Is It Safe to Ask the Questions That Matter Most to Me? Observations From a Female Residency Applicant

Parental Support Policies and Benefits: A Surgical Training Program Report Card of Transparency

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the transparency of parental benefits available to US surgical residency applicants.

BACKGROUND

Medical students prioritize work-family balance in specialty selection. Those applying to surgical residency programs also place a significant value on parental leave policies when deciding where to train. However, little is known about the amount of information that surgical training programs publicly offer to potential applicants regarding family support policies.

METHODS

Publicly available websites for 264 general surgery training programs were accessed to determine the availability of information on parental benefits. Twenty-six "items of transparency" included types of leave, contract flexibility, salary, lactation, and childcare support. Programs with fewer than the median items of transparency were contacted to inquire about additional public resources. Academic programs were stratified by their associated medical school rankings in the US News & World Report.

RESULTS

A total of 144 (54%) programs were academic and 214 (81.4%) had male program directors. The median number of items of transparency was 8 (29.6%). Of the 131 programs contacted, 33 (25.9%) replied, and 2 (6.1%) improved their transparency score. Academic programs associated with medical schools in the upper third of the rankings were more likely to have ≥8 items of transparency (70.8% vs. 45.6%; P =0.002). In the adjusted analysis, academic programs [odds ratio (OR): 3.44, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.87-6.34], those with female program directors (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.01-4.33), and those located in the Western (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.31-7.45) and Southern (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.21-4.98) regions of the country were more likely to have ≥8 items of transparency.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant deficits in publicly available information related to parental benefits for many surgical training programs, which may impact applicants' decision making. Attracting the most talented candidates requires programs to create and share policies that support the integration of professional and personal success.

An Initiative to Increase Residency Program Diversity

A physician workforce that reflects the patient population is associated with improved patient outcomes and promotes health equity. Notwithstanding, racial and ethnic disparities persist within US medical schools, making some individuals underrepresented in medicine (URM). We sought to increase the percentage of URM residents who matched into our pediatric residency programs from a baseline of 5% to 35% to achieve demographic parity with our patients. We developed a multifaceted approach using multiple iterative tests of change, with the primary strategy being increased visibility of URM trainees and faculty to residency applicants. Strategies included applicant interviews with URM faculty, interview dinners with URM residents, visibility at academic conferences for URM trainees, development of targeted marketing materials, and a visiting student program supported by networking with URM residents. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of matched residents in the categorical pediatrics, child neurology, and medical genetics training programs who identified as URM. The percentage of URM residents increased to 16% (6 of 37) in 2018, 26% (11 of 43) in 2019, 19% (8 of 43) in 2020, and 21% (9 of 43) in 2021 (a four-year average of 22% URM residents; P = .0002). This progress toward a more representative residency program was met by challenges, such as pipeline concerns, the minority tax, and recruitment during a pandemic. We were able to implement small, low-resource strategies that had a large cumulative impact and could be implemented in other residency programs. Specific tactics and challenges encountered are discussed in this special article.

Parental leave policy information during residency interviews

BACKGROUND

During interviews, medical students may feel uncomfortable asking questions that might be important to them, such as parental leave. Parental leave policies may be difficult for applicants to access without asking the program director or other interviewers. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether parental leave information is presented to prospective residents and whether medical students want this information.

METHODS

Fifty-two program directors (PD's) at 3 sites of a single institution received a survey in 2019 to identify whether parental leave information is presented at residency interviews. Medical students received a separate survey in 2020 to identify their preferences. Fisher exact tests, Pearson χ² tests and Cochran-Armitage tests were used where appropriate to assess for differences in responses.

RESULTS

Of the 52 PD's, 27 responded (52%) and 19 (70%) indicated that information on parental leave was not provided to candidates. The most common reason cited was the belief that the information was not relevant (n = 7; 37%). Of the 373 medical students, 179 responded (48%). Most respondents (92%) wanted parental leave information formally presented, and many anticipated they would feel extremely or somewhat uncomfortable (68%) asking about parental leave. The majority (61%) felt that these policies would impact ranking of programs "somewhat" or "very much."

CONCLUSIONS

Parental leave policies may not be readily available to interviewees despite strong interest and their impact on ranking of programs by prospective residents.

Fellowship program directors and trainees across the United States find parental leave policies to be inconsistent, inaccessible, and inadequate

INTRODUCTION

Determine the consistency, accessibility, and adequacy of parental leave policies for adult and pediatric medicine fellowship programs.

METHODS

We administered a 40-question survey to fellowship program directors (PDs) and trainees in adult and pediatric cardiology, hematology/oncology, gastroenterology, and pulmonology/critical care fellowship programs in the United States. We used Chi-square tests to compare proportions for categorical variables and t-tests to compare means for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 190 PDs from 500 programs (38.0%) and 236 trainees from 142 programs (28.4%) responded. Most respondents did not believe that parental leave policies were accessible publicly (322/426; 75.6%), on password-protected intranet (343/426; 80.5%), or upon request (240/426; 56.3%). The PDs and trainees broadly felt that parental leave for fellows should be 5-10 weeks (156/426; 36.6%) or 11-15 weeks (165/426; 38.7%). A majority of PDs felt that there was no increased burden upon other fellows (122/190; 64.2%) or change in overall well-being (110/190; 57.9%). When asked about the biggest barrier to parental leave support, most PDs noted time constrains of fellowship (101/190; 53.1%) and the limited number of fellows (43/190; 22.6%). Trainees similarly selected the time constraints of training (88/236; 37.3%), but nearly one-fifth chose the culture in medicine (44/236; 18.6%). There were no statistically significant differences in answers based on the respondents' sex, specialty, or subspecialty.

DISCUSSION

Parental leave policies are broadly in place, but did not feel these were readily accessible, standardized, or of optimum length. PDs and trainees noted several barriers that undermine support for better parental leave policies, including time constraints of fellowship, the limited number of fellows for coverage, and workplace culture. Standardization of parental leave policies is advisable to allow trainees to pursue fellowship training and care for their newborns without undermining their educational experiences.