Is venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation an option for managing septic shock

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Implementation in Septic Shock Rat Model

Septic shock, a global health concern, boasts high mortality rates. Research exploring the efficacy of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in septic shock remains limited. Our study aimed to establish a rodent model employing VA-ECMO in septic shock rats, assessing the therapeutic impact of VA-ECMO on septic shock. Nineteen Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to sham, septic shock, and (septic shock + VA-ECMO; SSE) groups. Septic shock was induced by intravenous lipopolysaccharides, confirmed by a mean arterial pressure drop to 25-30% of baseline. Rats in the SSE group received 2 hours of VA-ECMO support and 60 minutes of post-weaning ventilation. Sham and septic shock groups underwent mechanical ventilation for equivalent durations. Invasive mean arterial pressure monitoring, echocardiographic examinations, and blood gas analysis revealed the efficacy of VA-ECMO in restoring circulation and ensuring adequate tissue oxygenation in septic shock rats. Post-experiment pathology exhibited the potential of VA-ECMO in mitigating major organ injury. In summary, our study successfully established a stable septic shock rat model with the implementation of VA-ECMO, offering a valuable platform to explore molecular mechanisms underlying VA-ECMO's impact on septic shock.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock: Why, how, when, and for whom

Sepsis and septic shock remain the leading causes of death in intensive care units. Some patients with sepsis fail to respond to routine treatment and rapidly progress to refractory respiratory and circulatory failure, necessitating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, the role of ECMO in adult patients with sepsis has not been fully established. According to existing studies, ECMO may be a viable salvage therapy in carefully selected adult patients with sepsis. The choice of venovenous, venoarterial, or hybrid ECMO modes is primarily determined by the patient's oxygenation and hemodynamics (distributive shock with preserved cardiac output, septic cardiomyopathy (left, right, or biventricular heart failure), or right ventricular failure caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome). Veno-venous ECMO can be used in patients with sepsis and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome when conventional mechanical ventilation fails, and early application of veno-arterial ECMO in patients with sepsis-induced refractory cardiogenic shock may be critical in improving their chances of survival. When ECMO is indicated, the choice of an appropriate mode and determination of the optimal timing of initiation and weaning are critical, particularly in an experienced ECMO center. Furthermore, some special issues, such as ECMO flow, anticoagulation, and antibiotic therapy, should be noted during the management of ECMO support.

Hemodynamic management of septic shock: beyond the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines

Although the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines provide standardized and generalized guidance, they are less individualized. This review focuses on recent updates in the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Monitoring and intervention for septic shock should be personalized according to the phase of shock. In the salvage phase, fluid resuscitation and vasopressors should be given to provide life-saving tissue perfusion. During the optimization phase, tissue perfusion should be optimized. In the stabilization and de-escalation phases, minimal fluid infusion and safe fluid removal should be performed, respectively, while preserving organ perfusion. There is controversy surrounding the use of restrictive versus liberal fluid strategies after initial resuscitation. Fluid administration after initial resuscitation should depend upon the patient's fluid responsiveness and requires individualized management. A number of dynamic tests have been proposed to monitor fluid responsiveness, which can help clinicians decide whether to give fluid or not. The optimal timing for the initiation of vasopressor agents is unknown. Recent data suggest that early vasopressor initiation should be considered. Inotropes can be considered in patients with decreased cardiac contractility associated with impaired tissue perfusion despite adequate volume status and arterial blood pressure. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered for refractory septic shock with severe cardiac systolic dysfunction.