Limitations of anaesthesia depth monitoring

Processed electroencephalography-guided general anesthesia and norepinephrine requirements: A randomized trial in patients having vascular surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) may help clinicians optimize depth of general anesthesia. Avoiding excessive depth of anesthesia may reduce intraoperative hypotension and the need for vasopressors. We tested the hypothesis that pEEG-guided - compared to non-pEEG-guided - general anesthesia reduces the amount of norepinephrine needed to keep intraoperative mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg in patients having vascular surgery.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

PATIENTS

110 patients having vascular surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

pEEG-guided general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

Our primary endpoint was the average norepinephrine infusion rate from the beginning of induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery.

MAIN RESULT

96 patients were analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation average norepinephrine infusion rate was 0.08 ± 0.04 μg kg-1 min-1 in patients assigned to pEEG-guided and 0.12 ± 0.09 μg kg-1 min-1 in patients assigned to non-pEEG-guided general anesthesia (mean difference 0.04 μg kg-1 min-1, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.07 μg kg-1 min-1, p = 0.004). Patients assigned to pEEG-guided versus non-pEEG-guided general anesthesia, had a median time-weighted minimum alveolar concentration of 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) versus 0.8 (0.7, 0.8) (p = 0.006) and a median percentage of time Patient State Index was <25 of 12 (1, 41) % versus 23 (3, 49) % (p = 0.279).

CONCLUSION

pEEG-guided - compared to non-pEEG-guided - general anesthesia reduced the amount of norepinephrine needed to keep mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg by about a third in patients having vascular surgery. Whether reduced intraoperative norepinephrine requirements resulting from pEEG-guided general anesthesia translate into improved patient-centered outcomes remains to be determined in larger trials.

Intraoperative use of processed electroencephalogram in a quaternary center: a quality improvement audit

Although intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) is not consensual among anesthesiologists, growing evidence supports its use to titrate anesthetic drugs, assess the level of arousal/consciousness, and detect ischemic cerebrovascular events; in addition, intraoperative EEG monitoring may decrease the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders. Based on the known and potential benefits of intraoperative EEG monitoring, an educational program dedicated to staff anesthesiologists, residents of Anesthesiology and anesthesia technicians was started at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi in May 2022 and completed in June 2022, aiming to have all patients undergoing general anesthesia with adequate brain monitoring and following international initiatives promoting perioperative brain health. All the surgical cases performed under General Anesthesia at 24 daily locations were prospectively inspected during 15 consecutive working days in March 2023. The use or absence of a processed EEG monitor was registered. Of 379 surgical cases distributed by 24 locations under General Anesthesia, 233 cases (61%) had processed EEG monitoring. The specialty with the highest use of EEG monitoring was Cardiothoracic Surgery, with 100% of cases, followed by interventional Cardiology (90%) and Vascular Surgery (75%). Otorhinolaryngology (29%), Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (25%), and Interventional Pulmonology (20%) were the areas with the lowest use of EEG monitoring. Of note, in the Neuroradiology suite, no processed EEG monitor was used in cases under General Anesthesia. We identified a reasonable use of EEG monitoring during general anesthesia, unfortunately not reaching our target of 100%. The educational and support program previously implemented within the Anesthesiology Institute needs to be continued and improved, including workshops, online discussions, and journal club sessions, to increase the use of EEG monitoring in underused areas.

Alternative sensor montage for Index based EEG monitoring. A systematic review

The main objective of this systematic review is to assess the reliability of alternative positions of processed electroencephalogram sensors for depth of anesthesia monitoring and its applicability in clinical practice. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical trial.gov in accordance with reporting guidelines of PRISMA statement together with the following sources: Google and Google Scholar. We considered eligible prospective studies, written in the English language. The last search was run on the August 2023. Risk of bias and quality assessment were performed. Data extraction was performed by two authors and results were synthesized narratively owing to the heterogeneity of the included studies. Thirteen prospective observational studies (438 patients) were included in the systematic review after the final assessment, with significant diversity in study design. Most studies had a low risk of bias but due to lack of information in one key domain of bias (Bias due to missing data) the overall judgement would be No Information. However, there is no clear indication that the studies are at serious or critical risk of bias. Bearing in mind, the heterogeneity and small sample size of the included studies, current evidence suggests that the alternative infraorbital sensor position is the most comparable for clinical use when the standard sensor position in the forehead is not possible.

Closed-loop anesthesia: foundations and applications in contemporary perioperative medicine

A closed-loop automatically controls a variable using the principle of feedback. Automation within anesthesia typically aims to improve the stability of a controlled variable and reduce workload associated with simple repetitive tasks. This approach attempts to limit errors due to distractions or fatigue while simultaneously increasing compliance to evidence based perioperative protocols. The ultimate goal is to use these advantages over manual care to improve patient outcome. For more than twenty years, clinical studies in anesthesia have demonstrated the superiority of closed-loop systems compared to manual control for stabilizing a single variable, reducing practitioner workload, and safely administering therapies. This research has focused on various closed-loops that coupled inputs and outputs such as the processed electroencephalogram with propofol, blood pressure with vasopressors, and dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness with fluid therapy. Recently, multiple simultaneous independent closed-loop systems have been tested in practice and one study has demonstrated a clinical benefit on postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Despite their advantages, these tools still require that a well-trained practitioner maintains situation awareness, understands how closed-loop systems react to each variable, and is ready to retake control if the closed-loop systems fail. In the future, multiple input multiple output closed-loop systems will control anesthetic, fluid and vasopressor titration and may perhaps integrate other key systems, such as the anesthesia machine. Human supervision will nonetheless always be indispensable as situation awareness, communication, and prediction of events remain irreplaceable human factors.

EEG responses to standardised noxious stimulation during clinical anaesthesia: a pilot study

Background

During clinical anaesthesia, the administration of analgesics mostly relies on empirical knowledge and observation of the patient's reactions to noxious stimuli. Previous studies in healthy volunteers under controlled conditions revealed EEG activity in response to standardised nociceptive stimuli even at high doses of remifentanil and propofol. This pilot study aims to investigate the feasibility of using these standardised nociceptive stimuli in routine clinical practice.

Methods

We studied 17 patients undergoing orthopaedic trauma surgery under general anaesthesia. We evaluated if the EEG could track standardised noxious phase-locked electrical stimulation and tetanic stimulation, a time-locked surrogate for incisional pain, before, during, and after the induction of general anaesthesia. Subsequently, we analysed the effect of tetanic stimulation on the surgical pleth index as a peripheral, vegetative, nociceptive marker.

Results

We found that the phase-locked evoked potentials after noxious electrical stimulation vanished after the administration of propofol, but not at low concentrations of remifentanil. After noxious tetanic stimulation under general anaesthesia, there were no consistent spectral changes in the EEG, but the vegetative response in the surgical pleth index was statistically significant (Hedges' g effect size 0.32 [95% confidence interval 0.12-0.77], P=0.035).

Conclusion

Our standardised nociceptive stimuli are not optimised for obtaining consistent EEG responses in patients during clinical anaesthesia. To validate and sufficiently reproduce EEG-based standardised stimulation as a marker for nociception in clinical anaesthesia, other pain models or stimulation settings might be required to transfer preclinical studies into clinical practice.

Clinical trial registration

DRKS00017829.

Stimulation artefact on EEG trace with BIS monitoring during D-wave recording

The D-wave reflects the corticospinal fibre potentials and is frequently recorded intraoperatively for intramedullary spinal tumours to ensure maximum safe resection. A 38-year-old male had an intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgically removed while being monitored with D-wave from a single distal electrode technique. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (without a muscle relaxant and with intermittent intravenous fentanyl boluses) was used for the maintenance of anaesthesia guided by processed electroencephalography (EEG) using a bispectral index (BIS^®) monitor. Regular spike artefacts were observed in the EEG signal recorded by the BIS® monitor during the application of the single-pulse transcranial electrical stimulus and were used as a visual indicator of stimulus delivery. Finally, we propose a novel method of confirming stimulus delivery during D-wave recording based on stimulation artefacts in the EEG signal recorded by the BIS® monitor.

Electroencephalography spectral edge frequency and suppression rate-guided sedation in patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Sedation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has been identified as a major challenge. We aimed to investigate whether the use of a multiparameter electroencephalogram (EEG) protocol to guide sedation in COVID-19 patients would increase the 30-day mechanical ventilation-free days (VFD).

Methods

We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial. We included patients with severe pneumonia due to COVID-19 who required mechanical ventilation (MV) and deep sedation. We randomized to the control (n = 25) or multiparameter group (n = 25). Sedation in the intervention group was administered following the standard institutional protocols together with a flow chart designed to reduce the propofol administration dose if the EEG suppression rate was over 2% or the spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) was below 10 Hz. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis to evaluate our primary outcome (30-day VFD).

Results

There was no difference in VFD at day 30 (median: 11 [IQR 0–20] days in the control group vs. 0 [IQR 0–21] days in the BIS multiparameter group, p = 0.87). Among secondary outcomes, we documented a 17% reduction in the total adjusted propofol administered during the first 5 days of the protocol [median: 2.3 (IQR 1.9–2.8) mg/k/h in the control group vs. 1.9(IQR 1.5–2.2) mg/k/h in the MP group, p = 0.005]. This was accompanied by a higher average BIS value in the intervention group throughout the treatment period.

Conclusion

A sedation protocol guided by multivariate EEG-derived parameters did not increase the 30-day VFD. However, the intervention led to a reduction in total propofol administration.

Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus

BACKGROUND

The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) for depth of sedation (DOS) monitoring is increasing in anesthesia; however, how to use of this type of monitoring for critical care adult patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of international experts consisting of 21 clinicians involved in monitoring DOS in ICU patients was carefully selected on the basis of their expertise in neurocritical care and neuroanesthesiology. Panelists were assigned four domains (techniques for electroencephalography [EEG] monitoring, patient selection, use of the EEG monitors, competency, and training the principles of pEEG monitoring) from which a list of questions and statements was created to be addressed. A Delphi method based on iterative approach was used to produce the final statements. Statements were classified as highly appropriate or highly inappropriate (median rating ≥ 8), appropriate (median rating ≥ 7 but < 8), or uncertain (median rating < 7) and with a strong disagreement index (DI) (DI < 0.5) or weak DI (DI ≥ 0.5 but < 1) consensus.

RESULTS

According to the statements evaluated by the panel, frontal pEEG (which includes a continuous colored density spectrogram) has been considered adequate to monitor the level of sedation (strong consensus), and it is recommended by the panel that all sedated patients (paralyzed or nonparalyzed) unfit for clinical evaluation would benefit from DOS monitoring (strong consensus) after a specific training program has been performed by the ICU staff. To cover the gap between knowledge/rational and routine application, some barriers must be broken, including lack of knowledge, validation for prolonged sedation, standardization between monitors based on different EEG analysis algorithms, and economic issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on using DOS monitors in ICU is still scarce, and further research is required to better define the benefits of using pEEG. This consensus highlights that some critically ill patients may benefit from this type of neuromonitoring.

Neuromonitoring depth of anesthesia and its association with postoperative delirium

Delirium after surgery or Postoperative delirium (POD) is an underdiagnosed entity, despite its severity and high incidence. Patients with delirium require a longer hospital stay and present more postoperative complications, which also increases hospital costs. Given its importance and the lack of specific treatment, multifactorial preventive strategies are evidenced based. Our hypothesis is that using general anaesthesia and avoiding the maximum time in excessively deep anaesthetic planes through BIS neuromonitoring device will reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients over the age of 65 and their hospitalization stay. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: The visible BIS group and the hidden BIS neuromonitoring group. In the visible BIS group, the depth of anaesthesia was sustained between 40 and 60, while in the other group the depth of anaesthesia was guided by hemodynamic parameters and the Minimum Alveolar Concentration value. Patients were assessed three times a day by research staff fully trained during the 72 h after the surgery to determine the presence of POD, and there was follow-up at 30 days. Patients who developed delirium (n = 69) was significantly lower in the visible BIS group (n = 27; 39.1%) than in the hidden BIS group (n = 42, 60.9%; p = 0.043). There were no differences between the subtypes of delirium in the two groups. Patients in the hidden BIS group were kept for 26.6 ± 14.0 min in BIS values < 40 versus 11.6 ± 10.9 min (p < 0.001) for the patients in the visible BIS group. The hospital stay was lower in the visible BIS group 6.56 ± 6.14 days versus the 9.30 ± 7.11 days (p < 0.001) for the hidden BIS group, as well as mortality; hidden BIS 5.80% versus visible BIS 0% (p = 0.01). A BIS-guided depth of anaesthesia is associated with a lower incidence of delirium. Patients with intraoperative neuromonitoring stayed for a shorter time in excessively deep anaesthetic planes and presented a reduction in hospital stay and mortality.

Seeking the Light in Intensive Care Unit Sedation: The Optimal Sedation Strategy for Critically Ill Patients

The clinical approach to sedation in critically ill patients has changed dramatically over the last two decades, moving to a regimen of light or non-sedation associated with adequate analgesia to guarantee the patient’s comfort, active interaction with the environment and family, and early mobilization and assessment of delirium. Although deep sedation (DS) may still be necessary for certain clinical scenarios, it should be limited to strict indications, such as mechanically ventilated patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), status epilepticus, intracranial hypertension, or those requiring target temperature management. DS, if not indicated, is associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, and increased mortality. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the level of sedation, especially when associated with the raw EEG data, is important to avoid unnecessary oversedation and to convert a DS strategy to light sedation as soon as possible. The approach to the management of critically ill patients is multidimensional, so targeted sedation should be considered in the context of the ABCDEF bundle, a holistic patient approach. Sedation may interfere with early mobilization and family engagement and may have an impact on delirium assessment and risk. If adequately applied, the ABCDEF bundle allows for a patient-centered, multidimensional, and multi-professional ICU care model to be achieved, with a positive impact on appropriate sedation and patient comfort, along with other important determinants of long-term patient outcomes.

Effectiveness of the advisory display SmartPilot® view in the assessment of anesthetic depth in low risk gynecological surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Assessment of appropriate anesthetic depth is crucial to prevent harm to patients. Unnecessary deep anesthesia can be harmful, potentially causing acute renal failure, myocardial injury, delirium, and an increased mortality rate. Conversely, too light anesthesia combined with muscle relaxants can result in intraoperative patient awareness and lead to serious psychological trauma. This trial aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of the advisory display SmartPilot® View (SPV), as a supplemental measure in the assessment of anesthetic depth in low risk gynecological surgery patients. The hypothesis was that the use of the SPV would increase the precision of assessment, and result in a higher mean arterial pressure.

Methods

This trial used a randomized, controlled, single-blind design with a homogeneous sample. Patients undergoing minor, low risk gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: a test group wherein current standards were supplemented with the advisory display SPV and a control group assessed using only the current standards. Female patients aged between 18 and 75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System scores of 1–3 undergoing planned general anesthesia using the total intravenous anesthetic method, combining propofol and remifentanil, were included. The exclusion criteria included a body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m², a history of alcoholism, drug intake affecting propofol and remifentanil dynamics, and inability to consent. The independent sample t-test and chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to assess the statistical significance of differences between the two groups.

Results

A total of 114 patients were included in the analysis (test group n = 58, control group n = 56). No significant differences in the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, bispectral index, extubation delay, or post-anesthesia care unit stay were found between groups.

Conclusions

The addition of the advisory display SmartPilot® View to current standards in the evaluation of anesthetic depth had no significant effect on the outcome.

Trial registration

The trial was registered on January 16th 2019 with ClinicalTrials.gov (ref: NCT03807271).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01593-w.

The impact of bolus versus continuous infusion of intravenous ketamine on bispectral index variations and desflurane administration during major surgery: The KETABIS study

BACKGROUND

Although ketamine, a NMDA-receptor antagonist, tends to increase the bispectral index (BIS), it remains a widely used analgesic whenever administered in low doses during major surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the impact of intravenous ketamine (given either as a continuous infusion or as a bolus) on BIS and to compare desflurane administration and postoperative outcomes between the groups.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study.

SETTING

University hospital, operating room.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients, scheduled for major abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Patients were randomised into two groups: ketamine by intravenous continuous infusion - group (KI) and ketamine by i.v. bolus - group (KB). In the KI group, ketamine at a rate of 0.25 mg kg-1 h-1 was commenced at skin incision (T0) and maintained at this rate for the duration of surgery. In group KB, a ketamine bolus of 0.25 mg kg-1was administered at T0 and repeated every hour. The difference in BIS between the groups was compared from T0 onwards. The amount of desflurane administered to keep BIS within the usual recommended range (40-60) was compared, as were the doses of phenylephrine and remifentanil. Postoperative pain and recovery outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

After T0, the BIS increased significantly from baseline in group KB compared with group KI: the rise in BIS was 20 ± 8 vs. 11 ± 6, respectively (P = 0.0001). The between-group mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI), was 9 (5 to 13). In group KB, desflurane administration significantly increased for the first 15 min after T0: 6.3 ± 1.8 vs. 3.8 ± 1.3 ml (P < 0.0001) with a mean intergroup group difference (95% CI) of 2.4 (1.5 to 3.4) ml. There was no difference in desflurane administration when considering the full hour from T0 to T60 min: 16 ± 9 vs. 15 ± 5 ml (P = 0.63) with a mean intergroup difference (95% CI) of 1 (-3 to 5) ml. After surgery, pain scores, opioid consumption, incidence of nausea and vomiting and recovery scores were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with a continuous ketamine infusion, a ketamine bolus significantly increased the BIS after T0. In order to keep the BIS below 60, significantly more desflurane was administered from T0 to T15 min in group KB. To prevent such higher desflurane administration and its related atmospheric pollution, our results suggest administering intra-operative intravenous ketamine as an infusion rather than a bolus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov registration identifier: NCT03781635.

Influence of rate of administration on the mechanism behind propofol induced loss of consciousness

BACKGROUND

Propofol effect-site time course models included in TCI systems have been under discussion. We hypothesized that the rate of administration is a major contributor affecting the construction of a useful effect-site model: yielding different plasmatic concentrations, loss of consciousness may occur by different mechanisms more complex than the pharmacological effect-site.

METHODOLOGY

ASA III patients were randomized in two groups: rapid induction (RI) received TCI of propofol effect-site (CeCALC) 5.4 μg/mL (modified Marsh model), and slow induction (SI) propofol infusion of 10 mg/kg/hour. A neurologist, blinded to induction method, performed neurological assessments using the FOUR score until the loss of consciousness (LOC). At LOC, the presence of brain stem reflexes, EEG index (PSI) and infusion time/mass of drug were registered. Fisher's exact test was used to describe differences between brain stem reflexes and respiration components of the FOUR score and CeCALC for 4 propofo models at LOC time.

RESULTS

16 patients divided in two groups were included. All patient in SI had brainstem reflexes free at LOC. In the RI, all patients had brain stem reflexes abolished and 1 patient had B and R of 4 points in the FOUR score (brain stem reflexes unaffected; P < .001). CeCALC at LOC time were contradictory at LOC in both groups and using 4 different Pk/Pd models.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending of the infusion rate, propofol CeCALC at LOC calculated by different Pk/Pd models could be the source of confuse data to be used to guide the state of general anesthesia.

Influence of rate of administration on the mechanism behind propofol induced loss of consciousness

BACKGROUND

Propofol effect-site time course models included in TCI systems have been under discussion. We hypothesized that the rate of administration is a major contributor affecting the construction of a useful effect-site model: yielding different plasmatic concentrations, loss of consciousness may occur by different mechanisms more complex than the pharmacological effect-site.

METHODOLOGY

ASA III patients were randomized in two groups: rapid induction (RI) received TCI of propofol effect-site (CeCALC) 5.4 μg/mL (modified Marsh model), and slow induction (SI) propofol infusion of 10 mg/kg/hour. A neurologist, blinded to induction method, performed neurological assessments using the FOUR score until the loss of consciousness (LOC). At LOC, the presence of brain stem reflexes, EEG index (PSI) and infusion time/mass of drug were registered. Fisher's exact test was used to describe differences between brain stem reflexes and respiration components of the FOUR score and CeCALC for 4 propofo models at LOC time.

RESULTS

16 patients divided in two groups were included. All patient in SI had brainstem reflexes free at LOC. In the RI, all patients had brain stem reflexes abolished and 1 patient had B and R of 4 points in the FOUR score (brain stem reflexes unaffected; P < .001). CeCALC at LOC time were contradictory at LOC in both groups and using 4 different Pk/Pd models.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending of the infusion rate, propofol CeCALC at LOC calculated by different Pk/Pd models could be the source of confuse data to be used to guide the state of general anesthesia.

Use of Processed Electroencephalography in the Clinical Setting

Purpose of Review

Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) is widely used in clinical practice. Few clinicians utilize the full potential of these devices. This brief review will address the improvements in patient management available from the utilization of all pEEG data.

Recent Findings

Anesthesiologists easily learn to recognize raw pEEG patterns that are consistent with an appropriate level of hypnotic effect. Power distribution within the waveform can be displayed in a visual format that identifies signatures of the principal anesthetic hypnotics. Opinion on the benefit of pEEG data in the mitigation of postoperative neurological impairment remains divided.

Summary

Looking beyond the index number can aid clinical decision making and improve confidence in the benefits of this monitoring modality.

The quantification and monitoring of intraoperative nociception levels in thoracic surgery: a review

Nociception is the unconscious perception of a stimulus applied by trauma or surgery and expressed through a response of the autonomous nervous system. Local anaesthetics (LAs), opioids and other modulating agents such as ketamine are usually utilised to blunt nociception as a component during general anaesthesia (GA) and surgery. The effectiveness of these measures, however, are still difficult to quantify and monitoring of anti-nociception has been confined to assess variation of heart rate (HR) or blood pressure (BP). Recently, various monitoring concepts have been introduced to quantify nociception more systematically and on the other hand guide anti-nociceptive interventions more appropriately. This review describes the various technologies, their performance in clinical studies and provides a critical appraisal with particular application to thoracic anaesthesia and surgery and their relevance in the context of chronic pain after surgery.

[Evaluation of Bispectral Index time delay in response to anesthesia induction: an observational study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

According to the manufacturer, the Bispectral Index (BIS) has a processing time delay of 5-10s. Studies addressing this have suggested longer delays. We evaluated the time delay in the Bispectral Index response.

METHODS

Based on clinical data from 45 patients, using the difference between the predicted and the real BIS, calculated during a fixed 3minutes period after the moment the Bispectral Index dropped below 80 during the induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

RESULTS

The difference between the predicted and the real BIS was in average 30.09±18.73s.

CONCLUSION

Our results may be another indication that the delay in BIS processing may be much longer than stated by the manufacture, a fact with clinical implications.

Combined Monitoring-Brain Function Monitoring and Cerebral Oximetry

Peri-operative brain function monitoring is still seen by most clinicians as complex, difficult to interpret and is therefore adopted very slowly. Current available technology mainly focusses on either a processed parameter based on the electroencephalogram to titrate anesthetics and central acting agents or on cerebral oximetry, a wider term to obtain information on the cerebral oxygen balance. There is still a lack of technological offerings that allow to monitor both entities in one device. However, there is scientific evidence that it is possible to combine measurements in an algorithmic approach that allows to better manage brain function in the surgical setting. Such integrated solutions should be made available to clinicians as they are likely to optimize patient care dependent on a sound health technology assessment.

Evaluation of Bispectral Index time delay in response to anesthesia induction: an observational study

Background and objectives

According to the manufacturer, the Bispectral Index (BIS) has a processing time delay of 5–10 s. Studies addressing this have suggested longer delays. We evaluated the time delay in the Bispectral Index response.

Methods

Based on clinical data from 45 patients, using the difference between the predicted and the real BIS, calculated during a fixed 3 minutes period after the moment the Bispectral Index dropped below 80 during the induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

Results

The difference between the predicted and the real BIS was in average 30.09 ± 18.73 s.

Conclusion

Our results may be another indication that the delay in BIS processing may be much longer than stated by the manufacture, a fact with clinical implications.

Potential EEG biomarkers of sedation doses in intensive care patients unveiled by using a machine learning approach

OBJECTIVE

Sedation of neurocritically ill patients is one of the most challenging situation in ICUs. Quantitative knowledge on the sedation effect on brain activity in that complex scenario could help to uncover new markers for sedation assessment. Hence, we aim to evaluate the existence of changes of diverse EEG-derived measures in deeply-sedated (RASS-Richmond agitation-sedation scale  -4 and  -5) neurocritically ill patients, and also whether sedation doses are related with those eventual changes.

APPROACH

We performed an observational prospective cohort study in the intensive care unit of the Hospital de la Princesa. Twenty-six adult patients suffered from traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage were included in the present study. Long-term continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings (2141 h) and hourly annotated information were used to determine the relationship between intravenous sedation infusion doses and network and spectral EEG measures. To do that, two different strategies were followed: assessment of the statistical dependence between both variables using the Spearman correlation rank and by performing an automatic classification method based on a machine learning algorithm.

MAIN RESULTS

More than 60% of patients presented a correlation greater than 0.5 in at least one of the calculated EEG measures with the sedation dose. The automatic classification method presented an accuracy of 84.3% in discriminating between different sedation doses. In both cases the nodes' degree was the most relevant measurement.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results presented here provide evidences of brain activity changes during deep sedation linked to sedation doses. Particularly, the capability of network EEG-derived measures in discriminating between different sedation doses could be the framework for the development of accurate methods for sedation levels assessment.

Mechanisms underlying brain monitoring during anesthesia: limitations, possible improvements, and perspectives

Currently, anesthesiologists use clinical parameters to directly measure the depth of anesthesia (DoA). This clinical standard of monitoring is often combined with brain monitoring for better assessment of the hypnotic component of anesthesia. Brain monitoring devices provide indices allowing for an immediate assessment of the impact of anesthetics on consciousness. However, questions remain regarding the mechanisms underpinning these indices of hypnosis. By briefly describing current knowledge of the brain's electrical activity during general anesthesia, as well as the operating principles of DoA monitors, the aim of this work is to simplify our understanding of the mathematical processes that allow for translation of complex patterns of brain electrical activity into dimensionless indices. This is a challenging task because mathematical concepts appear remote from clinical practice. Moreover, most DoA algorithms are proprietary algorithms and the difficulty of exploring the inner workings of mathematical models represents an obstacle to accurate simplification. The limitations of current DoA monitors — and the possibility for improvement — as well as perspectives on brain monitoring derived from recent research on corticocortical connectivity and communication are also discussed.

[Is there an appropriate bispectral index for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in spontaneous breathing in the pediatric patient?]

OBJECTIVE

The bispectral index (BIS) values that predict appropriate anesthetic level to perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in spontaneous breathing are not well established in Pediatrics. The objective of this study is to determine whether it is possible to find an appropriate, less profound, BIS level in the pediatric patient that would enable an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) to be performed in spontaneous breathing without causing gag reflex or motor response.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective study was designed and included 61 patients from 12-167 months old, and an ASAI-II who needed a diagnostic UGE. The study was conducted from October 2011 to March 2013.

INTERVENTION

UGE performed with an anesthetic protocol using propofol. The vital signs measured were heart and respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure. The sedation level score (Ramsay scale) and BIS values were also measured. The first attempt was performed at BIS level 60-69, and this was not feasible, then the anesthetic was deepened and a second attempt made at BIS level 50-59. If this was still not possible a deeper anesthetic level was then achieved and a third attempt made at BIS level 45-49. Variables of interest were: effective BIS level (eBIS), BIS level at which UGE was performed without gag reflex or motor response; propofol total dose (mgkg(-1)), induction time (time from onset of sedation to effective start of UGE). A logistic regression analysis was performed to obtain an equation to estimate the possibility of UGE success.

RESULTS

The distribution of the patient was: male 40%, female 60%, with 11 (18%) patients under 36 months. The statistical values are expressed as mean and standard deviation, with following results; age (months): 95.9±45.86; weight (kg): 30.5±14.68; effective BIS: 56.41±4.63; induction time (minutes): 11.07±2.69; total propofol dose (per kg): 4.86±1.21. An additional intra-procedure propofol bolus was given in 38 patients (62%), with 7/38 of them (18%) due to movement, and 31/38 (82%) due to BIS level increase. No statistical differences were found in effective BIS level between older and younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results, BIS levels below 59 predict UGE success, with 72.13% sensitivity and 88.06% specificity in the pediatric population studied.