Multifocal motor neuropathy

Completing the Immunological Fingerprint by Refractory Proteins: Autoantibody Screening via an Improved Immunoblotting Technique

PURPOSE

Identifying autoantigens of serological autoantibodies requires expensive methods, such as protein microarrays or IP+MS. Thus, sera are commonly pre-screened for interesting immunopatterns via immunocytochemistry/immunohistochemistry. However, distinguishing immunopatterns can be difficult and intracellular antigens are less accessible. Therefore, a simple and cheap immunoblot screening able to distinguish immunopatterns and to detect refractory proteins is presented.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Five steps of immunoblotting-based autoantigen screening are revised: (1) choice of protein source, (2) protein extraction, (3) protein separation, (4) protein transfer, (5) antigen detection. Thereafter, 52 patients' sera with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 45 controls were screened.

RESULTS

The protein source impacts the detected antigen set. Steps 2-4 can be adapted for refractory proteins. Furthermore, longitudinal cutting of protein lanes saves ≥75% of time and material and allows for exact comparison of band patterns. As the latter are individually specific and temporarily constant, we call them "immunological fingerprints". In a proof-of-principle, a 155 kDa immunoband was detected with two anti-neurofascin-155-positive CIDP sera and two further immunobands (120/220 kDa) specific to a subgroup of 3-6 of 52 CIDP patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Adapted immunoblotting is a cheap and simple method for accurate serum screening including refractory and intracellular antigens.

Efficacy of Various Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy Protocols in Autoimmune and Chronic Inflammatory Disorders

Objective:

To determine the efficacy of various intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) protocols used in the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders.

Data Sources:

Literature retrieval was accessed through MEDLINE (November 1984–March 2007) and a search was conducted using the term intravenous immunoglobulin. References cited in the selected articles were also reviewed.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Inclusion criteria for studies were (1) English language, (2) randomized controlled trials, (3) defined protocols, (4) a minimum of 15 patients, and (5) objective criteria provided to assess clinical outcomes and course.

Data Synthesis:

The therapeutic efficacy of IVIG therapy is well established, and defined protocols exist for treatment of Kawasaki disease, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, Guillain–Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases. In the absence of a defined protocol, studies have demonstrated that IVIG therapy is effective in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, dermatomyositis, stiff person syndrome, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive systemic vasculitides, Graves' ophthalmopathy, and certain forms of systemic lupus erythematosus. It might also be of benefit in some patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. The outcomes are variable in these studies. In toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens–Johnson syndrome, use of IVIG has dramatically influenced clinical response and reduced mortality.

Conclusions:

The cumulative evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes observed are significantly influenced by the use of a defined protocol. There is a need for multicenter trials approved by the Food and Drug Administration to better define the role of IVIG in many disease states. Such studies would be able to establish the indications for use, optimal dose, frequency of infusions, duration of therapy, and need for gradual withdrawal versus sudden cessation. Defined protocols resulting from the study of a large cohort of patients often convince insurance companies to create policies that provide access to IVIG therapy.

Predicting treatment response in chronic, acquired demyelinating neuropathies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy is an immune-mediated neuropathy that was first described approximately 30 years ago. Since that time an increasingly wide spectrum of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies exhibiting different phenotypes, clinical course and treatment responses to immunomodulatory treatment have been described. Several new therapeutic agents have been prescribed for such conditions, some with promising results. This review summarizes what is presently known about the clinical courses, treatment responses and predictors of response of the chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy subgroups.

Antibody testing in peripheral nerve disorders

The identification of autoantibodies associated with dysimmune neuropathies was a major contribution to the characterization of peripheral nerve disorders, the understanding of their pathophysiology, and the clinical diagnosis of neuropathies. Antibodies directed to GM1, GQ1b, and disyalilated gangliosides, and anti-MAG antibodies are very useful in the diagnosis of acute or chronic motor or sensory-motor neuropathies with or without monoclonal IgM. Anti-onconeural anti-Hu and anti-CV2/CRMP antibodies allow when they are detected the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neuropathies. This chapter focuses on the description of these antibodies as diagnostic markers and on their immunopathogenesis. We give a background overview on the origin of these antibodies, their detection, and review those studies, which clearly show that these antibodies are capable of binding to the target tissues in peripheral nerve and thereby can exert a variety of pathophysiological effects. The corresponding electrophysiological and histological changes observed both in human and animal models are exemplified in order to get a better understanding of the immune mechanisms of these antibody-mediated neuropathies.

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peripheral nerve disease

INTRODUCTION

High-resolution ultrasound (US) of the peripheral nerves is now a standard means of assessing neuromuscular disorders in many centers. Currently used in conjunction with electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies, nerve US is especially effective in the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathies.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the basic physics of peripheral nerve US, guidelines for its current use and future directions. Advantages of using nerve US alongside EDX studies are outlined along with current limitations of testing. The role of US in the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathy is emphasized, particularly in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). US assisted diagnosis of peripheral nerve tumors, hereditary neuropathy and dysimmune neuropathy and traumatic injuries is also described.

EXPERT OPINION

US is a powerful tool in the assessment of peripheral nerve disease. Nerve US is an evolving, young discipline. There is still much to learn, but current evidence supports US imaging of all patients presenting for evaluation of possible mononeuropathy. With improvements in resolution, the introduction of US contrast agents and objective measures of nerve echogenicity, there is promise for further expanding its role in the diagnosis of all peripheral neuropathies.

Autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nervous system

Autoimmune-mediated diseases targeting the peripheral nerve represent a group of disorders often associated with high clinical disability. At present, therapeutic options are limited. The application of innovative and cutting-edge technologies to the study of immune-mediated disorders of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) have generated a better understanding of underlying principles of the organization of the immune network present in the peripheral nerve and its dialogue with the systemic immune system. These insights may foster the development of specific and highly effective therapies for autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nerve. Of great interest in this context is the application of monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab or alemtuzumab, which in small observational studies provided promising clinical results. But also other immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive drugs used in other indications currently find their way to PNS autoimmunity. Clearly, prospective controlled clinical trials are warranted before making firm conclusions on the feasibility of these innovative therapeutic approaches for treating immune-mediated disease of the peripheral nerve.

Treatment in inflammatory neuropathies

This review focuses on recent developments in the treatment of inflammatory neuropathies arising from immune dysregulation, rather than from infectious causes. The dysimmune inflammatory neuropathies are diseases of the peripheral nerves that have varying etiologies and may respond to immunomodulatory therapies. They are characterized by inflammatory changes in the nerve with associated destruction of myelin and axons. The underlying immune mechanisms are better understood in some of these conditions than others. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to prevent clinical progression. Randomized controlled trials of some treatments in the more common inflammatory neuropathies have clarified their effectiveness; however, there are still groups of patients who are resistant to currently available treatments and for whom little effective treatment is available. Newer, targeted biologics and larger controlled trials of existing and novel therapies in these conditions offer promise of improved morbidity and mortality in this group of diseases.

Diagnosis and treatment in inflammatory neuropathies

The inflammatory neuropathies are a large diverse group of immune-mediated neuropathies that are amenable to treatment and may be reversible. Their accurate diagnosis is essential for informing the patient of the likely course and prognosis of the disease, informing the treating physician of the appropriate therapy and informing the scientific community of the results of well-targeted, designed and performed clinical trials. With the advent of biological therapies able to manipulate the immune response more specifically, an understanding of the pathogenesis of these conditions is increasingly important. This review presents a broad overview of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of inflammatory neuropathies, concentrating on the most commonly encountered conditions.

Neuropathies associated with conduction block

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Two disorders, Lewis-Sumner syndrome and multifocal motor neuropathy, are defined by the demonstration of conduction block. These two entities have been intertwined since their description but there are important distinctions between them. It is therefore timely to reconsider these disorders and the physiologic process that defines them.

RECENT FINDINGS

Understanding of the pathophysiology of conduction block has evolved with better understanding of the structure of the node of Ranvier and surrounding apparatus. Axonal excitability studies have begun to give insights into why multifocal motor neuropathy has only motor conduction block. The many published criteria for conduction block vary in sensitivity and specificity and the electromyographer must be aware of the difficulties in determining physiologic block. The distinctions between Lewis-Sumner syndrome and multifocal motor neuropathy have become increasingly clear. Evidence suggests that Lewis-Sumner syndrome is a multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy but that multifocal motor neuropathy is distinct.

SUMMARY

It is important to recognize the distinctions between these disorders, not only because there are important therapeutic issues, but also because a true understanding of the nature of these illnesses will only be accomplished if the overlaps and differences are carefully considered.

Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct entity, whose treatment differs from that of other chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, mainly chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and its variant, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, although they share some electrophysiological characteristics. From the first descriptions, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) have been considered to be the gold standard of treatment for multifocal motor neuropathy. However, if the effectiveness of IVIg has been confirmed by several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, only a few patients experience persistent improvement after a single or few courses of therapy, and the long-term efficacy of IVIg in this disease is currently debated. Consequently, there is a need for new therapeutic strategies that focus on the effects and the costs of this therapy over long-term follow-up.

From bench to bedside--experimental rationale for immune-specific therapies in the inflamed peripheral nerve

Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy are autoimmune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the PNS. In recent years, substantial progress has been made towards understanding the immune mechanisms that underlie these conditions, in large part through the study of experimental models. Here, we review the available animal models that partially mimic human Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and discuss the wide range of therapeutic approaches that have been successfully established in these models of inflammatory neuropathies. Transfer of this preclinical knowledge to patients has been far less successful, and inflammatory neuropathies are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We will summarize successful therapeutic trials in human autoimmune neuropathies to provide a vantage point for the transfer of experimental treatment strategies to clinical practice in immune-mediated diseases of the peripheral nerve.

Epidemiology of neuroimmunological diseases

This review gives an overview of various neuroimmunological diseases in terms of incidence and prevalence rates, age and sex distribution, and the frequency of subtypes, if applicable. The disorders selected for review are inflammatory muscle disorders (polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis), myasthenia gravis, immune-mediated polyneuropathies (Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic polyneuritis and vasculitic neuropathies), and multiple sclerosis.

Neuropathie motrice multifocale avec blocs de conduction persistants

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was first specifically identified in 1986. Its major criterion is conduction blocks in motor nerves only. Clinically, this is a multifocal, thus asymmetric, neuropathy that begins and predominant touches upper limbs; it especially affects men after the age of 50 years and has a chronic course with relapses. Approximately 40-50% of patients also have IgM serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. There are no other laboratory criteria, although moderately high protein levels are found in cerebrospinal fluid. Its course is unpredictable, because the neuropathy may remain limited to one or two motor nerves or extend progressively to all the motor nerves of all four limbs. In general, there is no damage to sensory or cranial nerves or to the autonomic or central nervous systems. Intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulins at high doses are remarkably effective in the short term in 70 to 80% of cases. Corticosteroids and plasma exchange are generally ineffective and may aggravate the neuropathy. The long-term efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins in delaying motor decline and axon loss in the affected motor nerves is controversial. No information is currently available about the long-term efficacy of other immunomodulatory treatment.