Relevance of Posttransplant Flow Cytometric T- and B-cell Crossmatches in Tacrolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Patients

Surveillance of alloantibodies after transplantation identifies the risk of chronic rejection

The monitoring of the levels of alloantibodies following transplantation might facilitate early diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR), the leading cause of renal allograft failure. Here, we used serial alloantibody surveillance to monitor patients with preoperative positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM). Sixty-nine of 308 renal transplant patients in our center had preoperative positive FCXM. Blood was collected quarterly during the first postoperative year and tested by FCXM and single antigen bead luminometry, more sensitive techniques than complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatching. Distinct post-transplant profiles emerged and were associated with different clinical outcomes. Two-thirds of patients showed complete elimination of FCXM and solid-phase assay reactions within 1 year, had few adverse events, and a 95% 3-year graft survival. In contrast, the remaining third failed to eliminate flow FCXM or solid-phase reactions directed against HLA class I or II antibodies. The inferior graft survival (67%) with loss in this latter group was primarily due to CR. Thus, systematic assessment of longitudinal changes in alloantibody levels, either by FCXM or solid-phase assay, can help identify patients at greater risk of developing CR.

Human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection: from association to causation

Considerable research has established an association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection. Two new major developments now provide evidence that this relationship is in fact causative. First, recent studies of serial serum samples of 346 kidney transplant patients from four transplant centers show that de novo antibodies, can be detected before rejection. Moreover, serial testing revealed that when antibodies were not present, 528 patient years of good function was demonstrable in 149 patients. Second, among 90 patients whose grafts chronically failed, 86% developed antibodies before failure. To assess the likelihood of a causal link, we applied the nine widely accepted Bradford Hill criteria and conclude that the evidence supports a causal connection between human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection. The clinical implication is significant because we hope this review will stimulate centers to begin the one remaining task of showing that antibody removal will indeed prevent chronic failure.

Value of posttransplant antibody tests in the evaluation of patients with renal graft dysfunction

Posttransplant HLA antibodies correlate with C4d positive rejection and decreased graft survival. However, the diagnostic value of various antibody tests in the management of patients presenting with graft dysfunction is uncertain. Whether all or some patients should be tested, how often, what antibodies to test for and how to interpret results in presensitized or transfused patients, are issues still unresolved. We tested for HLA and non-HLA antibodies by flow cytometry assays in 103 consecutive patients with graft dysfunction. The results show that: (1) C4d positive rejection was diagnosed in 75% of patients who developed posttransplant HLA antibodies, but only in 2% in antibody negative patients. (2) The correlation existed for donor specific IgG antibodies but not for IgM or nondonor specific IgG antibodies. (3) Weak antibody reactivity required confirmation by alternative testing as there were false positive results. (4) Posttransplant transfusions did not induce de novo HLA antibodies. (5) Negative antibody results were unlikely to turn positive after several months of follow-up. (6) Antibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, HLA-DP and MICA did not correlate with C4d+ rejection. We conclude that testing for posttransplant HLA antibodies is critical in narrowing the diagnostic alternatives in patients with graft dysfunction.