Management of intracranial hemodynamics in the adult: a research analysis of head positioning and recommendations for clinical practice and future research

[Effects of body positioning in patients with non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhages]

The article presents an analysis of different methods of positioning patients with acute cerebral pathology. Changing of 'head-of-the bed' position is a routine and simple method of correction of intracranial hypertension. For the majority of patients with cerebral damage, regardless of the etiological factor, 15-30° 'head - of - the bed' position is preferable. However, in some cases head-of-bed manipulation can lead to the irreversible ischemic damage due to the reduction in systemic and perfusion pressure and cerebral blood flow. Thus, the selection of the optimal body position in different types of acute cerebral pathology remains a debated issue.

Elevation of the head during intensive care management in people with severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem and a fundamental cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The burden of TBI disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries. Intracranial hypertension is the most frequent cause of death and disability in brain-injured people. Special interventions in the intensive care unit are required to minimise factors contributing to secondary brain injury after trauma. Therapeutic positioning of the head (different degrees of head-of-bed elevation (HBE)) has been proposed as a low cost and simple way of preventing secondary brain injury in these people. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence related to the clinical effects of different backrest positions of the head on important clinical outcomes or, if unavailable, relevant surrogate outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical and physiological effects of HBE during intensive care management in people with severe TBI.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases from their inception up to March 2017: Cochrane Injuries' Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two clinical trials registers. The Cochrane Injuries' Information Specialist ran the searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving people with TBI who underwent different HBE or backrest positions. Studies may have had a parallel or cross-over design. We included adults and children over two years of age with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 9). We excluded studies performed in children of less than two years of age because of their unfused skulls. We included any therapeutic HBE including supine (flat) or different degrees of head elevation with or without knee gatch or reverse Trendelenburg applied during the acute management of the TBI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently checked all titles and abstracts, excluding references that clearly didn't meet all selection criteria, and extracted data from selected studies on to a data extraction form specifically designed for this review. There were no cases of multiple reporting. Each review author independently evaluated risk of bias through assessing sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other sources of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three small studies with a cross-over design, involving a total of 20 participants (11 adults and 9 children), in this review. Our primary outcome was mortality, and there was one death by the time of follow-up 28 days after hospital admission. The trials did not measure the clinical secondary outcomes of quality of life, GCS, and disability. The included studies provided information only for the secondary outcomes intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and adverse effects.We were unable to pool the results as the data were either presented in different formats or no numerical data were provided. We included narrative interpretations of the available data.The overall risk of bias of the studies was unclear due to poor reporting of the methods. There was marked inconsistency across studies for the outcome of ICP and small sample sizes or wide confidence intervals for all outcomes. We therefore rated the quality of the evidence as very low for all outcomes and have not included the results of individual studies here. We do not have enough evidence to draw conclusions about the effect of HBE during intensive care management of people with TBI.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The lack of consistency among studies, scarcity of data and the absence of evidence to show a correlation between physiological measurements such as ICP, CCP and clinical outcomes, mean that we are uncertain about the effects of HBE during intensive care management in people with severe TBI.Well-designed and larger trials that measure long-term clinical outcomes are needed to understand how and when different backrest positions can affect the management of severe TBI.

The effect of oral care on intracranial pressure: a review of the literature

Neuroscience intensive care unit nurses routinely perform oral care on patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. When the ICP is elevated or rises in response to oral care, this intervention may be withheld despite the lack of evidence linking the two. To appraise the best evidence for providing oral care to patients with ICP monitoring, articles published in English from 1978 to 2009 and indexed in CINHAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochran Library, and BioSys were searched using the key terms ICP monitoring, intracranial hypertension, oral care, mouth care, hygiene, nursing interventions, nursing care, intensive care, and critical care. Reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed for articles missed during the initial search. The search yielded 65 articles: 16 experimental or quasi-experimental studies, 24 descriptive studies, and 25 review articles. Of these, only four specifically tested or described the effect of oral care on ICP. There is a need for more knowledge about the effect of oral care on ICP so that evidence-based oral care practices in this patient population can be defined.

The pathophysiology and causes of raised intracranial pressure

This article explains the pathophysiology and causes of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), and the significance of assessing and recording vital observations for all patients when admitted to hospital. It discusses the nursing care, treatment and management required in order to minimize the risk of further increases in ICP.

Respiratory care in spinal cord injury with associated traumatic brain injury: bridging the gap in critical care nursing interventions

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating and challenging condition. The events that lead to SCI, such as road traffic accidents, falls, sports and violence [Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 5 (1999) 83], are also the common aetiologies of traumatic brain injury (TBI). It's not surprising then, that 20-50% of those with cervical SCI have TBI [J. Trauma 46 (1999) 450]. The literature pertaining to the management of either injury in isolation is vast, but lacking where the two conditions are experienced together and require distinct adaptations to interventions. Consequently, a gap in the literature exists. This paper focuses on those patients with SCI of the cervical spine with associated head injury, and pay particular attention to respiratory difficulties, and presents interventions required to minimise and treat the effects of such pulmonary compromise.

Acute care management of severe traumatic brain injuries

Preservation or restoration of optimal neurologic function following traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires timely and aggressive therapeutic interventions. Effective diagnostic tools, together with an armamentarium of treatment modalities, have augmented the treatment strategies utilized today. In addition, the Guidelinesfor the Management of Severe Head Injury have established a standardized approach for the TBI patient. This article will provide current information regarding the resuscitation priorities, appropriate interventions, and pharmacological agents used in the treatment required by the complex nature of TBI. Also, a review of the occurrences associated with TBI will be discussed.

Head trauma in the older adult population

The elderly person who is brain injured requires some special considerations because of the effects of aging on the body and brain. These individuals are increasingly admitted to the intensive care units for trauma from accidents, falls, and so forth. In addition to the care for the problems associated with brain trauma, the nurse must also be aware of the patient's medical history to prevent complications related to drug interactions, fluid overload, or volume deficit. This article addresses these considerations.

Management of raised intracranial pressure in children

Children suffer a significant number of head injuries as a result of their high activity levels, immature developmental skills and increased head-to-body mass ratio. Primary brain injury is irreversible, but secondary insults can be limited. Central to this is the management of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). The pathophysiology of head injury can explain some of the causes of raised ICP. Monitoring of ICP is important and this is closely linked to the maintenance of an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure and the importance of normovolaemia. Other interventions that have been shown to limit rises in ICP are appropriate use of positioning, mechanical ventilation and drug therapy. Less common therapies include jugular venous bulb oxygen saturation monitoring and the use of trometamol (THAM). Most nursing interventions do not actively reduce ICP, but they are central to its management. Reducing stimuli, avoiding cluster care, manual hyperinflation and limiting routine endotracheal suction may prevent an accumulative rise in ICP. Based on this literature review, it is possible to divide these interventions into first and second tier treatments, as shown in the protocol. Much of the suggested management will occur simultaneously, but it is important to assess the child's own response to each intervention and thus tailor treatment to minimize secondary brain injury.

Head elevation reduces head-rotation associated increased ICP in patients with intracranial tumours

PURPOSE

To quantify the effects of graded head rotation and elevation on intracranial pressure (ICP) in neurosurgical patients, before and after induction of general anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients with supratentorial tumours (n=12), scheduled for craniotomy with planned ICP monitoring, underwent baseline ICP measurements awake and supine (0 degrees rotation and elevation). Incremental degrees of head rotation (15 degrees) and of head elevation (10 degrees) were performed independently and in combination. Paired measurements of ICP at all levels of head rotation and elevation were also performed before and after induction of general anesthesia (n=6).

RESULTS

The baseline ICP was 12.3 +/- 6.4 mmHg (n=12). Changes of ICP were proportional to the degree of head rotation or elevation. Head rotation of 60 degrees maximally increased ICP to 24.8 +/- 14.3 mmHg (P < 0.05). Head elevation above 20 degrees reduced ICP with a maximal reduction to -0.2 +/- 5.5 mmHg at 40 degrees elevation (P < 0.01). Head elevation to 30 degrees reduced the intracranial hypertension associated with head rotation. No differences were observed between ICP measurements made before or after induction of general anesthesia (n=6). Three patients experienced headache with extreme head rotation (<60 degrees) and intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

Head rotation of 60 degrees caused an increase in ICP. Concomitant head elevation to 30 degrees reduced the intracranial hypertension associated with head rotation. Headache with head rotation may provide a useful clinical warning of elevated ICP.

The critical care nurse's role in preventing secondary brain injury in severe head trauma: achieving the balance

Secondary brain injury is associated with a reduction in cerebral blood flow, oxygenation and perfusion related to hypotension, hypoxemia and raised intracranial pressure. This has been confirmed on autopsy and is associated with a higher mortality rate, as supported by many studies. The primary goal of nursing management in severe head trauma is to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion and improve cerebral blood flow in order to prevent cerebral ischaemia and secondary injury to the brain. This literature review included a Medline and CINAHL search for published and unpublished research, a manual search of recent literature, a citation review of relevant primary and review articles, contact with primary investigators and clinical observation of case studies using the latest cerebral perfusion research technology. Expert critical care nurses were observed and their practice noted as they cared for severely head-injured patients. The majority of the evidence was derived from class II and class III classifications, which provide guidelines and options for practice. Nursing and medical management were found to overlap, with the focus for the nurse being an integrated balance of scientific, technical and humanistic management. The nurse's role is extremely important because the expert nurse cognitively manipulates many variables over a continuum of care and, if such tasks are skillfully and successfully performed, the incidence of secondary brain injury is reduced.