1
|
Wang L, Jing Q, Pei L, Li M, Ruan X, Chen S, Zhang Y, Wan K, Huang Y. Efficacy of continuous intravenous remimazolam versus midazolam in the extraction of impacted wisdom teeth: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067908. [PMID: 37185197 PMCID: PMC10151835 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benzodiazepines such as midazolam are widely used to moderately sedate patients during impacted wisdom tooth extraction to reduce anxiety in outpatient surgery. This present protocol was designed to determine whether continuous intravenous remimazolam, a new ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, produces superior postoperative recovery quality to that of midazolam in patients undergoing extraction of impacted wisdom teeth. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing Anzhen Hospital and Beijing Shijitan Hospital in China. Approximately 150 participants undergoing extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth will be randomly allocated to two groups (remimazolam and midazolam). The participants will be administered standard interventions to ensure they achieve a sedation level of III on the Ramsay sedation scale during the treatment. Preoperative and anaesthesia management and surgical techniques will be standardised for all participants. The primary outcome is recovery time for complete alertness and the secondary outcomes are anterograde amnesia during and after surgery, and interruption during operation for poor compliance or safety concerns. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (approval number: ZS-3142), Beijing Anzhen Hospital (approval number: KS2022082) and Beijing Shijitan Hospital (approval number: 2023-4). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05350085.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lejunzi Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Quan Jing
- Department of Stomatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijian Pei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Mohan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xia Ruan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaohui Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuelun Zhang
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kuo Wan
- Department of Stomatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuguang Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15356. [PMID: 36097050 PMCID: PMC9468171 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19468-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate if deep-sedated colonoscopy affects adenoma detection in certain colorectal segment. Review of colonoscopy reports, electronic images and medical records of individuals underwent screening colonoscopy with or without propofol sedation between October 2020 and March 2021 from seven hospitals in China. A total of 4500 individuals were analyzed. There was no significant difference in ADR between deep-sedated colonoscopy and unsedated colonoscopy [45.4% vs. 46.3%, P > 0.05]. The APP of deep-sedated colonoscopy was lower than unsedated colonoscopy (1.76 ± 0.81 vs. 2.00 ± 1.30, P < 0.05). Both average number of adenomas and luminal distention score of splenic flexure and descending colon were lower in deep-sedated colonoscopy (P < 0.05), and average number of adenomas was positively correlated with an improved distension score in splenic flexure and descending colon (splenic flexure r = 0.031, P < 0.05; descending colon r = 0.312, P < 0.05). Linear regression model showed deep-sedated colonoscopy significantly affected luminal distention of splenic flexure and descending colon as well as average number of adenomas detected in splenic flexure (P < 0.05). Deep-sedated colonoscopy decreased adenoma detection in splenic flexure and the luminal distention of splenic flexure and descending colon compared with unsedated colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Xin Y, Chu T, Wang J, Xu A. Sedative effect of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:262. [PMID: 35974309 PMCID: PMC9380378 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Remimazolam is a newer benzodiazepine with properties of rapid onset, short duration of action, and fast recovery. Our study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy. Methods One hundred twenty patients were randomly divided into four groups: alfentanil and propofol (AP) group, alfentanil and remimazolam 0.1 mg/kg (AR1 group), 0.15 mg/kg (AR2 group), or 0.2 mg/kg (AR3 group). Patients in the four groups received alfentanil 10 μg/kg, followed by propofol 2 mg/kg and three dosages of remimazolam. Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) scale, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS) values and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were collected at intervals of 5 min and analyzed at different time points: before anesthesia (T0), 5 min (T1), 10 min (T2), 15 min after anesthesia (T3) and at the end of surgery (T4). The average MAP was calculated utilizing the average of all MAP values. The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Secondary outcomes included time to full alert and adverse events. Results The success rate of sedation was 100% among the four groups. The incidence of hypotension was significantly decreased (all P < 0.05) and the average MAP was higher in AR1-AR3 groups than AP group (all P < 0.001). None of the patients developed bradycardia or hypertension during surgery in all study groups. BIS values were higher (all P < 0.001) and the time to full alert was statistically shorter in AR1-AR3 groups (all P < 0.05) compared with the AP group. The MOAA/S score in AR1 was higher than AR2 (P < 0.05) and the AR3 group (P < 0.05) at T1 and BIS values in the AR1 group were significantly higher than AR3 group (P < 0.05) at T4. Conclusions Remimazolam combined with alfentanil have a non-inferior sedative effect than propofol during the colonoscopic polypectomy. Moreover, this combination of two short-acting drugs might be a safer alternative. Trial registration The clinical trial was registered on (16/05/2021, ChiCTR2100046492). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01805-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yueyang Xin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Tiantian Chu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Jinxu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Aijun Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aminnejad R, Hormati A, Shafiee H, Alemi F, Hormati M, Saeidi M, Ahmadpour S, Sabouri SM, Aghaali M. Comparing the efficacy and safety of Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine with Propofol/Fentanyl for sedation in colonoscopy patients: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS 2021; 21:724-731. [PMID: 34620069 DOI: 10.2174/1871527320666211006141406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine [DK] with propofol and fentanyl [PF] for sedation in colonoscopy patients. METHODS In this study, 64 patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized into two groups: 1) A, which received PF, and 2) B, which received DK for sedation. Among 64 patients, 31 patients were included in PF, and 33 patients were included in the DK group. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics. Patients' sedation score (based on Ramsay sedation scale) and vital signs were recorded at 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes. Complications including apnea, hypotension, hypoxia, nausea, and vomiting, along with gastroenterologist satisfaction and patients' pain score (based on Wong-Baker faces pain assessment scale), were recorded by a checklist. Data were analyzed by SPSS v.18 software, using chi-square, independent t-tests, and repeated measures analysis with p<0.05 as the criterion for significant differences. RESULTS The mean score of sedation was 4.82±0.49 in the DK group and 5.22±0.45 in the PF group [p value=0.001]. Serious complications, including hypotension [p value=0.005] and apnea [p value=0.10] were significantly higher in the PF group. Satisfaction of gastroenterologist [p value= 0.400] and patients' pain score [p value = 0.900] were similar among groups. CONCLUSION Combination of DK provides sufficient sedation with fewer complications in comparison with PF in colonoscopy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Aminnejad
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom. Iran
| | - Ahmad Hormati
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. Iran
| | | | - Faezeh Alemi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom. Iran
| | | | | | - Sajjad Ahmadpour
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom. Iran
| | - Seyed Mahdi Sabouri
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom. Iran
| | - Mohammad Aghaali
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom. Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iacucci M, Cannatelli R, Tontini GE, Panaccione R, Danese S, Fiorino G, Matsumoto T, Kochhar GS, Shen B, Kiesslich R, Ghosh S. Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 4:971-983. [PMID: 31696831 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30194-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Several recommendations have addressed the topic of improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, there is variation between these recommendations, in part due to the absence of well-defined quality indicators, suggesting that these quality indicators should be studied and developed. We did a systematic review of evidence related to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease to look at the different variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during, and after the procedure. We identified several key quality measures that could be adopted in clinical practice, including control of inflammation, optimal bowel preparation, ideal time allocation, training, sedation, detection and characterisation of lesions, therapeutic management of the lesions, and colonoscopic reports. However, further primary research and consensus reports are needed to continue developing roadmaps at a global level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Translational of Medicine, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Institute of Translational of Medicine, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Silvio Danese
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Takayuki Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ralf Kiesslich
- Department of Medicine, Helios HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- Institute of Translational of Medicine, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|