Somatosensory Test Responses and Physical and Psychological Functioning of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Non-neuropathic Pain: An Exploratory Study

A systematic review of the biopsychosocial dimensions affected by chronic pain in children and adolescents: identifying reliable and valid pediatric multidimensional chronic pain assessment tools

Pediatric chronic pain is a complex experience that is often challenging to describe and measure. Multidimensional tools that evaluate the biopsychosocial impact of chronic pain in pediatric patients can help clinicians to prioritize and tailor interdisciplinary pain care; yet, the psychometric value and clinical utility of such tools has not yet been systematically studied in the literature. The purpose of this review was to identify multidimensional biopsychosocial tools used in pediatric chronic pain, synthesize their reliability and validity evidence, and draw on this evidence to describe the relationships between chronic pain and biopsychosocial domains. The search involved 2 phases to (1) identify eligible tools and (2) conduct a measured forward citation search of tool development articles. Tool eligibility was guided by the Multidimensional Biobehavioral Model of Pediatric Pain and study eligibility was focused on primary chronic pain diagnoses unrelated to disease. Data extraction was focused on reliability and validity evidence of eligible tools, guided by the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Results yielded 6 tools that included 64 eligible studies, highlighting 84 significant relationships between pain and functional interference across 11 biopsychosocial variables. All tools were shown to have good internal consistency and evidence of validity, primarily through relationships to other variables. Of the 6 tools, the most brief and easy to use were the most under studied. Further psychometric research is warranted for these tools to investigate their clinical utility and psychometric properties in guiding and prioritizing pain care for children and adolescents.

Multidimensional Self-report Assessment of Children's Acute Pain in an Inpatient Setting

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the feasibility of administering a multidimensional, self-report pain assessment protocol to children in an inpatient, acute pain context, and sought insight into the interrelationships between sensory, affective, and evaluative pain dimensions.

METHODS

A total of 132 children (5 to 16 y) experiencing acute pain were recruited from acute pain ward rounds or the short-stay surgical unit. A multidimensional self-report assessment protocol was administered, assessing pain intensity, pain-related affect, bother, perceived unfairness, and pain expectations (for tomorrow and in 1 wk). Duration of protocol administration was assessed and ease of administration was rated. Pain-related behaviors were rated using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Scale.

RESULTS

The duration of protocol administration was <2.5 minutes, on average, for all age groups. Median ease of protocol administration was 7/10 for 5- to 7-year-olds and 8/10 for older age groups. Pain-related bother was higher for 14- to 16-year-olds, relative to younger age groups, and significantly correlated with perceived unfairness (r=0.59, P<0.01), intensity (r=0.76, P<0.01), and affect (r=0.33, P<0.05). For younger age groups, bother was significantly positively correlated only with pain intensity (rs=0.59 to 0.79, Ps<0.01) and affect (rs=0.4 to 0.71, Ps <0.05). A stepwise multiple regression analysis found multidimensional self-reported information (especially pain intensity and perceived unfairness), accounted for significant additional amount of variance, beyond that explained by age, pain duration, and observed pain behavior.

DISCUSSION

Sensory, affective, and evaluative aspects of children's clinical, acute pain experience may be assessed using self-report tools, which provide unique and valuable information about their pain experience.

Somatosensory Testing in Pediatric Patients with Chronic Pain: An Exploration of Clinical Utility

We aimed to evaluate the utility of clinical somatosensory testing (SST), an office adaptation of laboratory quantitative sensory testing, in a biopsychosocial assessment of a pediatric chronic somatic pain sample (N = 98, 65 females, 7–18 years). Stimulus–response tests were applied at pain regions and intra-subject control sites to cutaneous stimuli (simple and dynamic touch, punctate pressure and cool) and deep pressure stimuli (using a handheld pressure algometer, and, in a subset, manually inflated cuff). Validated psychological, pain-related and functional measures were administered. Cutaneous allodynia, usually regional, was elicited by at least one stimulus in 81% of cases, most frequently by punctate pressure. Central sensitization, using a composite measure of deep pressure pain threshold and temporal summation of pain, was implied in the majority (59.2%) and associated with worse sleep impairment and psychological functioning. In regression analyses, depressive symptoms were the only significant predictor of pain intensity. Functional interference was statistically predicted by deep pressure pain threshold and depressive symptoms. Manually inflated cuff algometry had comparable sensitivity to handheld pressure algometry for deep pressure pain threshold but not temporal summation of pain. SST complemented standard biopsychosocial assessment of pediatric chronic pain; use of SST may facilitate the understanding of disordered neurobiology.

Electrical stimulation-induced SSSEP as an objective index to evaluate the difference of tactile acuity between the left and right hand

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to propose an objective index to evaluate the difference of tactile acuity between the left and right hand based on steady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP).

APPROACH

Two kinds of tactile sensations (vibration and pressure) with three levels of intensities (low/medium/high) were evoked on two finger areas of the left or right hand (thumb and index for healthy hands, thumb and index-projected areas for disabled hands) via transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Three forearm amputees and 13 able-bodied subjects were recruited to discriminate the specific level and area of the applied stimulation. Electroencephalography was adopted to simultaneously record the somatosensory cortex response to TENS. We assessed the discrimination performance (discrimination accuracy rate (AR) and response time (RT)) to quantify the tactile acuity, while the evoked SSSEP was synchronously analyzed. Linear regression analyses were performed between the difference of SSSEP amplitudes and the difference of discrimination performance for the left and right hand stimulation.

MAIN RESULTS

Frequency domain analysis revealed that SSSEP amplitude increased with the increase of the stimulation intensity. There were positive correlations between the difference of SSSEP amplitudes and the difference of ARs for the left and right hand stimulation in the sensations of vibration (R ²  =  0.6389 for able-bodied subjects, R ²  =  0.5328 for amputees) and pressure (R ²  =  0.6102 for able-bodied subjects, R ²  =  0.5452 for amputees), respectively. Significance The SSSEP amplitude could be used as an objective index to evaluate the difference of the tactile acuity between the left and right hand and has the potential to be applied in sensory rehabilitation for amputees or stroke patients.

The Pediatric American Pain Society Patient Outcomes Questionnaire (Pediatric APS-POQ): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief and Comprehensive Measure of Pain and Pain Outcomes in Hospitalized Youth

Pediatric pain assessment in the hospital traditionally involves the patient's self-report of pain intensity using a numeric rating scale, which does not capture the complexity of the pain experience. No valid, comprehensive measure of pain in hospitalized youth exists. This study was designed to develop and conduct initial psychometric testing of the Pediatric American Pain Society Patient Outcomes Questionnaire (Pediatric APS-POQ), a comprehensive patient-reported measure of pain and pain outcomes in hospitalized youth. A multidisciplinary group of pediatric pain researchers and clinicians collaborated to adapt the adult APS-POQ Revised to pediatrics, including a patient-report and parent proxy version. The adapted measures were administered to 218 pediatric inpatients (age M = 13.4 years, 56% female) and 214 of their parents (80% mothers) at 4 US children's hospitals. The measure was feasible to administer within the inpatient setting and was acceptable and understandable to pediatric patients and their parents. Internal consistency was adequate for both patient-report and parent proxy (α = 0.77). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the following 6 domains, consistent with the adult measure: pain intensity, functional interference, emotional response, side effects, perceptions of care, and usual pain. Additional research is needed to further support the reliability and validity of this measure in diverse clinical populations. PERSPECTIVE: To reduce the impact of pain on hospitalized youth, pediatric pain assessment must move beyond ratings of pain intensity. The Pediatric APS-POQ provides a brief but comprehensive assessment of pain and pain outcomes in hospitalized children and adolescents, which will allow for greater individualization in hospital-based pain management and quality improvement purposes.