Patient blood management: is it worth to be employed?

Blood over-testing: impact, ethical issues and mitigating actions

Plenty of studies demonstrate that hospital-acquired anemia (HAA) can increase transfusion rates, mortality, morbidity and cause unnecessary patient burden, including additional length of hospital stay, sleep disruption and venipuncture harms resulting from blood samples unlikely to change clinical management. Beyond patient costs, community costs should also be considered, such as laboratory time and resources waste, environmental impact, increasing pressure on labs and fewer tests available on time for patients who can benefit from them most. Blood over-testing does not support the principles of non-maleficence, justice and respect for patient autonomy, at the expense dubious beneficence. Reducing the number and frequency of orders is possible, to a certain extent, by adopting nudge strategies and raising awareness among prescribing doctors. However, reducing the orders may appear unsafe to doctors and patients. Therefore, reducing blood volume from each order is a better alternative, which is worth implementing through technological, purchasing and organizational arrangements, possibly combined according to need (smaller tubes, adequate analytic platforms, blind dilution, blood conservative devices, aggregating tests and laboratory units).

Comparison of the effects of autologous and non-autologous blood transfusions on the advantages, disadvantages, extubation time and bleeding after coronary bypass

Purpose

Blood transfusion; is considered an organ transplant. In coronary bypass surgery, large volumes of homologous blood transfusion may be required due to excessive bleeding. The large number of use of homologous blood transfusion in open heart surgery and the awareness of its various harmful effects have prompted researchers to conduct research on the use of autologous blood. With autologous transfusion, blood diseases, incompatibility, immunosuppression and organ damage can be prevented and the patient can be extubated earlier in the postoperative period.

Methods

Between January 2020 and January 2016, a total of 176 patients, 56 in the treatment group (with autologous blood transfusion) and 120 in the control group, whose information could be reached from hospital records were investigated retrospectively.

Results

No statistical difference was found between the mean intubation SO2 and PO2 values of the groups. On the contrary, considering the mean intubation times in the intensive care unit of both groups, the patients who underwent autologous blood transfusion were extubated at a statistically significant earlier time.

Conclusion

Autologous blood transfusion is a safe method in selected patients as well. Thanks to this method, patients are protected from complications associated with homologous blood transfusion. It is believed that performing autologous blood transfusion in selected patients undergoing open-heart surgery can decrease the number of postoperative transfusions, frequency of transfusion-related complications (especially in the lungs), and mean intubation times.

Demonstration of a U.S. nationwide reduction in transfusion in general surgery and a review of published transfusion reduction methodologies

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusions in surgical procedures can be lifesaving. However, recent studies show transfusions are associated with a dose-dependent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality; hospitals and physicians have attempted to reduce them. We sought to determine the success of these efforts and review and summarize published reduction methods employed.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

An analysis of transfusion data from ACS-NSQIP public use files of general surgical procedures for 2012 and 2018; a retrospective review of the literature surrounding general surgical transfusion reduction from 2008 to 2018.

RESULTS

The rate of general surgical transfusion in the NSQIP dataset decreased from 5.5% in 2012 to 4.0% in 2018, a 27% relative reduction in transfusion. After extensive multivariable adjustment for patient risk and operative complexity, this effect remained (Odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.63-0.67, p < .001). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between specific procedure decreases in transfusion and decreases in 30-day morbidity (rho =0.41, p = .003) and mortality (rho = 0.37, p = .007). There were 866 published studies matching our search term "red blood cell transfusion reduction." Forty-four were relevant to general surgery. Seven dominant strategies for transfusion reduction by descending frequency of report included restrictive transfusion thresholds, management of preoperative anemia, perioperative interventions, educational programs, electronic clinical decision support, waste reduction, and audits of transfusion practices.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates a 27% decrease in general surgery transfusion between 2012 and 2018 with associated reductions in morbidity and mortality, suggesting published employed strategies have been successful and safely implemented.

Implementation of an electronic identification system in the setting of perioperative autologous cell salvage transfusion: Experience at a university hospital

Perioperative autologous cell salvage (PACS) is one of the effective strategies in patient blood management (PBM). However, mistransfusion, in which the wrong blood is transfused to the wrong patient, of PACS units has been reported. In this study, we implemented a bar code-based electronic identification system (EIS) for blood transfusion in the setting of PACS transfusion. Between February 2009 and December 2020, a total of 12341 surgical patients (9% of whom received surgical interventions) received blood transfusion, among whom 6595 (54 %) received autologous blood transfusion alone, 2877 (23 %) both autologous and allogeneic blood transfusions, and 2869 (23 %) allogeneic blood transfusion alone. Among autologous blood conservation techniques, PACS units were transfused to 7873 patients (83 %) without a single mistransfusion. Rates of overall compliance with the electronic pre-transfusion check at the bedside for all autologous units and PACS units were 98.8 and 98.5 %, respectively. Our observations suggest that a bar code-based EIS can be successfully applied to PACS transfusion, as well as allogeneic blood transfusion in operating rooms.