Will precision medicine be available for all patients in the near future?

Personalized medicine for allergy treatment: Allergen immunotherapy still a unique and unmatched model

The introduction of personalized medicine (PM) has been a milestone in the history of medical therapy, because it has revolutionized the previous approach of treating the disease with that of treating the patient. It is known today that diseases can occur in different genetic variants, making specific treatments of proven efficacy necessary for a given endotype. Allergic diseases are particularly suitable for PM, because they meet the therapeutic success requirements, including a known molecular mechanism of the disease, a diagnostic tool for such disease, and a treatment blocking the mechanism. The stakes of PM in allergic patients are molecular diagnostics, to detect specific IgE to single-allergen molecules and to distinguish the causative molecules from those merely cross-reactive, pursuit of patient's treatable traits addressing genetic, phenotypic, and psychosocial features, and omics, such as proteomics, epi-genomics, metabolomics, and breathomics, to forecast patient's responsiveness to therapies, to detect biomarker and mediators, and to verify the disease control. This new approach has already improved the precision of allergy diagnosis and is likely to significantly increase, through the higher performance achieved with the personalized treatment, the effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy by enhancing its already known and unique characteristics of treatment that acts on the causes.

Clinical outcomes related to molecular allergy diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Aim of this review is the description of the medical conditions in which the support of molecular allergy diagnostics (MAD) has an impact on the clinical outcomes, such as laboratory diagnostics, prognosis, and therapy of allergic diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review of the literature of the last 2 years generated a wide number of results on this topic. As expected, not all were obtained by the use of MAD, but, in general, a clear trend is evident.

SUMMARY

Within the large number of works available, laboratory allergy diagnostics seems to be the most frequently discussed topic, in particular considering the complexity of the biological environment where these assays are used. Some interesting news arrive from the prognostic potential of MAD, whereas for allergen immunotherapy, waiting for a well-conducted prospective randomized clinical study, data from retrospective studies still confirms the added values of MAD in the management of the allergic patients.

A WAO - ARIA - GA2LEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnosis (PAMD@): Update 2020

Precision allergy molecular diagnostic applications (PAMD@) is increasingly entering routine care. Currently, more than 130 allergenic molecules from more than 50 allergy sources are commercially available for in vitro specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing. Since the last publication of this consensus document, a great deal of new information has become available regarding this topic, with over 100 publications in the last year alone. It thus seems quite reasonable to publish an update. It is imperative that clinicians and immunologists specifically trained in allergology keep abreast of the new and rapidly evolving evidence available for PAMD@.

PAMD@ may initially appear complex to interpret; however, with increasing experience, the information gained provides relevant information for the allergist. This is especially true for food allergy, Hymenoptera allergy, and for the selection of allergen immunotherapy. Nevertheless, all sIgE tests, including PAMD@, should be evaluated within the framework of a patient's clinical history, because allergen sensitization does not necessarily imply clinical relevant allergies.

A primer on cost-effectiveness in the allergy clinic

OBJECTIVE

To provide a cost-effectiveness primer for the practicing allergist.

DATA SOURCES

Articles assessing use of decision analysis and cost-effective healthcare delivery.

STUDY SELECTIONS

A narrative review detailing approaches to incorporate evidence based medicine into individualized patient-centered cost-effective practice.

RESULTS

Resources in medicine are finite and it has been estimated that more than 30% of healthcare spending is directed toward low-value care. Insurers and government agencies are increasingly looking to maximize health value. Cost-effective analyses (CEA) is a complex valuation that grades health outcomes and economic benefits of a specific aspect of clinical care over a particular time horizon. In the US, therapies are generally considered cost-effective at ceilings between $50,000 - $150,000 per QALY. Critical components of CEA include model development to accurately represent clinical decisions and outcomes, evidence-based inputs, appropriate sensitivity analyses, and clarity in selecting the target population, perspective, comparators, time horizon, discount rate, and health outcomes. CEA can better inform trade-offs in patient care and add clarity in the translation of evidence to medical recommendations. Future research is likely to provide a more complete understanding of variation across population health state utilities for allergic conditions to more accurately reflect quality adjusted life years for patients with allergies.

CONCLUSION

Viewing healthcare options through an economic lens has become the standard of care across the United States and internationally, whether mandated through government agencies or third party payers. Decision analysis with cost-utility models can provide a useful perspective for both individual practice and public health.