1
|
Samuels N, Shaham D, Schiff E, Ben-Yehuda D, Finkelstein A, Lesser L, Bergel M, Reis S, Ben-Arye E. From the "what" to the "how": Teaching integrative medicine-related skills to medical students during COVID-19. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2256-2263. [PMID: 34756637 PMCID: PMC9180628 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of an integrative medicine (IM) course on self-perceived IM-related communication and research skills. METHODS A 3-day mandatory "hybrid" (online and in-person) IM course was held within COVID-19 restrictions for 161 pre-clerkship medical students, with workshops facilitated by mentor healthcare professionals (IM and non-IM) and student-directed tasks. Self-perceived levels of 6 IM-related skills were scored (from 1 to 5) for history-taking; communicating with patients with "alternative" health-beliefs; referral to IM consultations; assessing risks/benefits; and working with non-medical IM practitioners. RESULTS 137 students (85.1%) completed pre-/post-course questionnaires, with overall scores improving from pre-course (1.98 ± 0.92) to post-course (3.31 ± 0.63; p < 0.0001), for the entire group and student subgroups (with vs. without prior IM experience). Multivariate analysis found no association between age, gender, primary language or prior experience with IM and improvement in skill scores. CONCLUSIONS The IM course increased self-perceived skill levels, reflecting the course curriculum and workshops. Further research needs to explore the application of these skills during clinical training. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Teaching medical students about IM in a course comprising communication and research skills was shown to be feasible and effective. The application of IM-related skills needs to be evaluated during the clinical clerkship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Samuels
- Center for Integrative Complementary Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Dorith Shaham
- Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Radiology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Elad Schiff
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Complementary Medicine Department, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dina Ben-Yehuda
- Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Adi Finkelstein
- Department of Nursing, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lior Lesser
- Center for Dignified End of Life, Hebrew University Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michael Bergel
- Hebrew University Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shmuel Reis
- Center for Medical Education, Hebrew University Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eran Ben-Arye
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Lin, Carmel, and Zebulun Medical centers, Clalit Health Services, Haifa, Israel; Integrative Oncology Program, The Oncology Service, Carmel, and Zebulun Medical centers, Clalit Health Services, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barrios-Anderson A, Wu E, Liu DD, Snead J, Lee DJ, Robbins J, Aguirre J, Tang O, Garcia CM, Pucci F, Anderson MN, Syed S, Shaaya E, Gokaslan ZL. A survey study examining the motivations, concerns, and perspectives of medical students engaging in neurosurgical research. Surg Neurol Int 2021; 12:490. [PMID: 34754540 PMCID: PMC8571239 DOI: 10.25259/sni_742_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In a competitive landscape for neurosurgical residency admission, research productivity is increasingly important. Medical school applicants to neurosurgery report high numbers of "scholarly products" as published by the National Residency Match Program. Despite increased student involvement in research and productivity, to the best of our knowledge, no previous reported studies have examined student perspectives on their involvement in neurosurgical research. Methods For 2 consecutive years (February 2019 and February 2020), medical students (n = 55) from around the United States presented original research at the Student Neurosurgical Research Conference. Participants were administered a mixed-method survey designed to assess experiences and perspectives on engaging in neurosurgical research. Survey responses were analyzed independently by two researchers to assess for common themes and perspectives. Results Medical students engaged in all types of research work across nearly every neurosurgical subfield with "Basic/Bench Lab work" (38.5%) and "Chart Review" (23.1%) representing the majority of projects. Students commonly cited "curiosity/interest," and "residency application competitiveness" as main reasons for participation in research. About 66% of respondents reported experiencing anxiety/concern about research productivity "often" or "very often." Thematic analysis revealed that sources of research-related stress were (1) having enough publications to match into residency, and (2) having enough time in medical school to engage in research. Conclusion Medical students engaging in neurosurgical research are highly motivated students driven by scientific curiosity and pressure to prepare for competitive residency applications. Students experience anxiety due to time constraints in medical curricula and increasing demands for scholarly productivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriel Barrios-Anderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Esther Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - David D Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Jameson Snead
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - David J Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - James Robbins
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Jesus Aguirre
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Oliver Tang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Catherine M Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Francesco Pucci
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Matthew N Anderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Sohail Syed
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Elias Shaaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Ziya L Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schneider M, Evans R, Haas M, Leach M, Delagran L, Hawk C, Long C, Cramer GD, Walters O, Vihstadt C, Terhorst L. The effectiveness and feasibility of an online educational program for improving evidence-based practice literacy: an exploratory randomized study of US chiropractors. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:27. [PMID: 27486510 PMCID: PMC4970279 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0109-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Online education programs are becoming a popular means to disseminate knowledge about evidence-based practice (EBP) among healthcare practitioners. This mode of delivery also offers a viable and potentially sustainable solution for teaching consistent EBP content to learners over time and across multiple geographical locations. We conducted a study with 3 main aims: 1) develop an online distance-learning program about the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) for chiropractic providers; 2) test the effectiveness of the online program on the attitudes, skills, and use of EBP in a sample of chiropractors; and 3) determine the feasibility of expanding the program for broader-scale implementation. This study was conducted from January 2013 to September 2014. Methods This was an exploratory randomized trial in which 293 chiropractors were allocated to either an online EBP education intervention or a waitlist control. The online EBP program consisted of 3 courses and 4 booster lessons, and was developed using educational resources created in previous EBP educational programs at 4 chiropractic institutions. Participants were surveyed using a validated EBP instrument (EBASE) with 3 rescaled (0 to 100) subscores: Attitudes, Skills, and Use of EBP. Multiple regression was used to compare groups, adjusting for personal and practice characteristics. Satisfaction and compliance with the program was evaluated to assess feasibility. Results The Training Group showed modest improvement compared to the Waitlist Group in attitudes (Δ =6.2, p < .001) and skills (Δ =10.0, p < .001) subscores, but not the use subscore (Δ = −2.3, p = .470). The majority of participants agreed that the educational program was ‘relevant to their profession’ (84 %) and ‘was worthwhile’ (82 %). Overall, engagement in the online program was less than optimal, with 48 % of the Training Group, and 42 % of the Waitlist Group completing all 3 of the program courses. Conclusions Online EBP training leads to modest improvements in chiropractors’ EBP attitudes and skill, but not their use of EBP. This online program can be delivered to a wide national audience, but requires modification to enable greater individualization and peer-to-peer interaction. Our results indicate that it is feasible to deliver an online EBP education on a broad scale, but that this mode of education alone is not sufficient for making large changes in chiropractors’ use of EBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schneider
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Roni Evans
- Center for Spirituality and Healing, Integrative Health and Wellbeing Research Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | | | - Matthew Leach
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Louise Delagran
- Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | - Cheryl Hawk
- Chair, Scientific Commission, Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters, Lexington, SC USA
| | - Cynthia Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA USA
| | | | | | - Corrie Vihstadt
- Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | - Lauren Terhorst
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
AIM This article describes the benefits of integrating students into a National Institutes of Health-funded research project. BACKGROUND Research is important in all academic disciplines for increasing knowledge and determining the effectiveness of currently used interventions. Educating nursing students to read, evaluate, and use research in practice is essential for solving complex health care challenges and achieving better patient outcomes METHOD The students were involved at all levels of the research process: project development, site acquisition, recruitment of participants, data collection and analysis, and manuscript development. Interviews of the student researchers were conducted to understand the students' experience of participation in the research study. RESULTS Three themes were identified: creating new knowledge is worthwhile, research is interesting and meaningful, and research can shape practice. CONCLUSION Promoting knowledge and experience by involving students in research projects can create a bridge to the development of evidence-based practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bussières AE, Terhorst L, Leach M, Stuber K, Evans R, Schneider MJ. Self-reported attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice among Canadian doctors of chiropractic: a national survey. THE JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION 2015; 59:332-48. [PMID: 26816412 PMCID: PMC4711333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify Canadian chiropractors' attitudes, skills and use of evidence based practice (EBP), as well as their level of awareness of previously published chiropractic clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS 7,200 members of the Canadian Chiropractic Association were invited by e-mail to complete an online version of the Evidence Based practice Attitude & utilisation SurvEy (EBASE); a valid and reliable measure of participant attitudes, skills and use of EBP. RESULTS Questionnaires were completed by 554 respondents. Most respondents (>75%) held positive attitudes toward EBP. Over half indicated a high level of self-reported skills in EBP, and over 90% expressed an interest in improving these skills. A majority of respondents (65%) reported over half of their practice was based on evidence from clinical research, and only half (52%) agreed that chiropractic CPGs significantly impacted on their practice. CONCLUSIONS While most Canadian chiropractors held positive attitudes towards EBP, believed EBP was useful, and were interested in improving their skills in EBP, many did not use research evidence or CPGs to guide clinical decision making. Our findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the low response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André E. Bussières
- Assistant Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University
- Professor, Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
| | - Lauren Terhorst
- Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy and Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Matthew Leach
- Senior Research Fellow, School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of South Australia
| | - Kent Stuber
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
| | - Roni Evans
- Associate Professor, Center for Spirituality & Healing, Academic Health Center, University of Minnesota
| | - Michael J. Schneider
- Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy and Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Menard MB, Weeks J, Anderson B, Meeker W, Calabrese C, O'Bryon D, Cramer GD. Consensus Recommendations to NCCIH from Research Faculty in a Transdisciplinary Academic Consortium for Complementary and Integrative Health and Medicine. J Altern Complement Med 2015; 21:386-94. [PMID: 26133203 PMCID: PMC4505754 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2014.0295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This commentary presents the most impactful, shared priorities for research investment across the licensed complementary and integrative health (CIH) disciplines according to the Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care (ACCAHC). These are (1) research on whole disciplines; (2) costs; and (3) building capacity within the disciplines' universities, colleges, and programs. The issue of research capacity is emphasized. DISCUSSION ACCAHC urges expansion of investment in the development of researchers who are graduates of CIH programs, particularly those with a continued association with accredited CIH schools. To increase capacity of CIH discipline researchers, we recommend National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) to (1) continue and expand R25 grants for education in evidence-based healthcare and evidence-informed practice at CIH schools; (2) work to limit researcher attrition from CIH institutions by supporting career development grants for clinicians from licensed CIH fields who are affiliated with and dedicated to continuing to work in accredited CIH schools; (3) fund additional stand-alone grants to CIH institutions that already have a strong research foundation, and collaborate with appropriate National Institutes of Health (NIH) institutes and centers to create infrastructure in these institutions; (4) stimulate higher percentages of grants to conventional centers to require or strongly encourage partnership with CIH institutions or CIH researchers based at CIH institutions, or give priority to those that do; (5) fund research conferences, workshops, and symposia developed through accredited CIH schools, including those that explore best methods for studying the impact of whole disciplines; and (6) following the present NIH policy of giving priority to new researchers, we urge NCCIH to give a marginal benefit to grant applications from CIH clinician-researchers at CIH academic/research institutions, to acknowledge that CIH concepts require specialized expertise to translate to conventional perspectives. SUMMARY We commend NCCIH for its previous efforts to support high-quality research in the CIH disciplines. As NCCIH develops its 2016-2020 strategic plan, these recommendations to prioritize research based on whole disciplines, encourage collection of outcome data related to costs, and further support capacity-building within CIH institutions remain relevant and are a strategic use of funds that can benefit the nation's health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Weeks
- 2 Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care , Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | - David O'Bryon
- 6 Association of Chiropractic Colleges , Bethesda, MD
| | - Greg D Cramer
- 7 National University of Health Sciences , Lombard, IL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schneider MJ, Evans R, Haas M, Leach M, Hawk C, Long C, Cramer GD, Walters O, Vihstadt C, Terhorst L. US chiropractors' attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional national survey. Chiropr Man Therap 2015; 23:16. [PMID: 25949800 PMCID: PMC4422535 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-015-0060-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2014] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence based practice (EBP) is being increasingly utilized by health care professionals as a means of improving the quality of health care. The introduction of EBP principles into the chiropractic profession is a relatively recent phenomenon. There is currently a lack of information about the EBP literacy level of US chiropractors and the barriers/facilitators to the use of EBP in the chiropractic profession. Methods A nationwide EBP survey of US chiropractors was administered online (Nov 2012-Mar 2013) utilizing a validated self-report instrument (EBASE) in which three sub-scores are reported: attitudes, skills and use. Means, medians, and frequency distributions for each of the sub-scores were generated. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic characteristics of the sample. Means and proportions were calculated for all of the responses to each of the questions in the survey. Results A total of 1,314 US chiropractors completed the EBASE survey; the sample appeared to be representative of the US chiropractic profession. Respondents were predominantly white (94.3%), male (75%), 47 (+/− 11.6) years of age, and in practice for more than 10 years (60%). EBASE sub-score means (possible ranges) were: attitudes, 31.4 (8–40); skills, 44.3 (13–65); and use, 10.3 (0–24). Survey participants generally held favorable attitudes toward EBP, but reported less use of EBP. A minority of participants indicated that EBP coursework (17%) and critical thinking (29%) were a major part of their chiropractic education. The most commonly reported barrier to the use of EBP was “lack of time”. Almost 90% of the sample indicated that they were interested in improving their EBP skills. Conclusion American chiropractors appear similar to chiropractors in other countries, and other health professionals regarding their favorable attitudes towards EBP, while expressing barriers related to EBP skills such as research relevance and lack of time. This suggests that the design of future EBP educational interventions should capitalize on the growing body of EBP implementation research developing in other health disciplines. This will likely include broadening the approach beyond a sole focus on EBP education, and taking a multilevel approach that also targets professional, organizational and health policy domains. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12998-015-0060-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Roni Evans
- Center for Spirituality and Healing, Integrative Health and Wellbeing Research Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | | | - Matthew Leach
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Cheryl Hawk
- Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, MO USA
| | - Cynthia Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA USA
| | | | | | - Corrie Vihstadt
- Center for Spirituality and Healing, Integrative Health and Wellbeing Research Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | - Lauren Terhorst
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang W, Pritzker SE, Hui KK. Factors Affecting Definitions of and Approaches to Integrative Medicine: A Mixed Methods Study Examining China's Integrative Medicine Development. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE : ECAM 2015; 2015:458765. [PMID: 25792999 PMCID: PMC4352459 DOI: 10.1155/2015/458765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Aim. This study identifies existing definitions and approaches among China's integrative medicine (IM) experts and examines relationships with key characteristics distinguishing individual experts. Methods. Snowball sampling was used to select 73 IM experts for semistructured interviews. In this mixed methods study, we first identified definitions and approaches through analyzing core statements. Four key factors, including age, education, practice type, and working environment, were then chosen to evaluate the associations with the definitions. Results. Four unique definitions were identified, including IM as a "new medicine" (D1), as a combination of western medicine (WM) and Chinese medicine (CM) (D2), as a modernization of CM (D3), and as a westernization of CM (D4). D4 was mostly supported by those working in WM organizations, while D3 was more prominent from individuals working in CM organizations (P = 0.00004). More than 64% clinicians had D2 while only 1 (5.9%) nonclinician had D2. Only 1 clinician (1.8%) had D4 while almost 30% nonclinicians had D4 (P = 0.0001). Among nonclinicians working in WM organizations, 83.3% of them had D4 (P = 0.001). Conclusion. Findings indicate that institutional structure and practice type are factors affecting IM approaches. These results carry implications for the ways in which western countries move forward with the definition and implementation of IM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijun Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Center for East-West Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Sonya E. Pritzker
- Department of Medicine, Center for East-West Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Ka-Kit Hui
- Department of Medicine, Center for East-West Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| |
Collapse
|