Flow Cytometric Measurement of ABO Antibodies in ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Antibody Titers in Transfusion Medicine: A Critical Reevaluation of Testing Accuracy, Reliability, and Clinical Use

CONTEXT.—

Substantial variability between different antibody titration methods has been identified since the development and introduction of the uniform procedure in 2008.

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine whether more recent methods or techniques decrease interlaboratory and intralaboratory variation measured using proficiency testing.

DESIGN.—

Proficiency test data for antibody titration between 2014 and 2018 were obtained from the College of American Pathologists. Interlaboratory and intralaboratory variations were compared by analyzing the distribution of titer results by method and phase, comparing the results against the supplier's quality control titer, and by evaluating the distribution of paired titer results when each laboratory received a sample with the same titer twice.

RESULTS.—

A total of 1337 laboratories participated in the antibody titer proficiency test during the study period. Only 54.1% (5874 of 10 852) of anti-D and 63.4% (3603 of 5680) of anti-A reported responses were within 1 titer of the supplier's intended result. Review of the agreement between laboratories of the same methodology found that 78.4% (3139 of 4004) for anti-A and 89.0% (9655 of 10 852) of laboratory responses for anti-D fell within 1 titer of the mode response. When provided with 2 consecutive samples of the same titer (anti-D titer: 16), 85% (367 of 434) of laboratories using the uniform procedure and 80% (458 of 576) using the other method reported a titer difference of 1 or less.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Despite advances, interlaboratory and intralaboratory variance for this assay remains high in comparison with the strong reliance on titer results in clinical practice. There needs to be a reevaluation of the role of this test in clinical decision-making.

Laboratory support of ABO antibody monitoring for ABO-incompatible solid organ transplantation

The accurate measurement of ABO antibodies is essential for successful ABO-incompatible solid organ transplantation. Titration using two-fold dilution is considered a standard method and is applied in most laboratories. However, this titration method has inherent limitations, including differences in methods between laboratories, a lack of standardization, its semiquantitative nature, and the difficulty of considering the results to be representative of the in vivo activity of ABO antibodies. Various measurement methods other than titration have been developed, and new methods continue to be introduced. Physicians and laboratory specialists who are involved in ABO-incompatible solid organ transplantation need to fully understand these methods for optimal patient management.

A Novel Method of CD31-Combined ABO Carbohydrate Antigen Microarray Predicts Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

Isohemagglutinin assays employing red blood cells (RBCs) are the most common assays used to measure antibody titer in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi KTx). However, ABO antigens expressed on RBCs are not identical to those of kidney and antibody titers do not always correlate with clinical outcome. We previously reported that CD31 was the main protein linked to ABO antigens on kidney endothelial cells (KECs), which was different from those on RBCs. We developed a new method to measure antibody titer using a microarray of recombinant CD31 (rCD31) linked to ABO antigens (CD31-ABO microarray). Mass spectrometry analysis suggested that rCD31 and native CD31 purified from human kidney had similar ABO glycan. To confirm clinical use of CD31-ABO microarray, a total of 252 plasma samples including volunteers, hemodialysis patients, and transplant recipients were examined. In transplant recipients, any initial IgG or IgM antibody intensity >30,000 against the donor blood type in the CD31-ABO microarray showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AABMR, compared to isohemagglutinin assays. Use of a CD31-ABO microarray to determine antibody titer specifically against ABO antigens expressed on KECs will contribute to precisely predicting AABMR or preventing over immunosuppression following ABOi KTx.

Establishment of a Hyperacute Rejection Model of ABO-Incompatible Renal Transplantation in Nonhuman Primates

The establishment of a hyperacute rejection (HAR) model of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KTx) in nonhuman primates is of great significance for the study of the relevant clinical pathophysiological processes and related interventions in ABOi-KTx. In this study, blood group B cynomolgus monkeys were presensitized with synthetic blood group A-antigen conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (A-KLH) to boost circulating anti-A antibody levels. The serum anti-A antibody levels were measured by flow cytometry using type A human reagent red blood cells (RBCs) or monkey primary renal tubular epithelial cells (RTECs) as target cells. ABOi-KTx was performed in type B monkeys using type A monkeys as donors. After 14 days of A-KLH sensitization, 12 of 16 (75%) type B monkeys had significantly elevated anti-A antibody levels. We found that in order to avoid irregular results in the detection of blood group antibodies by flow cytometry, it was more effective to use RTECs rather than RBCs as target cells. In the absence of presensitization, ABOi-KTx in three monkeys with relatively high levels of natural anti-A antibodies did not produce HAR. However, when four Type B monkeys with significantly increased anti-A antibodies after presensitization were randomly selected as recipients for ABOi-KTx, the allografts in all four monkeys developed HAR with typical pathologic characteristics. Thus, we have successfully established a monkey model of HAR in ABOi-KTx via blood group antigen presensitization, which will be helpful for the further study of rejection, accommodation, and clinical intervention in ABOi-KTx.

Quantification of anti-A of IgM or IgG isotype using three different methodologies

BACKGROUND

Reliability of ABO-antibody measurement is important in the context of supplying low-titer ABO incompatible plasma-containing blood products. This study investigated the correlation of anti-A measurements between three different titer methodologies.

METHODS

Thirty-four blood group O individuals were included. IgM and IgG anti-A was measured by three different methods: (1) manual method (Bio-Rad ID-gel card), (2) automated method (Immucor NEO), (3) flow cytometry (FC) with calibration in molecules of equivalent fluorochrome (MEF). Data were log2 transformed to titer steps (TS) and log2 MEF, respectively. All three methods were benchmarked against the 14/300 WHO anti-A/anti-B standard reagent.

RESULTS

The correlation between the manual and automated methods was statistically significant for both IgM (Spearman's r_s  = 0.89, p < .0001) and IgG (r_s  = 0.95, p < .0001). The mean TS difference between the manual and automated methods was 0.61 for IgM (p = .0033) and 2.1 for IgG (p < .0001). The manual method yielded IgM titer results that were generally 1 titer step higher than the automated method, whereas for the IgG titrations the difference was generally a median of 2 TS higher. The FC median log2 MEF level was significantly correlated with TS of IgG and IgM for both manual and automated agglutination-based titer methods (0.69 ≤ r²  ≤ 0.91). With the WHO standard reagent, the manual method produced the expected results while the automated method's results were 1 TS lower for both IgM and IgG at all dilutions tested.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that all three methods are suitable for measuring anti-A in group O whole blood.

Immunoglobulin isotype compositions of ABO specific antibodies are dependent on the individual patient blood group and blood group specificity: Results from a healthy donor cohort

Antibodies specific for the blood group ABO system antigens are of clinical significance and immunological interest. Routine clinical methods typically employ direct or indirect haemagglutination methods to measure IgM and IgG, respectively. We have developed a simple, single tube method to quantify IgM, IgG, and IgA specific for A and B antigens in order to improve accuracy and reproducibility, and to investigate the relationships between ABO group antibody type, and antibody level. Plasma samples from 300 healthy blood donors were studied. Levels of IgM and IgG binding to reagent group A and B red cells were measure by agglutination (HA) and multi-colour flow cytometry (MC-FC). IgA was also measured by MC-FC. Our FC method was found to be significantly more reproducible than HA for the measurement of blood group A and B specific antibodies. We found statistically significant correlations between antibodies measured by GC-HA and MC-FC, but sufficient differences to indicate that these methods are not equivalent. By MC-FC, IgM, IgG and IgA levels and isotope profiles were found to be dependent on both the donor ABO type and the specificity of the antibody. This study demonstrated heterogeneity in the immunoglobulin class profiles of ABO-blood group specific antibodies within the healthy population. Differences in isotype profiles of ABO-blood group specific antibodies may indicate fundamental differences in the immune mechanisms that generate these antibodies. This is likely to be relevant to the clinical situations where management or diagnosis depend on ABO-specific antibody detection and measurement.

Strategies to overcome the ABO barrier in kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation across the ABO blood group barrier was long considered a contraindication for transplantation, but in an effort to increase donor pools, specific regimens for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation have been developed. These regimens are now widely used as an integral part of the available treatment options. Various desensitization protocols, commonly based on transient depletion of preformed anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies and modulation of B-cell immunity, enable excellent transplant outcomes, even in the long-term. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms behind transplant acceptance facilitated by a short course of anti-humoral treatment are still incompletely understood. With the evolution of efficient clinical programmes, tailoring of recipient preconditioning based on individual donor-recipient blood type combinations and the levels of pretransplant anti-A/B antibodies has become possible. In the context of low antibody titres and/or donor A2 phenotype, immunomodulation and/or apheresis might be dispensable. A concern still exists, however, that ABOi kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of surgical and infectious complications, partly owing to the effects of extracorporeal treatment and intensified immunosuppression. Nevertheless, a continuous improvement in desensitization strategies, with the aim of minimizing the immunosuppressive burden, might pave the way to clinical outcomes that are comparable to those achieved in ABO-compatible transplantation.

Application of flow cytometry to measure anti-A/B antibody in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare anti-ABO antibody levels as measured by means of flow cytometry (FCM) with the levels measured with the use of the column agglutination test (CAT), and to evaluate the clinical outcome as it relates to the baseline mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio obtained by FCM.

METHODS

We reviewed 21 cases of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABO-i KT). In these patients, baseline IgG titers were measured with the use of both FCM and CAT methods. We investigated the correlation between levels measured by FCM and those by CAT with the use of correlation coefficients. Patients were classified into a high MFI ratio group (≥200; n = 7) or low MFI ratio group (<200; n = 14).

RESULTS

The MFI ratio for the FCM-based method was highly correlated with the titer measured by CAT (r = 0.890; P = .01). The relationship between MFI ratio and CAT titer can be expressed as follows: log (MFI ratio) = 0.879 × log (CAT titer) + 0.298. The number of pre-transplantation rounds of plasmapheresis significantly increased as the baseline MFI ratio increased. The allograft function was immediately recovered and stable. A single case of acute cellular rejection was observed in the low MFI ratio group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-ABO antibody levels measured by means of the FCM-based method were highly correlated with the levels measured with the use of CAT in cases of ABO-i KT. The decreased level of anti-ABO antibody measured by means of FCM after plasmapheresis suggests its potential as an effective and objective method for assessment of anti-ABO antibody levels.

An update on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is nowadays a well-established procedure to expand living donor transplantation to blood group incompatible donor/recipient constellations. In the last two decades, transplantation protocols evolved to more specific isohaemagglutinin elimination techniques and established competent antirejection protection protocols without the need of splenectomy. ABOi kidney transplantation associated accommodation despite isohaemagglutinin reappearance, C4d positivity of peritubular capillaries as well as the increased incidence of bleeding complications is currently under intense investigation. However, most recent data show excellent graft survival rates equivalent to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation outcome.

Comparison of ABO antibody titers on the basis of the antibody detection method used

BACKGROUND

Detection methods for ABO antibody (Ab) titers vary across laboratories, and the results are different depending on the method used. We aimed to compare titer values using different detection methods for the measurement of ABO Ab titers.

METHODS

For ABO Ab detection, pooled group A or B red blood cells (RBCs) were reacted with each of 20 sera from blood groups A, B, or O without dithiothreitol treatment. The room-temperature (RT) incubation technique and the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) were used in the tube test and gel card test. Flow cytometry (FCM) was performed by using anti-IgM and anti-IgG Abs.

RESULTS

Regardless of the blood groups tested, the FCM assay with anti-IgM showed the highest titer compared to the tube test and gel card test with RT incubation in both. The tube test with IAT showed a higher titer than the gel card test with IAT (Gel-IAT) or FCM with anti-IgG in blood group A and B, while Gel-IAT showed the highest titer relative to the other tests, only for the anti-A Ab in blood group O.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in the titers depending on the detection method used, and each method showed a different detection capacity for each ABO Ab depending on the ABO blood group tested. Therefore, caution should be exercised in interpreting ABO Ab titer results, taking into consideration the detection method used and the blood group.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A dramatic shortage of available organs around the world encouraged attempts to cross previously forbidden immunological boundaries in kidney transplantation. This review focuses on the recent results of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The outcome of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in terms of patient and graft survival is comparable to ABO-compatible transplantation for adult and pediatric recipients. Splenectomy has been replaced by the B-cell-depleting agent rituximab to avoid isoagglutinin titer rebound, prevent antibody-mediated rejection, and improve graft survival. However, the risk for infections may be increased and warrants caution. Corticosteroids remain a necessary component of any ABO-incompatible protocol; early as well as late steroid withdrawal may bear an enhanced risk for acute rejection and should only be performed with careful follow-up including protocol biopsies. The few studies that have long-term outcomes using protocol biopsies have characterized a state of accommodation by up-regulation of complement inhibitors, down-regulation of A/B antigens, and establishment of endothelial chimerism over time.

SUMMARY

The experience accumulated around the world indicates that ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is well tolerated and effective in adults and in children, and it represents an important step forward in expanding the living donor pool. Further understanding of ABO-incompatible graft accommodation may have broader implication also for human leukocyte antigen-sensitized allograft recipients.

Flow cytometric detection of anti-AB antibody titers in blood group O recipients of blood group A2 donor kidneys

AIM

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation has been accepted for end-stage renal failure patients who have no ready opportunity for a deceased or living donor. Antibody titration for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation is not only difficult but also lacks conformity among laboratories. Herein we analyzed 20 living related renal transplant couples to detect recipient anti-A2 antibody using flow cytometric analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were admitted to our center for renal transplantation between January 1999 and December 2010. All but four of them had undergone a previous renal transplantation from an ABO-compatible donor but experienced graft failure. All donor blood groups were subtyped by our blood bank using a lectin-based dilution assay. To detect recipient anti-A2 antibody titers we used a tube hemagglutination method. A/B antibody titer analysis by flow cytometry incubated serially diluted serum samples with donor erythrocytes. Each analysis was repeated three times over a 2-week period using an older and the last sera simultaneously.

RESULTS

The 13 male and 7 female patients showed our overall mean age of 32 ± 12 years. All patients had panel-reactive antibody levels below 15%. The level of flow cytometric antibody titers did not vary upon repeated analysis (P = .01). When compared with the tube method there was a discrepancy of the level at which the antibody titer became negative.

DISCUSSION

Flow cytometric antibody titration is a practical and rapid technique to determine the amount of anti-A2 antibody in renal recipients.

Anti-H can trigger apoptosis and down-regulate FUT1 expression in erythroid differentiated K562 cells without complement mediation

The reason why delayed RBC engraftment and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) develop only in some but not all recipients of major ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains elusive and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Understanding how incompatible erythroid blood group antibodies (Abs) interact with ABH antigens (Ags) of grafts, and investigating how to induce artificially accommodation of grafts are of obvious importance in transplantation immunology. The effects of anti-H on proliferation, apoptosis, and α-(1,2)-fucosyltransferase gene (FUT1) expression in erythroid differentiated K562 cells were analyzed by the MTT assay, Annexin V/PI staining, and quantitative RT-PCR method. The growth of erythroid differentiated K562 cells was significantly suppressed when anti-H dilution was ≤ 1:8 (P<0.001, as compared with 1:16). Under the complement-free culture conditions, the apoptotic ratio of erythroid differentiated K562 cells was significantly increased when anti-H dilution was ≤ 1:16 (P<0.05, as compared with 1:32). The apoptosis was not only closely associated with anti-H dilution (F=138.991, P<0.001), but also correlated with treated time (F=583.249, P<0.001), which indicated typical dose- and time-dependent effects. Under the complement-free culture conditions, the FUT1 mRNA expression level was also suppressed when anti-H dilution was ≤ 1:16 (P<0.05, as compared with 1:32), which also manifested in typical dose-dependent (F=130.356, P<0.001) and time-dependent (F=1432.00, P<0.001) effects. The results confirm that anti-H can trigger apoptosis and down-regulate FUT1 expression in erythroid differentiated K562 cells without complement mediation. The findings suggest that anti-H could accommodate grafts through triggering apoptosis and down-regulating Fut1 expression to reduce ABH antigens.

Anti-A/B antibody depletion by semiselective versus ABO blood group-specific immunoadsorption

BACKGROUND

Recipient desensitization using blood group (BG)-specific immunoadsorption (ABO-IA) has proven to enable successful kidney transplantation across major ABO barriers. In this context, the efficiency of non-antigen-specific (semiselective) IA adsorbers has not yet been established. The objective of our study was to quantify anti-A/B antibody depletion by protein A-, peptide ligand- and anti-human immunoglobulin-based semiselective IA in comparison to ABO-IA.

METHODS

Eight ABO-IA-treated transplant candidates and 39 patients subjected to semiselective IA for a variety of different indications outside the context of ABO-incompatible transplantation were included. Antibody patterns (IgG, IgG1-4 subclasses, IgM, C4d-fixing reactivities) were analysed applying conventional agglutination testing and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

As assessed by sensitive flow cytometric antibody detection, ABO-IA-based desensitization led to a profound even though often incomplete reduction of anti-A/B reactivities. Persistent complement- or non-complement-fixing reactivities, however, were not associated with transplant rejection or capillary C4d deposition. Single sessions of semiselective IA turned out to be more effective than ABO-IA in decreasing levels of anti-A/B IgG [median reduction to 28 versus 59% (ABO-IA) of baseline values, P < 0.001). In contrast, BG-specific IgM (74 versus 30%, P < 0.001) and IgG3 (72 versus 42%, P < 0.05) were reduced to a lesser extent, without differences between tested adsorber types. Analysis of four consecutive IA sessions revealed that inferior efficiency could not be overcome by serial treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our observation of limited adsorption capacities regarding distinct BG-specific Ig (sub)classes suggests caution in applying semiselective IA techniques in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Short-term results of ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: comparison with ABO-compatible grafts

Purpose

ABO incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) has been increasing to compensate for the shortage of organ donors. However, detailed comparative analyses of ABOi KT with ABO compatible (ABOc) KT are still rare.

Methods

This retrospective study compared 12 consecutive ABOi KTs to 50 ABOc KTs that employed the same maintenance immunosuppressive agents during the same period. Comparisons of patient survival, graft survival, graft function, and complications were made until post-transplant day 90.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for the positivity of panel reactive antibody (12% in the ABOc group vs. 42% in the ABOi group; P = 0.029). There were no significant differences in patient survival, graft survival, post-operative renal function, incidence of acute rejection, infections, or medical and surgical complications. However, bleeding complications were more common in the ABOi group (25%) than versus the ABOc group (6%) (P = 0.08). The preoperative and total hospital stay of the ABOi patients was significantly longer than the ABOc patients (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

ABOi KT is a viable and safe option for patients whose only donor is blood incompatible, despite the longer preoperative hospital stay for preparation.

Changes of circulating antibody levels induced by ABO antibody adsorption for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using immunoadsorption to remove anti-A/B antibodies has become a successful clinical practice. Since the data on the specificity of the ABO columns are controversial, the present study assessed the efficiency and specificity of the ABO immunoadsorption, the effect on total immunoglobulins and antibodies previously induced by vaccination. Anti-A/B antibodies were measured by agglutination and ABO flow cytometry, total IgG/IgM, carbohydrate- and protein-specific antibodies by nephelometry and ELISA. The first immunoadsorption not only efficiently reduced donor-specific anti-A/B IgM (81%) and IgG (56%) but also reduced compatible anti-A/B IgM (59%) and IgG (34%). The measurements of antidonor A/B antibodies by direct agglutination (IgM) or flow cytometry better represented the effective antibody levels than the indirect agglutination test (IgG). The median reduction of total IgM and total IgG levels after a single immunoadsorption was 34% and 18%, respectively. Antibodies against pneumococcus and haemophilus polysaccharide antigens were significantly reduced, whereas antitetanus and antidiphtheria protein antibodies were not affected. Intravenous immunoglobulin administration restored the protective anticarbohydrate antibody levels. In summary, immunoadsorption efficiently removed antidonor A/B antibodies, but was not specific for A/B antigens. Anti-A/B antibody levels as determined by ABO flow cytometry are useful to establish the minimal number of immunoadsorptions needed for successful ABO-incompatible transplantation.

Application of flow cytometry to monitor antibody levels in ABO incompatible kidney transplantation

Current methods of measuring ABO antibody levels based on the hemagglutination (HA) titers have the disadvantages of relatively poor reproducibility and do not offer fine discrimination of antibody concentration. We therefore developed a simple and rapid method of measuring ABO antibody levels using flow cytometry (FC). For validation, we analyzed plasma samples from 79 blood donors. Both IgM and IgG were detected and measured with IgG essentially restricted blood group O donors. Forty-two successive samples were collected from a patient with blood group O undergoing antibody removal and subsequent transplantation from a group A2 donor and tested by both HA and FC. Changes in IgG measured by FC (relative median fluorescence) correlated well with HA titers and importantly rejection episodes were preempted by a rising relative median fluorescence. The method allowed quantitative discrimination in the range of antibody levels relevant to ABO incompatible transplantation and has the advantages over HA of objective measurement and reproducibility.