Recommendations for Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Cancer-related Neck Dysfunction: A Systematic Review:

Evaluation of Neck Disability Using Computed-Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Objective

We have previously reported that 55% of head and neck cancer survivors have neck disability. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to their neck disability. Our study aim is to determine if survivors with neck disability have evidence of cervical spine degenerative disease assessed by computed tomography (CT).

Materials/Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported neck disability, prospectively collected on survivors of squamous cell carcinomas without recurrence or metastasis over one-year post-treatment. Neck disability and its impact on daily life was measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and compared with cervical CT scans within 6 months. Scans were evaluated for degeneration of the disc and facet of the cervical vertebrae rated on a 5-point scale where 5 indicates more severe disease. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze the association between NDI and radiographic findings.

Results

116 survivors of oropharyngeal carcinomas were identified, predominantly male (81.9%) with an average age of 62.8 ± 8.2 (range 43.8–81.4). Most survivors had advanced stage III-IVa cancer (94.0%) with treatment modalities including surgery (n=26, 52.0%), chemotherapy (n = 45, 90.0%), and radiation therapy (n = 49, 98.0%). Absence of neck disability was observed in 44.0% of survivors, 39.7% had mild disability, and 16.4% moderate disability. The time from treatment to clinic visit was an average of 3.1 ± 2.7 years (range 1.1–13.4). Multivariable analysis of NDI controlling for age, time since treatment, and treatment modality identified an inverse association between NDI and spinal degenerative disease examining cervical discs (−1.46 95% confidence interval (CI) [−2.86, −0.06], p = 0.041) and age (−0.24 95% CI[−0.40, −0.08], p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Our study shows that neck impairment and pain in head and neck cancer survivors is not sufficiently explained by cervical degeneration related to age or trauma, supporting the theory that post-treatment neck disability occurs as a side effect of treatment. These results support the further assessment of structure and function of cervical musculature and degeneration following HNC treatment.

The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment Against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Individuals with cancer experience loss of function and disability due to disease and cancer-related treatments. Physical fitness and frailty influence treatment plans and may predict cancer outcomes. Outcome measures currently used may not provide sufficiently comprehensive assessment of physical performance.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the development of a functional measure, the Bellarmine Norton Assessment Tool (BNAT), for individuals with cancer; and (2) assess the relationship between the BNAT and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, a commonly used classification system by oncologists.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort correlation study.

METHODS

The BNAT encompasses 1 self-reported physical activity question and 4 objective tests: 2-Minute Step Test, 30-Second Sit to Stand, Timed Arm Curl, and Timed Up and Go. The BNAT score and its components were compared with ECOG Performance Status scores assigned by oncologists and analyzed for correlation and agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 103 male and female individuals (ages 33-87 years) with various cancer diagnoses participated. The mean (SD) ECOG Performance Status score was 0.95 (0.87), range 0 to 3, and the mean BNAT score was 14.9 (4.3), range 5 to 24. Spearman agreement association of BNAT and ECOG Performance Status scores revealed a significant moderate negative relationship (r = -0.568).

LIMITATIONS

The BNAT was compared with the ECOG Performance Status, a commonly used but subjective measure. Additionally, a common data set was used for both deriving and evaluating the BNAT performance scale.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a moderate negative linear relationship of BNAT to ECOG Performance Status scores across all participants. Utilization of the BNAT may reflect overall physical performance and provide comprehensive and meaningful detail to influence therapeutic decisions.