Clinically Important Change in Insomnia Severity After Chronic Pain Rehabilitation

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

The aims were (i) to determine the effects of Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on sleep disturbances, pain intensity and disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), and (ii) to determine the dose-response association between CBT-I dose (total minutes) and improvements in sleep disorders, pain intensity and disability in patients with CMP. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SCOPUS until December 17, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using CBT-I without co-interventions in people with CMP and sleep disorders were eligible. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence. A random effects meta-analysis was applied to determine the effects on the variables of interest. The dose-response association was assessed using a restricted cubic spline model. Eleven RCTs (n = 1801 participants) were included. We found a significant effect in favor of CBT-I for insomnia (SMD: -1.34; 95%CI: -2.12 to -0.56), with a peak effect size at 450 min of CBT-I (-1.65, 95%CI: -1.89 to -1.40). A non-significant effect was found for pain intensity. A meta-analysis of disability was not possible due to the lack of data. This review found benefits of CBT-I for insomnia compared to control interventions, with a large effect size. In addition, it was estimated that a 250-min dose of CBT-I had a large effect on reducing insomnia and that the peak effect was reached at 450 min. These novel findings may guide clinicians in optimizing the use of CBT-I in people with CMP and insomnia.

Telehealth delivery of adapted CBT-I for insomnia in chronic pain patients: a single arm feasibility study

Objectives

A large proportion of individuals with chronic pain experience insomnia-related symptoms which can be persistent in nature, and negatively impact one's quality of life. This single arm trial aimed to investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of CBT-I, adapted for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain, delivered via telehealth.

Methods

We conducted a single arm feasibility trial in which 10 adult women (M age = 50.76 years, SD = 8.03 years) with self-reported insomnia and a diagnosed chronic musculoskeletal chronic pain received six CBT-I individual treatment sessions over 6-10 weeks. Treatment was delivered via telehealth. Participants completed weekly sleep diaries, and self-reported measures of insomnia, pain, anxiety and depression pre-treatment, post-treatment, and one-month follow-up.

Results

The trial yielded, high levels of compliance with intervention protocols, and affirmative feedback on satisfaction which demonstrated feasibility. The enrolment rate into the study was 37% (27 participants screened, 10 participants enrolled). The intervention was associated with statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in self-reported insomnia severity. There were statistically significant improvements in sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, sleep onset latency, anxiety and depression.

Conclusion

Adapted CBT-I delivered via telehealth may be a feasible, acceptable, and efficacious therapeutic approach for individuals with co-existent sleep and chronic pain. Future trials should adopt a randomized design against usual care.

Clonidine is better than zopiclone for insomnia treatment in chronic pain patients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Chronic pain is associated with insomnia. The objective of this clinical study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different prescribed doses of zopiclone and clonidine for the management of insomnia in patients with chronic pain.

METHODS

This prospective observational crossover study included 160 consenting adult patients receiving pain management treatment. For insomnia treatment, each patient ingested different prescribed doses of zopiclone or clonidine on alternate nights. Each patient used a special validated sleep diary to collect data including pain score, sleep scores, sleep duration, sleep medication dose, and adverse effects. Each patient completed the diary for 3 continuous weeks. Pain was measured using a numeric pain rating scale. Sleep score was measured using the Likert Sleep Scale. A change in the pain or sleep scores by 2 points was considered significant. Of the 160 study participants, 150 (93.8%) completed the study successfully, and their data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) using Student's t test, analysis of variance, Pearson chi-square test, and regression analysis. A P value < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Pain score was lower with clonidine than zopiclone (P = .025). Time to fall asleep was shorter with clonidine than zopiclone (P = .001). Feeling rested on waking in the morning was better with clonidine than zopiclone (P = .015). Overall sleep quality was better with clonidine than zopiclone (P = .015). Total Likert sleep score was better with clonidine than zopiclone (P = .005). Total sleep duration was better with clonidine than zopiclone (P = .013). Adverse effects were commoner with zopiclone, including collapse, fall, confusion, amnesia, mood disorder, hallucination, nightmare, nocturnal restlessness, locomotor dysfunction, nausea and headache. A minor adverse effect of dry mouth was commoner with clonidine.

CONCLUSIONS

Clonidine is significantly better than zopiclone with respect to sleep quality, analgesia, tolerability profile, and patient safety. Further studies comparing clonidine with other insomnia medications will be beneficial.

CITATION

Bamgbade OA, Tai-Osagbemi J, Bamgbade DO, et al. Clonidine is better than zopiclone for insomnia treatment in chronic pain patients. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(6):1565-1571.

Treatment of Insomnia within an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Trial

Background/Objective

Prior research indicates interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) usual care (UC) does not sufficiently address sleep problems among individuals with comorbid chronic pain and clinical levels of insomnia. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an evidence-based insomnia intervention. The current study investigates the translation of CBT-I into an IPRP.

Method

In this single-site, prospective, randomized controlled pilot study, insomnia and pain-related outcomes were examined for adults participating in a 10-week IPRP (N = 79) who were allocated to a 4-session group-based CBT-I (IPRP+CBT-I) or usual care (IPRP-UC) condition.

Results

Patients in the IPRP+CBT-I group showed improvements in insomnia symptoms at the end compared to the beginning of the CBT-I group; however, there were no IPRP outcome differences relative to the IPRP-UC condition. Both groups reported statistically significant reductions in insomnia, pain severity, pain-related life interference, and depressed mood. Fewer than one-third of participants reported clinically meaningful reductions in insomnia symptoms following IPRP participation.

Conclusions

Further efforts are needed to address sleep problems in pain rehabilitation settings.

Insomnia symptoms and chronic pain: Outcomes of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program

OBJECTIVES

Insomnia is a highly prevalent problem among patients with chronic pain. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) are a leading treatment option for chronic pain; however, research is limited and existing findings are mixed on the impact of insomnia symptoms on IPRP outcomes and the extent to which insomnia symptoms improve as a result of IPRP treatment.

METHODS

In this study, insomnia and pain-related outcomes following a 10-week IPRP were examined from a relatively large sample (N = 393) of adult patients with varying chronic pain conditions who completed the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at program admission and discharge. Both group- and individual-level changes in insomnia severity were examined to evaluate statistically and clinically significant changes in insomnia symptoms, along with the impact of insomnia symptoms on measures of pain, emotional distress, and functioning. Participants were categorized as having no clinically significant insomnia symptoms (NCSI), mild, moderate, or severe insomnia based on ISI scores.

RESULTS

Higher levels of insomnia severity were associated with worse pain, functioning, and emotional distress. Most patients reporting mild, moderate, or severe insomnia symptoms at program admission moved to a lower insomnia symptom category at the time of discharge (62%); however, only 33% of these patients reported a meaningful score reduction (i.e., ISI change ≥8 points). In addition, insomnia symptoms had a negative impact on treatment gains related to pain interference and physical health-related quality of life.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that usual IPRP care confers overall treatment benefit for individuals with chronic pain and insomnia. However, insomnia symptoms may negatively impact pain treatment outcomes and usual care appears insufficient to address elevated insomnia symptoms for many patients. Additional insomnia-specific treatment may be warranted for patients with comorbid chronic pain.

Validation of a Limitations in Daily Activities Scale for Chronic Pain

Limitations in physical function and participation are important domains of assessment in chronic pain. In 1995, the International Association for the Study of Pain distributed a self-report measure of functional limitations. Although the questionnaire has been used in research studies, it has never been subjected to a thorough investigation of its measurement properties. In this study, 941 patients with chronic pain completed the 16-item Limitations in Daily Activities Scale (LIDAS) at 2 pretreatment and 1 post-treatment assessment points. Individual item analysis favored a 13-item scale. This 13-item LIDAS had a confirmed 3-factor structure consisting of limitations in personal care, global participation, and specific tasks. Reliability analyses for the total scale (α = .90), as well as for each factor individually (αs = .82-.84), indicated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations = .65-.88 over varying time intervals), and responsiveness to change with treatment. LIDAS scores correlated as expected with measures of pain intensity, pain cognitions, and depression, as well as with other self-report and clinician-administered measures of functional performance. Using patient global ratings as anchors, a minimal clinically important difference of 5 points was established as a criterion for meaningful individual improvement after treatment. In conclusion, the LIDAS is a reliable, valid, and clinically relevant option for assessing limitations in physical function and participation in patients with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: Physical function and participation comprise a core dimension in the assessment of chronic pain. This study demonstrates that the LIDAS is a reliable and valid measure of this dimension, with good applicability for documenting clinically important change with treatment.

Is sleep disturbance in patients with chronic pain affected by physical exercise or ACT-based stress management? - A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Most people suffering chronic pain are plagued by sleeping difficulties. Cognitive behaviour therapy has produced promising results for insomnia comorbid with chronic pain, but the access to such treatment is often limited. Over the last ten years, interventions aiming to increase cognitive flexibility and physical activity have been assumed to be effective treatments for a variety of conditions, including insomnia and chronic pain. If proven effective, these treatments could constitute the first steps in a stepped care model for chronic pain and insomnia.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-nine chronic pain subjects were randomized to Exercise, ACT-based stress management (ACT-bsm), or an active control group. Two hundred thirty-two participants (78%) received their allocated intervention at least to some extent. These participants were evaluated using mixed model analyses for changes in sleep (Insomnia Severity Index, ISI), pain intensity, depression, and anxiety immediately after treatment, six months and twelve months after treatment.

RESULTS

The mixed model analyses revealed that Exercise had a positive effect on insomnia compared with the control group and the effect remained after 12 months. No clear effect (i.e., both for completers and for completers together with treatment non-completers) upon ISI was found for the ACT-bsm. Pain intensity decreased significantly both in the exercise group and in the control group. For the two psychological variables (i.e., symptoms of anxiety and depression) were found significant improvements over time but no group differences. The treatment effects for ISI and pain intensity did not reach clinical significance per definitions presented in other relevant studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Beneficial significant effects on insomnia was confirmed in the exercise condition. However, these changes were probably not clinically important. For pain intensity a general decrease was found in the Exercise condition and in the control condition, while no change occurred in ACT-bsm. No group differences were found for the two psychological variables.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in Clinical Trials (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT02399644 , 21 January 2015, retrospectively registered).

Insomnia Really Hurts: Effect of a Bad Night's Sleep on Pain Increases With Insomnia Severity

Insomnia and chronic pain are highly prevalent conditions and are often comorbid. Somatic complaints other than pain are also often observed in insomnia. Poor sleep and pain are known to mutually reinforce each other. However, it is unknown whether the habitual severity of insomnia modulates the acute effect of a particularly bad night's sleep on the next day's pain severity, and whether it modulates the acute effect of pain on the following night's sleep quality. Using data from 3,508 volunteers (2,684 female, mean age 50.09 y), we addressed these questions in addition to the associations between the habitual severity of insomnia, somatic complaints, and pain. Results indicated that people suffering from more severe habitual insomnia showed stronger mutual acute within-day reactivity of pain and poor sleep quality. The same increased reactivity was found in people with more severe habitual pain. Interestingly, the acute within-day mutual reactivity of pain and sleep quality showed consistent asymmetry. Pain worsened more after a particularly bad night's sleep than it improved after a particularly good night's sleep. Likewise, sleep worsened more after a day with more-than-usual pain than it improved after a day with less-than-usual pain. Future interventions may profit from addressing this asymmetric mutual reactivity especially in people with severe comorbid insomnia and chronic pain.

The McAndrews Leadership Lecture: February 2016, by Dr Greg Kawchuk. Putting the "Act" Back in Chiropractic

The McAndrews Leadership Lecture was developed by the American Chiropractic Association to honor the legacy of Jerome F. McAndrews, DC, and George P. McAndrews, JD, and their contributions to the chiropractic profession. This article is an edited and truncated version of the McAndrews Leadership Lecture given by Dr Greg Kawchuk on February 27, 2016, in Washington, DC, at the National Chiropractic Leadership Conference. This was the second McAndrews lecture in this annual series.

Assessment and treatment at a pain clinic: A one-year follow-up of patients with chronic pain

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pain is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek primary health care. Pain relief is likely to be achieved for patients suffering from acute pain, but for individuals with chronic pain it is more likely that the condition will persist. These patients have the option of being referred to specialised pain clinics. However, the complexity surrounding chronic pain patients is not well studied in these settings. This study aimed to describe patients with chronic pain referred to a pain clinic by using the information submitted during their first visit and one year later and also to identify associations between baseline characteristics and improvements in health-related quality of life in the follow-up.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal observational study of a sample consisting of 318 patients referred to a pain clinic. One group of patients containing 271 individuals (median age 48, 64% females) was assessed and received conventional pain treatment (CPT group) and a second group of 47 patients (median age 53, 64% females) was assessed by a pain specialist and referred back to their physician with a treatment recommendation (assessment only, AO group). Patient-reported outcome measures in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), pain intensity (VAS), mental health (HADS), insomnia (ISI), pain-related disability (PDI), kinesiophobia (TSK) and sense of coherence (SOC) were collected at the first visit and one year later.

RESULTS

At baseline, the CPT group reported a low EQ-5D Index (median (md) 0.157) and EQ VAS (md 40) as well as considerable high, current pain intensity VAS (md 58), HADS anxiety (md 8), ISI (md 17), PDI (md 36) and TSK (md 39). The AO group showed similar problems (no significant differences compared to the CPT group), except for ISI, where the AO group reported less severe problems. At the one-year follow-up, the CPT group had a statistically significant improvement in EQ-5D, VAS, ISI, PDI and TSK. In the AO group no significant changes were observed. In the CPT group there was an association between a high ISI level at baseline and an improved EQ-5D Index in the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The study describes rarely explored groups of patients with chronic pain at a pain clinic. Severe pain problems were present in both groups at their first visit. A statistically significant improvement could be seen in the group that was conventionally treated while this was not the case among those subjects who were assessed and referred. The results imply, that relatively limited treatment strategies were helpful for the patients' health-related quality of life. Despite these improvements, the patients were not fully recovered, pointing to the chronicity of pain conditions and the need of support for many patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Increased knowledge about assessment, selection and treatment at pain clinics is important to improve the quality of the work performed at these clinics. Despite limited resources, further efforts should be made to collect comparable, valid data on a regular base from pain clinics in order to develop recommendation models.