Heart Valve Operations in Solid Organ Recipients: An 18-Year Single-Center Experience

Redo Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Replacement with On-X in Renal Transplant Patient: A Case Report

Surgical treatment is recommended in patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation. Although renal transplant patients are a high-risk patient group for cardiac surgery, heart valve surgeries can be performed successfully. There are a limited number of studies published on this subject in the literature. Therefore, we present a case who underwent tricuspid ring annuloplasty (TRA) before being followed up with renal transplantation and then successfully performed redo tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) and pulmonary valve replacement (PVR).

Outcomes of left-sided heart valve surgery after heart transplantation: a systematic review

As the survival after heart transplantation (HTx) is steadily improving, an increasing number of patients with late cardiac pathologies such as valvular disease is expected to rise. Nevertheless, no guidelines for indication of redo cardiac surgery after HTx exists. The aim of the present systematic review is to describe the results reported in the literature of surgical management of severe aortic and/or mitral valve disease. A systematic review was conducted including studies reporting on adult patients with severe mitral or aortic valve pathology needing surgery after their previous HTx. Exclusion criteria consisted in surgery with no left heart valve surgery, concomitant valve surgery during heart transplant, transcatheter interventions, and heterotopic HTx. A total of 35 papers met our inclusion criteria out of 2755 potentially eligible studies with 44 mitral valve surgery patients and 20 aortic valve surgery patients. In the entire population, the mean time from HTx to reintervention was 6.19 ± 5.22 years. After a mean follow-up of 2.78 ± 3.54 years and 1.53 ± 2.26 years from reintervention, 65.6% mitral and 86.7% aortic patients were reported as alive, respectively. As guidelines on cardiac surgery after HTx are currently lacking, left-sided valvular cardiac reinterventions can be considered a possible therapeutic approach in carefully selected patients. These interventions may not only improve the patient's functional status and survival, but may ultimately reduce the need for re-transplantation due to the chronic shortage of donor hearts. However, the support of more robust data is warranted.

Outcomes of tricuspid valve prostheses after heart transplantation: a systematic review

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is the most common valvular pathology after heart transplantation (HTx) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains responsible for the majority of cases due to the high probability of structural valve damage. The aim of the present review was to describe the results of surgical management of severe tricuspid regurgitation through tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) after a previous HTx. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, DOAJ, and Cochrane databases until June 2023 for publications reporting patients undergoing TVR surgery after a previous HTx. If no right heart valve surgery was undertaken, or a heterotopic heart transplant was performed, or if the concomitant procedure was performed during the transplant itself, the paper was excluded. Twenty articles met our inclusion criteria out of 1532 potentially eligible studies, with a total of 300 patients. Mean age was 55.1 ± 9.6 years, and 85.1% were male. The mean number of EMB per patient was 31.1 ± 5.5 with a mean time between HTx and TVR of 7.64 ± 3.31 years. Bioprostheses were used in 83.3% of cases and 75.0% of patients with a bioprosthesis were reported as alive at last follow-up. Tricuspid valve repair is a valuable option, but these patients will be susceptible to recurrent TR after EMB. TVR with a bioprosthesis may provide the optimal solution for this subset of patients, as EMB is not feasible with a mechanical valve.

Influence of Tricuspid Regurgitation After Heart Transplantation: A Single-center Experience

Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TVR) is often observed after orthotopic heart transplantation. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding long-term outcomes of patients with TVR.

Methods

Between January 2008 and December 2015, 169 patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our center and were included in this study. TVR trends and associated clinical parameters were retrospectively analyzed. TVR was assessed after 30 d, 1 y, 3 y, and 5 y, and groups were defined according to changes in TVR grade: constant (group 1; n = 100), improvement (group 2; n = 26), and deterioration (group 3; n = 43). Survival, outcome with regard to operative technique, and long-term kidney and liver function during follow-up were assessed.

Results

Mean follow-up time was 7.67 ± 4.17 y (median 8.62, Q1 5.06, Q3 11.16). Overall mortality was 42.0%, with differences between the groups (P < 0.01). Cox regression analysis revealed improvement of TVR as a significant predictor for survival (hazard ratio 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.63, P < 0.01). After 1 y 2.7%, after 3 y 3.7%, and after 5 y 3.9% of the patients showed persistent severe TVR. Creatinine levels after 30 d and 1, 3, and 5 y showed significant differences between the groups (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P = 0.01), deterioration of TVR being associated with higher creatinine levels during follow-up.

Conclusions

Deterioration of TVR is associated with higher mortality and renal dysfunction. Improvement of TVR may function as a positive predictor for long-term survival after heart transplantation. Improvement of TVR should be a therapeutic goal offering a prognostic value for long-term survival.

Short-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Kidney Transplant Recipients (from the US Nationwide Representative Study)

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are considered high-risk patients for surgical interventions. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been introduced as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) at high operative risk. However, the outcomes of TAVI compared with SAVR KTRs have not been well-studied in nationally representative data. Patients with prior history of functioning kidney transplant who were hospitalized for TAVI and SAVR between January 2012 and December 2017 were identified retrospectively in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Our study included 762 TAVI and 1,278 SAVR KTRs. Compared with SAVR, TAVI patients generally had higher rates of co-morbidities with lower risk of in-hospital mortality (3.1% vs 6.3, p = 0.002), blood transfusion (11.5% vs 38.6%, p <0.001), acute myocardial infarction (3.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.16), acute kidney injury (24.5% vs 42.1%, p <0.001), sepsis (3.9% vs 9.5%, p <0.001) and discharge with disability (42.6% vs 68.4%, p <0.001). However, the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was significantly higher in TAVI group (11.4% vs 3.9%, p <0.001). Of note, in-hospital stroke and 30-day readmission were comparable between both groups. These findings were confirmed after adjusting for other co-morbidities. TAVI is growing as a valid and safe alternative for KTRs with severe AS.

Cardiac valve operations after solid organ transplantation: A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac valve operations in patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation (ie, kidney, liver, pancreas, heart, and lung) pose unique challenges due to patient comorbidities and to the need for immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to present our experience with patients with solid-organ transplant who had cardiac valve operation at the time or after transplantation.

METHODS

Records of patients who had undergone cardiac valve operations after solid organ transplantation between January 1998 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up amounted to a median of 51 months (interquartile range, 5-88 months).

RESULTS

Among the 14,465 patients who underwent treatment for a cardiac valvular pathology during the study period, 127 patients (0.9%) had undergone a solid organ transplantation (kidney: n = 9 [76%]; liver: n = 12 [9%]; pancreas: n = 4 [3%]; heart: n = 16 [13%]; lung: n = 9 [7%]). Postoperatively, 14 patients (11%) underwent rethoracotomy for bleeding and 24 patients (19%) required new dialysis treatment. Twenty-five patients (20%) died in-hospital. Postoperative course was worse in patients operated for endocarditis or undergoing concomitant transplantation and valve surgery. Overall survival was 59%, 47%, and 40%, but survival conditioned to hospital discharge was 73%, 58%, and 50% at 5-, 10-, and 15-year follow-up, respectively. Freedom from major valve-related events amounted to 77%, 56%, and 46%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the high prevalence of postoperative complications, especially in patients with endocarditis or concomitant transplantation and valve surgery, survival conditioned to hospital discharge was satisfactory in patients undergoing valve surgery after solid organ transplantation.

Cardiac Surgery After Heart Transplantation: Elective Operation or Last Exit Strategy?

Background

Because of improved long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx), late graft pathologies such as valvular disease or cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) might need surgical intervention to enhance longer survival and ensure quality of life. To this date, there exist no guidelines for indication of cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after HTx.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-center study, we evaluated patients who underwent cardiac surgery after HTx at our institution.

Results

Between March 1984 and October 2016, 17 (1.16%) of 1466 HTx patients underwent cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after HTx. Indication were valvular disease (n = 7), CAV (n = 6), and other (n = 4). Of these, 29.4% (n = 5) were emergency procedures and 70.6% were elective cases. Median age at time of surgery was 61 years (interquartile range, 52-66 years); 82.4% (n = 14) were male. Median time to surgery after HTx was 9.3 years (2.7-11.1 years). In-hospital, mortality was 11.8% (n = 2); later need of retransplantation was 11.8% (n = 2) due to progressing CAV 3 to 9 months after surgery. One-year survival was 82.35%; overall survival was 47.1% (n = 8) with a median follow-up of 1477 days (416-2135 days). Overall survival after emergency procedures was 209 days (36-1119.5 days) whereas, for elective procedures, it was 1583.5 days (901.5-4319 days).

Conclusions

Incidence of cardiac surgery after HTx in our cohort was low (1.16%) compared with that of other studies. In elective cases, long-term survival was good.

Anesthesia Management in Aortic Dissection in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant

Kidney transplant is a last resort to increase the life expectancy and quality of life in patients with renal failure. Aortic dissection is a disease that requires emergency intervention; it is characterized by sudden life-threatening back or abdominal pain. In the case described, constant chest pain that increased with respiration was present on examination of a 28-year-old man (85 kg, 173 cm) who presented at our emergency department complaining of severe back pain. He had undergone a kidney transplant in 2004 from his mother (live donor). He was diagnosed with acute Type II aortic dissection and was scheduled for emergent surgery. Because there were no surgical or anesthetic complications, the patient with 79 and 89 minutes aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass durations was sent, intubated, to intensive care unit. When nephrotoxic agents are avoided and blood flow is stabilized, cardiovascular surgery with cardio-pulmonary bypass may be performed seamlessly in patients who have undergone a kidney transplant.

Aortic valve replacement performed twice through ministernotomy 15 years after lung transplantation

After transplantation, steroids and calcineurin inhibitors together with end-stage renal failure may lead to associated cardiovascular diseases, particularly in long-term survivors. We present a case of aortic valve replacement 15 years after lung transplantation, followed by reoperative valve replacement for late infective endocarditis. Lung compliance and gas exchange were excellent during recovery. Despite adequate prophylaxis, immunosuppression and hemodialysis likely contributed to repeated episodes of sepsis, which caused detachment of the first aortic prosthesis. Despite the high mortality of prosthetic valve endocarditis, the postoperative course was uneventful and the patient is doing well at 24-month follow-up.

Survival of kidney transplantation patients in the United States after cardiac valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Few published studies address the survival of kidney transplantation patients after valve surgery, and none address relative outcomes related to tissue versus nontissue prosthesis. This study aimed to assess survival of US kidney transplantation patients after cardiac valve replacement and to compare associations of valve selection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 1 698 706 patients in the US Renal Data System database, we identified 1335 kidney transplantation patients hospitalized in 1991 to 2004 for cardiac valve replacement. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; independent predictors of death were examined in a comorbidity-adjusted (by Charlson and propensity score) Cox model. Of the cohort, 17% were 0 to 44 years of age, 50% were 45 to 64 years of age, 28% were 65 to 74 years of age, and 5% were > or =75 years of age; 78% were white; 63% were men; and 20% had kidney failure caused by diabetes mellitus. Of 369 patients (28%) who received tissue valves, 75% had aortic valve replacement, 20% had mitral valve replacement, and 5% had both. Use of tissue valves increased from 13% in 1991 to 1995 to 38% in 2000 to 2004. Age, diabetes mellitus, and combined aortic and mitral valve replacement were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality. In-hospital mortality was 14.0% overall, 11.4% for tissue-valve patients, and 15.0% for nontissue-valve patients (P=0.09). Two-year survival estimates were 61.5% for tissue-valve and 59.5% for nontissue-valve patients (P=0.30). The adjusted hazard ratio of death for tissue- versus nontissue-valve patients was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal transplantation patients requiring valve replacement have high mortality rates ( approximately 20%/y). These data suggest minimally reduced mortality risk for patients receiving tissue versus nontissue valves.