Peripheral Interventions for Painful Stump Neuromas of the Lower Limb: A Systematic Review

Resurgent neuropathic discharge: an obstacle to the therapeutic use of neuroma resection?

ABSTRACT

Ectopic discharge ("ectopia") in damaged afferent axons is a major contributor to chronic neuropathic pain. Clinical opinion discourages surgical resection of nerves proximal to the original injury site for fear of resurgence of ectopia and exacerbated pain. We tested this concept in a well-established animal neuroma model. Teased-fiber recordings were made of ectopic spontaneous discharge originating in the experimental nerve-end neuroma and associated dorsal root ganglia in rats that underwent either a single transection (with ligation) of the sciatic nerve or 2 consecutive transections separated by 7, 14, 21, or 30 days. Ectopia emerged in afferent A and C fibers after a single cut with kinetics anticipated from previous studies. When resection was performed during the early period of intense A-fiber activity, a brief period of resurgence was observed. However, resection of neuromas of more than 14 days was followed by low levels of activity with no indication of resurgence. This remained the case in trials out to 60 days after the first cut. Similarly, we saw no indication of resurgent ectopia originating in axotomized dorsal root ganglion neuronal somata and no behavioral reflection of resurgence. In summary, we failed to validate the concern that proximal resection of a problematic nerve would lead to intense resurgent ectopic discharge and pain. As the well-entrenched concept of resurgence is based more on case reports and anecdotes than on solid evidence, it may be justified to relax the stricture against resecting neuromas as a therapeutic strategy, at least within the framework of controlled clinical trials.

A retrospective case series of prophylactic neurectomy during total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty is a common operation performed to relieve pain and restore functional activity. While overall widely successful, a subset of patients has continued pain postoperatively with no identifiable cause. Neuroma formation has been identified as a possible contributor to this unexplained pain, often necessitating an additional procedure for neuroma removal. The purpose of our study was to evaluate if prophylactic neurectomy could reduce the occurrence of postoperative pain.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients were compared, 44 control patients and 68 neurectomy patients. Demographic information, Numerical rating pain scale (NRS) and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were collected pre- and post-operatively. Patients were additional asked if they were overall satisfied with the operation.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups with respect to age (Median: 71 vs 69 years, p = 0.28), male sex (41% vs 44%, p = 0.85), or body mass index (Median: 32.2 vs 31.3, p = 0.80). When comparing the degree of change following surgery there were no statistically significant differences observed in NRS pain scores (Median change: -7 vs -6, p = 0.89) or KSS scores (Median change: +44 vs +40, p = 0.14). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in overall patient-reported satisfaction with the knee replacement (82.5% vs 86.6%, p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

We did not find a statistically significant difference in NRS, KSS, or overall patient satisfaction between the prophylactic neurectomy and control patient groups. Larger studies with evaluation of the nerve diameter will be needed to determine which patients are at risk for symptomatic neuroma development following total knee arthroplasty.

Postamputation Residual Limb Pain Severity and Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Individuals with an extremity amputation are predisposed to persistent pain that reduces their quality of life. Residual limb pain is defined as pain that is felt in the limb after amputation. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of 5 databases from inception to June 2020 was performed and is registered under the PROSPERO ID: CRD42020199297. Included studies were clinical trials with residual limb pain assessed at a minimum follow-up of 1 week. Meta-analyses of residual limb pain prevalence and severity were performed with subgroups of extremity and amputation etiology. Results: Twenty clinical trials met criteria and reported on a total of 1347 patients. Mean patient ages ranged from 38 to 77. Residual limb pain prevalence at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively, was 50%, 11%, 23%, 27%, 22%, and 24%. Mean residual limb pain severity at the 6 months or longer follow-up was 4.19 out of 10 for cancer amputations, 2.70 for traumatic amputations, 0.47 for vasculopathy amputations, 1.01 for lower extremity amputations, and 3.56 for upper extremity amputations. Conclusions: Residual limb pain severity varies according to the etiology of amputation and is more common after upper extremity amputation than lower extremity amputations. The most severe pain is reported by patients undergoing amputations due to cancer, followed by traumatic amputations, while vascular amputation patients report lower pain severity. Promising methods of reducing long-term pain are preoperative pain control, nerve or epidural blocks, use of memantine, calcitonin-containing blocks, and prophylactic nerve coaptations.

Surgical Approaches for Prevention of Neuroma at Time of Peripheral Nerve Injury

Painful neuroma is a frequent sequela of peripheral nerve injury which can result in pain and decreased quality of life for the patient, often necessitating surgical intervention. End neuromas are benign neural tumors that commonly form after nerve transection, when axons from the proximal nerve stump regenerate in a disorganized manner in an attempt to recreate nerve continuity. Inflammation and collagen remodeling leads to a bulbous end neuroma which can become symptomatic and result in decreased quality of life. This review covers surgical prophylaxis of end neuroma formation at time of injury, rather than treatment of existing neuroma and prevention of recurrence. The current accepted methods to prevent end neuroma formation at time of injury include different mechanisms to inhibit the regenerative response or provide a conduit for organized regrowth, with mixed results. Approaches include proximal nerve stump capping, nerve implantation into bone, muscle and vein, various pharmacologic methods to inhibit axonal growth, and mechanisms to guide axonal growth after injury. This article reviews historical treatments that aimed to prevent end neuroma formation as well as current and experimental treatments, and seeks to provide a concise, comprehensive resource for current and future therapies aimed at preventing neuroma formation.

Neuromas and postamputation pain

Postamputation stump and phantom pain are highly prevalent but remain a difficult condition to treat. The underlying mechanisms are not fully clarified, but growing evidence suggests that changes in afferent nerves, including the formation of neuromas, play an important role. The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether ultrasound-verified neuroma swellings are more frequent in amputees with postamputation pain than in amputees without pain (primary outcome). Sixty-seven amputees were included. Baseline characteristics including the frequency and intensity of spontaneous stump and phantom pain were obtained, and sensory characteristics and evoked responses were assessed. A high-frequency ultrasound examination of the amputated extremity was performed to obtain information on the presence, size, and elasticity of swollen neuromas and pressure pain thresholds. Swollen neuromas were present in 53 (79.1%) of the 67 amputees included in the study, in 47 (82.5%) of 57 amputees with pain and in 6 (60.0%) of 10 amputees without pain (P = 0.2). No difference was found in stump pain intensity (P = 0.42) during the last week or in phantom pain intensity in the last month (P = 0.74) between amputees with and without swollen neuromas. Our findings suggest that it is not the presence of swollen neuromas itself that drives postamputation pain. However, changes in the transected nerve endings may still be crucial for driving postamputation pain because a positive Tinel sign was significantly more frequent in amputees with pain, irrespectively of the degree of neuroma swelling.

Managing Neuroma and Phantom Limb Pain in Ontario: The Status of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Painful neuromas (PN) and phantom limb pain (PLP) are common following amputation and are unreliably treated, which impacts quality of life. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a microsurgical technique that repairs the severed proximal nerve end to a redundant motor nerve in the amputated stump. Evidence supports TMR as effective in treating PN and PLP; however, its adoption has been slow. This study aimed to characterize: (1) the populations experiencing post-amputation PN/PLP; (2) current trends in managing PN/PLP; and (3) attitudes toward routine use of TMR to manage PN/PLP.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was distributed to all orthopedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, and physiatrists practicing in Ontario, via publicly available emails and specialty associations. Data were collected on demographics, experience with amputation, managing post-amputation pain, and attitudes toward routine use of TMR.

Results:

Sixty-six of 698 eligible participants submitted complete surveys (9.5% response rate). Respondents had a greater experience with surgical management of PN (71% PN versus 10% PLP). However, surgery was considered a 3rd-line option for PN and not an option for PLP in 57% and 59% of respondents, respectively. Thirty participants (45%) were unaware of TMR as an option, and only 8 respondents have currently incorporated TMR into their practice. Many (76%) would be willing to incorporate TMR into their practice as either an immediate or delayed surgical technique.

Conclusions:

Despite its promise in managing post-amputation pain, awareness of TMR as a surgical option is generally poor. Several barriers to the widespread adoption of this technique are defined.