Calcineurin inhibitors in chronic urticaria

Systemic calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and voclosporin: A review of off-label dermatologic uses

BACKGROUND

Systemic calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and voclosporin, have been utilized in various dermatologic conditions. Although there have been numerous off-label dermatologic indications with published guidelines for cyclosporine, there is no established strong consensus for tacrolimus and voclosporin.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a review of off-label use of systemic tacrolimus and voclosporin in various dermatoses to better inform treatment methods.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Relevant clinical trials, observational studies, case series, and reports regarding off-label dermatologic uses of systemic tacrolimus and voclosporin were included.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus shows promise for numerous dermatologic conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis/eczema, pyoderma gangrenosum, chronic urticaria, and Behcet's disease. Randomized controlled trial data are only available for voclosporin in psoriasis, which showed efficacy but did not meet noninferiority to cyclosporine.

LIMITATIONS

Data were limited and extracted from published papers. Studies differed in methodology, and nonstandardized outcomes limited the conclusions drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to cyclosporine, tacrolimus can be considered for treatment-refractory disease or in patients with cardiovascular risk factors or inflammatory bowel disease. Voclosporin has only been utilized in psoriasis currently, and clinical trials in psoriasis show voclosporin's efficacy. Voclosporin can be considered for patients with lupus nephritis.

Cyclosporine for omalizumab-refractory chronic urticaria: a report of five cases

BACKGROUND

While both the AAAAI/ACAAI and the EAACI/GA2LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guidelines recommend starting cyclosporine for patients with chronic urticaria who have had an inadequate response to omalizumab, many clinicians are hesitant to initiate cyclosporine due to paucity of clinical data. The objective of this study was to report real-life clinical outcomes in adult patients with chronic urticaria who had an inadequate response to omalizumab and were switched from omalizumab to cyclosporine. Medical records of adult patients with chronic urticaria who had an inadequate response with omalizumab and were later treated with cyclosporine were reviewed retrospectively. Data pertaining to treatment method, clinical response, and adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS/PRESENTATION OF CASES

Five patients with omalizumab-refractory chronic urticaria, three of whom also had angioedema and one with an inducible urticaria, were treated with low doses of oral cyclosporine (1-3 mg/kg/d). Four of five patients in this case series had complete resolution of symptoms with oral cyclosporine, while continuing other standard therapies. Systemic side effects occurred in three patients which prompted drug discontinuation in two patients.

DISCUSSION

Cyclosporine alone was effective in inducing urticaria control in adult patients with chronic urticaria who had an inadequate response to omalizumab, though the impact of cyclosporine was limited by reversible adverse effects. Adverse effects were associated with pre-existing medical conditions. As novel chronic urticaria therapies are being investigated, this experience highlights the importance of uncovering chronic urticaria subtypes which tend to respond to cyclosporine, while providing alternative treatments with better tolerability.

Approach to Children with Hives

Urticaria (or hives) is a pruritic and erythematous skin rash. Angioedema commonly occurs with urticaria. The term "chronic urticaria" is used when hives are present for more than 6 weeks. Acute urticaria is common in children, whereas chronic urticaria is rare. Causes of urticaria can be identified in many cases of acute urticaria with a thorough medical history. Laboratory evaluation may be needed to confirm the etiology of acute urticaria. Chronic urticaria is often idiopathic. Clinicians should avoid universal allergy testing for food allergens or aeroallergens in chronic urticaria as it usually does not help in identifying the cause, can lead to false-positive results, and unnecessary avoidance of allergens or foods. Urticarial vasculitis should be considered for lesions that are painful, present for more than 48 hours, leave scars/hyperpigmentation, or present with systemic symptoms such as fever, weight loss, and arthritis. Skin biopsy should be considered for suspected urticarial vasculitis. [Pediatr Ann. 2021(5):e191-e197.].

Pharmacological treatment options for mast cell activation disease

Mast cell activation disease (MCAD) is a term referring to a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by aberrant release of variable subsets of mast cell (MC) mediators together with accumulation of either morphologically altered and immunohistochemically identifiable mutated MCs due to MC proliferation (systemic mastocytosis [SM] and MC leukemia [MCL]) or morphologically ordinary MCs due to decreased apoptosis (MC activation syndrome [MCAS] and well-differentiated SM). Clinical signs and symptoms in MCAD vary depending on disease subtype and result from excessive mediator release by MCs and, in aggressive forms, from organ failure related to MC infiltration. In most cases, treatment of MCAD is directed primarily at controlling the symptoms associated with MC mediator release. In advanced forms, such as aggressive SM and MCL, agents targeting MC proliferation such as kinase inhibitors may be provided. Targeted therapies aimed at blocking mutant protein variants and/or downstream signaling pathways are currently being developed. Other targets, such as specific surface antigens expressed on neoplastic MCs, might be considered for the development of future therapies. Since clinicians are often underprepared to evaluate, diagnose, and effectively treat this clinically heterogeneous disease, we seek to familiarize clinicians with MCAD and review current and future treatment approaches.

Retrospective case note review of chronic spontaneous urticaria outcomes and adverse effects in patients treated with omalizumab or ciclosporin in UK secondary care

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is approved in the UK as add-on treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in patients with inadequate response to H1-antihistamines. Ciclosporin is an established but unlicensed 3rd line option for CSU. Two parallel retrospective observational studies were conducted to describe outcomes of treatment and adverse events with omalizumab or ciclosporin for CSU treatment.

METHODS

Data from UK specialist centres prescribing omalizumab (five centres) or ciclosporin (three centres) in CSU patients were collected from hospital records by clinical staff and pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients prescribed omalizumab and 72 patients prescribed ciclosporin were included. Twenty-two (48%) omalizumab-treated patients had paired Urticaria Activity Scores (UAS7), showing a 25.4 point improvement during treatment (P < 0.0001). Paired Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was available in 28 (61%) omalizumab-treated and 17 (24%) ciclosporin-treated patients. At least a 75% improvement in DLQI score was observed in 79% of omalizumab-treated and 41% of ciclosporin-treated patients, and 65% of omalizumab-treated patients had complete resolution of their quality-of-life impairment (DLQI 0-1) versus 21% of ciclosporin-treated patients. Clinician comments reported symptom clearance in 15/36 (42%) omalizumab-treated and 10/60 (17%) ciclosporin-treated patients. Proportions of patients with adverse events were similar but those for omalizumab resembled CSU symptoms, making causality assignment difficult, whereas those for ciclosporin were consistent with its known adverse effect profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Validated patient-reported measures of disease severity and quality of life should be used routinely in CSU management. Based on clinician comments and DLQI scores, symptoms and quality of life showed a greater improvement in the omalizumab-treated cohort than in the ciclosporin-treated cohort.

The potential role of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic urticaria

Treatment of chronic urticaria refractory to antihistamines presents a challenge to both people affected with the disease as well as the physicians who treat them. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody against IgE, has emerged as one potential solution to this challenge. In several clinical trials published between 2011 and 2013, omalizumab significantly reduced or eliminated symptoms of chronic urticaria. The optimal dose for chronic urticaria is 300 mg administered every 4 weeks, a dose that differs from those used in asthma, which are based on the patient's weight and IgE level. Omalizumab does not appear to cause lasting symptom remission, and the ideal duration of treatment for chronic urticaria has not been defined.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of dapsone in antihistamine refractory chronic idiopathic urticaria

BACKGROUND

Management of antihistamine refractory chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) has poorly defined therapeutic options.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of dapsone (4,4'-diaminodiphenylsulfone) in antihistamine refractory CIU compared with placebo.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with antihistamine refractory CIU were randomly assigned to 100 mg of dapsone daily or placebo for 6 weeks in a 14-week double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. End points were measured from a daily diary that reflected the weekly hive score, the weekly itch score, and a visual analog scale (VAS) score. Secondary to a carryover effect, the first period results were analyzed as a parallel design that compared placebo with dapsone directly by using repeated-measures analysis.

RESULTS

After 6 weeks, the patients in the dapsone arm showed mean improvement over baseline in VAS (2.3 [95% CI, 0.6-4.1], P = .01), urticaria score (-3.5 [95% CI, -6.2 to -0.9], P = .01), and itch score (-4.8 [95% CI, -7.6 to -2.1], P = .001), whereas the placebo arm showed no improvement over baseline for VAS, urticaria, or itch scores. Dapsone showed greater improvement compared with placebo for itch (P = .047) and VAS (P = .04). Of the 22 patients, 3 showed complete resolution of hives and itch with dapsone, whereas 31% and 41% had ≥ 50% resolution of hives and itch, respectively. No serious adverse effects were observed with dapsone.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first double-blind, placebo controlled study of dapsone in CIU and indicates that dapsone has efficacy in patients with antihistamine refractory CIU.

Urticaria and autoimmunity: where are we now?

There is considerable debate whether chronic urticaria is an autoimmune disease or whether its features suggestive of autoimmunity are epiphenomena. A plethora of circumstantial evidence suggests that chronic urticaria is an autoimmune disease, but criteria to establish autoimmunity require direct proof and indirect evidence, and these are lacking in chronic urticaria. Current approaches to assessing for autoimmunity in vivo via the autologous serum skin test, and in vitro via either basophil histamine release or the basophil activation test are widely utilized, but the results of these tests have limited impact on prediction of the clinical course and efficacy of treatments. Recent guidelines for diagnosing autoimmune urticaria have been proposed, but further investigation is needed.

Alternative agents in refractory chronic urticaria: evidence and considerations on their selection and use

Patients with chronic urticaria (CU) who are refractory to antihistamines are frequently encountered by allergy specialists. Several alternative agents have been used to treat these patients; however, the evidence to support these agents is generally limited. This review focuses on some of the more commonly used alternative agents in refractory CU, including anti-inflammatory agents (montelukast, hydroxychloroquine, dapsone, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, colchicine), immunosuppressants (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate), and immunomodulatory agents (omalizumab, immune globulin). The evidence to support their use, dosing, potential toxicity, monitoring, and selection of these alternative agents is reviewed. Although numerous knowledge gaps exist for alternative agents in refractory CU, a rational, patient-based approach can be used with a goal of improving control and quality of life and minimizing adverse medication effects.