New Insights Into the Mechanisms of Action of Thymoglobulin

Biologicals in the prevention and treatment of intestinal graft rejection: The state of the art Biologicals in Intestinal Transplantation

Intestinal transplantation is the standard treatment for patients with intestinal failure with severe complications due to parenteral nutrition; however, rejection leads to graft failure in approximately half of both adult and pediatric recipients within 5 years of transplantation. Although intensive immunosuppressive therapy is used in an attempt to reduce this risk, commonly used treatment strategies are generally practice- and/or expert-based, as head-to-head comparisons are lacking. In this ever-developing field, biologicals designed to prevent or treat rejection are used increasingly, with both infliximab and vedolizumab showing potential in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in individual cases and in relatively small patient cohorts. To help advance progress in clinical care, we review the current use of biologicals in intestinal transplantation, and we provide future perspectives to guide this progress.

Anesthesia and Perioperative Care in Reconstructive Transplantation

Reconstructive transplantation of vascularized composite allografts (VCAs), such as upper extremity, craniofacial, abdominal, lower extremity, or genitourinary transplants, has emerged as a cutting-edge specialty, with more than 50 programs in the United States and 30 programs across the world performing these procedures. Most VCAs involve complicated technical planning and preparation, protracted surgery, and complex immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory protocols, each associated with unique anesthesiology challenges. This article outlines key procedural, patient, and protocol-related aspects of VCA relevant to anesthesiology management with the goal of ensuring patient safety and optimizing surgical, immunologic, and functional outcomes.

The role of biologicals in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the role of biologicals in intestinal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several biologicals have been used in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation for various indications, such as induction therapy, prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, desensitization, anti-inflammatory treatment, as well as treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Particularly, the administration of biologicals in induction therapy such as T-cell depleting antibodies and interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have significantly contributed to the great improvement of patient and allograft outcome. Novel biologicals, such as B-cell, plasma-cell, and complement-directed agents have been successfully applied to treat antibody and complement-driven alloimmune processes to stabilize long-term outcome. Several other inflammatory allotransplant conditions have been addressed with anti-TNF-α antibodies, such as infliximab.

SUMMARY

Biologicals have contributed significantly to the recent success of intestinal transplantation. Novel developments in this field are supposed to aid in addressing various urgent needs in intestinal transplantation, such as preimmunization, antibody and complement-induced graft injury, as well as pathologies originating from innate immune responses.

Management of acute rejection in paediatric liver transplantation

The success of paediatric liver transplantation is attributed to improved surgical techniques and the advent of calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. Acute rejection (AR) rarely results in graft loss with calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppressive regimens, and the advent of newer agents like interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibodies. The latter have the benefit of reducing the incidence of AR further and may be of use in patients who are susceptible to recurrent AR, were retransplanted for graft rejection or are in a steroid-sparing regimen. A total of 60 % of all paediatric liver transplants result in AR; however, there is a 75 % response rate to initial steroid therapy. Steroid therapy remains the mainstay of initial AR management, coupled with an increase in baseline immunosuppression. Steroid-resistant rejection (SRR), previously an immediate indication for potent anti-lymphocyte preparations, is now effectively treated with chimeric or humanised IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies. Recurrent AR can be treated by adding adjuvant immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus. Studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of MMF as rescue therapy for SRR. Anti-lymphocyte preparations such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and OKT3 are rarely used in SRR but may be of use as rescue therapy for severe SRR. The challenges of the management of AR remain in the management of recurrent AR and SRR. We discuss the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of AR, including prevention, and specific management of AR and SRR based on current evidence and our own experience at the King's College Paediatric Liver, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Centre in London.

Current status of immunosuppressive agents for solid organ transplantation in children

Immunosuppression after organ transplantation is complex and ever evolving. Over the past two decades, newer immunosuppressive agents have been introduced with an aim to provide better patient and graft survival. Improved therapeutic strategies have been developed offering the option to use combinations of drugs with non-overlapping toxicities. There are, however, only a few clinical studies with robust data to rationalize the use of these agents in children. This review will discuss the newer immunosuppressive agents used for solid organ transplant, their current status in post-transplant management and prevention of allograft rejection.

Randomized phase II trial comparing two dose levels of thymoglobulin in patients undergoing unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant

The optimal dose and schedule of thymoglobulin (ATG) for graft-versus-host disease prevention (GVHD) is unknown. We compared two doses of ATG (4.5 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg) in a Bayesian adaptively randomized fashion, and assessed whether ATG levels measured on days 0, 7, 14 and 28 were associated with clinical outcomes. Treatment success was defined as the patient being alive, engrafted, in remission and without acute GVHD at day 100. Twenty patients received ATG 4.5 mg/kg (n = 15) or 7.5 mg/kg (n = 5) with reduced-intensity conditioning followed by unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant. The first 10 patients were fairly randomized, but the next 10 patients were adaptively randomized to the arm with higher success rate (4.5 mg/kg arm in this trial). The posterior mean treatment success rates for the ATG 4.5 mg/kg and ATG 7.5 mg/kg arms were 0.73 and 0.45, respectively. The posterior probability that the success rate was greater in the 4.5 mg/kg arm than in the 7.5 mg/kg arm was 0.93. There was no difference in the overall survival (p = 0.607), relapse-free survival (p = 0.607), treatment-related mortality (p = 0.131) or incidence of acute (p = 0.303) or chronic GVHD (p = 0.999) between the two doses. ATG levels were not associated with clinical outcomes. Thus, our results favor the use of ATG 4.5 mg/kg over ATG 7.5 mg/kg in patients undergoing unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): 25 years and new frontiers in solid organ transplantation and haematology

The more than 25 years of clinical experience with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), specifically Thymoglobulin, has transformed immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and haematology. The utility of rATG has evolved from the treatment of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease to the prevention of various complications that limit the success of solid organ and stem cell transplantation. Today, rATG is being successfully incorporated into novel therapeutic regimens that seek to reduce overall toxicity and improve long-term outcomes. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rATG in recipients of various types of solid organ allografts, recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants who are conditioned with both conventional and nonconventional regimens, and patients with aplastic anaemia. Over time, clinicians have learnt how to better balance the benefits and risks associated with rATG. Advances in the understanding of the multifaceted mechanism of action will guide research into new therapeutic areas and future applications.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of acute renal allograft rejection

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) [Thymoglobulin(R); Thymoglobuline(R)] is a purified, pasteurized preparation of polyclonal gamma immunoglobulin raised in rabbits against human thymocytes that is indicated for the prevention and/or treatment of renal transplant rejection in several countries worldwide. rATG induction in combination with immunosuppressive therapy is more effective in preventing episodes of acute renal graft rejection in adult renal transplant recipients than immunosuppressive therapy without induction. The efficacy of rATG induction is generally better than that of equine antithymocyte globulin (eATG) induction and generally no different from that of basiliximab or low-dose daclizumab induction in this patient population. However, in high-risk patients, rATG induction was more effective than daclizumab or basiliximab induction in preventing acute renal graft rejection. In the treatment of renal graft rejection in adult renal transplant recipients, rATG was more effective than eATG in terms of the successful response rate, although the agents generally did not differ with regard to most other endpoints. Both induction and treatment with rATG are generally well tolerated, although adverse events, such as fever, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, appear more common with rATG than with other antibody preparations. The overall incidence of infection associated with rATG induction was generally no different from that seen with eATG or basiliximab induction, although was higher with rATG than with basiliximab in high-risk patients. The incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease generally did not differ between rATG and eATG induction, and there was no significant difference between rATG and daclizumab induction with regard to the incidence of CMV infections or the proportion of patients who received treatment for a CMV episode or infection. Relative to basiliximab, the incidence of CMV infection was generally higher with rATG, except in high-risk patients. In the treatment of acute renal rejection, the nature and incidence of infections were generally similar with rATG and eATG. The incidence of malignancies is generally low with rATG therapy and generally does not differ from that seen with other agents. Further prospective comparative studies would be beneficial in order to definitively position rATG with respect to other antibody preparations. In the meantime, available clinical data suggest that rATG is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the prevention and treatment of acute renal graft rejection in renal transplant recipients.