Local Anesthetics in the Surgical Wound-Is the Pendulum Swinging Toward Increased Use?:

Preperitoneal postcesarean section bupivacaine analgesia: Comparison between dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants

Background:

The peritoneal wound is frequently neglected during laparotomy. The preperitoneal local anesthetics and many adjuvants were effective for postcesarean analgesia. Analgesia may involve somatic and autonomic components. The preperitoneal bupivacaine and the promising adjuvants dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine were compared in this study.

Patients and Methods:

Sixty patients subjected to a cesarean section (CS) under general anesthesia divided into two groups using a bolus of preperitoneal bupivacaine 0.7 mg/kg with either 1ug/kg dexmedetomidine (Group P) or 8 mg dexamethasone (Group D). The time to the first analgesic request was the primary outcome.

Results:

There was a significantly prolonged time to the first analgesic request in the Group P than the Group D and less required preperitoneal injections in the Group P, also pain assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was lower in the Group P than the Group D after 6 h postoperatively up to 24 h.

Conclusions:

Dexmedetomidine provided better analgesia than dexamethasone as an adjuvant to preperitoneal bupivacaine post-CS.

Intravenous lignocaine in colorectal surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery leads to morbidity during recovery including pain and fatigue. Intravenous (IV) lignocaine (IVL) has both analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects that may improve post-operative pain and recovery. The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of IVL to other perioperative analgesia regimens for reducing pain and opioid consumption following colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, a literature search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials that compared IVL with IV placebo or epidural anaesthesia in open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were opioid requirements and pain scores assessed by visual analogue score. Data were entered into pre-designed electronic spreadsheets.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 2707 studies. A total of nine randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Five studies investigated IVL compared with IV placebo and four studies investigated IVL compared with epidural anaesthesia. Two out of the five studies comparing IVL and placebo showed statistically significant reductions in opioid consumption with IVL. There was a variable degree of improvement in pain scores when IVL was compared with epidural. Two studies showed a significant difference, with lower opioid consumption and pain scores in the epidural group. Laparoscopic and open procedures could not be compared between the IVL and placebo group.

CONCLUSION

IVL has shown limited benefit towards reducing early pain and morphine consumption when compared with placebo in colorectal surgery. However, IVL did not show any significant reduction in pain or opioid consumption when compared with epidural. Further research investigating IVL combined with intraperitoneal local anaesthetic is warranted.

Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pain after Caesarean section is often treated with opioids with a risk of side effects. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetics is effective and has few side effects, but volume vs. dose concentration has not been examined.

METHODS

Ninety patients scheduled for elective Caesarean section included in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial receiving infiltration with 50 ml ropivacaine 0.5% or 125 ml ropivacaine 0.2% or 50 ml 0.9% saline (placebo) during surgery. Surgery was performed under lumbar spinal anaesthesia. Primary endpoint was post-operative pain. Secondary endpoints were rescue analgesic, post-operative nausea and vomiting, time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and time to first mobilisation.

RESULTS

No difference in pain response between groups, but time until maximum pain score was prolonged in the ropivacaine 0.5% group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.0493). The administration of ketobemidone at 24 h post-operatively in the ropivacaine 0.5% group was reduced compared with the placebo group (P = 0.020), and between the ropivacaine 0.2% group and the ropivacaine 0.5% group (P = 0.044). No significant differences between groups were found concerning time spent in the PACU, to first mobilisation or in number of women with nausea/vomiting (P ≥ 0.05). No complications related to ropivacaine were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic infiltration with a high concentration, low volume compared with low concentration, high volume showed no significant effect on post-operative pain intensity. However, a statistically significant, but clinically limited opioid sparing effect was demonstrated compared with placebo in the high concentration, low volume group.

Effect of systematic local infiltration analgesia on postoperative pain in vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of systematic local infiltration analgesia on postoperative pain in vaginal hysterectomy, and describe the technique in detail.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study following the CONSORT criteria.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.

METHODS

Patients received high-volume (50 mL) ropivacaine 0.50% (n = 20) or saline (n = 17) infiltration using a systematic technique ensuring uniform delivery to all tissues incised, handled or instrumented during the procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain, nausea, vomiting and opioid requirements were assessed for 32 h as well as time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit and time to first mobilization.

RESULTS

Pain at rest was significantly reduced after one, four and eight hours in the ropivacaine group (p ≤ 0.001-0.01). Pain during coughing was significantly reduced after one and four hours (p ≤ 0.001 and p ≤ 0.003), and pain during movement was significantly reduced after four hours (p ≤ 0.02). Opioid requirements and time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit were significantly reduced in the ropivacaine group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), as well as the time to first mobilization (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative systematic local infiltration analgesia reduces postoperative pain in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy, facilities mobilization and improves early recovery.

Wound infiltration with local anesthetics for post-operative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In this systematic review, we evaluated double-blind, randomized and controlled trials on the effect of wound infiltration with local anesthetics compared with the effect of placebo on post-operative pain after lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

Medline, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for appropriate trials. Qualitative analysis of post-operative effectiveness was evaluated by assessment of significant difference (P < 0.05) between study groups regarding pain relief using pain scores, supplemental analgesic consumption and time to first analgesic request as outcome measures. Data on adverse effects were extracted and evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine trials including 12 comparisons and 529 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ten comparisons presented data on pain scores. In only three of these 10 comparisons (30%), a reduction in pain score using local anesthetic infiltration was observed averaging between 8 and 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale. In six out of 12 comparisons, the local anesthetic infiltration significantly reduced the supplemental opioid consumption after surgery. Observed reductions in analgesic consumption over the first 24 h averaged between 2.5 mg and approximately 15 mg of morphine. Data on opioid-related adverse effects were incomplete and difficult to interpret.

CONCLUSION

Interpretation of the results was difficult because of diversity of the studies. However, clinical significance was in general questionable, with only a few trials showing a small or a modest reduction in pain intensity, which was observed mainly immediately after the operation. Similarly, although more frequently observed, only a minor and probably not clinically relevant reduction in opioid consumption was shown.

Local infiltration analgesia in urogenital prolapse surgery: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the analgesic effect of high-volume infiltration analgesia in urogenital prolapse surgery and provide a detailed description of the infiltration technique.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study following the CONSORT criteria.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PATIENTS

48 patients undergoing posterior wall repair and perineorraphy.

METHODS

Patients received high-volume (26 ml) ropivacaine 1% with epinephrine (n=23) or saline (n=22) infiltration using a systematic technique ensuring uniform delivery to all tissues incised, handled or instrumented during the procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain and opioid requirements were assessed for 24 hours as well as time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit and time to first mobilization.

RESULTS

Pain at rest, during coughing and movement was significantly reduced for the first four hours with the high-volume local anesthetic infiltration technique (p<0.001-0.006). Opioid requirements and time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit were significantly reduced in the ropivacaine group (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) as well as the time to first mobilization (p<0.014).

CONCLUSION

Systematic high-volume infiltration analgesia is an effective analgesic technique in patients undergoing posterior wall repair and perineorraphy, and improves early recovery.

[Continuous infusion of local anesthetic at the site of the abdominal surgical wound for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review]

OBJECTIVES

We present a systematic review of clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of infusing local anesthetic through a catheter placed in the abdominal surgical wound.

METHODS

The Jadad (Oxford) scoring system was used to select trials. The variables considered in relation to each trial selected were as follows: type of intervention and incision; type, dose, and concentration of local anesthetic; site where the catheter was placed; rescue analgesia required; opioid use; and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifteen clinical trials with a mean Jadad score of 4.6 were selected. The 1139 patients enrolled in the trials were grouped according to catheter placement: subfascial (6 trials), subcutaneous (8 trials), and both (1 trial). Six additional unpublished trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov were also located.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical wound analgesia is a safe technique whose effectiveness has been observed in cesarean sections and hysterectomies performed with Pfannenstiel incisions. Outcomes for other types of surgery are inconsistent. There is a lack of studies of the optimal site for catheter placement as well as of adequate anesthetic concentration and volume.

Standard perioperative management in gastrointestinal surgery

INTRODUCTION

The outcome of patients who are scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery is influenced by various factors, the most important being the age and comorbidities of the patient, the complexity of the surgical procedure and the management of postoperative recovery. To improve patient outcome, close cooperation between surgeons and anaesthesiologists (joint risk assessment) is critical. This cooperation has become increasingly important because more and more patients are being referred to surgery at an advanced age and with multiple comorbidities and because surgical procedures and multimodal treatment modalities are becoming more and more complex.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with practical recommendations for day-to-day decision-making from a joint surgical and anaesthesiological point of view. The discussion centres on gastrointestinal surgery specifically.

Chronic, painful lower extremity wounds: postoperative pain management through the use of continuous infusion of regional anaesthesia supplied by a portable pump device

Reducing and preventing postoperative pain are currently a topic of great interest. There are different modalities for providing analgesia that can provide an alternative or adjunct to opioid therapy. One mode of therapy involves the use of portable pain pump devices that can deliver continuous local anaesthesia directly to the site of interest. A considerable amount of attention in literature has been dedicated to using regional anaesthesia postoperatively for various surgical applications. However, to our knowledge, little or no work has been published concerning the use of infusion of regional anaesthesia in the treatment of painful lower extremity wounds. We present a case report of a 55-year-old gentleman with a complex past medical history, 2-year history of opioid dependency and a 2-week history of intractable pain associated with the combination of debilitating painful diabetic neuropathy and painful lower extremity wounds. After surgical debridement of the lower extremity wounds, substantial analgesia was achieved postoperatively through the implantation of a portable direct infusion pump device. The device supplied 2 ml/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine and resulted in a reduction in pain within the first hour of implantation. Although the device achieved maximal analgesia at 6 hours, we found that this could have been likely reduced through the use of a 5-ml bolus dose of 0.25% bupivacaine at the time of implantation. The device provided sufficient analgesia to the patient without any observed adverse effects, and showed significant potential in avoiding an increase in his requirement for other systemic analgesia including opioids.