1
|
Rhon DI, George SZ, Greenlee TA, Farrokhi S, Lentz TA. General and Pain-Associated Psychological Distress Phenotypes Among Patients With Low Back Pain in the Military Health System. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:943-952. [PMID: 38383982 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to describe rates of general and pain-related psychological distress for individuals with low back pain (LBP) in the Military Health System (MHS). We identified common phenotypes defined by rates of general and pain-related psychological distress and compared phenotypes on their level of pain interference, physical function, anxiety, and depression. METHODS We created a cohort from two completed trials assessing nonpharmacological treatment for LBP in the MHS (n = 510 total). The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag assessment tool identified the presence of 11 different yellow flags. Latent class analysis (LCA) used yellow flag indicators to identify common psychological phenotypes. We then compared Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems measures of pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety across phenotypes. RESULTS LCA identified five phenotypes (percentage of the sample): low distress (32%), high distress (27%), poor pain coping and low self-efficacy (18%), low self-efficacy and acceptance (14%), and poor pain coping (10%). Highly distressed phenotypes reported higher levels of pain interference, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety than those with other phenotypes, whereas the low distress phenotype had significantly lower pain interference and higher physical function scores than those characterized by all other phenotypes. CONCLUSION These phenotypes provide opportunities for clinicians and researchers to develop novel LBP treatment pathways tailored to patients with different profiles of psychological distress. Future work is needed to validate their predictive capabilities for clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel I Rhon
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, and The Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, Washington
| | | | - Tina A Greenlee
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, and The Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, Washington
| | - Shawn Farrokhi
- Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, San Diego, California
| | - Trevor A Lentz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sergooris A, Verbrugghe J, Matheve T, Van Den Houte M, Bonnechère B, Corten K, Bogaerts K, Timmermans A. Clinical phenotypes and prognostic factors in persons with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty: protocol for a longitudinal prospective cohort study (HIPPROCLIPS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:224. [PMID: 36964541 PMCID: PMC10039547 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06326-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large heterogeneity exists in the clinical manifestation of hip osteoarthritis (OA). It is therefore not surprising that pain and disability in individuals with hip OA and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) cannot be explained by biomedical variables alone. Indeed, also maladaptive pain-related cognitions and emotions can contribute to pain and disability, and can lead to poor treatment outcomes. Traumatic experiences, mental disorders, self-efficacy and social support can influence stress appraisal and strategies to cope with pain, but their influence on pain and disability has not yet been established in individuals with hip OA undergoing THA. This study aims (1) to determine the influence of traumatic experiences and mental disorders on pain processing before and shortly after THA (2) to identify preoperative clinical phenotypes in individuals with hip OA eligible for THA, (3) to identify pre- and early postoperative prognostic factors for outcomes in pain and disability after THA, and (4) to identify postoperative clinical phenotypes in individuals after THA. METHODS This prospective longitudinal cohort study will investigate 200 individuals undergoing THA for hip OA. Phenotyping variables and candidate prognostic factors include pain-related fear-avoidance behaviour, perceived injustice, mental disorders, traumatic experiences, self-efficacy, and social support. Peripheral and central pain mechanisms will be assessed with thermal quantitative sensory testing. The primary outcome measure is the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Other outcome measures include performance-based measures, hip muscle strength, the patient-specific functional scale, pain intensity, global perceived effect, and outcome satisfaction. All these measurements will be performed before surgery, as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. Pain-related cognitions and emotions will additionally be assessed in the early postoperative phase, on the first, third, fifth, and seventh day after THA. Main statistical methods that will be used to answer the respective research questions include: LASSO regression, decision tree learning, gradient boosting algorithms, and recurrent neural networks. DISCUSSION The identification of clinical phenotypes and prognostic factors for outcomes in pain and disability will be a first step towards pre- and postoperative precision medicine for individuals with hip OA undergoing THA. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05265858. Registered on 04/03/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abner Sergooris
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| | - Jonas Verbrugghe
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Thomas Matheve
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maaike Van Den Houte
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Laboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LABGAS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bruno Bonnechère
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Kristoff Corten
- Department of Orthopaedics - Hip Unit, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Centre for Translational Psychological Research (TRACE), Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Katleen Bogaerts
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annick Timmermans
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A - B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neumann A, Hampel P. Long-term effects of rehabilitation and prevention of further chronification of pain among patients with non-specific low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2022; 35:1257-1268. [PMID: 35754259 PMCID: PMC9697049 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-210221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological factors influence the development and persistence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and may impair the psychosocial rehabilitation success. OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of a combined pain competence and depression prevention training compared to the pain competence training alone and as well as the patients' stages of pain on the long-term psychosocial rehabilitation success. METHODS In this controlled multicentre study with cluster-block randomization, patients with CLBP in different stages of pain (I-III) received either pain competence training (control group, CG; n= 255) or combined pain competence and depression prevention training (intervention group, IG; n= 271; per protocol). Depressive symptoms (primary outcome), anxiety, somatization, health status, and average pain intensity (secondary outcomes) were assessed up to 12 months of follow-up. Standardised questionnaires were used to record the outcomes, which were filled out by the patients themselves. Analyses after multiple imputation (N= 1225) were conducted to validate multi- and univariate analyses of variance. RESULTS Patients in stage of pain I and II showed significant improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, mental health, and average pain intensity at the 12-month follow-up, irrespective from treatment condition. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary rehabilitation seems to be appropriate for patients with CLBP in stage of pain I and II. However, patients in stage of pain III need more psychological treatments to manage their mental comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petra Hampel
- Corresponding author: Petra Hampel, Institute of Health, Nutrition, and Sport Sciences, Europa-Universität of Flensburg, Auf dem Campus 1, 24943 Flensburg, Germany. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Irgens P, Myhrvold BL, Kongsted A, Natvig B, Vøllestad NK, Robinson HS. Exploring visual pain trajectories in neck pain patients, using clinical course, SMS-based patterns, and patient characteristics: a cohort study. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:37. [PMID: 36076234 PMCID: PMC9454174 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00443-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The dynamic nature of neck pain has so far been identified through longitudinal studies with frequent measures, a method which is time-consuming and impractical. Pictures illustrating different courses of pain may be an alternative solution, usable in both clinical work and research, but it is unknown how well they capture the clinical course. The aim of this study was to explore and describe self-reported visual trajectories in terms of details of patients’ prospectively reported clinical course, their SMS-based pattern classification of neck pain, and patient’s characteristics. Methods Prospective cohort study including 888 neck pain patients from chiropractic practice, responding to weekly SMS-questions about pain intensity for 1 year from 2015 to 2017. Patients were classified into one of three clinical course patterns using definitions based on previously published descriptors. At 1-year follow-up, patients selected a visual trajectory that best represented their retrospective 1-year course of pain: single episode, episodic, mild ongoing, fluctuating and severe ongoing. Results The visual trajectories generally resembled the 1-year clinical course characteristics on group level, but there were large individual variations. Patients selecting Episodic and Mild ongoing visual trajectories were similar on most parameters. The visual trajectories generally resembled more the clinical course of the last quarter. Discussion The visual trajectories reflected the descriptors of the clinical course of pain captured by weekly SMS measures on a group level and formed groups of patients that differed on symptoms and characteristics. However, there were large variations in symptoms and characteristics within, as well as overlap between, each visual trajectory. In particular, patients with mild pain seemed predisposed to recall bias. Although the visual trajectories and SMS-based classifications appear related, visual trajectories likely capture more elements of the pain experience than just the course of pain. Therefore, they cannot be seen as a proxy for SMS-tracking of pain over 1 year. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00443-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Irgens
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Birgitte Lawaetz Myhrvold
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Bård Natvig
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Køpke Vøllestad
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Stendal Robinson
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Müller M, Bräscher AK. [Psychotherapy in the Context of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy: Update]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2020; 55:536-548. [PMID: 32916737 DOI: 10.1055/a-1022-3051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is based on the biopsychosocial model of pain and describes an integrated treatment for patients with chronic pain. IMPT incorporates a close cooperation of different disciplines, including physicians, psychotherapists, physiotherapists, and others. IMPT mainly aims to restore and increase patients' physical, social and psychological functional capacity. The efficacy of IMPT has been evidenced by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of studies further indicate IMPT's cost-efficiency. Psychotherapy is an essential component of IMPT. Its main goal within the framework of IMPT is to identify and modify dysfunctional patterns of pain coping, and to diagnose and potentially treat psychological comorbidities. Pain psychotherapy comprises mostly cognitive-behavioral interventions which address dysfunctional coping at the three levels of the pain experience (i.e., cognitive, emotional, and behavioral). Research into the efficacy of pain psychotherapy is rather sparse and studies have mostly focused on chronic back pain, yet existing results show promising evidence both for psychotherapy within IMPT and for psychotherapy as a monotherapy. This paper aims at providing an overview of (a) commonly employed cognitive-behavioral psychotherapeutic approaches and strategies in the treatment of chronic pain, and (b) the existing empirical evidence of pain psychotherapy both within the framework of IMPT and as a monotherapy. Future research should include a wider range of pain diagnoses and also investigate the potential benefit of individually-tailored treatments.
Collapse
|
6
|
Embodied Pain: There is a Need to Reflect Interactions Between Cognitions, Behavior, and Neuromuscular Activity in Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain 2019; 36:178-180. [PMID: 31850934 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|