Sirolimus use and de novo minimal change nephropathy following renal transplantation

Recurrent and de novo Glomerulonephritis After Kidney Transplantation

The prevalence, pathogenesis, predictors, and natural course of patients with recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN) occurring after kidney transplantation remains incompletely understood, including whether there are differences in the outcomes and advances in the treatment options of specific GN subtypes, including those with de novo GN. Consequently, the treatment options and approaches to recurrent disease are largely extrapolated from the general population, with responses to these treatments in those with recurrent or de novo GN post-transplantation poorly described. Given a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of GN and the development of novel treatment options, it is conceivable that these advances will result in an improved structure in the future management of patients with recurrent or de novo GN. This review focuses on the incidence, genetics, characteristics, clinical course, and risk of allograft failure of patients with recurrent or de novo GN after kidney transplantation, ascertaining potential disparities between “high risk” disease subtypes of IgA nephropathy, idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. We will examine in detail the management of patients with high risk GN, including the pre-transplant assessment, post-transplant monitoring, and the available treatment options for disease recurrence. Given the relative paucity of data of patients with recurrent and de novo GN after kidney transplantation, a global effort in collecting comprehensive in-depth data of patients with recurrent and de novo GN as well as novel trial design to test the efficacy of specific treatment strategy in large scale multicenter randomized controlled trials are essential to address the knowledge deficiency in this disease.

De novo glomerular diseases after renal transplantation

Glomerular diseases developing in the kidney allograft are more often recurrences of the original disease affecting the native kidneys. However, in an undefined number of cases de novo, glomerular diseases unrelated to the original disease in the native kidneys can develop in the transplanted kidney. The clinical presentation and histologic features of de novo diseases are often similar to those features observed in patients with primary or secondary GN in the native kidneys. However, in transplanted kidneys, the glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial changes are often intertwined with structural abnormalities already present at the time of transplant or caused by antibody- or cell-mediated allograft rejection, immunosuppressive drugs, or superimposed infection (most often of a viral nature). The pathophysiology of de novo glomerular diseases is quite variable. In rare cases of de novo minimal change disease, circulating factors increasing the glomerular permeability likely participate. Maladaptive hemodynamic changes and tissue fibrosis caused by calcineurin inhibitors or other factors may be involved in the pathogenesis of de novo FSGS. The exposure of cryptic podocyte antigens may favor the development of de novo membranous nephropathy. Many cases of de novo membranoproliferative GN are related to hepatitis C virus infection. Patients with Alport syndrome lacking antigenic epitopes in their glomerular basement membrane may develop antibodies against these glomerular basement membrane antigens expressed in the transplanted kidney. Infection may cause acute GN to have a heterogeneous clinical presentation and outcome. De novo pauci-immune GN in renal transplant is rare. Preexisting or acquired intolerance to glucose may, in the long term, cause diabetic nephropathy. The prognosis of de novo diseases depends on the type of GN, the severity of lesions caused by the alloimmune response, or the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. In most cases, the management of de novo glomerular diseases is empirical or elusive.

De novo minimal change disease after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

We report the clinical and pathological findings of a case of de novo minimal change disease (MCD) after ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. A 62-yr-old man with end-stage renal disease associated with type I diabetes received ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation from his 58-yr-old wife. Although allograft function was excellent immediately after surgery, massive proteinuria (35 g/d) appeared on post-transplantation day 5. After the allograft biopsy taken on post-transplantation day 6, he was treated with 12 cycles of plasma exchange, but the nephrotic-range proteinuria showed no remission. The biopsy specimen showed no significant pathological findings on light microscopy, but electron microscopy showed diffuse effacement of podocyte foot processes. Based on the diagnosis of de novo MCD, the patient received intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy, followed by high-dose steroid maintenance therapy. The steroid therapy induced complete remission of nephrotic syndrome and stable allograft function immediately, which was also maintained at one yr after the transplantation.

Emerging therapy-related kidney disease

CONTEXT

Many new therapies have emerged within the last 5 to 10 years to treat a variety of conditions. Several of these have direct or indirect renal toxicities that may go undiagnosed without careful attention of the pathologist to a patient's clinical history, particularly the addition of new medications or treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss patterns of renal injury resulting from medications or therapeutic regimens that have been introduced within the last 10 years. Recognition of these patterns may allow the pathologist to alert the attending clinician to a possible drug-induced renal injury and prevent further deterioration of renal function and possible chronic kidney disease.

DATA SOURCES

A review of recent literature and unpublished observations of case-derived material.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of newer therapies have emerged as agents of renal toxicity, producing a variety of pathologic changes in the kidney. The outcome can be acute or chronic glomerular, tubular, interstitial, and/or vascular injury. Some drugs will result in irreversible changes and end-stage renal disease, whereas many of the alterations can be reversed with removal of the offending agent, avoiding potential long-term kidney injury.

Néphrotoxicité des médicaments: veille bibliographique janvier 2003–décembre 2005

Drug-induced kidney injury is a major side effect in clinical practice. Renal injury associated with drugs may involve several components of the kidney: glomerulus, tubules, interstitium, and blood vessels. Acute renal failure may occur as a major reaction to many drugs. Moreover, therapeutic agents may induce an allergic reaction leading to interstitial inflammation and tubular damage. In this article, we present an updated version of the bibliography containing the case reports of nephrotoxicity published in the international literature from January 2003 to December 2005.

Differences in proteinuria and graft function in de novo sirolimus-based vs. calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression in live donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitor(CNI)-free protocols using sirolimus (SRL) in kidney transplantation have proven effective, although reports have linked SRL to proteinuria. We sought to investigate this link and its impact on graft function.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 184 live donor kidney transplant recipients who exclusively received de novo CNI-based (n = 106) or SRL-based (n = 78) regimens. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and semi-quantitative dipstick proteinuria measurements were obtained at one, six, 12, and 24 months and six and 12 months, respectively.

RESULTS

SRL-treated patients had higher frequencies of proteinuria (> or =1+) at 6 months (40.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.006) and 12 months (37.8% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.004) than those treated with CNI. Independent predictors of proteinuria at 12 months were GFR at one month (OR 0.62 per 10 ml/min/1.73 m, P<0.001), delayed graft function (OR 11.5, P = 0.02), and a SRL-based regimen (OR 4.18, P=0.002). By univariable analysis, SRL vs. CNI patients had higher GFR at each point. SRL-treated patients without proteinuria had higher GFR at 12 months compared to CNI-treated patients with and without proteinuria (66 vs. 50 or 56 ml/min/1.73 m, P < 0.05). No difference in GFR was seen between SRL-treated patients with proteinuria vs. CNI-treated patients without proteinuria (57 vs. 56 ml/min/1.73 m, P > 0.05). Absence of proteinuria and a SRL-based regimen remained independently associated FS with higher GFR at 12 months by multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo SRL-based immunosuppression is associated with a higher frequency of semi-quantitative proteinuria, however, estimated graft function at 1 year posttransplant remains superior to that of CNI-treated patients. Nevertheless, the long-term implications of these findings need to be determined.