Do Changes in Sensory Processing Precede Low Back Pain Development in Healthy Individuals?

Disentangling the relationship between sensory processing, alexithymia and broad autism spectrum: A study in parents' of children with autism spectrum disorders and sensory processing disorders

BACKGROUND

Autistic features and sensory processing difficulties and their phenotypic co-expression with alexithymia share a transdiagnostic vulnerability. In this work, we explored whether the current concept of broad autism phenotype rather translates altered sensory processing (non-specific to autism), meaning that the characteristics of altered sensory processing should be overexpressed among individuals with heightened vulnerability to sensory processing atypicalities (parents of children with sensorial processing disorder, or SPD parents) and individuals with heightened vulnerability to autistic traits (parents of children with autism spectrum disorders, or ASD parents). In addition, the association between altered sensory processing and alexithymia was inspected.

METHOD

The Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, Autism Spectrum Quotient, and Toronto Alexithymia Scale were completed by 31 parents of children with ASD, 32 parents of children with SPD, and 52 parents of typically developed (TD) children.

RESULTS

Extreme sensory patterns were overexpressed both in parents of children with SPD and parents of children with ASD when compared to parents of TD children. In addition, extreme sensory patterns were significantly associated with alexithymia scores. Specifically, sensory avoidance, low registration, and sensory sensitivity were positively correlated with alexithymia. No significant differences were found regarding the proportion of autistic traits and alexithymia between ASD and SPD groups of parents.

CONCLUSIONS

These results challenge the specificity of broad autism phenotype and suggest a neurodevelopmental atypicity with roots in altered sensory and emotional processing.

Comparison of Joint Mobilization and Movement Pattern Training for Patients With Hip-Related Groin Pain: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of completing a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and examine the preliminary effects of 2 interventions for hip-related groin pain (HRGP).

METHODS

In this pilot RCT, patients with HRGP, who were 18 to 40 years old, were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a joint mobilization (JtMob) group or a movement pattern training (MoveTrain) group. Both treatments included 10 supervised sessions and a home exercise program. The goal of JtMob was to reduce pain and improve mobility through peripherally and centrally mediated pain mechanisms. The key element was physical therapist-provided JtMob. The goal of MoveTrain was to reduce hip joint stresses by optimizing the biomechanics of patient-specific tasks. The key element was task-specific instruction to correct abnormal movement patterns displayed during tasks. Primary outcomes were related to future trial feasibility. The primary effectiveness outcome was the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Examiners were blinded to group; patients and treatment providers were not. Data collected at baseline and immediately after treatment were analyzed with analysis of covariance using a generalized linear model in which change was the dependent variable and baseline was the covariate. The study was modified due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic affected participation; 127 patients were screened, 33 were randomized (18 to the JtMob group and 15 to the MoveTrain group), and 29 (88%) provided posttreatment data. Treatment session adherence was 85%, and home exercise program component adherence ranged from 71 to 86%. Both groups demonstrated significant mean within-group improvements of ≥5 points on Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scales. There were no between-group differences in effectiveness outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A large RCT to assess the effects of JtMob and MoveTrain for patients with HRGP may be feasible. Preliminary findings suggested that JtMob or MoveTrain may result in improvements in patient-reported pain and activity limitations.

IMPACT

The COVID-19 pandemic interfered with participation, but a randomized controlled trial may be feasible. Modification may be needed if the trial is completed during future pandemics.

Geodesic Logistic Analysis of Lumbar Spine Intervertebral Disc Shapes in Supine and Standing Positions

Non-specific lower back pain (LBP) is a world-wide public health problem that affects people of all ages. Despite the high prevalence of non-specific LBP and the associated economic burdens, the pathoanatomical mechanisms for the development and course of the condition remain unclear. While intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is associated with LBP, there is overlapping occurrence of IDD in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, suggesting that degeneration alone cannot identify LBP populations. Previous work has been done trying to relate linear measurements of compression obtained from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to pain unsuccessfully. To bridge this gap, we propose to use advanced non-Euclidean statistical shape analysis methods to develop biomarkers that can help identify symptomatic and asymptomatic adults who might be susceptible to standing-induced LBP. We scanned 4 male and 7 female participants who exhibited lower back pain after prolonged standing using an Open Upright MRI. Supine and standing MRIs were obtained for each participant. Patients reported their pain intensity every fifteen minutes within a period of 2 h. Using our proposed geodesic logistic regression, we related the structure of their lower spine to pain and computed a regression model that can delineate lower spine structures using reported pain intensities. These results indicate the feasibility of identifying individuals who may suffer from lower back pain solely based on their spinal anatomy. Our proposed spinal shape analysis methodology have the potential to provide powerful information to the clinicians so they can make better treatment decisions.

Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers' and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induced LBP based on which appropriate preventive measures can be planned. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases as well as Google Scholar and ProQuest were systematically searched from inception through 14 July 2022 using a combination of terms relevant to 'standing' and 'LBP'. Studies with low risk of bias in English and Persian using a methodological quality scoring system were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were laboratory studies using prolonged standing duration greater than 42 min to classify adult PDs and non-pain developers (NPDs) without a history of LBP. PDs were compared with NPDs in demographics, biomechanical, and psychological outcomes. Weighted or standardized mean differences, and Hedge's g were generated to determine the pooled effect sizes using STATA software version 17. 52 papers and theses involving 1070 participants (528 PDs and 542 NPDs) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review 33 of which were used in meta-analyses. Significant differences between PDs and NPDs in terms of movement patterns, muscular, postural, psychological, structural, and anthropometric variables were evidenced. The following factors were found to have a statistically significant association with standing-induced LBP: lumbar fidgets (Hedge's g - 0.72, 95% CI - 1.35 to - 0.08, P = 0.03), lumbar lordosis in participants over 25 years (Hedge's g 2.75, 95% CI 1.89-3.61, P < 0.001), AHAbd test (WMD 0.7, 95% CI 0.36-1.05, P < 0.001), GMed co-activation (Hedge's g 4.24, 95% CI 3.18-5.3, P < 0.001), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (WMD 2.85, 95% CI 0.51-5.19, P = 0.02). Altered motor control displayed in AHAbd test and higher lumbar lordosis in individuals over 25 years seem to be probable risk factors for standing-induced LBP. In order to detect standing-induced LBP risk factors, future researchers should investigate the association of the reported distinctive characteristics to the standing-induced LBP and that whether they are manipulable through various interventions.

Is low intensity exercise sufficient to induce exercise-induced pain threshold modulation in people with persistent pain?

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether a 12-min walk test (12MWT) yielded exercise-induced pain threshold modulation (EIPM) within people with persistent pain and whether baseline self-report and pain sensitivity measures differed according to these responses.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Two cohorts (tertiary/community) (n = 88) with persistent pain underwent pressure pain threshold (PPT) testing before and after a 12MWT to determine exercise-induced pain threshold modulation responses. Baseline self-report (pain severity, pain distribution, psychological distress, sleep) and baseline widespread pain sensitivity (WPS) (high/low) were recorded. Within and between-group differences were analysed using paired t-tests and repeated measure analyses of covariance. Individual EIPM responses were categorised as hyperalgesic, no change and hypoalgesic responses. Differences in baseline self-report and pain sensitivity measures between EIPM categories were investigated.

RESULTS

No significant within- or between-group differences in PPT following the 12MWT were detected (p > 0.05). Individual responses showed that up to 30% of the community and 44% of the tertiary cohort demonstrated >20% change in PPT (in either direction). Significant differences were shown in pain distribution (p = 0.002) and baseline WPS (p = 0.001) between people with hyperalgesic, no change, hypoalgesic responses. People with 4-5 pain regions were more likely hyperalgesic (χ2 = 9.0, p = 0.003); people with low baseline WPS were more likely to demonstrate no change (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Low or self-selected intensity exercise was insufficient to induce exercise-induced pain modulation at group level. Individual responses were variable with pain distribution and baseline WPS differing between responses. Future research could evaluate responses and associated factors in larger samples with high baseline pain sensitivity specifically.

Relief of chronic pain associated with increase in midline frontal theta power

Unique electroencephalogram signatures of relief from chronic pain demonstrate theta power increase in the midline frontal cortex.

Introduction:

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Spatial and Frequency-specific Electrophysiological Signatures of Tonic Pain Recovery in Humans

The objective of this study was to comprehensively investigate patterns of brain activities associated with pain recovery following experimental tonic pain in humans. Specific electrophysiological features of pain recovery may either be monitored or be modulated through neurofeedback (NF) as a novel chronic pain treatment. The cold pressor test was applied with simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. EEG data were acquired, and analyzed to define: (1) EEG power topography patterns of pain recovery; (2) source generators of pain recovery at cortical level; (3) changes in functional connectivity associated with pain recovery; (4) features of phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) as it relates to pain recovery. The novel finding of this study is that recovery from pain was characterized by significant theta power rebound at the left fronto-central area. The sources of theta power over-recovery were located in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), cingulate cortex, left insula and contralateral sensorimotor cortex. These effects were paralleled by theta band connectivity increase within hemispheres in a prefrontal-somatosensory network and interhemispherically between prefrontal and parietal areas. In addition, this study revealed significant reduction in PAC between theta/alpha and gamma oscillations during recovery period following tonic pain. These findings have largely been replicated across two identical sessions. Our study emphasizes the association between pain recovery and left lateral prefrontal theta power rebound, and significant over-recovery of functional connectivity in prefrontal-sensorimotor neural network synchronized at theta frequencies. These findings may provide basis for chronic pain treatment by modulating neural oscillations at theta frequencies in left prefrontal cortex.

Low Self-Efficacy and High Kinesiophobia Are Associated With Worse Function in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

CONTEXT

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a painfully debilitating hip condition disproportionately affecting active individuals. Mental health disorders are an important determinant of treatment outcomes for individuals with FAIS. Self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing are psychosocial factors that have been linked to inferior outcomes for a variety of orthopedic conditions. However, these psychosocial factors and their relationships with mental health disorders, pain, and function have not been examined in individuals with FAIS.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To examine relationships between self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, pain, and function in patients with FAIS and (2) to determine if these variables differ between patients with and without a self-reported depression and/or anxiety.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

University health center.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-one individuals with FAIS (42 females/9 males; age 35.7 [11.6] y; body mass index 27.1 [4.9] kg/m2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, visual analog scale for hip pain at rest and during activity, and the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool. Self-reported depression and/or anxiety were recorded. The relationships between psychosocial factors, pain, and function were examined using Spearman rank-order correlations. Independent t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the effect of self-reported depression and/or anxiety on psychosocial factors, pain and function.

RESULTS

The 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool was correlated with pain during activity (ρ = -.57, P ≤ .001), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (ρ = -.52, P ≤ .001), and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (ρ = .71, P ≤ .001). The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was also correlated with pain at rest (ρ = -.43, P = .002) and pain during activity (ρ = -.46, P = .001). Individuals with self-reported depression and/or anxiety (18/51; 35.3%) had worse self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing (P ≤ .01).

CONCLUSION

Self-reported depression and/or anxiety, low self-efficacy, and high kinesiophobia were associated with more hip pain and worse function for patients with FAIS. These findings warrant further examination including psychosocial treatment strategies to improve the likelihood of a successful clinical outcome for this at-risk population.

What Psychosocial and Physical Characteristics Differentiate Office Workers Who Develop Standing-Induced Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Study

This study examines demographic, physical and psychosocial factors associated with an increase in low back pain (LBP) during a one-hour standing task. A cross-sectional survey with 40 office workers was conducted. The primary outcome was pain severity during a one-hour standing task recorded every 15 min using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants were defined as pain developers (PD), if they reported a change in pain of ≥10 mm from baseline, or non-pain developers (NPD). Physical outcomes included participant-rated and examiner-rated trunk and hip motor control and endurance. Self-report history of LBP, physical activity, psychosocial job characteristics, general health and pain catastrophising were collected. Fourteen participants were PD. Hip abduction, abdominal and spinal muscle endurance was lower for PD (p ≤ 0.05). PD had greater self-reported difficulty performing active hip abduction and active straight leg raise tests (p ≤ 0.04). Those reporting a lifetime, 12 month or 7-day history of LBP (p < 0.05) and lower self-reported physical function (p = 0.01) were more likely to develop LBP during the standing task. In conclusion, a history of LBP, reduced trunk and hip muscle endurance and deficits in lumbopelvic/hip motor control may be important to consider in office workers experiencing standing-induced LBP.