Guiding Preclinical Medical Students in Finding, Synthesizing, and Communicating Translational Basic Research Literature: Roles for Basic Science Research Mentors

Scientific competence during medical education - insights from a cross-sectional study at a German Medical School

BACKGROUND

Medical knowledge regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of diseases is constantly evolving. To effectively incorporate these findings into professional practice, it is crucial that scientific competencies are a central component of medical education. This study seeks to analyse the current state of scientific education and students' desires for integration into the curriculum.

METHODS

From October to December 2022, a survey was distributed at the Medical Faculty Dresden to all medical students from the 1st to 5th academic year (AY). The survey investigates current expectations of applying scientific competencies later in professional life, and the students were asked to self-assess various scientific skills and in relation to the National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education. The self-assessments were objectified through a competence test with ten multiple-choice questions. The desire for curricular teaching was inquired.

RESULTS

860 students completed the survey. This corresponds to a response rate of 64%. In the 5th AY, approximately 80% of the participants stated that they expected to work with scientific literature on a daily to monthly basis in future professional life and to communicate corresponding scientific findings to patients. Only 30-40% of the 5th AY rate their scientific competencies as sufficient to do this appropriately. This corresponds with the self-assessed competencies that only slightly increased over the 5 AYs from 14.1 ± 11.7 to 21.3 ± 13.8 points (max. 52) and is also reflected in the competence test (1st AY 3.6 ± 1.75 vs. 5th AY 5.5 ± 1.68, max. 10 points). Half of the students in the 4th and 5th AYs were dissatisfied with the current teaching of scientific skills. The majority preferred the implementation of a science curriculum (56%), preferably as seminars dealing with topics such as literature research, analysis, and science communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show discrepancies between expectations of using scientific knowledge in everyday professional life, self-rated and objectively recorded competencies, and the current state of curricular teaching of scientific competencies. There is a strong need for adequate practical training, particularly in critical analyses of scientific literature, which enables the communication of scientific knowledge to patients.

Short-Term Training with Basic Science Research Literature Advances Medical Students' Skills for Adaptive Expertise

Physicians must adapt their learning and expertise to the rapid evolution of healthcare. To train for the innovation-efficient demands of adaptive expertise, medical students need to acquire the skill of adaptive self-regulated learning, which includes accessing, interpreting, and synthesizing emerging basic and translational research to support patient care. In response, we developed the course Medical Student Grand Rounds (MSGR). It engages all pre-clerkship students at our institution with self-regulated learning from translational basic research literature. In this report, we describe MSGR's methodology and important outcomes. Students found, interpreted, critically assessed, and presented basic research literature about self-selected clinically relevant topics. In less than one semester and mentored by basic science researchers, they completed eight milestones: (a) search research literature databases; (b) choose a clinical topic using searching skills; (c) outline the topic's background; (d) outline a presentation based on the topic's mechanistic research literature; (e) attend translational research-oriented grand rounds by faculty; (f) learn to prepare oral presentations; (g) write an abstract; and (h) present at Grand Rounds Day, emphasizing their topic's research literature. Graded milestones and end-of-course self-assessments indicated students became proficient in interpreting research articles, preparing and delivering presentations, understanding links among basic and translational research and clinical applications, and pursuing self-regulated learning. Qualitative analysis of self-assessment surveys found most students thought they progressed toward the learning objectives: find scientific information about a research topic (56% positive responses), interpret and critically assess scientific information (64%), and prepare and deliver a scientific presentation (50%). Milestones improve time management and provide a scaffolded method for presenting focused research topics. MSGR equips students with critical thinking skills for lifelong, adaptive, self-regulated learning-a foundation for adaptive expertise. The master adaptive learner cycle of planning, learning, assessing, and adjusting is a conceptual framework for understanding students' MSGR learning experiences.