1
|
Clark NC, Pethick J, Falla D. Measuring complexity of muscle force control: Theoretical principles and clinical relevance in musculoskeletal research and practice. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 64:102725. [PMID: 36773547 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal conditions affect bones, joints, and muscles of the locomotor system and are a leading cause of disability worldwide. This suggests that current musculoskeletal rehabilitation techniques fail to target the characteristics (e.g., physiological/physical/psychological) most influential for long-term musculoskeletal health. To identify whether a physiological characteristic is impaired, it must be measured. In neuromuscular control, traditional research approaches use magnitude-based measurements (e.g., peak force/standard deviation of force/coefficient of variation of force). However, magnitude-based measurements miss 'hidden information' regarding a physiological system's status across time. To better identify physiological characteristics that are clinically-important for long-term musculoskeletal health, other measurement approaches currently less applied in musculoskeletal research may be helpful. The purpose of this article is to present an introduction to technical and measurement principles for quantifying the 'complexity' of muscle force control as one representation of peripheral joint neuromuscular control. Complexity measurements are time-based and consider the irregular temporal structure of physiological signals. We review theoretical principles underlying measuring complexity of muscle force control and explain its clinical relevance for musculoskeletal scientists and clinicians. The principles include sensorimotor control of peripheral joints, muscle force signal construction and features, muscle force control measurement procedures, and variability and complexity variables. We propose the potential utility of measuring the complexity of muscle force control for diagnosing sensorimotor system impairment and prognosis following musculoskeletal disease or injury. This article will serve as an educational asset and a scientific resource that will inform future research directions to optimise rehabilitation for people with peripheral joint disease and injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Clark
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation, and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Jamie Pethick
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation, and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Deborah Falla
- School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matthews D, Cancino EE, Falla D, Khatibi A. Exploring pain interference with motor skill learning in humans: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274403. [PMID: 36099284 PMCID: PMC9470002 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor learning underpins successful motor skill acquisition. Although it is well known that pain changes the way we move, it’s impact on motor learning is less clear. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the impact of experimental and clinical pain on task performance and activity-dependent plasticity measures across learning and explore these findings in relation to different pain and motor learning paradigms. Five databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane ROB2 and ROBIN-I. The overall strength of evidence was rated using the GRADE guidelines. Due to the heterogeneity of study methodologies a narrative synthesis was employed. Twenty studies were included in the review: fifteen experimental pain and five clinical pain studies, covering multiple motor paradigms. GRADE scores for all outcome measures suggested limited confidence in the reported effect for experimental pain and clinical pain, on motor learning. There was no impact of pain on any of the task performance measures following acquisition except for ‘accuracy’ during a tongue protrusion visuomotor task and ‘timing of errors’ during a motor adaptation locomotion task. Task performance measures at retention, and activity dependent measures at both acquisition and retention showed conflicting results. This review delivers a detailed synthesis of research studies exploring the impact of pain on motor learning. This is despite the challenges provided by the heterogeneity of motor learning paradigms, outcome measures and pain paradigms employed in these studies. The results highlight important questions for further research with the goal of strengthening the confidence of findings in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Matthews
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Edith Elgueta Cancino
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ali Khatibi
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown MR, Personius KE, Langan J. Participants with mildly-disabling chronic neck pain perform differently during explicit compared to implicit motor learning of a reaching task. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266508. [PMID: 35390088 PMCID: PMC8989223 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic musculoskeletal (CMSK) pain associated with musculoskeletal disorders like low back pain or neck pain are the leading causes of disability. While CMSK pain has the potential to negatively influence motor learning, there is limited research to understand the impact of CMSK on motor learning. In order to examine differences in motor learning between individuals with and without CMSK we modified a serial reaction time task to assess motor learning of a repetitive reaching task. The paradigm was used to assess both explicit and implicit motor learning. In a cross-sectional study design, seventeen participants with chronic neck pain (CNP) (5 males) and 21 controls (8 males) were recruited. In addition, physical, cognitive, sensorimotor, disability and pain assessments were used to examine differences between individuals with and without CNP. All participants with CNP were categorized as having mild disability. There was no difference in cognitive assessments and minimal differences in physical measures between groups. Examining motor learning, groups with and without CNP demonstrated similar outcomes in both explicit and implicit motor learning. There was one notable performance difference between groups in the reaching task, the group with CNP demonstrated slower reaching movements outward and inward during blocks without explicit information. This may suggest a cautious approach to movement with reduced explicit information. Findings from this study provide insight on motor learning in individuals with mildly-disabling CNP, further research is necessary to examine how instruction can impact peak performance in people with CMSK pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R. Brown
- Rehabilitation Science Department, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Kirkwood E. Personius
- Rehabilitation Science Department, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Jeanne Langan
- Rehabilitation Science Department, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kantak SS, Johnson T, Zarzycki R. Linking Pain and Motor Control: Conceptualization of Movement Deficits in Patients With Painful Conditions. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6497839. [PMID: 35079833 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED When people experience or expect pain, they move differently. Pain-altered movement strategies, collectively described here as pain-related movement dysfunction (PRMD), may persist well after pain resolves and, ultimately, may result in altered kinematics and kinetics, future reinjury, and disability. Although PRMD may manifest as abnormal movements that are often evident in clinical assessment, the underlying mechanisms are complex, engaging sensory-perceptual, cognitive, psychological, and motor processes. Motor control theories provide a conceptual framework to determine, assess, and target processes that contribute to normal and abnormal movement and thus are important for physical therapy and rehabilitation practice. Contemporary understanding of motor control has evolved from reflex-based understanding to a more complex task-dependent interaction between cognitive and motor systems, each with distinct neuroanatomic substrates. Though experts have recognized the importance of motor control in the management of painful conditions, there is no comprehensive framework that explicates the processes engaged in the control of goal-directed actions, particularly in the presence of pain. This Perspective outlines sensory-perceptual, cognitive, psychological, and motor processes in the contemporary model of motor control, describing the neural substrates underlying each process and highlighting how pain and anticipation of pain influence motor control processes and consequently contribute to PRMD. Finally, potential lines of future inquiry-grounded in the contemporary model of motor control-are outlined to advance understanding and improve the assessment and treatment of PRMD. IMPACT This Perspective proposes that approaching PRMD from a contemporary motor control perspective will uncover key mechanisms, identify treatment targets, inform assessments, and innovate treatments across sensory-perceptual, cognitive, and motor domains, all of which have the potential to improve movement and functional outcomes in patients with painful conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailesh S Kantak
- Neuroplasticity and Motor Behavior Laboratory, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tessa Johnson
- Neuroplasticity and Motor Behavior Laboratory, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ryan Zarzycki
- Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dupuis F, de Fontenay BP, Bouffard J, Bouchard M, Bouyer LJ, Mercier C, Roy JS. Does musculoskeletal pain interfere with motor learning in a gait adaptation task? A proof-of-concept study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:281. [PMID: 35321679 PMCID: PMC8944163 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05237-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experimental pain during gait has been shown to interfere with learning a new locomotor task. However, very few studies have investigated the impact of clinical pain on motor learning due to the challenges associated with clinical populations. OBJECTIVE The first objective of this proof-of-concept study was to determine the feasibility to obtain two groups of participants with chronic ankle pathology with or without residual pain while walking. The second objective was to evaluate the impact of clinical musculoskeletal pain on motor learning during gait. METHODS Participants with chronic isolated ankle pathology were recruited and their personal and clinical characteristics were collected (functional performance, dorsiflexion maximal strength, range of motion). To assess motor acquisition (Day 1) and retention (Day 2), participants performed an adaptation task on two consecutive days that consisted of walking while experiencing a perturbing force applied to the ankle. The level of pain during the task was measured, and participants who reported pain were attributed to the Pain group and participants without pain to the No Pain group. Learning performance was assessed by measuring ankle kinematics (Mean plantarflexion absolute error) and learning strategy was assessed by measuring the Relative timing of error and the tibialis anterior (TA) electromyographic activity. RESULTS Twenty-five participants took part in the experiment. Eight (32%) were excluded because they could not be included in either the Pain or No Pain group due to the intermittent pain, leaving eight participants in the Pain group and nine in the No Pain group. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Musculoskeletal pain had no influence on learning performance, but the learning strategy were different between the two groups. The No Pain group showed a TA activity reduction before perturbation between the days, while the Pain group did not. CONCLUSION Some barriers were identified in studying musculoskeletal pain including the high rates of participants' exclusion, leading to a small sample size. However, we showed that it is feasible to investigate clinical pain and motor learning. From the results of this study, musculoskeletal pain has no influence on motor learning performance but influences the learning strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Dupuis
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, Canada.,Départment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Benoit Pairot de Fontenay
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, Canada
| | - Jason Bouffard
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, Canada.,Départment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Marc Bouchard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Laurent J Bouyer
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, Canada.,Départment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Catherine Mercier
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, Canada.,Départment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, Canada. .,Départment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pain's Adverse Impact on Training-Induced Performance and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review. Brain Imaging Behav 2022; 16:2281-2306. [PMID: 35301674 PMCID: PMC9581826 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00621-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Motor training is a widely used therapy in many pain conditions. The brain’s capacity to undergo functional and structural changes i.e., neuroplasticity is fundamental to training-induced motor improvement and can be assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The aim was to investigate the impact of pain on training-induced motor performance and neuroplasticity assessed by TMS. The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA-guidelines and a Prospero protocol (CRD42020168487). An electronic search in PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane until December 13, 2019, identified studies focused on training-induced neuroplasticity in the presence of experimentally-induced pain, 'acute pain' or in a chronic pain condition, 'chronic pain'. Included studies were assessed by two authors for methodological quality using the TMS Quality checklist, and for risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The literature search identified 231 studies. After removal of 71 duplicates, 160 abstracts were screened, and 24 articles were reviewed in full text. Of these, 17 studies on acute pain (n = 7) or chronic pain (n = 10), including a total of 258 patients with different pain conditions and 248 healthy participants met the inclusion criteria. The most common types of motor training were different finger tasks (n = 6). Motor training was associated with motor cortex functional neuroplasticity and six of seven acute pain studies and five of ten chronic pain studies showed that, compared to controls, pain can impede such trainings-induced neuroplasticity. These findings may have implications for motor learning and performance and with putative impact on rehabilitative procedures such as physiotherapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Magni NE, McNair PJ, Rice DA. Impairments in grip and pinch force accuracy and steadiness in people with osteoarthritis of the hand: A case-control comparison. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021; 55:102432. [PMID: 34333399 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (OA) is severely disabling condition. Limited evidence has focused on force control measures in this population. OBJECTIVES It was the aim of the present study to determine whether force matching accuracy and steadiness are impaired in people with hand OA. In addition, the relationship between force control measures (accuracy and steadiness) and measures of hand function and pain in people with symptomatic hand OA was explored. DESIGN Case-control study. METHOD Sixty-two participants with symptomatic hand OA and 26 healthy pain-free controls undertook an isometric grip and pinch force matching task at 50 % of their maximum voluntary contraction. Average pain hand pain was recorded. In addition, the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), and the Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis were collected. RESULTS Grip force-matching accuracy and steadiness were significantly impaired in the hand OA group compared to controls (P < 0.05). Pinch force-matching error was greater in people with hand OA (P < 0.05), however, pinch force steadiness was not different between groups. There was a learning effect in people with hand OA, with resolution of force matching impairments with task repetition. A small positive correlation was identified between grip force control and the DASH. No association was found between other measures of force control and self-reported measures of function or pain. CONCLUSIONS People with hand OA presented with greater impairments in measures of submaximal force control. These were correlated with self-reported hand function but not pain. Future studies may wish to examine whether objective measures of functional performance are related to force-matching error and steadiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoló Edoardo Magni
- Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, Auckland, 0627, New Zealand.
| | - Peter John McNair
- Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, Auckland, 0627, New Zealand.
| | - David Andrew Rice
- Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, Auckland, 0627, New Zealand; Waitemata Pain Service, Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, North Shore Hospital, Waitemata DHB, 124 Shakespeare Road, Takapuna, Westlake, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vittersø AD, Buckingham G, Ten Brink AF, Halicka M, Proulx MJ, Bultitude JH. Characterising sensorimotor adaptation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Cortex 2021; 140:157-178. [PMID: 33989901 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
It has been suggested that sensorimotor conflict contributes to the maintenance of some pathological pain conditions, implying that there are problems with the adaptation processes that normally resolve such conflict. We tested whether sensorimotor adaptation is impaired in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) by characterising their adaption to lateral prismatic shifts in vision. People with unilateral upper-limb CRPS Type I (n = 17), and pain-free individuals (n = 18; matched for age, sex, and handedness) completed prism adaptation with their affected/non-dominant and non-affected/dominant arms. We examined 1) the rate at which participants compensated for the optical shift during prism exposure (i.e., strategic recalibration), 2) endpoint errors made directly after prism adaptation (sensorimotor realignment) and the retention of these errors, and 3) kinematic markers associated with strategic control. Direct comparisons between people with CRPS and controls revealed no evidence of any differences in strategic recalibration, including no evidence for differences in a kinematic marker associated with trial-by-trial changes in movement plans during prism exposure. All participants made significant endpoint errors after prism adaptation exposure, indicative of sensorimotor realignment. Overall, the magnitude of this realignment did not differ between people with CRPS and pain-free controls. However, when endpoint errors were considered separately for each hand, people with CRPS made greater errors (indicating more rather than less realignment) when using their affected hand than their non-affected hand. No such difference was seen in controls. Taken together, these findings provide no evidence of impaired strategic control or sensorimotor realignment in people with CRPS. In contrast, they provide some indication that there could be a greater propensity for sensorimotor realignment in the CRPS-affected arm, consistent with more flexible representations of the body and peripersonal space. Our study challenges an implicit assumption of the theory that sensorimotor conflict might underlie some pathological pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel D Vittersø
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Department of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
| | - Gavin Buckingham
- Department of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia F Ten Brink
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| | - Monika Halicka
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J Proulx
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Centre for Real and Virtual Environments Augmentation Labs, Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| | - Janet H Bultitude
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pelletier R, Purcell-Levesque L, Girard MC, Roy PM, Leonard G. Pain Intensity and Functional Outcomes for Activities of Daily Living, Gait and Balance in Older Adults Accessing Outpatient Rehabilitation Services: A Retrospective Study. J Pain Res 2020; 13:2013-2021. [PMID: 32821153 PMCID: PMC7423354 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s256700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older adults are referred for outpatient physical therapy to improve their functional capacities. The goal of the present study was to determine if pain had an influence on functional outcomes in older adults who took part in an outpatient physical rehabilitation program. Patients and Methods A retrospective study was performed on the medical records of patients aged 65 and over referred for outpatient physical therapy to improve physical functioning (n=178). Pain intensity (11-point numeric pain scale) and results from functional outcome measures (Timed Up and Go [TUG], Berg Balance Scale [BBS], 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test and Functional Autonomy Measuring System [SMAF]) were extracted at initial (T1) and final (T2) consultations. Paired t-tests were performed to determine if there were differences in functional outcome measures between T1 and T2 in all the patients. Patients were stratified to those with pain (PAIN, n=136) and those without pain (NO PAIN, n=42). Differences in functional outcome measures between T1 and T2 (delta scores) were compared between groups with independent t-tests with Welch corrections for unequal variances. Pearson correlation coefficients between initial pain intensity and changes in functional outcome measures (T2-T1) were also performed. Correcting for multiple comparisons, a p-value of p≤0.01 was considered as statistically significant. Results The TUG, BBS, 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test all demonstrated improvement between T1 and T2 (all p<0.01). There was no difference between groups for delta scores for TUG (p=0.14), BBS (p=0.03), 10-meter walk test (p=0.54), 6-minute walk test (p=0.94) and SMAF (p=0.23). Pearson correlation coefficients were weak between initial pain intensity and changes in functional outcome scores between T1 and T2 (r= −0.16 to 0.15, all p-values >0.10). Conclusion These results suggest that pain is not an impediment to functional improvements in older individuals who participated in an outpatient physical rehabilitation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Pelletier
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - L Purcell-Levesque
- Research Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - M-C Girard
- Research Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - P-M Roy
- Research Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - G Leonard
- Research Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rice D, McNair P, Huysmans E, Letzen J, Finan P. Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 5: Osteoarthritis. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8111769. [PMID: 31652929 PMCID: PMC6912819 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability in older adults, which most commonly affects the joints of the knee, hip, and hand. To date, there are no established disease modifying interventions that can halt or reverse OA progression. Therefore, treatment is focused on alleviating pain and maintaining or improving physical and psychological function. Rehabilitation is widely recommended as first-line treatment for OA as, in many cases, it is safer and more effective than the best-established pharmacological interventions. In this article, we describe the presentation of OA pain and give an overview of its peripheral and central mechanisms. We then provide a state-of-the-art review of rehabilitation for OA pain—including self-management programs, exercise, weight loss, cognitive behavioral therapy, adjunct therapies, and the use of aids and devices. Next, we explore several promising directions for clinical practice, including novel education strategies to target unhelpful illness and treatment beliefs, methods to enhance the efficacy of exercise interventions, and innovative, brain-directed treatments. Finally, we discuss potential future research in areas, such as treatment adherence and personalized rehabilitation for OA pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rice
- Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
- Waitemata Pain Service, Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
| | - Peter McNair
- Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion International Research Group.
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.
- Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
- I-CHER, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Janelle Letzen
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Patrick Finan
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matheve T, Brumagne S, Demoulin C, Timmermans A. Sensor-based postural feedback is more effective than conventional feedback to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2018; 15:85. [PMID: 30253807 PMCID: PMC6156867 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0423-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improving movement control can be an important treatment goal for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Although external feedback is essential when learning new movement skills, many aspects of feedback provision in patients with CLBP remain currently unexplored. New rehabilitation technologies, such as movement sensors, are able to provide reliable and accurate feedback. As such, they might be more effective than conventional feedback for improving movement control. The aims of this study were (1) to assess whether sensor-based feedback is more effective to improve lumbopelvic movement control compared to feedback from a mirror or no feedback in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and (2) to evaluate whether patients with CLBP are equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. Methods Fifty-four healthy participants and 54 patients with chronic non-specific LBP were recruited. Both participant groups were randomised into three subgroups. During a single exercise session, subgroups practised a lumbopelvic movement control task while receiving a different type of feedback, i.e. feedback from movement sensors, from a mirror or no feedback (=control group). Kinematic measurements of the lumbar spine and hip were obtained at baseline, during and immediately after the intervention to evaluate the improvements in movement control on the practised task (assessment of performance) and on a transfer task (assessment of motor learning). Results Sensor-based feedback was more effective than feedback from a mirror (p < 0.0001) and no feedback (p < 0.0001) to improve lumbopelvic movement control performance (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 9.9° (95% CI 6.1°-13.7°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 10.6° (95% CI 6.8°-14.3°)) and motor learning (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 7.2° (95% CI 3.8°-10.6°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 6.9° (95% CI 3.5°-10.2°)). Patients with CLBP were equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. Conclusions Sensor-based feedback is an effective means to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with CLBP. Future research should focus on the long-term retention effects of sensor-based feedback. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT02773160, (retrospectively registered on May 16th, 2016). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12984-018-0423-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Matheve
- Rehabilitation Research Center - Biomed, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Simon Brumagne
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Demoulin
- Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Annick Timmermans
- Rehabilitation Research Center - Biomed, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chang WJ, O'Connell NE, Beckenkamp PR, Alhassani G, Liston MB, Schabrun SM. Altered Primary Motor Cortex Structure, Organization, and Function in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2018; 19:341-359. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
13
|
Pelletier R, Bourbonnais D, Higgins J. Nociception, pain, neuroplasticity and the practice of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine. INT J OSTEOPATH MED 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|