Effects of Contingency Management on Substance Abuse Continuing Care Participation

A systematic review of interventions to enhance initiation of and adherence to treatment for alcohol use disorders

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) contribute significantly to the global disease burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. While effective treatment options exist, engagement with care remains a challenge, impacting treatment outcomes and resource allocation, particularly in resource-constrained settings. In this review, we aim to systematically examine and synthesize the evidence on interventions targeting initiation of and adherence to treatment for AUDs.

METHODS

A search was conducted on six electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL and CENTRAL) using search terms under the following concepts: alcohol use disorders, initiation/adherence, treatments, and controlled trial study design. Due to the heterogeneity in intervention content and outcomes among the included studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

The search yielded 32 distinct studies testing eleven categories of interventions. 23 out of 32 studies reported effectiveness of interventions in improving at least one initiation or adherence outcome, with 11 studies reporting an improvement in at least one outcome related to drinking, and four studies reporting improvements in at least one measure of well-being or disability. Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) emerged as a prominent approach for treatment initiation, contingency management for adherence, and motivational interviewing (MI) for both treatment initiation and adherence.

CONCLUSION

Integrating initiation and adherence interventions into AUD treatment services holds immense potential for optimizing client outcomes and fostering overall well-being. However, generalizability of these strategies remains uncertain owing to the lack of studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Addressing this gap is crucial for enhancing global access to effective treatments for AUDs.

Contingency management for patients with cooccurring disorders: evaluation of a case study and recommendations for practitioners

Research indicates that contingency management (CM) has potential to improve a number of outcomes (e.g. substance use, treatment attendance, quality of life) among individuals with substance use and cooccurring disorders. However, multiple factors must be considered on a case-by-case basis in order to promote optimal treatment effects. The present study describes an individualized CM protocol for a US Veteran with substance dependence and cooccurring severe mental illness. CM targeted attendance at outpatient appointments and appropriate use of hospital resources. Effects of CM were assessed by comparing the 3-month baseline and CM periods. The CM intervention marginally reduced unnecessary hospital admissions, resulting in cost savings to the medical center of over $5,000 in three months for this individual. However, CM did not affect outpatient attendance. Several complications arose, highlighting challenges in using CM in populations with substance use and cooccurring disorders. Practical suggestions are offered for maximizing the effects of CM.

Substance abuse treatment programs' data management capacity: an exploratory study

Despite treatment improvement and performance management imperatives, little research describes the data management capacity of substance abuse treatment programs, and useful metrics are not available to gauge capacity. This exploratory study evaluates clinical and administrative data management at eight substance abuse treatment programs in four US states to identify factors for developing an appropriate metric. Findings indicate that programs tend to manage data inefficiently and have few protocols guiding information management. Barriers to better data management included lack of integrated information technology (IT) systems; limited funding, time, and staff for developing and implementing IT-related changes; and divergent staff skills in and attitudes toward IT. This snapshot of substance abuse treatment programs' data management capabilities suggests a need for a metric to examine data management capability in these settings. Infusion of expertise, training, and funding are needed to improve substance abuse treatment programs' IT-related systems and data management processes.