Immunophenotype of infiltrating cells in protocol renal allograft biopsies from tacrolimus-versus cyclosporine-treated patients

From Inflammation to the Onset of Fibrosis through A2A Receptors in Kidneys from Deceased Donors

Pretransplant graft inflammation could be involved in the worse prognosis of deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants. A2A adenosine receptor (A_2AR) can stimulate anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, leading to fibrosis if injury and inflammation persist. Pre-implantation biopsies of kidney donors (47 DD and 21 living donors (LD)) were used to analyze expression levels and activated intracellular pathways related to inflammatory and pro-fibrotic processes. A_2AR expression and PKA pathway were enhanced in DD kidneys. A_2AR gene expression correlated with TGF-β1 and other profibrotic markers, as well as CD163, C/EBPβ, and Col1A1, which are highly expressed in DD kidneys. TNF-α mRNA levels correlated with profibrotic and anti-inflammatory factors such as TGF-β1 and A_2AR. Experiments with THP-1 cells point to the involvement of the TNF-α/NF-κB pathway in the up-regulation of A_2AR, which induces the M2 phenotype increasing CD163 and TGF-β1 expression. In DD kidneys, the TNF-α/NF-κB pathway could be involved in the increase of A_2AR expression, which would activate the PKA–CREB axis, inducing the macrophage M2 phenotype, TGF-β1 production, and ultimately, fibrosis. Thus, in inflamed DD kidneys, an increase in A_2AR expression is associated with the onset of fibrosis, which may contribute to graft dysfunction and prognostic differences between DD and LD transplants.

Early Macrophage Infiltration and Sustained Inflammation in Kidneys From Deceased Donors Are Associated With Long-Term Renal Function

Kidney transplants from living donors (LDs) have a better outcome than those from deceased donors (DDs). Different factors have been suggested to justify the different outcome. In this study, we analyzed the infiltration and phenotype of monocytes/macrophages and the expression of inflammatory and fibrotic markers in renal biopsy specimens from 94 kidney recipients (60 DDs and 34 LDs) at baseline and 4 months after transplantation. We evaluated their association with medium- and long-term renal function. At baseline, inflammatory gene expression was higher in DDs than in LDs. These results were confirmed by the high number of CD68-positive cells in DD kidneys, which correlated negatively with long-term renal function. Expression of the fibrotic markers vimentin, fibronectin, and α-smooth muscle actin was more elevated in biopsy specimens from DDs at 4 months than in those from LDs. Gene expression of inflammatory and fibrotic markers at 4 months and difference between 4 months and baseline correlated negatively with medium- and long-term renal function in DDs. Multivariate analysis point to transforming growth factor-β1 as the best predictor of long-term renal function in DDs. We conclude that early macrophage infiltration, sustained inflammation, and transforming growth factor-β1 expression, at least for the first 4 months, contribute significantly to the difference in DD and LD transplant outcome.

The Interplay between inflammation and fibrosis in kidney transplantation

Serial surveillance renal allograft biopsies have shown that early subclinical inflammation constitutes a risk factor for the development of interstitial fibrosis. More recently, it has been observed that persistent inflammation is also associated with fibrosis progression and chronic humoral rejection, two histological conditions associated with poor allograft survival. Treatment of subclinical inflammation with steroid boluses prevents progression of fibrosis and preserves renal function in patients treated with a cyclosporine-based regimen. Subclinical inflammation has been reduced after the introduction of tacrolimus based regimens, and it has been shown that immunosuppressive schedules that are effective in preventing acute rejection and subclinical inflammation may prevent the progression of fibrosis and chronic humoral rejection. On the other hand, minimization protocols are associated with progression of fibrosis, and noncompliance with the immunosuppressive regime constitutes a major risk factor for chronic humoral rejection. Thus, adequate immunosuppressive treatment, avoiding minimization strategies and reinforcing educational actions to prevent noncompliance, is at present an effective approach to combat the progression of fibrosis.

Study of CC chemokine receptor 5 in renal allograft rejection

Allospecific recruitment of T cells is primary to the pathogenesis of renal transplant rejection. Chemokines and their receptors inducing a Th1 cytokine response play a central role in this recruitment. Renal allograft biopsies of 28 patients with acute cellular rejection and 10 protocol biopsies (controls) were examined in accordance with Banff grading 2007 schema. Immunohistochemistry for CD3 and CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) in sequential sections was performed and quantitatively assessed in the glomeruli, tubules, and interstitium. Histopathologic and clinical correlations were carried out. CD3- and CCR5-positive cells were observed in significantly higher numbers in rejection cases than in controls (P = 0.010). A larger proportion of CCR5-positive cells were noted in the foci of tubulitis compared to the interstitial infiltrates and glomeruli in all cases, and it correlated with the grade of cellular rejection (P = 0.010). A greater number of CCR5-positive cells were seen in early rejection (<6 months posttransplant) compared to late rejection. No clinical correlation with serum creatinine levels was found. CCR5-positive cells represent the alloaggressive subset of T cells in ACR, and their numbers correlate with rejection severity. CCR5 may be used as a marker of early acute rejection and may be an important target for future antirejection therapies.

Antibody-mediated allograft rejection: morphologic spectrum and serologic correlations in surveillance and for cause biopsies

BACKGROUND

Subclinical antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR) has been characterized in serial biopsies from presensitized recipients but has not been systematically studied in conventional renal transplants.

METHODS

We evaluated 1101 consecutive kidney transplant biopsies (400 surveillance biopsies [SBx] and 701 for cause biopsies [FCBx]) with concurrent donor-specific antibody (DSA) studies, C4d staining, and ultrastructural examination.

RESULTS

A comparison of AMR-related features (DSA and DSA class, C4d staining, and microvascular injury) demonstrated that these were qualitatively and quantitatively associated with each other and with graft dysfunction. A major difference between SBx and FCBx was that the complete AMR phenotype was more common in FCBx. Among SBx, 8.5% showed complete or incomplete AMR with predominance of an incomplete phenotype (according to the Banff schema, these were acute AMR [23.5%], chronic active AMR [14.7%], suspicious for acute AMR [41.1%], suspicious for chronic active AMR [2.9%], and only microvascular injury insufficient to consider AMR [17.5%]). Persistence or worsening of AMR in a subsequent biopsy occurred in 38.2% of cases independently of the strength of AMR findings in the first biopsy (e.g., progression to chronic AMR occurred also in cases with suspicious or nondiagnostic findings). Temporal progression from subclinical to clinically evident AMR is consistent with the fact that, overall, the biopsies with incomplete phenotype (DSA±C4d) occurred between 14.52 and 20.86 months, whereas the complete phenotype occurred much later (36.71 months).

CONCLUSION

An accurate diagnostic interpretation of the potentially important but incomplete, subclinical, AMR phenotype represents a serious challenge that may impact clinical management.

Chapter 18: Enhancement of nerve regeneration and recovery by immunosuppressive agents

Clinically, little can be done to induce restoration of good to excellent neurological function following nervous system trauma, and time is required before an effective technique is developed and applied clinically. However, there are novel techniques that have not been tested experimentally or clinically that may induce significantly faster, reliable, and extensive neurological recovery following nervous system trauma than is presently possible, even for techniques currently being tested on animal models. To repair peripheral nerves following trauma in which a length of the nerve pathway is destroyed, many clinicians consider autologous sensory nerve grafts to be the "gold standard" for inducing neurological recovery. However, this technique has severe limitations, such as being effective only across gaps less than 2 cm, for repairs performed less than 2 months posttrauma, and in young patients. As a consequence, many patients suffer permanent neurological deficits or recover only limited neurological function, and they frequently develop irreversible neuropathic pain. This review examines the clinical role that immunosuppressants might play, in the presence or absence of autologous, allografts, or xenografts, in increasing the rate, success, and extent of neurological recovery following nervous system trauma.

The utility of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies on renal allograft function: a randomized controlled study

Identification of pathological events in the renal allograft using protocol biopsies at predetermined time intervals may yield useful information and improve outcomes. We examined the influence of decisions taken on the basis of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies findings on 1-year renal allograft function in a prospective randomized study. Out of 102 living-donor allograft recipients, 52 were randomized to undergo protocol biopsies and 50 controls had only indicated biopsies. All acute rejection (AR) episodes (clinical and subclinical) were treated. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dose adjustments were made on clinical judgment. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics, immunosuppressive drug usage, HLA matches and 2-h cyclosporine levels were similar in both groups. At 1 and 3 months, protocol biopsies revealed borderline (BL) changes in 11.5% and 14% patients, AR in 17.3% and 12% and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in 3.8% and 10%. The incidence of clinically evident AR episodes was similar in the two groups, but biopsy group had lower serum creatinine at 6 months (p = 0.0003) and 1 year (p < 0.0001). The renal functions were similar in those with normal histology and BL changes. Protocol biopsies are helpful in detecting subclinical histological changes in the graft and improving short-term renal allograft function.

Immunephenotype of glomerular and interstitial infiltrating cells in protocol renal allograft biopsies and histological diagnosis

Patients with a protocol renal allograft biopsy simultaneously displaying interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and subclinical rejection (SCR) have a shortened graft survival than patients with a normal biopsy, or with a biopsy only displaying IF/TA or SCR. The poor outcome of these patients could be related with a more severe inflammation. We evaluate the immunophenotype of infiltrating cells in these diagnostic categories. Nonexhausted paraffin blocks from protocol biopsies done during the first year were stained with anti-CD45, CD3, CD20, CD68 and CD15 monoclonal antibodies. Glomerular and interstitial positive cells were counted. C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries was evaluated. Histological diagnoses were: normal (n = 80), SCR (n = 17), IF/TA (n = 42) and IF/TA + SCR (n = 17). Only interstitial CD20 positive cells were significantly increased in patients displaying IF/TA + SCR; normal (137 +/- 117), SCR (202 +/- 145), IF/TA (208 +/- 151) and IF/TA + SCR (307 +/- 180 cells/mm(2)), p < 0.01. The proportion of biopsies displaying C4d deposition was not different among groups. The upper tertile of CD20 positive interstitial cells was associated with a decreased death-censored graft survival (relative risk: 3.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-7.35; p = 0.015). These data suggest that B-cell interstitial infiltrates are associated with histological damage and outcome, but do not distinguish whether these infiltrates were the cause or the consequence of chronic tubulo-interstitial damage.

Tacrolimus Once-Daily Formulation

Tacrolimus once-daily (OD) is a new oral formulation of the well established immunosuppressant tacrolimus. Tacrolimus OD provided equivalent steady-state systemic tacrolimus exposure to that achieved with standard oral tacrolimus twice daily in stable renal and liver transplant recipients. The two formulations also provided broadly similar steady-state systemic exposure in de novo renal and liver transplant recipients. In a large, randomised, nonblind, multicentre, three-armed, noninferiority trial in de novo renal transplant recipients, the efficacy failure rates (primary endpoint) [any patient who died, experienced graft failure, had a biopsy-confirmed acute rejection or was lost to follow-up] of tacrolimus OD (14.0%) and standard tacrolimus (15.1%) were noninferior to that of ciclosporin (cyclosporine) microemulsion (17.0%) at 1 year, when each was given in conjunction with corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil and basiliximab induction. Data from a pharmacokinetic study suggests that tacrolimus OD has similar efficacy to standard tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients over 6 weeks of treatment. In noncomparative 2-year trials, tacrolimus OD was effective in stable renal and liver transplant recipients converted to tacrolimus OD from standard tacrolimus. The overall tolerability profile of tacrolimus OD appears to be similar to that of standard tacrolimus in de novo and stable renal and liver transplant patients.