1
|
Donati PA, Plotnikow G, Benavides G, Belerenian G, Jensen M, Londoño L. Tidal volume in mechanically ventilated dogs: can human strategies be extrapolated to veterinary patients? J Vet Sci 2019; 20:e21. [PMID: 31161739 PMCID: PMC6538511 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper compares and describes the tidal volume (Vt) used in mechanically ventilated dogs under a range of clinical conditions. Twenty-eight dogs requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) were classified into 3 groups: healthy dogs mechanically ventilated during surgery (group I, n = 10), dogs requiring MV due to extra-pulmonary reasons (group II, n = 7), and dogs that required MV due to pulmonary pathologies (group III, n = 11). The median Vt used in each group was 16 mL/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 15.14-21) for group I, 12.59 mL/kg (IQR, 9-14.25) for group II, and 12.59 mL/kg (IQR, 10.15-14.96) for group III. The Vt used was significantly lower in group III than in group I (p = 0.016). The thoraco-pulmonary compliance was significantly higher in group I than in groups II and III (p = 0.011 and p = 0.006, respectively). The median driving pressure was similar among the groups with a median of 9, 11, and 10 cmH₂O in groups I, II, and III, respectively (p = 0.260). Critically-ill dogs requiring MV due to the primary pulmonary pathology received a significantly lower Vt than healthy dogs but with a range of values that were markedly higher than those recommended by human guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo A Donati
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cooperativa Veterinaria (UCICOOP), Buenos Aires C1406GZP, Argentina.
| | - Gustavo Plotnikow
- Capítulo de Kinesiología Intensivista, Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva, Buenos Aires C1414BEA, Argentina.,Servicio de Kinesiología, Unidad de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Anchorena, Buenos Aires C1425ELP, Argentina
| | - Gloria Benavides
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cooperativa Veterinaria (UCICOOP), Buenos Aires C1406GZP, Argentina
| | | | - Mario Jensen
- Veterinary Clinic Desivet, Buenos Aires C1417DSR, Argentina
| | - Leonel Londoño
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chung KK, Rhie RY, Lundy JB, Cartotto R, Henderson E, Pressman MA, Joe VC, Aden JK, Driscoll IR, Faucher LD, McDermid RC, Mlcak RP, Hickerson WL, Jeng JC. A Survey of Mechanical Ventilator Practices Across Burn Centers in North America. J Burn Care Res 2016; 37:e131-9. [PMID: 26135527 PMCID: PMC5312724 DOI: 10.1097/bcr.0000000000000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Burn injury introduces unique clinical challenges that make it difficult to extrapolate mechanical ventilator (MV) practices designed for the management of general critical care patients to the burn population. We hypothesize that no consensus exists among North American burn centers with regard to optimal ventilator practices. The purpose of this study is to examine various MV practice patterns in the burn population and to identify potential opportunities for future research. A researcher designed, 24-item survey was sent electronically to 129 burn centers. The χ, Fisher's exact, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests were used to determine if there were significant differences in practice patterns. We analyzed 46 questionnaires for a 36% response rate. More than 95% of the burn centers reported greater than 100 annual admissions. Pressure support and volume assist control were the most common initial MV modes used with or without inhalation injury. In the setting of Berlin defined mild acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ARDSNet protocol and optimal positive end-expiratory pressure were the top ventilator choices, along with fluid restriction/diuresis as a nonventilator adjunct. For severe ARDS, airway pressure release ventilation and neuromuscular blockade were the most popular. The most frequently reported time frame for mechanical ventilation before tracheostomy was 2 weeks (25 of 45, 55%); however, all respondents reported in the affirmative that there are certain clinical situations where early tracheostomy is warranted. Wide variations in clinical practice exist among North American burn centers. No single ventilator mode or adjunct prevails in the management of burn patients regardless of pulmonary insult. Movement toward American Burn Association-supported, multicenter studies to determine best practices and guidelines for ventilator management in burn patients is prudent in light of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin K. Chung
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ryan Y. Rhie
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan B. Lundy
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Cartotto
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth Henderson
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa A. Pressman
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Victor C. Joe
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - James K. Aden
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ian R. Driscoll
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lee D. Faucher
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert C. McDermid
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronald P. Mlcak
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - William L. Hickerson
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - James C. Jeng
- From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix; University of California Irvine Regional Burn Center, Orange; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, Texas; Memphis Burn Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
López-Aguilar J, Lucangelo U, Albaiceta GM, Nahum A, Murias G, Cañizares R, Oliva JC, Romero PV, Blanch L. Effects on lung stress of position and different doses of perfluorocarbon in a model of ARDS. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2015; 210:30-7. [PMID: 25662756 DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2015.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Revised: 01/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
We determined whether the combination of low dose partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with perfluorocarbons (PFC) and prone positioning improved lung function while inducing minimal stress. Eighteen pigs with acute lung injury were assigned to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) or PLV (5 or 10 ml/kg of PFC). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trials in supine and prone positions were performed. Data were analyzed by a multivariate polynomial regression model. The interplay between PLV and position depended on the PEEP level. In supine PLV dampened the stress induced by increased PEEP during the trial. The PFC dose of 5 ml/kg was more effective than the dose 10 ml/kg. This effect was not observed in prone. Oxygenation was significantly higher in prone than in supine position mainly at lower levels of PEEP. In conclusion, MV settings should take both gas exchange and stress/strain into account. When protective CMV fails, rescue strategies combining prone positioning and PLV with optimal PEEP should improve gas exchange with minimal stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefina López-Aguilar
- Fundació Parc Taulí, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Institut de Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus d' Excelència Internacional, Bellaterra, Spain; Critical Care Center, Hospital de Sabadell, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Umberto Lucangelo
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care and Emergency, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
| | - Guillermo M Albaiceta
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Dpto. Biologia Funcional, Universidad de Oviedo, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Avi Nahum
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Department, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Gastón Murias
- Clínica Bazterrica y Clínica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Joan Carles Oliva
- Fundació Parc Taulí, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Institut de Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus d' Excelència Internacional, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Pablo V Romero
- Laboratory of Experimental Pneumology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - Lluís Blanch
- Fundació Parc Taulí, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Institut de Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus d' Excelència Internacional, Bellaterra, Spain; Critical Care Center, Hospital de Sabadell, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|