No Association of Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T Gene Polymorphisms With Kidney Allograft Survival: A Multicenter Study

Complications of Factor V Leiden in Adults Undergoing Noncardiac Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Factor V Leiden is the commonest hereditary prothrombotic allele, affecting 1% to 5% of the world's population. The objective of this study was to characterize the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with Factor V Leiden compared to patients without a diagnosis of hereditary thrombophilia. This was a focused systematic review of studies including adult (>18 years) patients with Factor V Leiden (heterozygous or homozygous) undergoing noncardiac surgery. Included studies were either randomized controlled trials or observational. The primary clinical outcomes of interest were thromboembolic events occurring from the perioperative period up to 1 year postoperatively, defined as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other clinically significant thrombosis occurring during or after a surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included cerebrovascular events, cardiac events, death, transplant-related outcomes, and surgery-specific morbidity. Pediatric and obstetrical patients were excluded, as were case reports and case series. Databases searched included MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until August 2021. Study bias was assessed through the CLARITY (Collaboration of McMaster University researchers) Risk of Bias tools, and heterogeneity through analysis of study design and end points, as well as the I 2 statistic with its confidence interval and the Q statistic. A total of 5275 potentially relevant studies were identified, with 115 having full text assessed for eligibility and 32 included in the systematic review. On the whole, the literature suggests that patients with Factor V Leiden have an increased risk of perioperative and postoperative thromboembolic events compared to patients without the diagnosis. Increased risk was also seen in relation to surgery-specific morbidity and transplant-related outcomes, particularly arterial thrombotic events. The literature did not support an increased risk for mortality, cerebrovascular, or cardiac complications. Limitations of the data include predisposition toward bias due in many study designs and small sample sizes across the majority of published studies. Variable outcome definitions and durations of patient follow-up across different surgical procedures resulted in high study heterogeneity precluding the effective use of meta-analysis. Factor V Leiden status may confer additional risk for surgery-related adverse outcomes. Large, adequately powered studies are required to accurately estimate the degree of this risk by zygosity.

Utility of thrombophilia screening in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Thrombosis after kidney transplantation may result in catastrophic outcomes, including graft loss. Thrombophilia has been implicated in post-transplant thrombosis; data, however, are inconclusive on the impact of acquired and inherited thrombophilia and resultant thrombosis in renal graft recipients. We aimed to evaluate whether identifying children with thrombophilia during the pretransplant evaluation predicted post-transplant outcomes. We reviewed 100 kidney transplants performed in 100 children, aged 1-18 years, in a single-center retrospective study. Routine pretransplant comprehensive thrombophilia evaluation was completed. Thrombophilia was demonstrated in 36% patients (N = 36). TEs occurred in 11 patients before kidney transplant. Low PS and antithrombin were found in 9/86 (10.5%) and 2/89 (2.2%) children, respectively. Heterozygosity for FLV and PGM were found in 5/81 (6.2%) and 1/93(1.1%) children, respectively. A post-transplant thrombotic event occurred in 10 children (10%); six involved the renal transplant. The association between a history of a pretransplant thrombotic event and post-operative renal graft thrombosis approached, but did not reach significance (P = 0.071). There was no association between preoperative screening abnormalities and post-operative TEs. Graft loss due to a thrombotic event occurred in two patients; none had underlying thrombophilia. Our data suggest that the utility of universal, comprehensive preoperative thrombophilia testing is not beneficial in determining risk of post-operative graft thrombosis. Thrombophilia testing may be considered in a select population with a history of pretransplant thrombotic event.

Renal transplantation experience in a patient with factor V Leiden homozygous, MTHFR C677T heterozygous, and PAI heterozygous mutation

Vascular complications are important causes of allograft loss in renal transplantation. A two and a half-month-old boy was diagnosed with posterior urethral valve and progressed to end-stage renal disease at eight yr of age. During the HD period, a central venous catheter was replaced three times for repeated thrombosis. The boy was found to be homozygous for FVL and heterozygous for both MTHFR (C677T) and PAI. At the age of 12, renal transplantation was performed from a deceased donor. Postoperative anticoagulation therapy was initiated with continuous intravenous administration of heparin at the dose of 10 IU/kg/h. HD was performed for the first three days. By the fourth day of transplantation, his urine output had increased gradually. Heparin infusion was continued for 18 days during hospitalization at the same dosage. Thereafter, he was discharged with LMWH. On the third month after transplantation, his serum creatinine level was 1.1 mg/dL and eGFR was 75.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2). He has still been using LMWH, and his eGFR was 78.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) eight months after transplantation. Postoperative low-dose heparin treatment is a safe strategy for managing a patient with multiple thrombotic risk factors.

End-stage renal disease and thrombophilia

Chronic kidney disease is an established risk factor for arterial and venous thromboembolism (TE). Whereas the overall risk of TE in moderately decreased kidney function is approximately 2.5-fold higher compared to patients with normal renal function, the risk increase is 5.5-fold in patients with severe renal dysfunction. In patients with renal dysfunction and arterial thrombosis (OR: 4.9), malignancy (OR: 5.8) surgery (OR: 14.0) or thrombophilia (OR: 4.3) the risk to suffer from venous TE is higher compared to the risk associated to the baseline renal dysfunction alone. The treatment options for end-stage renal diseases include hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation. During all treatment modalities thrombotic complications have been described, namely catheter malfunction and shunt thrombosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis in up to 25% of patients, and TE, pulmonary embolism or graft vessel thrombosis in approximately 8% of patients. The reported incidence of reno-vascular thrombosis following renal transplantation leading to hemorrhagic infarction with organ rejection or organ loss varied between 2-12%. Keeping in mind the multifactorial etiology of TE in patients with kidney dysfunction a general screening for thrombophilia in this patient group is not indicated. Selected screening on an individual patient basis should be discussed if the family history for TE is positive or the patient itself had suffered one thrombosis before the onset of the renal disease or multiple TEs during hemodialysis or post kidney transplantation in patients waiting for living donor kidney transplantation.

Successful living donor kidney transplantation in a patient with prothrombin gene mutation: Case report and literature review

We present a patient with known prothrombin gene mutation and a history of prior vascular events, who underwent living donor kidney transplantation. Given the presumed elevated risk of complication from known prothrombin mutation, clinical management was directed towards optimizing living donor allograft function.

Thrombophilic factors do not predict outcomes in renal transplant recipients under prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid

A cohort of recipients of renal transplant after 2000 (N=310) was prospectively screened on the day of transplantation and 1 month later for a panel of 11 thrombophilic factors to assess their effect on posttransplant outcomes. All patients received prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid, started before transplantation. The rate of thromboembolic events or acute rejection episodes during the first posttransplant year (primary composite endpoint) was 16.7% among patients free of thrombophilic factor (N=60) and 17.2% in those with >or=1 thrombophilic factor (N=250) (p>0.99). The incidence of the primary endpoint was similar among patients free of thrombophilic factors and those with >or=2 (N=135), or >or=3 (N=53) factors (16.3% and 15.1% respectively; p=1) and in patients who remained thrombophilic at 1 month (15.7%; p=0.84). None of the individual thrombophilic factor present at the day of transplantation was associated with the primary endpoint. The incidence of cardiovascular events at 1-year, serum creatinine at 1-year, 4-year actuarial graft and patient survival were not influenced by the presence of >or=1 thrombophilic factor at baseline (p=NS). In conclusion, the presence of thrombophilic factors does not influence thromboembolic events, acute rejection, graft or patient survival in patients transplanted after 2000 and receiving prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid.

The impact of eNOS, MTR and MTHFR polymorphisms on renal graft survival in children and young adults

BACKGROUND

The main cause of reduced long-term graft survival is chronic allograft injury. Cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperhomocysteinaemia, accumulation of asymmetric dimethylarginine, increased oxidative stress and decreased production of nitric oxide seem to play an important role. Functional polymorphisms of the endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) gene cause an alteration in nitric oxide production. Nitric oxide levels, and thus oxidative stress, are also influenced by hyperhomocysteinaemia.

METHODS

We carried out a genetic analysis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) 894G>T, methionine synthase (MTR) 2756A>G and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T/1298A>C in 268 renal allograft recipient/donor (D/R) matches, with respect to long-term graft survival.

RESULTS

While MTHFR 677C>T/1298A>G and MTR 2756A>G polymorphism distribution in both recipients (R) and donors (D) showed no significant difference between matches with loss of graft function and those with long-term graft survival, the frequency of the eNOS 894TT genotype of donors was significantly increased (P = 0.040) in matches with better graft survival. The multivariate analysis identified the eNOS 894 genotype and clinically acute rejection episodes as independent risk factors for graft loss (P = 0.0406 and P = 0.0093, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between eNOS 894G>T polymorphism of donors and graft survival seems to suggest a role for this gene in chronic allograft injury; however, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Genetic polymorphisms and the fate of the transplanted organ

There has been an abundance of publications describing genetic variability in molecules affecting innate and adaptive immunity, pharmacogenetics, and other nonimmunological factors like the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system, coagulation, and fibrosis markers. Studies indicated some associations between polymorphisms in these candidate genes with outcomes in organ transplantation and underlined a potential role of genetic variability in transplantation. To be clinically applicable, large prospective studies must be performed to better define the potential benefits of genotyping on these genetic markers and clinical outcomes. The purposes of this review are to summarize recent data describing associations of polymorphisms in both immunological and nonimmunological molecules with transplant outcomes, with a particular emphasis on renal transplantation, and discuss limitations and clinical implications.