &lt; 0·001). Long-term graft outcome was similar. The only donor factor that influenced outcome was baseline kidney disease, which was similar in both groups, even though DCD donors were younger, with a higher predonation estimated glomerular filtration rate. The global histology score predicted DGF (odds ratio 1·85 per unit; P = 0·006) and graft failure (relative risk 1·55 per unit; P = 0·001), although there was no difference for DCD and DBD kidneys.

Conclusion

Transplant outcomes for DCD and DBD kidneys are comparable. Baseline donor kidney disease influences DGF and graft survival but the impact is no greater for DCD kidneys.

Long-term outcomes of donation after cardiac death liver allografts from a single center

Organ shortage continues to be a major challenge in transplantation. Recent experience with controlled non-heart-beating or donation after cardiac death (DCD) are encouraging. However, long-term outcomes of DCD liver allografts are limited. In this study, we present outcomes of 19 DCD liver allografts with follow-up >4.5 years. During 1998-2001, 19 (4.1%) liver transplants (LT) with DCD allografts were performed at our center. Conventional heart-beating donors included 234 standard criteria donors (SCD) and 214 extended criteria donors (ECD). We found that DCD allografts had equivalent rates of primary non-function and biliary complications as compared with SCD and ECD. The overall one-, two-, and five-yr DCD graft and patient survival was 73.7%, 68.4%, and 63.2%, and 89.5%, 89.5%, and 89.5%, respectively. DCD graft survival was similar to graft survival of SCD and ECD in non hepatitis C virus (HCV) recipients (p > 0.370). In contrast, DCD graft survival was significantly reduced in HCV recipients (p = 0.007). In conclusion, DCD liver allografts are durable and have acceptable long-term outcomes. Further research is required to assess the impact of HCV on DCD allograft survival.

[Recovery of transportable organs after cardiac arrest]

The transplant of an allograft after cardiac arrest has been allowed in France since 2005 (decree of 2 august 2005: art R.1232-4-1, 2 and 3 of the public health code). Recently, according to the international scale, 4 situations that could lead to the realization of transplantable organs after cardiac arrest were identified according to a classification called "Maastricht" which describes the potential donors. In France the donors of class III (cessation of all medical care) were excluded. Ethical questions concerning this new practice come up. Are criteria adopted to define death enough sure? What is the place of non-heart beating donor transplantation with new technical resuscitation as extracorporeal life support for prolonged cardiac arrest? How does family and medical staff live this protocol? Despite this, non heart-beating donor kidney transplants offer the opportunity to compensate for the growing discrepancy between supply and demand for donor kidneys. Results from foreign studies have shown that they have the same survival and long term function as kidneys from traditional brain-stem dead donors. This practice is defined by legislation and supervised by the "Agence de la biomédecine" which guarantees technical efficiency and respect of ethics.

Urological complications and their impact on survival after kidney transplantation from deceased cardiac death donors

Urological complications after kidney transplantation may result in significant morbidity and mortality. However, the incidence of such complications after deceased cardiac death (DCD) donor kidney transplantation and their effect on survival is unknown. Purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of urological complications after DCD kidney transplantation, and to estimate their impact on survival. Patient records of all 76 DCD kidney transplantations in the period 1997-2004 were reviewed for (urological) complications during the initial hospitalization until 30 days after discharge, and graft survival until the last hospital visit. Urological complications occurred in 32 patients (42.1%), with leakage and/or obstruction occurring in seven patients (9.2%). The latter seems to be comparable with the incidence reported in the literature for deceased heart-beating (DHB) transplantations (range 2.5-10%). Overall graft survival was 92% at 1 year and 88% at 3 years, comparable to the rates reported in the literature for kidneys from DHB donors, and was not affected by urological complications (chi(2) = 0.27, P = 0.61). Only a first warm-ischaemia time of 30 min or more reduced graft survival (chi(2) = 4.38, P < 0.05). We conclude that urological complications occur frequently after DCD kidney transplantation, but do not influence graft survival. The only risk factor for reduced graft survival in DCD transplant recipients was the first warm-ischaemia time.

Dual transplantation of marginal kidneys from nonheart beating donors selected using machine perfusion viability criteria

PURPOSE

Viability testing can be used to avoid the transplantation of nonheart beating donor organs that are likely to have primary nonfunction. Such testing also identifies a second group of kidneys which, although unsuitable for solitary transplantation, may be considered for dual transplantation. In kidneys in this group solitary transplants would be unlikely to produce a sufficient glomerular filtration rate to support the recipient. However, if used together as a dual transplant, they have the potential to produce sufficient renal function in 1 patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The group at our unit has performed 23 dual nonheart beating donor renal transplants from 2003 to date. Using 3 and 12-month post-transplantation recipient glomerular filtration rates as primary end points we compared our dual transplant group with our series of 115 single nonheart beating donor transplants from 1998 to 2006.

RESULTS

At 3 and 12 months mean glomerular filtration rates in the dual group were 46.2 and 45.5 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2), respectively. These values were not significantly different from the mean glomerular filtration rates of 40.7 and 43.0 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2), respectively, in the single transplant group.

CONCLUSIONS

We have observed that a subset of nonheart beating donor kidneys that do not satisfy the viability criteria for single organ transplantation may become successful dual organ grafts, thus, avoiding unnecessary organ nonuse and maximizing organ resources.

In situ preservation of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: results and complications

OBJECTIVES

To describe the results and complications of in situ preservation (ISP) of kidneys from donors after cardiac death (DCD).

BACKGROUND

DCD donors are increasingly being used to expand the pool of donor kidneys. ISP reduces warm ischemic injury which is associated with DCD donation.

METHODS

Insertion of a double-balloon triple-lumen catheter allows selective perfusion of the abdominal aorta to preserve the kidneys in situ. From January 2001 until August 2005, 133 ISP procedures were initiated in our procurement area.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (42%) ISP procedures led to transplantation; in the remaining 77 cases (58%), the donation procedure was abandoned or both kidneys were discarded because of ISP complications (n = 31), poor graft quality (n = 23), no consent for donation (n = 13), medical contraindications (n = 8), or unknown cause (n = 2). Increasing donor age (odds ratio (OR) 1.06 per year, P < 0.001) and uncontrolled DCD donation (OR 5.4, P < 0.001) were independently correlated with ISP complications. After transplantation, prolonged double-balloon triple-lumen catheter insertion time was an independent predictor of graft failure (OR 2.0, P = 0.05). Selected controlled DCD donors were managed by rapid laparotomy and direct aortic cannulation; graft survival of these kidneys was superior to kidneys from controlled DCD donors managed by ISP.

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of initiated ISP procedures led to transplantation, resulting in a high workload compared with donation after brain death. The association between increasing catheter insertion time and inferior graft outcome emphasizes the need for fast and effective surgery. Therefore, rapid laparotomy with direct aortic cannulation is preferred over ISP in controlled DCD donation. Despite these limitations, we have expanded our donor pool 3- to 4-fold by procuring DCD kidneys that were preserved in situ.

In defense of the reverence of all life: Heideggerean dissolution of the ethical challenges of organ donation after circulatory determination of death

During the past 50 years since the first successful organ transplant, waiting lists of potential organ recipients have expanded exponentially as supply and demand have been on a collision course. The recovery of organs from patients with circulatory determination of death is one of several effective alternative approaches recommended to reduce the supply-and-demand gap. However, renewed debate ensues regarding the ethical management of the overarching risks, pressures, challenges and conflicts of interest inherent in organ retrieval after circulatory determination of death. In this article, the author claims that through the engagement of a Heideggerean existential phenomenological and hermeneutic framework what are perceived as ethical problems dissolve, including collapse of commitment to the dead donor rule. The author argues for a revisioned socially constructed conceptual and philosophical responsibility of humankind to recognize the limits of bodily finitude, to responsibly use the capacity of the transplantable organs, and to grant enhanced or renewed existence to one with diminished or life-limited capacity; thereby making the locus of ethical concern the donor-recipient as unitary ''life.'' What ethically matters in the life-cycle (life-world) of donor-recipient is the viability of the organs transplanted; thereby granting reverence to all life.