1
|
Lasorsa F, Rutigliano M, Milella M, d’Amati A, Crocetto F, Pandolfo SD, Barone B, Ferro M, Spilotros M, Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Lucarelli G. Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4332. [PMID: 38673917 PMCID: PMC11050495 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation offers a longer life expectancy and a better quality of life than dialysis to patients with end-stage kidney disease. Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is thought to be a cornerstone in delayed or reduced graft function and increases the risk of rejection by triggering the immunogenicity of the organ. IRI is an unavoidable event that happens when the blood supply is temporarily reduced and then restored to an organ. IRI is the result of several biological pathways, such as transcriptional reprogramming, apoptosis and necrosis, innate and adaptive immune responses, and endothelial dysfunction. Tubular cells mostly depend on fatty acid (FA) β-oxidation for energy production since more ATP molecules are yielded per substrate molecule than glucose oxidation. Upon ischemia-reperfusion damage, the innate and adaptive immune system activates to achieve tissue clearance and repair. Several cells, cytokines, enzymes, receptors, and ligands are known to take part in these events. The complement cascade might start even before organ procurement in deceased donors. However, additional experimental and clinical data are required to better understand the pathogenic events that take place during this complex process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Monica Rutigliano
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Milella
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio d’Amati
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Pathology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67010 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spilotros
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahlmark A, Sallinen V, Eerola V, Lempinen M, Helanterä I. Characteristics of Delayed Graft Function and Long-Term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Brain-Dead Donors: A Single-Center and Multicenter Registry-Based Retrospective Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12309. [PMID: 38495816 PMCID: PMC10942003 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is common and associated with worse graft outcomes. However, little is known about factors affecting graft survival post-DGF. We studied the association of cold ischemia time (CIT) and Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) with the long-term outcomes of deceased brain-dead donor kidneys with and without DGF. Data from Finland (n = 2,637) and from the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) registry (n = 61,405) was used. The association of KDPI and CIT with the graft survival of kidneys with or without DGF was studied using multivariable models. 849 (32%) kidneys had DGF in the Finnish cohort. DGF and KDPI were independent risk factors for graft loss, [HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.14-1.53), p < 0.001, and HR 1.01 per one point (95% CI 1.01-1.01), p < 0.001, respectively], but CIT was not, [HR 1.00 per CIT hour (95% CI 0.99-1.02), p = 0.84]. The association of DGF remained similar regardless of CIT and KDPI. The US cohort had similar results, but the association of DGF was stronger with higher KDPI. In conclusion, DGF and KDPI, but not CIT, are independently associated with graft survival. The association of DGF with worse graft survival is consistent across different CITs but stronger among marginal donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Ahlmark
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lasorsa F, Rutigliano M, Milella M, Ferro M, Pandolfo SD, Crocetto F, Simone S, Gesualdo L, Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Lucarelli G. Complement System and the Kidney: Its Role in Renal Diseases, Kidney Transplantation and Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16515. [PMID: 38003705 PMCID: PMC10671650 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The crosstalk among the complement system, immune cells, and mediators of inflammation provides an efficient mechanism to protect the organism against infections and support the repair of damaged tissues. Alterations in this complex machinery play a role in the pathogenesis of different diseases. Core complement proteins C3 and C5, their activation fragments, their receptors, and their regulators have been shown to be active intracellularly as the complosome. The kidney is particularly vulnerable to complement-induced damage, and emerging findings have revealed the role of complement system dysregulation in a wide range of kidney disorders, including glomerulopathies and ischemia-reperfusion injury during kidney transplantation. Different studies have shown that activation of the complement system is an important component of tumorigenesis and its elements have been proved to be present in the TME of various human malignancies. The role of the complement system in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been recently explored. Clear cell and papillary RCC upregulate most of the complement genes relative to normal kidney tissue. The aim of this narrative review is to provide novel insights into the role of complement in kidney disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Monica Rutigliano
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Milella
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Simona Simone
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salguero J, Chamorro L, Gómez-Gómez E, de Benito P, Robles JE, Campos JP. Kidney Survival Impact of Delayed Graft Function Depends on Kidney Donor Risk Index: A Single-Center Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6397. [PMID: 37835040 PMCID: PMC10573826 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant challenge in renal transplantation, particularly with deceased donors, necessitating early postoperative dialysis. The prolonged effects of medium- and long-term DGF remain uncertain, marked by contradictory graft survival outcomes. This incongruity might arise from the inherent graft resilience and regenerative capacity during transplantation. This study investigates DGF's impact on graft survival, focusing on grafts displaying favorable (KDRI < 1) and unfavorable outcomes (KDRI ≥ 1). METHODS In this retrospective cohort study (January 2015-December 2019), we assessed kidney transplants at our center, excluding multiorgan simultaneous cases, primary non-functioning grafts, and surgical complications causing graft loss. Patients were categorized into DGF presence or absence groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses, alongside propensity score matching (PSM), were performed. RESULTS The study encompassed 322 deceased donor kidneys, with 83 encountering DGF. Grafts with higher KDRI indices (KDRI ≥ 1) and DGF exhibited a notably increased graft loss risk (HR: 4.17, 95% CI: 1.93-9.01). However, lower-KDRI donor grafts displayed no significant disparities between the DGF and non-DGF groups. CONCLUSIONS Delayed graft function (DGF) development significantly contributes to graft loss in kidney transplants, particularly in grafts with KDRI ≥ 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseba Salguero
- Urology Department, Infanta Margarita Hospital, 14940 Cabra, Spain
| | - Laura Chamorro
- Urology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; (L.C.); (P.d.B.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Enrique Gómez-Gómez
- Urology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; (L.C.); (P.d.B.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Patricia de Benito
- Urology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; (L.C.); (P.d.B.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Jose E. Robles
- Urology Department, University of Navarra Clinic, 31009 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Juan P. Campos
- Urology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; (L.C.); (P.d.B.); (J.P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lasorsa F, Rutigliano M, Milella M, Ferro M, Pandolfo SD, Crocetto F, Autorino R, Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Lucarelli G. Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Origins and Biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13179. [PMID: 37685983 PMCID: PMC10487877 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The term "cancer stem cell" (CSC) refers to a cancer cell with the following features: clonogenic ability, the expression of stem cell markers, differentiation into cells of different lineages, growth in nonadhesive spheroids, and the in vivo ability to generate serially transplantable tumors that reflect the heterogeneity of primary cancers (tumorigenicity). According to this model, CSCs may arise from normal stem cells, progenitor cells, and/or differentiated cells because of striking genetic/epigenetic mutations or from the fusion of tissue-specific stem cells with circulating bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs). CSCs use signaling pathways similar to those controlling cell fate during early embryogenesis (Notch, Wnt, Hedgehog, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), fibroblast growth factors, leukemia inhibitory factor, and transforming growth factor-β). Recent studies identified a subpopulation of CD133+/CD24+ cells from ccRCC specimens that displayed self-renewal ability and clonogenic multipotency. The development of agents targeting CSC signaling-specific pathways and not only surface proteins may ultimately become of utmost importance for patients with RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Monica Rutigliano
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Milella
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fiorentino M, Bagagli F, Deleonardis A, Stasi A, Franzin R, Conserva F, Infante B, Stallone G, Pontrelli P, Gesualdo L. Acute Kidney Injury in Kidney Transplant Patients in Intensive Care Unit: From Pathogenesis to Clinical Management. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11051474. [PMID: 37239144 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11051474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the first-choice treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at higher risk of experiencing a life-threatening event requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mainly in the late post-transplant period (more than 6 months after transplantation). Urosepsis and bloodstream infections account for almost half of ICU admissions in this population; in addition, potential side effects related to immunosuppressive treatment should be accounted for cytotoxic and ischemic changes induced by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), sirolimus/CNI-induced thrombotic microangiopathy and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Throughout the ICU stay, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) incidence is common and ranges from 10% to 80%, and up to 40% will require renal replacement therapy. In-hospital mortality can reach 30% and correlates with acute illness severity and admission diagnosis. Graft survival is subordinated to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), clinical presentation, disease severity and potential drug nephrotoxicity. The present review aims to define the impact of AKI events on short- and long-term outcomes in KTRs, focusing on the epidemiologic data regarding AKI incidence in this subpopulation; the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AKI development and potential AKI biomarkers in kidney transplantation, graft and patients' outcomes; the current diagnostic work up and management of AKI; and the modulation of immunosuppression in ICU-admitted KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Fiorentino
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Bagagli
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Annamaria Deleonardis
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Stasi
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Rossana Franzin
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Conserva
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Barbara Infante
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Stallone
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Paola Pontrelli
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lentine KL, Fleetwood VA, Caliskan Y, Randall H, Wellen JR, Lichtenberger M, Dedert C, Rothweiler R, Marklin G, Brockmeier D, Schnitzler MA, Husain SA, Mohan S, Kasiske BL, Cooper M, Mannon RB, Axelrod DA. Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision Making: A Survey of U.S. Transplant Centers. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1268-1277. [PMID: 35685316 PMCID: PMC9171615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
8
|
Yi Z, Salem F, Menon MC, Keung K, Xi C, Hultin S, Haroon Al Rasheed MR, Li L, Su F, Sun Z, Wei C, Huang W, Fredericks S, Lin Q, Banu K, Wong G, Rogers NM, Farouk S, Cravedi P, Shingde M, Smith RN, Rosales IA, O'Connell PJ, Colvin RB, Murphy B, Zhang W. Deep learning identified pathological abnormalities predictive of graft loss in kidney transplant biopsies. Kidney Int 2021; 101:288-298. [PMID: 34757124 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and inflammation are major contributors to kidney allograft failure. Here we sought an objective, quantitative pathological assessment of these lesions to improve predictive utility and constructed a deep-learning-based pipeline recognizing normal vs. abnormal kidney tissue compartments and mononuclear leukocyte infiltrates. Periodic acid- Schiff stained slides of transplant biopsies (60 training and 33 testing) were used to quantify pathological lesions specific for interstitium, tubules and mononuclear leukocyte infiltration. The pipeline was applied to the whole slide images from 789 transplant biopsies (478 baseline [pre-implantation] and 311 post-transplant 12-month protocol biopsies) in two independent cohorts (GoCAR: 404 patients, AUSCAD: 212 patients) of transplant recipients to correlate composite lesion features with graft loss. Our model accurately recognized kidney tissue compartments and mononuclear leukocytes. The digital features significantly correlated with revised Banff 2007 scores but were more sensitive to subtle pathological changes below the thresholds in the Banff scores. The Interstitial and Tubular Abnormality Score (ITAS) in baseline samples was highly predictive of one-year graft loss, while a Composite Damage Score in 12-month post-transplant protocol biopsies predicted later graft loss. ITASs and Composite Damage Scores outperformed Banff scores or clinical predictors with superior graft loss prediction accuracy. High/intermediate risk groups stratified by ITASs or Composite Damage Scores also demonstrated significantly higher incidence of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline and subsequent graft damage. Thus, our deep-learning approach accurately detected and quantified pathological lesions from baseline or post-transplant biopsies and demonstrated superior ability for prediction of post-transplant graft loss with potential application as a prevention, risk stratification or monitoring tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengzi Yi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fadi Salem
- Pathology Division, Department of Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Karen Keung
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caixia Xi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sebastian Hultin
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Rizwan Haroon Al Rasheed
- Pathology Division, Department of Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Li Li
- Pathology Division, Department of Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fei Su
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zeguo Sun
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chengguo Wei
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Weiqing Huang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Fredericks
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qisheng Lin
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Khadija Banu
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Germaine Wong
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natasha M Rogers
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samira Farouk
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Meena Shingde
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - R Neal Smith
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivy A Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Philip J O'Connell
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert B Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara Murphy
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Weijia Zhang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Novel Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2020018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is one of the most important mechanisms involved in delayed or reduced graft function after kidney transplantation. It is a complex pathophysiological process, followed by a pro-inflammatory response that enhances the immunogenicity of the graft and the risk of acute rejection. Many biologic processes are involved in its development, such as transcriptional reprogramming, the activation of apoptosis and cell death, endothelial dysfunction and the activation of the innate and adaptive immune response. Recent evidence has highlighted the importance of complement activation in IRI cascade, which expresses a pleiotropic action on tubular cells, on vascular cells (pericytes and endothelial cells) and on immune system cells. The effects of IRI in the long term lead to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, which contribute to chronic graft dysfunction and subsequently graft failure. Furthermore, several metabolic alterations occur upon IRI. Metabolomic analyses of IRI detected a “metabolic profile” of this process, in order to identify novel biomarkers that may potentially be useful for both early diagnosis and monitoring the therapeutic response. The aim of this review is to update the most relevant molecular mechanisms underlying IRI, and also to discuss potential therapeutic targets in future clinical practice.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stallone G, Grandaliano G. To discard or not to discard: transplantation and the art of scoring. Clin Kidney J 2019; 12:564-568. [PMID: 31411597 PMCID: PMC6671422 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing gap between inadequate supply and constantly high demand for kidney transplantation observed in the last two decades led to exploring the possibility of using organs from older donors with an increasing number of comorbidities. The main issue in this scenario is to identify transplantable organs and to allocate them to the most suitable recipients. A great number of clinical investigations proposed several acceptance/allocation criteria to reduce the discard rate of these kidneys and to improve their outcome, including histological features at the time of transplant. Despite the widespread use of several histological scoring systems, there is no consensus on their value in predicting allograft survival and there is established evidence that histological analysis is the most common reason to discard expanded criteria donor kidneys. To overcome this issue, a clinical scoring system, the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), was developed on the basis of easily accessible donor features. The KDPI score, adopted in the new US allocation procedure, has good reproducibility but presents several limitations, as suggested also in this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal. This observation should stimulate the search for novel scores combining clinical, histological and molecular features in an attempt to improve the decision process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Stallone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grandaliano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Phillips BL, Kassimatis T, Atalar K, Wilkinson H, Kessaris N, Simmonds N, Hilton R, Horsfield C, Callaghan CJ. Chronic histological changes in deceased donor kidneys at implantation do not predict graft survival: a single‐centre retrospective analysis. Transpl Int 2019; 32:523-534. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedict L. Phillips
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Theodoros Kassimatis
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Kerem Atalar
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Hannah Wilkinson
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Naomi Simmonds
- Department of Histopathology Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Rachel Hilton
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Chris J. Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Colussi G, Casati C, Colombo VG, Camozzi MLP, Salerno FR. Renal transplants from older deceased donors: Is pre-implantation biopsy useful? A monocentric observational clinical study. World J Transplant 2018; 8:110-121. [PMID: 30148077 PMCID: PMC6107519 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i4.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare survival of kidney transplants from deceased extended criteria donors (ECD) according to: (1) donor graft histological score; and (2) allocation of high score grafts either to single (SKT) or dual (DKT) transplant.
METHODS Renal biopsy was performed as part of either a newly adopted DKT protocol, or of surveillance protocol in the past. A total 185 ECD graft recipients were categorized according to pre-implantation graft biopsy into 3 groups: SKT with graft score 1 to 4 [SKT(1-4), n = 102]; SKT with donor graft score 5 to 8 [SKT(> 4), n = 30]; DKT with donor graft score 5 to 7 (DKT, n = 53). Graft and patient survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test. Mean number of functioning graft years by transplant reference, and mean number of dialysis-free life years by donor reference in recipients were also calculated at 1, 3 and 6 years from transplantation.
RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in graft and patient survival between SKT(1-4) and SKT(> 4), and between SKT(> 4) and DKT. Recipient renal function (plasma creatinine and creatinine clearance) at 1 years did not differ in SKT(1-4) and SKT(> 4) (plasma creatinine 1.71 ± 0.69 and 1.69 ± 0.63 mg/dL; creatinine clearance 49.6 + 18.5 and 52.6 + 18.8 mL/min, respectively); DKT showed statistically lower plasma creatinine (1.46 ± 0.57, P < 0.04) but not different creatinine clearance (55.4 + 20.4). Due to older donor age in the DKT group, comparisons were repeated in transplants from donors older than 70 years, and equal graft and patient survival in SKT and DKT were confirmed. Total mean number of functioning graft years by transplant reference at 1, 3 and 6 post-transplant years were equal between the groups, but mean number of dialysis-free life years by donor reference were significantly higher in SKT (mean difference compared to DKT at 6 years: 292 [IQR 260-318] years/100 donors in SKT(1-4) and 292.5 [(IQR 247.8-331.6) in SKT(> 4)].
CONCLUSION In transplants from clinically suitable ECD donors, graft survival was similar irrespective of pre-implantation biopsy score and of allocation to SKT or DKT. These results suggest use of caution in the use of histology as the only decision criteria for ECD organ allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Colussi
- Fabio Rosario Salereno, Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantatation, ASST Grande Ospedale Territoriale Niguarda, Milan 20162, Italy
| | - Costanza Casati
- Fabio Rosario Salereno, Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantatation, ASST Grande Ospedale Territoriale Niguarda, Milan 20162, Italy
| | - Valeriana Giuseppina Colombo
- Fabio Rosario Salereno, Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantatation, ASST Grande Ospedale Territoriale Niguarda, Milan 20162, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stallone G, Grandaliano G. It is the time to rethink the criteria to define transplantable kidneys. Should we combine histological and clinical evaluation? Transpl Int 2017; 30:969-971. [PMID: 28493629 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Stallone
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grandaliano
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sánchez-Escuredo A, Sagasta A, Revuelta I, Rodas LM, Paredes D, Musquera M, Diekmann F, Campistol JM, Solé M, Oppenheimer F. Histopathological evaluation of pretransplant donor biopsies in expanded criteria donors with high kidney donor profile index: a retrospective observational cohort study. Transpl Int 2017; 30:975-986. [PMID: 28403541 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Revised: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
There is no consensus on the allocation of renal transplants from expanded criteria donors (ECD). The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) is used without the need for pretransplant donor biopsies (PTDB). We explored whether PTDB based on Remuzzi Score (RS) allows identification of those marginal kidneys in the highest calculated KDPI risk group (>91%) that appropriate for single transplantation. A retrospective study was conducted of 485 consecutive kidneys procured from a single center and transplanted if the RS was ≤4. We compared 5-year kidney and patients survival between KDPI groups and between RS <4 or =4 in the highest KDPI group. The median KDPI (interquartile range) was 71 (66-76) for KDPI <80% (n = 77), 86 (81-90) for KDPI 81-90% (n = 82), and 97 (94-100) for KDPI >91% (n = 205). Patient survival at 5 years was 85.7%, 85.3%, and 76.09% (P = 0.058) and death-censored graft survival was 84.4%, 86.5%, 73.6% (P = 0.015), respectively for each KDPI group. In >91% calculated KDPI group, there were no differences in graft survival depending on the RS (<4 vs. =4) (P = 0.714). The implementation of PTDB based on RS used for allocation of organs with the highest KDPI range could support to the acceptance of suitable organs for single transplantation with good patient and graft survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Sánchez-Escuredo
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amaia Sagasta
- Pathology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lida M Rodas
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Transplant Service Foundation, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Campistol
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Solé
- Pathology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Nephrology and Renal Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The old-for-old allocation policy used for kidney transplantation (KT) has confirmed the survival benefit compared to remaining listed on dialysis. Shortage of standard donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria, particularly of kidneys from elderly donors. We have systematically reviewed the literature on those different strategies. In addition to the review of outcomes of expanded criteria donor or advanced age kidneys, we assessed the value of the Kidney Donor Profile Index policy, preimplantation biopsy, dual KT, machine perfusion and special immunosuppressive protocols. Survival and functional outcomes achieved with expanded criteria donor, high Kidney Donor Profile Index or advanced age kidneys are poorer than those with standard ones. Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar. Preimplantation biopsies and related scores have been useful to predict function, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated. Machine perfusion techniques have decreased delayed graft function and could improve graft survival. Investing 2 kidneys in 1 recipient does not make sense when a single KT would be enough, particularly in elderly recipients. Tailored immunosuppression when transplanting an old kidney may be useful, but no formal trials are available.Old donors constitute an enormous source of useful kidneys, but their retrieval in many countries is infrequent. The assumption of limited but precious functional expectancy for an old kidney and substantial reduction of discard rates should be generalized to mitigate these limitations.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bevilacqua V, Pietroleonardo N, Triggiani V, Brunetti A, Di Palma AM, Rossini M, Gesualdo L. An innovative neural network framework to classify blood vessels and tubules based on Haralick features evaluated in histological images of kidney biopsy. Neurocomputing 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
17
|
Messina M, Diena D, Dellepiane S, Guzzo G, Lo Sardo L, Fop F, Segoloni GP, Amoroso A, Magistroni P, Biancone L. Long-Term Outcomes and Discard Rate of Kidneys by Decade of Extended Criteria Donor Age. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12:323-331. [PMID: 27979977 PMCID: PMC5293338 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.06550616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Extended criteria donors represent nowadays a main resource for kidney transplantation, and recovery criteria are becoming increasingly inclusive. However, the limits of this approach are not clear as well as the effects of extreme donor ages on long-term kidney transplantation outcomes. To address these issues, we performed a retrospective study on extended criteria donor kidney transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In total, 647 consecutive extended criteria donor kidney transplantations performed over 11 years (2003-2013) were included. Donor, recipient, and procedural variables were classified according to donor age decades (group A, 50-59 years old [n=91]; group B, 60-69 years old [n=264]; group C, 70-79 years old [n=265]; and group D, ≥80 years old [n=27]). Organs were allocated in single- or dual-kidney transplantation after a multistep evaluation including clinical and histologic criteria. Long-term outcomes and main adverse events were analyzed among age groups and in either single- or dual-kidney transplantation. Kidney discard rate incidence and causes were evaluated. RESULTS Median follow-up was 4.9 years (25th; 75th percentiles: 2.7; 7.6 years); patient and graft survival were comparable among age groups (5-year patient survival: group A, 87.8%; group B, 88.1%; group C, 88.0%; and group D, 90.1%; P=0.77; graft survival: group A, 74.0%; group B, 74.2%; group C, 75.2%; and group D, 65.9%; P=0.62) and between dual-kidney transplantation and single-kidney transplantation except for group D, with a better survival for dual-kidney transplantation (P=0.04). No difference was found analyzing complications incidence or graft function over time. Kidney discard rate was similar in groups A, B, and C (15.4%, 17.7%, and 20.1%, respectively) and increased in group D (48.2%; odds ratio, 5.1 with A as the reference group; 95% confidence interval, 2.96 to 8.79). CONCLUSIONS Discard rate and long-term outcomes are similar among extended criteria donor kidney transplantation from donors ages 50-79 years old. Conversely, discard rate was strikingly higher among kidneys from octogenarian donors, but appropriate selection provides comparable long-term outcomes, with better graft survival for dual-kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Messina
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Davide Diena
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Sergio Dellepiane
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Gabriella Guzzo
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Luca Lo Sardo
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Fabrizio Fop
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Giuseppe P. Segoloni
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| | - Antonio Amoroso
- Immunogenetics and Transplant Biology Service, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino,” Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Magistroni
- Immunogenetics and Transplant Biology Service, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino,” Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Luigi Biancone
- Renal Transplant Center “A. Vercellone,” Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Division, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; and
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grifasi C, D'Alessandro V, D'Armiento M, Campione S, Scotti A, Pelosio L, Renda A. Can only histological evaluation determine the allocation of ECD kidneys? BMC Nephrol 2014; 15:207. [PMID: 25540026 PMCID: PMC4383215 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a recent debate on the "transplantability" of ECD (Expanded Criteria Donors) kidneys and the selection criteria used to allocate them to single or double transplantation. Remuzzi et al. have defined a protocol incorporating pre-transplant donor biopsy to guide the use of older donor organs. They allocated organs as single or double transplants on the basis of histological findings. We aim to show the pros and cons of the only histological evaluation in the allocation of ECD kidneys, to compare the different experiences in United States and Europe and thus to discuss whether this tool should be used alone or included in a comprehensive clinical and histopathological evaluation. DISCUSSION In the United States many Authors stated that the biopsy actually increases the percentage of kidney discarded and they raised questions about the importance of the biopsy in evaluating ECD kidneys for transplantation. On the other hand, the experiences of the majority of european transplant centers showed that allocating kidneys as single or dual transplant based on biopsy findings may achieve good graft and patient outcomes. Moreover, the experience of some centers as ours showed that kidneys allocated as DKT (Dual Kidney Transplant) on the basis of Remuzzi's score could have been suitable for single transplantation suggesting the need of an adjustment of the Remuzzi Score System. Many Authors, who are in favor of histological evaluation, actually believe that a comprehensive clinical and histopathological assessment before transplantation remains necessary. We lack precise national- or international-based selection criteria to guide clinicians. An adjustment of the Remuzzi Score System could be taken into consideration such as narrowing the indication for DKT from those ECD kidneys with higher scores and including the histological evaluation in a multifactor score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Grifasi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università "Federico II", via Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo D'Alessandro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Maria D'Armiento
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Severo Campione
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Scotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Luigi Pelosio
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Andrea Renda
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gandolfini I, Buzio C, Zanelli P, Palmisano A, Cremaschi E, Vaglio A, Piotti G, Melfa L, La Manna G, Feliciangeli G, Cappuccilli M, Scolari M, Capelli I, Panicali L, Baraldi O, Stefoni S, Buscaroli A, Ridolfi L, D'Errico A, Cappelli G, Bonucchi D, Rubbiani E, Albertazzi A, Mehrotra A, Cravedi P, Maggiore U. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pretransplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:2515-25. [PMID: 25155294 PMCID: PMC4400114 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Revised: 06/11/2014] [Accepted: 06/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pretransplant donor biopsy (PTDB)-based marginal donor allocation systems to single or dual renal transplantation could increase the use of organs with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) in the highest range (e.g. >80 or >90), whose discard rate approximates 50% in the United States. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively calculated the KDPI and analyzed the outcomes of 442 marginal kidney transplants (340 single transplants: 278 with a PTDB Remuzzi score<4 [median KDPI: 87; interquartile range (IQR): 78-94] and 62 with a score=4 [median KDPI: 87; IQR: 76-93]; 102 dual transplants [median KDPI: 93; IQR: 86-96]) and 248 single standard transplant controls (median KDPI: 36; IQR: 18-51). PTDB-based allocation of marginal grafts led to a limited discard rate of 15% for kidneys with KDPI of 80-90 and of 37% for kidneys with a KDPI of 91-100. Although 1-year estimated GFRs were significantly lower in recipients of marginal kidneys (-9.3, -17.9 and -18.8 mL/min, for dual transplants, single kidneys with PTDB score<4 and =4, respectively; p<0.001), graft survival (median follow-up 3.3 years) was similar between marginal and standard kidney transplants (hazard ratio: 1.20 [95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.79; p=0.38]). In conclusion, PTDB-based allocation allows the safe transplantation of kidneys with KDPI in the highest range that may otherwise be discarded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Gandolfini
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - C. Buzio
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - P. Zanelli
- Immunogenetic Unit, Parma University Hospital Parma, Italy
| | - A. Palmisano
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - E. Cremaschi
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - A. Vaglio
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - G. Piotti
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - L. Melfa
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - G. La Manna
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G. Feliciangeli
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M. Cappuccilli
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M.P. Scolari
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - I. Capelli
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L. Panicali
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - O. Baraldi
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S. Stefoni
- Section of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A. Buscaroli
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Hospital of Ravenna, Italy
| | - L. Ridolfi
- Organ Procurement Organization CRT-Emilia Romagna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A. D'Errico
- Institute of Anatomopathology, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - G. Cappelli
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - D. Bonucchi
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - E. Rubbiani
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - A. Albertazzi
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - A. Mehrotra
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - P. Cravedi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - U. Maggiore
- Kidney and kidney-pancreas Transplant Unit (Department of Nephrology), Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|