How Do Surgery Students Use Written Language to Say What They See? A Framework to Understand Medical Students' Written Evaluations of Their Teachers

Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review

BACKGROUND

Clinician-teachers, physicians with educational responsibilities in either classroom or clinical setting, are assumed to add value by virtue of their dual role. The clinical responsibilities are often prioritised over the educational tasks. How and under which circumstances clinician-teachers are able to perform their educational role and create added value for different stakeholders is currently unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To identify for whom, how and under which circumstances educational activities executed by CTs by virtue of their dual role add value to others.

SCOPE

CTs activities linking the system of education and clinical practice beyond direct patient interactions and purposefully executed.

METHODS

A realist review was conducted. Databases were searched in two stages: a narrow conventional search, followed by a comprehensive artificial intelligence-aided search. Studies concerning clinician-teachers' dual role were included. Realist analysis was applied to identify in which contexts resource mechanisms triggered reasoning mechanisms, which led to specific outcomes for different stakeholders.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were included. In contexts where clinician-teachers' dual role was formally recognised and valued, clinician-teachers benefitted from the credibility and legitimacy bestowed on them, making the transfer of domain-specific knowledge more impactful. In contexts where sociocultural differences between both systems existed, CTs were able to mediate and adjust recommendations aligned with stakeholders' perceived relevance. Also, contexts organised to support both roles made resource mechanisms more impactful. Clinician-teachers added value to students' clinical competency and learning environment, and to educational organisations' curricular innovation. In their clinical workspace, clinician-teachers added value by enhancing colleague physicians' teaching expertise, implementing educational innovations and recruiting students for scarce specialisms.

CONCLUSION

Clinician-teachers add value to students, colleague physicians and the clinical and educational contexts at large. Domain-specific knowledge of both systems was important to gain credibility and achieve added value. Openness, formal recognition and allocated time for both roles in educational and clinical contexts towards the dual role are important to strengthen the impact of the dual role.

Third year medical students impersonalize and hedge when providing negative upward feedback to clinical faculty

Medical students provide clinical teaching faculty with feedback on their skills as educators through anonymous surveys at the end of their clerkship rotation. Because faculty are in a position of power, students are hesitant to provide candid feedback. Our objective was to determine if medical students were willing to provide negative upward feedback to clinical faculty and describe how they conveyed their feedback. A qualitative analysis of third year medical students' open-ended comments from evaluations of six clerkships was performed using politeness theory as a conceptual framework. Students were asked to describe how the clerkship enhanced their learning and how it could be improved. Midway through the academic year, instructions to provide full names of faculty/residents was added. Overall, there were significantly more comments on what worked well than suggestions for improvement regarding faculty/residents. Instructing students to name-names increased the rate of naming from 35% to 75% for what worked well and from 13% to 39% for suggestions for improvement. Hedging language was included in 61% of suggestions for improvement, but only 2% of what worked well. Students described the variability of their experience, used passive language and qualified negative experiences with positive ones. Medical students may use linguistic strategies, such as impersonalizing and hedging, to mitigate the impact of negative upward feedback. Working towards a culture that supports upward feedback would allow students to feel more comfortable providing candid comments about their experience.

Comparison of the Perspectives of Medical Students and Residents on the Surgery Learning Environment

BACKGROUND

The learning environment plays a critical role in learners' satisfaction and outcomes. However, we often lack insight into learners' perceptions and assessments of these environments. It can be difficult to discern learners' expectations, making their input critical. When medical students and surgery residents are asked to evaluate their teachers, what do they focus on?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open-ended comments from medical students' evaluations of residents and attending surgeons and from residents' evaluations of attendings during the 2016-2017 academic year were analyzed. Content analysis was used, and codes derived from the data. A matrix of theme by learner role was created to distinguish differences between medical student and resident learners. Subthemes were grouped based on similarity into high-order themes.

RESULTS

Two overarching themes were Creating a positive environment for learning by modeling professional behaviors and Intentionally engaging learners in training and educational opportunities. Medical students and residents made similar comments for the subthemes of appropriate demeanor, tone and dialog, respect, effective direct instruction, feedback, debriefing, giving appropriate levels of autonomy, and their expectations as team members on a service. Differences existed in the subthemes of punctuality, using evidence, clinical knowledge, efficiency, direct interactions with patients, learning outcomes, and career decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty development efforts should target professional communication, execution of teaching skills, and relationships among surgeons, other providers, and patients. Attendings should make efforts to discuss their approach to clinical decision making and patient interactions and help residents and medical students voice their opinions and questions through trusting adult learner-teacher relationships.

Surgeons have an opportunity to improve teaching quality through feedback provision

BACKGROUND

Medical student evaluations of faculty are increasingly incorporated into promotion and tenure decisions, making it imperative to understand learner perceptions of quality teaching. Prior work has shown that students value faculty responsiveness in the form of feedback, but faculty and students differ in their perceptions of what constitutes sufficient feedback. The innovative minute feedback system (MFS) can quantify responsiveness to students' feedback requests. This study assessed how feedback provision via MFS impacts teaching quality scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study compared average faculty teaching quality scores with faculty's percentage response to student feedback requests via the MFS. The data were generated from the core surgical clerkship for third-year medical students at the University of Michigan Medical School. The relationship between average teaching quality scores and response percentage was assessed by weighted regression analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-seven medical students requested feedback via MFS, and 104 faculty were evaluated on teaching quality. The mean faculty feedback response percentage was 55.78%. The mean teaching quality score was 4.27 on a scale of 1 to 5. Teaching quality score was significantly correlated with response percentage (P < 0.001); for every 10% increase in response percentage, average teaching quality score improved by 0.075. Average teaching quality score was not significantly associated with response time (P = 0.158), gender (P = 0.407), or surgical service (P = 0.498).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students consider responsiveness to feedback requests an important component of quality teaching. Furthermore, faculty development focused on efficient and practical feedback strategies may have the added benefit of improving their teaching quality.